Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Motion for Appointment of Counsel, ADA, Memo Law, 05-CA-7205, May-24-2011

Motion for Appointment of Counsel, ADA, Memo Law, 05-CA-7205, May-24-2011

Ratings: (0)|Views: 10 |Likes:
Published by Neil Gillespie
Motion for Appointment of Counsel, ADA, Memo Law, 05-CA-7205, May-24-2011.
As cross-filed in the U.S. District Court for the M.D. Fla., 5:10-cv-503, July 7, 2011.

Mr. Rodems' full nuclear blast approach has aggravated Gillespie's disability to the point where Gillespie can no longer represent himself at hearings. Gillespie becomes easily distracted and confused, and can no longer speak coherently enough during a hearing to represent himself.

The litigation of Neil Gillespie against his former lawyers, Barker, Rodems & Cook. PA, is to recover $7,143 stolen during their prior representation of Gillespie. Ryan Christopher Rodems is unethically representing his firm against Gillespie, a former client of the small three-partner firm, contrary to Florida Bar Rules, including Rule 4-1.7 Conflict of Interest; Current Clients, Rule 4-1.9 Conflict of Interest; Former Client, Rule 4-1.10(a) Imputed Disqualification of All Lawyers in Firm, and well-established case law, see McPartland v. ISI Inv. Services, Inc., 890 F.Supp. 1029, M.D.Fla., 1995, and U.S. v. Culp, 934 F.Supp. 394, etc. Mr. Rodems’ strategy has been, since 2006, to inflict severe emotional distress on Gillespie who he knows to be especially vulnerable, through an abuse of power in a position of dominance, while simultaneously engaged in misconduct that includes dishonesty, fraud, deceit, and misrepresentation on the court, and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice. Mr. Rodems also brought a vexatious libel counterclaim against Gillespie over a letter about a closed Bar complaint. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted Gillespie leave to amend his motion for disability accommodation, and it was submitted August 6, 2012, see Amended Motion for Disability Accommodation, http://www.scribd.com/doc/102585752/Amended-Disability-Motion-12-11213-C-C-A-11
Motion for Appointment of Counsel, ADA, Memo Law, 05-CA-7205, May-24-2011.
As cross-filed in the U.S. District Court for the M.D. Fla., 5:10-cv-503, July 7, 2011.

Mr. Rodems' full nuclear blast approach has aggravated Gillespie's disability to the point where Gillespie can no longer represent himself at hearings. Gillespie becomes easily distracted and confused, and can no longer speak coherently enough during a hearing to represent himself.

The litigation of Neil Gillespie against his former lawyers, Barker, Rodems & Cook. PA, is to recover $7,143 stolen during their prior representation of Gillespie. Ryan Christopher Rodems is unethically representing his firm against Gillespie, a former client of the small three-partner firm, contrary to Florida Bar Rules, including Rule 4-1.7 Conflict of Interest; Current Clients, Rule 4-1.9 Conflict of Interest; Former Client, Rule 4-1.10(a) Imputed Disqualification of All Lawyers in Firm, and well-established case law, see McPartland v. ISI Inv. Services, Inc., 890 F.Supp. 1029, M.D.Fla., 1995, and U.S. v. Culp, 934 F.Supp. 394, etc. Mr. Rodems’ strategy has been, since 2006, to inflict severe emotional distress on Gillespie who he knows to be especially vulnerable, through an abuse of power in a position of dominance, while simultaneously engaged in misconduct that includes dishonesty, fraud, deceit, and misrepresentation on the court, and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice. Mr. Rodems also brought a vexatious libel counterclaim against Gillespie over a letter about a closed Bar complaint. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted Gillespie leave to amend his motion for disability accommodation, and it was submitted August 6, 2012, see Amended Motion for Disability Accommodation, http://www.scribd.com/doc/102585752/Amended-Disability-Motion-12-11213-C-C-A-11

More info:

Published by: Neil Gillespie on Sep 02, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

09/02/2012

pdf

text

original

 
Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-TBS Document 37 Filed 07/07/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID 864
 
Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-TBS Document 37 Filed 07/07/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID 865
 
Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-TBS Document 37-1 Filed 07/07/11 Page 1 of 99 PageID 866

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->