WORKING DRAFT – DO NOT CITE WITHOUT AUTHORS’ PERMISSION
3
accommodations for 4 to over 20.
[SLIDE]
Type 2 camps are less formal andcentrally organized. They feature RVs typically attached to masts providing power and,in most cases, water and sewage disposal. The types of units vary and, in many cases,residents own the trailers or mobile homes, although this is not universally true.
[SLIDE]
The camps show no particular uniformity although most have someconsistent arrangement dictated largely by the power and water hook ups, and someoffer basic amenities.
[SLIDE]
Type 3 camps are the least formal, uniform, and offer the least access to amenities.
[SLIDE]
They lack power or water masts, regular organization, and sometimes are little more than groups of RVs or tents shelteringtheir itinerant occupants in a windbreak or tree belt. The relationship between thedifferent types of camps and administrative apparatus of the state roughly follows our typology. Type 1 camps fall under the jurisdiction of the ND Department of Commerce and their inspectors; local health departments monitor conditions in Type2 camps, and the police manage the spread of Type 3 camps, which are typically illegal.In August of this year, we returned to the Bakken Oil patch to document examples of Type 1, Type 2, and Type 3 camps. We adopted a blend of archaeological recordingtactics and ethnographic style interviews designed to document social and materialconditions at the camps.
[SLIDE]
The archaeological recording techniques involved photography, recordingof textual descriptions, and sketches of individual units and the plan of the camps.
[SLIDE]
By using both photography and more impressionistic methods to collectdata we have produced a rich dataset that sought both to capture data that could bemined for future research as well as more focused descriptions emphasizing datarelevant to our short term research questions regarding site formation, architecturalmodifications, and material evidence for domestic life. [SLIDE] Interviewscomplemented the archaeological documentation by documenting the range of socialand economic conditions existing in the man camps, and testing whether our materialtypology correlated to social conditions in the camps.