• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
 
Letters
 Jan. 8–21, 2009
An open letter to the FGPS
DEAR EXECUIVE COMMIEE o the Fac-ulty o Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies,Your membership on the Executive Com-mittee o the Faculty o Graduate and Postdoc-toral Studies shows that you are committed toupholding the academic values that sustainreedom o inquiry, reedom o expression, andproessional independence in the academic en- vironment. Your presumed commitment willsoon be tested.You are being asked to take part in an egre-gious, unprecedented, and indeensible viola-tion o these academic values. How you proceedwill indelibly, and publicly, refect upon not only your committee but upon each one o you as in-dividuals. You will soon be evaluating my super- visory skills or the direction o graduate thesesin my discipline.Your evaluation is proceeding in the absenceo any student complaints about my supervisory skills and in the ace o unanimous student testi-mony to the contrary, in the context o a recog-nized and productive multidisciplinary NaturalSciences and Research Council o Canada-und-ed scientic research group. Te exercise o thepresent review has been an egregious violationo academic norms and an indeensible attack against academic reedom.Since your committee is the nal authority inthe matter o my membership review, I ask thatyou answer these simple procedural questions:1. What are the criteria or evaluating the su-pervisory skills o a ull proessor and active re-searcher with several graduate students?2. What are the criteria or involuntary termi-nation o such a proessor’s privilege to super- vise graduate students?3. What are the precedents, i any, o activeull proessors being terminated on the basis o insu cient supervisory skills?4. Which o the criteria were obtained in theprecedent cases, i any?Tese are the relevant questions in a air andtransparent process.I ask to be heard at your committee meeting andI suggest that you enquire about all the documentsthat have been excluded rom consideration in theprevious committee despite my requests.
Denis Rancourt Physics professor 
Contents
Contents
Transit time out continuesPainting the town surrealLooking towards 2009Animation mania
News
News
Arts
Arts
Sports
Sports
Feature
Feature
p. 3
p. 3
p. 8
p. 8
p. 17
p. 17
p. 12
p. 12
U of O and SFUO offer more emergency shuttles as SFUO backs striking OC Transpo workers.
p. 3 Amanda Shendruk 
investigates graduates’ career possibili-ties in an economically uncertain time.
p. 4Peter Henderson
interviews local visual artistMatthew Kennedy.
p. 8Hisham Kelati
lists the top
 ve movies of 2008.
p. 9
The road ahead for the Gee-Gees.
p. 17
Learn how to make good on those New Year’s resolutions by  working out right.
p. 19
The world of animation is uncovered by 
Nigel Smith
.
p. 12–13Di
discusses brotherly love.
p. 21
Deidre Butters, Advertising Representativephone: (613) 880-6494fax: (613) 562-5259e-mail: ads@thefulcrum.caCheck out our rate card online.Go to www.thefulcrum.ca and follow the link for “Advertisers”.Multi-market advertisers: Campus Plus: (800)265-5372Campus Plus offers one-stop shopping for over 90 Canadianstudent newspapers.The
 Fulcrum
is a proud member of Canadian University Press:www.cup.ca
 Advertising DepartmentBusiness Department
The
 Fulcrum
, the University of Ottawa’s independent Eng-lish-language student newpaper, is published by the FulcrumPublishing Society (FPS) Inc., a not-for-pro
t corporationwhose members consist of all Univeristy of Ottawa students.The Board of Directors (BOD) of the FPS governs all admin-istrative and business actions of the
 Fulcrum
and consistsof the following individuals: Ross Prusakowski (President), Andrea Khanjin (Vice-President), Tyler Meredith (Chair),Peter Raaymakers, Nick Taylor-Vaisey, Toby Climie, ScottBedard and Andrew Wing.To contact the
Fulcrum
’s BOD,contact Ross Prusakowski at (613) 562-5261.
