Comment [A22]:
But will they be hereto wait for passengers or are passengersalready here desperately waiting for them?Should they have come earlier?
Comment [A23]:
Is it the right thing to
do because it’s a good thing? Or is it a good
thing just because
he
thinks it’s the right
thing to do? Either way, it is a thing thatwill take place at the expense (literally) of taxpayers.
Comment [A24]:
As with the trains, willthey be here to wait for people or arepeople already here waiting for them?
Comment [A25]:
One notes that this is
different from “It is the best and cheapest
healthcare any government can provid
e.”
Comment [A26]:
This may be taken to
mean that he won’t be d
oing much to helphouseholds afford their own homes sincepractically every household is
already
ableto afford one in his eyes.
Comment [A27]:
Yes. It just meansthere is going to be very much less space
for each person when we already don’t
have a lot of space to begin with.
Comment [A28]:
Warning: all attemptsto build utopias have resulted in thecreation of dystopias.
Comment [A29]:
He does not need aminister to look i
nto the matter “actively”
when the solution is simply to let singlesbuy from the HDB
—
unless he is bent onmaintaining certain obstacles. And ohyes
—there aren’t enough flats. People are
waiting for them, not them for people.
Comment [A30]:
That’s why he learned
how to use facebook.
Comment [A31]:
He could have meant,
“Our universities produce graduates who
are highly sought after here and in
their own
countries.”
Comment [A32]:
An idiotic statementgiven that there is only one NDR per year.
Comment [A33]:
The students areinstitutions? Very unique.