But will they be hereto wait for passengers or are passengersalready here desperately waiting for them?Should they have come earlier?
Is it the right thing to
do because it’s a good thing? Or is it a good
thing just because
thinks it’s the right
thing to do? Either way, it is a thing thatwill take place at the expense (literally) of taxpayers.
As with the trains, willthey be here to wait for people or arepeople already here waiting for them?
One notes that this is
different from “It is the best and cheapest
healthcare any government can provid
This may be taken to
mean that he won’t be d
oing much to helphouseholds afford their own homes sincepractically every household is
ableto afford one in his eyes.
Yes. It just meansthere is going to be very much less space
for each person when we already don’t
have a lot of space to begin with.
Warning: all attemptsto build utopias have resulted in thecreation of dystopias.
He does not need aminister to look i
nto the matter “actively”
when the solution is simply to let singlesbuy from the HDB
unless he is bent onmaintaining certain obstacles. And ohyes
—there aren’t enough flats. People are
waiting for them, not them for people.
That’s why he learned
how to use facebook.
He could have meant,
“Our universities produce graduates who
are highly sought after here and in
An idiotic statementgiven that there is only one NDR per year.
The students areinstitutions? Very unique.