 
by Megan O’MearaFulcrum Staf A A CIY Council meeting on Dec.8, ollowing months o presentationsand lobbying eforts by representa-tives rom the University o Ottawaand the Student Federation o the Uni- versity o Ottawa (SFUO) in avour o a universal bus pass or students, Ot-tawa’s city councillors amended theproposed $125 cost o the potentialU-Pass to an inated price o $194.According to the SFUO’s Decem-ber bulletin, this meeting was held“without student representation.” TeSFUO had planned to attend a Dec.10 meeting to witness the city’s deci-sion but were surprised to hear thatcouncillors had already made up theirminds days beore.“We were not given any noticationthat they were going to do that,” saidSFUO President Dean Haldenby. “Hadwe been [aware], we would have beenthere in orce. It disappoints me thatthey brought it up earlier without noti-ying us, and also that they’ve approvedsomething that we don’t eel is right.”Te combined eforts o the SFUOand the U o O to establish the U-Passhas been a years-long process, andthose working on the project are notsatised with the city’s latest ofer.Jonathan Rausseo, the U o O’ssustainable development coordinatorwho has been involved in the U-Passproject since its early stages, claimedthat the city has not given them clearreasons or the inated price.“We’re still looking or the reasonsto make sure that it wasn’t a techni-cal error,” he said. “We spoke to onecouncillor who wasn’t exactly surewhat it meant and it hasn’t been listedin any minutes rom the budget pro-ceedings yet, so we’ve been tryingclariy that $194 is the actual pricethey’re [proposing].”Knoxdale-Merivale Ward Council-lor Gord Hunter, who indicated hissupport or the U-Pass but said heonly voted against it or its nancialrepercussions, explained that the $194number came rom OC ranspo. Hesaid they took into consideration thenancial implications o current rev-enue rom students through tickets,passes, and cash ares, compared to a$125 U-Pass that only ull-time U o O undergraduates would pay into.“It’s very important or the contin-uation o the project behind the pilotproject stage that you cost it at theright price point right away,” he said.“Te suggestion was $125—there’s no[point] in having that i that’s thencosting the city bus company a losso several million dollars in revenue,and we can’t aford to sustain that.”A number o councillors at theOct. 15 ransit Committee meetinghad made it clear that making the U-Pass revenue neutral was a priority.At that meeting, city representativesexplained that a $125 per semesterU-Pass would potentially cost OCranspo and the City o Ottawa $2.1million, although the committee end-ed up supporting the pilot project.
REJECTED continued on p.7
News
 Jan. 8–21, 2009
Emma GodmereNews Editornews@thefulcrum.ca
3
by Jolene Hanselland Emma GodmereFulcrum Staf UNIVERSIY OF OAWA studentsliving of-campus and away rom thedowntown core have returned romthe holiday break to nd the same sit-uation they experienced during De-cember exams: no OC ranspo busesdriving down any city roads.Te city o Ottawa has been withoutbuses since Dec. 10, and thousands o students must continue to cope withan absence o transit services or atleast the rst week o second semesterclasses. In an efort to help studentsmake their way to campus or the rstour days o classes, the U o O andthe Student Federation o the Univer-sity o Ottawa (SFUO) have reinstatedthe hourly shuttle service that was inplace or much o the exam period.“Right now, what’s conrmed isthat the shuttle will go on [rom Jan.]6–9, and the reason or putting thisshuttle in place was to accommodatestudents as they come back or thenew session,” said Gisele Charlebois,assistant director or the Parking andSustainable ransportation Divisionat the U o O. “Aer that, or the timebeing, there will be no additionalshuttle ollowing [Jan.] 9.”According to the Parking andSustainable ransportation Divisionsection o the U o O website, noemergency shuttles will continue tobe provided, or “the University o Ottawa, as any other institution andworkplace, must respect that the OCranspo workers are on strike”.SFUO President Dean Haldenby explained that there are still otherpossibilities being considered to helpstudents get to campus aer Jan. 9.“We looked at a couple o optionsbeore we made the decision to putout more buses or the our days, andthe other option was to make it sothat the proessors would adjust in acertain way to not having the studentsin the classroom and using technol-ogy to our advantage,” he said. “Tatis still an option, should the vote ail,so we’re open to that and the univer-sity’s open to that as well.”Te over 2,000 members o Amal-gamated ransit Union Local 279—the union that represents OC ranspodrivers, mechanics, and dispatchers—are obligated to vote on the latest o the city’s contract proposals by Jan. 9,adhering to a Dec. 31 ederal govern-ment decision to orce a vote.ransit workers o cially went onstrike shortly aer midnight on Dec.10—six days into the U o O’s examperiod—aer contract talks brokedown, primarily over schedulingchanges or drivers that were recently proposed by the City o Ottawa.While Haldenby pointed out thathe wants to see an agreement reachedsooner rather than later, he indicatedthat the SFUO is in support o thestriking union.“Ultimately, we want to see an agree-ment [between both sides]. However,we are a union and we do support thetransit union,” he said. “We see the way that the City o Ottawa has treated usand it wouldn’t be highly unlikely thatthis is the same type o manner thatthey’re treating the AU members, soultimately, we want to see an agree-ment come out o it, but we want tomake sure that it’s the right thing oreveryone involved.Charlebois indicated that whileshuttle service will not be continuingaer Jan. 9, several parking lots oncampus are ofering reduced pricesor students wishing to drive to theuniversity, and those reduced priceswill be maintained throughout thestrike period.
For more inormation about the emer- gency shuttles ofered by the university,visit protection.uottawa.ca/en/added_shuttles.html.
No buses in back-to-school commutes
SFUO supportsstriking transitunion as additionalshuttles are oferedor rst week back 
City rejects U-Pass, SFUO rejects city 
Councillors amendproposed pilotproject cost to$194 per semester
The Campus bus station has seen no passengers nor buses since the transit strike began on Dec. 10.
photo by Martha Pearceillustration by Alex Martin
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...