Read without ads and support Scribd by becoming a Scribd Premium Reader.
 
1Center or American Progress |  The Repeal o Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell—1 Year Later
 The Repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell—1 Year Later
Crosby Burns and Alex Rothman September 20, 2012
One year ago oday he ban on openly gay miliary service—also known as Don’ Ask,Don’ ell, or DAD—came o an end as he law’s repeal nally wen ino eec. Fromha poin on, gay men and women have been able o serve heir counry openly, hon-esly, and, or he rs ime, wihou punishmen.
1
Te ransiion o open service has proceeded smoohly over he pas 12 monhs despiedoomsday predicions by supporers o he gay ban. In he years leading up o repeal, pro-ponens o Don’ Ask, Don’ ell repeaedly claimed ha open service would underminehe uni cohesion and readiness o he U.S. miliary. Bu no repuable sudy ever showedha allowing service by openly gay personnel compromises miliary eeciveness.
2
 Moreover, hey coninued o make hese claims even aer he Penagon released acomprehensive pre-repeal survey o service members revealing ha he vas majoriy o roops were already serving wih someone hey knew o be gay or lesbian, and hadoing so in no way hreaened uni cohesion or miliary readiness. Tey also made heseasserions despie he ac ha some o our closes oreign allies repealed heir gay bans wihou any impac o uni cohesion or miliary readiness.One year laer i is clear ha gay and lesbian roops were never a hrea o miliary readi-ness, and his week he rs academic sudy o he issue ound ha U.S. naional securiy has been enhanced by he realiy o open service, no diminished by i.One year laer our armed orces are sronger hanks o he honorable service o openly gay men and women. Our miliary no longer urns away Americans willing o serve heircounry because o heir sexual orienaion. Our miliary no longer orces ou oherwisequalied roops–including hose wih “mission criical” skills such as engineers or Arabiclinguiss–simply because hey are gay. And our miliary no longer squanders millions o axpayer dollars o enorce a awed policy ha asked roops o lie abou who hey are.In shor our counry is beter o oday han i was one year ago when he ban on openly gay service coninued o exis. Even in a pos-DAD world, however, oudaed laws and
 
2Center or American Progress |  The Repeal o Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell—1 Year Later
policies sill preven gay service members and heir amilies rom accessing he benesaorded o heir sraigh counerpars.
Open service has enhanced our national security
Las week he Palm Cener—an academic research insiue a he Universiy o Caliornia, Sana Barbara—released he rs comprehensive sudy o he eecs o heDAD repeal on miliary readiness. o measure he impac o open service on miliarreadiness, he auhors o he sudy polled and inerviewed acive-duy service members,observed miliary unis, and me wih represenaives rom major organizaions on bohsides o he DAD debae over he pas six monhs. Teir ndings were clear: “DADrepeal has enhanced he miliarys abiliy o pursue is mission.”
3
 Te Palm Cener concludes ha DAD repeal has had “no negaive eec” on any com-ponen o miliary readiness, including “cohesion, recruimen, reenion, assauls, harass-men or morale.”
4
Repeal has no sparked mass resignaions in he ranks or a widespreaddecrease in morale; roops are jus as likely o re-enlis as hey were pre-repeal.
5
Nor hasopen service caused a jump in anigay violence. In ac some gay service members appearo eel beter able o resolve dispues relaing o heir sexual orienaion under he new policy.
6
Perhaps mos imporanly, he sudy nds ha DAD repeal “has no had any discernible impac, eiher posiive or negaive, on recruimen or reenion.
7
Te U.S. miliarys smooh ransiion o open service is ar rom surprising. Even beorerepeal, decades o sudies, as well as he experiences o some o our closes allies, pro- vided overwhelming evidence ha dropping he gay ban would no undermine U.S.naional securiy.Te Unied Kingdom, Canada, and Israel—hree close U.S. allies wih similarly sruc-ured miliaries—have long allowed gay and lesbian roops o serve openly.
8
As a resul,U.S. service members have been serving admirably openly gay oreign roops in coali-ion eors in Iraq and Aghanisan or years.Moreover, in 2010, wih he Obama adminisraion pushing or repeal, he Penagonlaunched a yearlong sudy on he consequences o ending Don’ Ask, Don’ ell. Teresuls, released in November 2010, se he sage or repeal. Sixy-nine percen o roopspolled said hey were already working in a uni wih someone hey believed o be gay or lesbian. An asounding 92 percen o hose individuals believed heir uni’s “abil-iy o work ogeher” was eiher “very good,” “good,” or “neiher good nor poor”—hisincludes 89 percen o hose in Army comba arms unis and 84 percen o hose inMarine comba arms unis.
9
 
3Center or American Progress |  The Repeal o Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell—1 Year Later
Over he pas wo years, he miliary admirably worked o implemen he repeal o Don’ Ask, Don’ ell. And allowing gay and lesbian men and women o proudly serve heircounry has proved o be no only a moral vicory bu also a vicory in he Unied Saes’long-erm securiy ineress. Te counry will no longer lose counless qualied men and women each year due o his discriminaory policy.
Even with open service, gay service members do not have equal accessto military benefits
 While gay service members can now serve heir counry openly and honesly, hey aresill no aorded he same benes ha heir sraigh counerpars receive.Miliary personnel have access o imporan benes ha oer employmen securiy andnancial suppor o hem and heir amilies. Tese benes include housing allowances,ravel and relocaion assisance, and miliary healh insurance.
10
Bu even under openservice, gay service members and heir amilies do no have equal access o miliary  benes.
11
Te primary reason or his inequiable access is he Deense o Marriage Ac, orDOMA, a ederal law ha denes marriage solely as he union beween one man andone woman. Under his exclusive deniion, same-sex couples–even hose who arelegally married–canno access a range o ederal benes normally aorded o marriedcouples, including governmen programs and ax breaks.For gay members o he armed orces, he governmen canno oer benes such ashealh care o same-sex parners (and poenially o heir children) because hose benes operae under he Deense o Marriage Ac’s resricive deniion o “spouse.Luckily, oher benes are no linked o he ac and can be exended o same-sex par-ners and legally recognized children. Te Penagon Working Group (PWG)–a commis-sion asked wih developing comprehensive recommendaions or implemening DADrepeal–divided benes ino hree broad caegories or gay service members:
12
 
•
Benefits that cannot be extended to same-sex partners.
Tese benes are governed by ederal saue and specically include “spouse” wihin heir deniion o depen-den. Because o he Deense o Marriage Ac, gay service members and heir amiliesdo no have equal access o hese benes. Tese include he Basic Allowance orHousing, healh insurance benes hrough RICARE, and counless benes ormiliary veerans and heir amilies.
•
Benefits that are not prohibited by statute, but are currently not extended to same-sex partners under Pentagon regulations.
Deparmen o Deense regulaions ie cer-ain benes o he governmen’s resricive deniion o “spouse” under he Deense
Search History:
Searching...
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
  • p.
  • More From This User

    Notes
    Load more