12345678910111213141516171819202122232425
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X
UNITED STATES, :Petitioner, :v. : No. 04-1414JEFFREY GRUBBS. :- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -XWashington, D.C.Wednesday, January 18, 2006The above-entitled matter came on for oralargument before the Supreme Court of the United Statesat 10:14 a.m.APPEARANCES:MICHAEL R. DREEBEN, ESQ., Deputy Solicitor General,Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.; on behalfthe Petitioner.MARK J. REICHEL, ESQ., Sacramento, California; onbehalf of the Respondent.
1
1111 14th Street, NW Suite 400 Alderson Reporting Company Washington, DC 200051-800-FOR-DEPO
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425
C O N T E N T S
ORAL ARGUMENT OF PAGEMICHAEL R. DREEBEN, ESQ.On behalf of the Petitioner
3
MARK J. REICHEL, ESQ.
On behalf of the Respondent
28REBUTTAL ARGUMENT OFMICHAEL R. DREEBEN, ESQ.On behalf of the Petitioner 56
2
1111 14th Street, NW Suite 400 Alderson Reporting Company Washington, DC 200051-800-FOR-DEPO
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425
P R O C E E D I N G S(10:14 a.m.)CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: We'll hear argumentfirst today in No. 04-1414, United States v. Grubbs.General Dreeben.ORAL ARGUMENT OF MICHAEL R. DREEBENON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONERMR. DREEBEN: Mr. Chief Justice, and may itplease the Court:The postal inspectors in this case appliedfor a warrant to search respondent's property. Thewarrant that they obtained particularly described theplace to be searched and the things to be seized. Itwas issued based on an affidavit that informed themagistrate judge that a videotape containing childpornography that respondent had ordered through themail and had paid for in cash was going to be deliveredto respondent's house and that the warrant would not beexecuted until the delivery had taken place.The Ninth Circuit held that the execution ofthis warrant, which occurred after the delivery thatthe postal inspectors represented would occur had infact happened, violated the Particularity Clause of theFourth Amendment.The Ninth Circuit's opinion is wrong because
3
1111 14th Street, NW Suite 400 Alderson Reporting Company Washington, DC 200051-800-FOR-DEPO
of 00
US Supreme Court: 04-1414
43 Reads
Info and Rating
| Category: | Uncategorized. |
| Rating: | |
| Upload Date: | 01/19/2008 |
| Copyright: | Attribution Non-commercial |
| Tags: |
Leave a Comment