Radiative and Nonradiative DecayPathways
Radiative decay describes molecular deexcitation pro-cesses accompanied by photon emission. Molecules in theexcited electronic states can also relax by nonradiativeprocesses where excitation energy is not converted intophotons but are dissipated by thermal processes such asvibrationalrelaxationandcollisionalquenching.Let
G
and
k
betheradiativeandnonradiativedecayratesrespectivelyand
N
be the fraction of fluorophore in the excited state.The temporal evolution of the excited state can bedescribed by:
d dt
À
À
N
¼
N
0
e
Àð
À
þ
k
Þ
¼
N
0
e
À
=
À
½
2
The fluorescence lifetime,
t
, of the fluorophore measuresthe combined rate of the radiative and nonradiativepathways:
À
3
In the absence of nonradiative decay processes, one candefine the intrinsic lifetime of the fluorophore:
À
4
The ‘efficiency’ of the fluorophore can then be quantifiedby the fluorescence quantum yield,
Q
:
ÀÀ
5
FactorsAffectingFluorescenceIntensity
A number of factors contributes to the nonradiative decaypathways of the fluorophores and reduces fluorescenceintensity. In general, the nonradiative decay processes canbe classified as:
k
5
k
ic
1
k
ec
1
k
is
[6]where
k
ic
isthe rateof internalconversion,
k
ec
istherate of external conversion, and
k
is
is the rate of intersystemcrossing.Internal conversion is a process where the electronicenergy is converted to the vibrational energy of thefluorophore itself. Since vibrational processes are drivenbythermalprocesses,theinternalconversionratetypicallyincreases with temperature, which accounts for thecommonlyobserveddecreaseinfluorescenceintensitywithrising temperature.External conversion describes the process where thefluorophore loses electronic energy to its environmentthroughcollisionwithothersolutes.Collisionalquenchingprocesses are particularly interesting as they allow thebiochemical environment of the fluorophores to bemeasured. A number of important solute molecules, suchas oxygen, are efficient fluorescence quenchers. Uponcollision, the fluorophore is deexcited nonradiatively. Thecollisional quenching rate can be expressed as:
k
ec
5
k
0
[
Q
] [7]where
k
0
isrelatedtothediffusivityandthehydrodynamicsradii of the reactants and [
Q
] is the concentration of thequencher.When collisional quenching is the dominant nonradia-tive process, eqn [1] predicts that fluorescence lifetimedecreases with quencher concentration:
8
The steady state fluorescence intensity,
F
, also diminishesrelative to the fluorescence intensity in the absence of quencher,
F
0
. This effect is described by the Stern–Volmerequation:
9
Fluorescence signal reduction can also result from groundstate processes – steady state quenching. A fluorophorecan be chemically bound to a quencher to form a ‘darkcomplex’ – aproductthatdoesnotfluoresce.Fluorescenceintensity decreases with steady state quenching as:
K
where
s
is the association constant of the quencher andthe fluorophore. Fluorescence lifetime is not affected bysteady state quenching as the excited states are notinvolved.
Phosphorescence
Intersystemcrossingisanotherprocesswherefluorescencesignal is reduced and phosphorescence is generated. Spin-orbit coupling is a quantum mechanical process that isresponsible for intersystem crossing. Intersystem crossingdescribes the relaxation of the molecule from a singletexcited state to a lower energy, triplet excitation state.Since spin-orbit coupling is a weak effect, the intersystemcrossingrate islow.Therelaxationfromthetripletstate tothe singlet ground state requires another change of multiplicity. Hence, the decay from the triplet states alsohas a very low rate. However, radiative relaxation,phosphorescence, does occur due to spin-orbit coupling.The typical phosphorescence lifetime is on the order of
Fluorescence Spectrophotometry2
ENCYCLOPEDIA OF LIFE SCIENCES /
&
2002 Macmillan Publishers Ltd, Nature Publishing Group / www.els.net
Leave a Comment