12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728ii
sf-3194101
Judgment as a matter of law that the Samsung Captivate, Continuum, Droid Charge, Epic4G, Galaxy Prevail, Galaxy S II (i9100, AT&T, T-Mobile, Epic 4G Touch, andSkyrocket), and Infuse 4G phones dilute Apple’s unregistered iPhone 3G Trade Dress, orin the alternative,
if
there is a new trial involving the unregistered iPhone 3G Trade Dressit should include the Captivate, Continuum, Droid Charge, Epic 4G, Galaxy Prevail,Galaxy S II (i9100, AT&T, T-Mobile, Epic 4G Touch, and Skyrocket), and Infuse 4Gphones;
Judgment as a matter of law that Apple’s unregistered combination iPhone Trade Dress isprotectable and famous, and that each accused Samsung smartphone product dilutesApple’s unregistered combination iPhone Trade Dress, or in the alternative, a new trial;
Judgment as a matter of law that the Samsung Intercept, Replenish, and Galaxy Acephones infringe claim 8 of U.S. Patent No. 7,844,915 (’915 patent), or in the alternative,
if
there is a new trial involving the ’915 patent it should include the Intercept, Replenish,and Galaxy Ace phones;
Judgment as a matter of law that the Samsung Captivate, Continuum, Gem, Indulge,Intercept, Nexus S 4G, Transform, and Vibrant phones infringe claim 50 of U.S. PatentNo. 7,864,163 (’163 patent), or in the alternative,
if
there is a new trial involving the ’163patent it should include the Captivate, Continuum, Gem, Indulge, Intercept, Nexus S 4G,Transform, and Vibrant phones;
Judgment as a matter of law that Samsung’s infringement of the D’889 and D’087 patentsand of Apple’s unregistered iPad/iPad 2 Trade Dress was willful, or in the alternative,
if
there is to be a new trial on any of Apple’s infringement claims, the new trial shouldinclude Apple’s willfulness claims where the jury made no finding or found nowillfulness;
Judgment as a matter of law that Samsung’s dilution of Apple’s unregistered combinationiPhone Trade Dress and of unregistered iPad/iPad 2 Trade Dress was willful, or in thealternative,
if
there is to be a new trial on any of Apple’s dilution claims, the new trial
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1989 Filed09/21/12 Page3 of 43