Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
4Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Manhattan DA's appeal of Jason Mack decision

Manhattan DA's appeal of Jason Mack decision

Ratings: (0)|Views: 65,772|Likes:
Published by Jen Chung

More info:

Published by: Jen Chung on Sep 19, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

07/10/2013

pdf

text

original

 
Pursuant to Civil Rights Law § 50-b, the identities of the victims, who arethe victims of sex offenses, shall be confidential, and this document shallnot be made available for public inspection.
 
To be argued by 
  V 
INCENT
IVELLESE
 (10 Minutes Requested)
Court of Appeals
 
STATE OF NEW YORK 
 
 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 
,
 Appellant,
 
- against - 
 
 JASON MACK 
,
 
Defendant-Respondent.
 
BRIEF AND APPENDIX FOR APPELLANT
CYRUS R. VANCE, JR.
District Attorney New York County  Attorney for RespondentOne Hogan PlaceNew York, New York 10013 Telephone: (212) 335-9000Facsimile: (212) 335-9288danyappeals@dany.nyc.gov H
ILARY 
H
 ASSLER 
  V 
INCENT
IVELLESE
 A
SSISTANT
D
ISTRICT
 A
 TTORNEYS
 
Of Counsel 
 
 J
ULY 
15,
 
2011
 
 
Page TABLE OF CONTENTS
 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .............................................................................................. ii
 
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT ......................................................................................... 1
 
QUESTION PRESENTED ................................................................................................ 2
 
INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................ 3
 
 THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED TO THE GRAND JURY ....................................... 6
 
 THE MOTION PRACTICE ............................................................................................... 8
 
 THE APPELLATE DIVISION’S DECISION .............................................................. 12
 
POINT
 
 THE EVIDENCE BEFORE THE GRAND JURY SUFFICIENTLY ESTABLISHED THAT THE 300-POUND DEFENDANTUSED PHYSICAL FORCE WHEN HEPOSITIONED HIMSELF BEHIND AMUCH SMALLER TEENAGER ON ACROWDED SUBWAY TRAIN, PINNINGHER AGAINST OTHER RIDERS AND THE STRUCTURE OF THE CAR WHILEHE MASTURBATED TO EJACULATION AGAINST HER BACK. ...................................................... 14
 
CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................... 29
 
 
ii
 TABLE OF AUTHORITIESS
 TATE
C
 ASES
 
 Matter of Additional Jan. 1979 Grand Jury v. Doe 
, 50 N.Y.2d 14 (1980) ............................ 15
People v. Beam 
, 57 N.Y.2d 241 (1982) ............................................................................. 17-19
People v. Bennett 
, 219 A.D.2d 570 (1
st
Dep’t 1995) .......................................... 8-9, 13, 24-25
People v. Bonilla 
, 290 A.D.2d 454 (2
nd
Dep’t 2002) ............................................................ 24
People v. Calbud, Inc.
, 49 N.Y.2d 389 (1980) ....................................................................... 16
People v. Cobb 
, 188 A.D.2d 308 (1
st
Dep’t 1992) ................................................................ 26
People v. Deegan 
, 69 N.Y.2d 976 (1987) ............................................................................... 17
People v. Del Campo
, 281 A.D.2d 279 (1
st
Dep’t 2001) ...................................................... 22
People v. Dordal 
, 55 N.Y.2d 954 (1982) ............................................................................... 17
People v. Dorsey 
, 104 Misc. 2d 963 (Sup. Ct., Bronx County 1980),
modified on other grounds 
, 89 A.D.2d 521 (1
st
Dep’t 1982) ............................................. 22
People v. Dunleavy 
, 41 A.D.2d 717,
aff’d without opinion 
, 33 N.Y.2d 573 (1973) .................................................................... 16
People v. Flynn 
, 123 Misc. 2d 1021 (Sup. Ct., N.Y. County 1984) .................................... 18
People v. Fuller 
, 50 A.D.3d 1171 (3
rd
Dep’t 2008) .............................................................. 19
People v. Fuller 
, 50 N.Y.2d 628 (1980) ................................................................................. 24
People v Jennings 
, 69 N.Y.2d 103 (1986) ......................................................................... 13, 16
People v. King 
, 79 A.D.3d 1277 (3
rd
Dep’t 2010) ................................................................ 19
People v. Mack
, 76 A.D.3d 877 (1
st
Dep’t 2010) ................................................................ 4-5
People v Mayo
, 36 N.Y.2d 1002 (1975) ........................................................................... 13, 16
People v. Peraza 
, 288 A.D.2d 689 (3
rd
Dep’t 2001) ............................................................. 18
People v. Randall 
, 86 A.D.2d 918 (3
rd
Dep’t 1982) ............................................................. 24

Activity (4)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
1 thousand reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->