Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
4Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Kimberlin Cert. Petition (OCR)

Kimberlin Cert. Petition (OCR)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 3,886|Likes:
Published by AaronWorthing

More info:

Published by: AaronWorthing on Sep 03, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

09/03/2012

pdf

text

original

 
IN
THE
COURT
OF
APPEALS
OF
MARYLAND
BRETTKIMBERLIN,
Petitioner,
v,
AARON
WALKER,
Respondent
No,
PETITION
FOR
A
WRIT
OF
CERTIORARIAFTER
JUDGMENT
ThePetitioner,BrettKimberlin,
pro
se,moves,
pursuant
to
MarylandRule8-301,
for
theissuance
of
a
writ
ofcertiorariafterjudgmentintheCircuitCourtofMontgomeryCounty,sittingasanappellate
court
overthejudgmentoftheDistrictCourt
of
MontgomeryCounty,toreviewtheabove-captionedcase,In
support
of
thispetition,and
pursuant
toRules8-303(b)(1)
and
(2),Petitionerstates:1,ThecasewasdocketedasaPeaceOrderintheDistrictCourtonJanuary
9,
2012as
BrettKimberlin
v,
Aaron
W a l k e r ~
No
0601SP005392012.Thetrialjudgmentwas
entered
onFebruary8,2012infavorofPetitioner,BrettKimberlin,Appx,
4.
2.
Respondent
Aaron
Walkerfiledanappeal
to
the
CircuitCourtonMontgomeryCounty
On
April11,2012,JudgeEricJohnsonoftheCircuitCourtreversedthejudgmentof
the
DistrictCourtinaline
order
finding
that
Petitionercould
not
meet
the
statutoryburden
of
proot
Appx,
2Inhisoralrulingtrom
the
bench,he
stated
that
althoughRespondentassaultedPetitioneronJanuary
9,
2012,
there
wasnoevidence
that
Respondentwouldcommit
another
assaultAppx3,pp·,98-100
RECEIVE.D
MAY
10
LUll
 
3Copies
are
attachedhereto
of
(i)thedocketentriesshowingthejudgment
of
theCircuitCourt.Appx.1;(ii)theline
order
oftheCircuitCourt,Appx
2;
(iii)
thetranscript
oftheCircuitCourttrial,Appx
3;
(iv)
thewrittendecision
of
theDistrictCourt,Appx4;(5)docket
entries
showingfivecriminalchargesfiled
by
RespondentagainstPetitioner
that
werenolleprossed.Appx
5,
QUESTIONSPRESENTED
1,
Whetherit
was
erroneous
fortheCircuitCourttoprohibitevidenceofsustained
harassmentby
Respondent
that
occurredbefore
andafter
anassault
by
RespondentwhentheDistr'ictCourtconsideredall
that
evidence
when
issuingthe
temporary
andfinalPeaceOrders,andthisCourt'sdecisionin
Galloway
11,
State,
781A.2d851(2001)holds
that
repeatedunwanted,alarmingandannoyingcontactconstitutesharassment
under
MarylandCode18-3-803
2"
Whetherit
was
erroneous
fortheCircuitCourt
to
prohibitevidenceofRespondent'srepeated
post
assaultretaliatory
harassmentto
demonstr'atefuture
harassment
asrequired
by
MarylandCode18-3-1505c(i)(ii)
3,
Whether
the
CircuitCourterredindismissingthePeaceOrder
without
allowingPetitionertoquestionRespondentorrequiringRespondentto
put
onevidence
when
(1)
it
wasRespondentwhoappealed
tothe
CircuitCourt
and
(2)Respondent
was
present
and
the
witnesswithpersonalknowledge
of
hislong
term
harassment
ofPetitioner,
 
PRELIMINARY
STATEMENT
PetitionerBrettKimberlin,aMarylandresident,hasbeentheDirectorofanon-profitpubliccharityforthe
past
tenyears
that
focusesonyouthinvolvement
in
socialissues,includingreligioustoleranceofMuslims.RespondentAaronWalker,aVirginiaresident,is
anattorney
who,usingthepseudonymAaronWorthing,fortwoyearshaspublishedaMuslimhateblogcalledEveryoneDrawMohammed,whichincludes
over
800
insultingdepictionsof
the
Prophet
MohammedPetitioner,forthe
past
twoyears,wascyberstalked
by
anassociateofRespondent'susingthepseudonymSocratesPetitionersuedSocratesinMontgomeryCountyCircuitCourtfor
,inter
alia,stalking,andtheCourt
ordered
Google
Inc.
todisclosetheidentity
of
Socrates,which
it
didasSeth
Allen..
On
August
23,2011,
MrAllen
wrote
an
email
to
an
attorney
named"AaronWorthing"
stating
that
he
was
consideringcomingtoMarylandto
murderPetitioner
As
a
resultof
thisemail.Mr.Allenwas
arrested
for
criminal
harassmentand
PetitionergotaPeace
Order
against
Mr.
Allen.Becauseof
the
death
threat
email,
the
CircuitJudgeintheSethAllencivilcase
ordered
further
discoverytodeterminewhetherothers,includingAaronWorthing,
were
conspiring
to
stalk
or
harm
Petitioner.However,Petitionercould
not
locate
anyattorneynamed
AaronWorthing
andso
wasunable
to
seek
that
additionaldiscovery.
On
November14,2011,theCircuitCourtintheSethAllencaseissuedjudgmentinfavor
of
Petitioner
and
issueda
permanent
injunctionagainst
Mr.
Allen

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->