Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Poverty Reduction: An Effective Means of Population Control

Poverty Reduction: An Effective Means of Population Control

Ratings: (0)|Views: 20 |Likes:
Published by The Wilson Center
Rachel Nugent reviews Poverty Reduction: An Effective Means of Population Control, by Mohammed Sharif.
Rachel Nugent reviews Poverty Reduction: An Effective Means of Population Control, by Mohammed Sharif.

More info:

Categories:Types, Research
Published by: The Wilson Center on Sep 05, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





ECSp rEport
iSSuE 13
light o recent strides, interdisciplinary collabo
ration remains a challenge.Climate change has emerged as the topic
du  jour 
 when urbanization and aging have replaced ruralpopulation growth and youthul population
trends o the new millennium, the demands o rural population change and urban consump
tion on rural systems remain the primary driv 
towards climate change, human vulnerability,urbanization, and aging, the conversion o oreststo agriculture by rural people still leaves the larg 
est human ootprint on the Earth’s surace, with
between human activity and environmental con
cerns demonstrated in
Population, Land Use, and the Environment,
 which synthesizes more than a 
exciting and daunting.Population policy in developing countrieshas long been a controversial topic, not leastbecause the vast amount o research devoted tounderstanding the key determinants o ertility behavior has been inconclusive. In addition,because population raises sensitive and ideo
logical issues, population policy has been mired
progress in both the research and policy sphereson the role o population growth in develop
ment, and what governments should do toinuence that growth, has pushed this crucialtopic to the sidelines o most o the importantdevelopment discussions o our day.Fertility decisions are driven by a compli
cated set o social, economic, cultural, andtechnological conditions that are difcult tosort out. Government policy may be a minorinuence on the ertility component o popula 
tion growth, but in some places and times it canbe an important agent o change, even simply by changing decisions at the margin. However,it is not easy to measure the impact o govern
ment policy—or any other actors—on ertility.
dictory, sometimes inconclusive, and the stron
Poverty Reduction: An Effective Means of Population Control,
Mohammed Shari attempts to use both theoretical and empiri
cal analysis to take a resh look at the topic.Unortunately, the book is contradictory andinconclusive—and certainly not resh.Until very recently, policy advocates andresearchers seemed to agree that high rates o 
Rachel Nugent
s depty decto of teCente fo global Development’s globalhealt Poams. Se as 25 yeas of expe-ence as a development economst wt tePoplaton refeence Bea, te Foatyintenatonal Cente of te u.S. Natonalinstttes of healt, and te uN Food andAclte Oanzaton, amon otes.
Poverty Reduction: An Effective Means ofPopulation Control
By Mohammed Sharif  London: Ashgate, 2007. 184 pages.
EnvironmEntal ChangE and SECurity program
population growth adversely aect developmentand poverty, and that amily planning policiesare important tools o development assistance.
population issues has declined alarmingly,stemming rom a combination o complacency (due to lower population growth in some coun
tries) and a paucity o eective tools to meet theongoing twin challenges o poverty reduction
 While ertility has declined in many develop
ing countries, and most o the developed worldis experiencing stagnant or declining popula 
tions, the “population problem” is not solved.In 16 developing countries, total ertility rates
and higher. Depending on death rates in thosecountries, this implies their populations will
other developing countries, the highest ertil
ity rates are generally ound among the poorest
population growth and its relationship to pov 
erty is not inconsequential, leaving substantialroom or debate about appropriate policies.Mohammed Shari’s book takes us back to
 whether amily planning is good or poor ami
lies. Shari’s main arguments are that high er
tility is a rational, oten benefcial choice orpoor amilies; and that poverty makes a highernumber o children desirable. He concludesthat only reductions in poverty will bring downertility rates among the poor. Shari examinesthese assertions empirically, and then derivespolicy implications rom the results.
the challenge o demonstrating a direct causalrelationship between poverty and ertility.Many correlates o poverty are also associated with high ertility rates. How do we know  what causes what? Shari devotes much o 
intended to demonstrate that poor people may be acting rationally in choosing large ami
lies. Unortunately, the analysis presented islargely undermined by the ailure o his data and methodology to adequately answer “whatcauses what?”Shari compiled data on poverty and related
ous UN sources to test multiple specifcationso his model. With countries as the unit o anal
ysis, he fnds that high ertility is not a cause o poverty, and illiteracy is not causally related tocontraceptive prevalence. Shari concludes that
citizens are rational, and argues by implicationthat international amily planning advocateshave ailed because they have not understood
processes. Hal o Shari’s message is certainly 
also extremely constrained in their choices,
result, their choices may not be optimal—orthemselves or society. Shari does not explorethis possibility, and thereore the book does notadvance our knowledge o what policies wouldbe useul in reducing these constraints.Setting aside the book’s polemics attacking international amily planning advocates, Sharis
poverty suers rom measurement and econo
metric issues—not the least o which is theproblem o intervening variables. No reasonableperson doubts that poverty aects childbearing decisions in a household, and that numbers o children aect a household’s likelihood o being impoverished—but many other variables inter
to speciy models in which ertility choice canbe isolated rom the variables that determine
nous empirical and methodological literature in
his results are anomalous; or example, he fndsthat—in addition to ertility—urbanizationand illiteracy have no eect on poverty.It is difcult to compare Shari’s data andresults with other studies. For his preliminary 
the highes
fetlty ates aeeneally fond
among hepoores fifh of 
te poplaton.

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->