• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
 
 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
This article was downloaded by:On:
19 January 2009 
Access details:
Access Details: Free Access 
Publisher
Informa Healthcare 
Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House,37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713609207
The General Transcription Machinery and General Cofactors
Mary C. Thomas
a
; Cheng-Ming Chiang
aa
Department of Biochemistry, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USAOnline Publication Date: 01 June 2006
To cite this Article
Thomas, Mary C. and Chiang, Cheng-Ming(2006)'The General Transcription Machinery and GeneralCofactors',Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology,41:3,105 — 178
To link to this Article: DOI:
10.1080/10409230600648736
URL:
Full terms and conditions of use:http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdfThis article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial orsystematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply ordistribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden.The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contentswill be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug dosesshould be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss,actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directlyor indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
 
Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 
, 41:105–178, 2006Copyright
c
Taylor & Francis Group, LLCISSN: 1040-9238 print / 1549-7798 onlineDOI: 10.1080/10409230600648736
The General Transcription Machineryand General Cofactors
Mary C. Thomas andCheng-Ming Chiang
Department of BiochemistryCase Western ReserveUniversity School of MedicineCleveland, OH, USA
ABSTRACT
Ineukaryotes,thecorepromoterservesasaplatformfortheassem-bly of transcription preinitiation complex (PIC) that includes TFIIA, TFIIB,TFIID, TFIIE, TFIIF, TFIIH, and RNA polymerase II (pol II), which func-tion collectively to specify the transcription start site. PIC formation usuallybegins with TFIID binding to the TATA box, initiator, and/or downstreampromoter element (DPE) found in most core promoters, followed by the en-try of other general transcription factors (GTFs) and pol II through either asequential assembly or a preassembled pol II holoenzyme pathway. Formationof this promoter-bound complex is sufficient for a basal level of transcription.However, for activator-dependent (or regulated) transcription, general cofactorsare often required to transmit regulatory signals between gene-specific activa-tors and the general transcription machinery. Three classes of general cofactors,including TBP-associated factors (TAFs), Mediator, and upstream stimulatoryactivity(USA)-derivedpositivecofactors(PC1/PARP-1,PC2,PC3/DNAtopoi-somerase I, and PC4) and negative cofactor 1 (NC1/HMGB1), normally func-tion independently or in combination to fine-tune the promoter activity in agene-specific or cell-type-specific manner. In addition, other cofactors, such asTAF1, BTAF1, and negative cofactor 2 (NC2), can also modulate TBP or TFIIDbinding to the core promoter. In general, these cofactors are capable of repress-ing basal transcription when activators are absent and stimulating transcriptionin the presence of activators. Here we review the roles of these cofactors andGTFs, as well as TBP-related factors (TRFs), TAF-containing complexes (TFTC,SAGA, SLIK/SALSA, STAGA, and PRC1) and TAF variants, in pol II-mediatedtranscription, with emphasis on the events occurring after the chromatin hasbeen remodeled but prior to the formation of the first phosphodiester bond.
KEYWORDS
core promoter elements, general transcription machinery, transcription co-factors, preinitiation complex, CTD phosphorylation, pol II ubiquitination, E3 ubiquitin ligase,TAF variants
INTRODUCTIONDiscovery of Eukaryotic RNA Polymerase I,II,III, and IV
The view that genetic information flows from DNA to RNA to protein,known as the Central Dogma (Crick, 1958), has been expanded due to the
Address correspondence toCheng-Ming Chiang, Department ofBiochemistry, Case Western ReserveUniversity School of Medicine, 10900Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH44106-4935. E-mail: cmc23@cwru.edu
105
 D o w nl o ad ed  A t : 03 :14 19  J a n u a r y 2009
 
discovery of additional pathways to perpetuate geneticinformation,
i.e.
, from RNA to DNA (Baltimore, 1970;Temin and Mizutani, 1970) and to conformationalchanges induced by proteinaceous infectious agents(Prusiner 
et al.
, 1982). The production of RNA, termedtranscription, is a highly coordinated process mediatedby RNA polymerase, whose enzymatic activity wasfirst discovered by Weiss and Gladstone in 1959from rat liver nuclei. This enzyme could synthesizeRNA in a DNA-dependent manner, as evidencedby the observation that, upon addition of DNase,incorporation of [
α
-
32
P]CTP into RNA was drasticallyreduced (Weiss and Gladstone, 1959). A similaRNA-synthesizing activity was later identified from
Escherichia coli 
(Hurwitz
et al 
., 1960; Stevens, 1960;Chamberlin and Berg, 1962), thereby establishing auniversal role of RNA polymerases in transcribingDNA in both eukaryotes and prokaryotes. To date,four different RNA polymerases have been identifiedin higher eukaryotes. In contrast, only one RNApolymerase is found in prokaryotes and archaea.Three eukaryotic RNA polymerases (I, II, and III,or named A, B, and C, respectively) were first iden-tified by Roeder and Rutter, based on the chromato-graphic fractionation of sea urchin embryo nuclei ona DEAE-Sephadex column. RNA polymerase I cameoff the column first at the lowest salt concentration,whereas RNA polymerase III eluted at the highest saltconcentration (Roeder and Rutter, 1969). Although theexistence of three eukaryotic RNA polymerases wasestablished in 1969, their functions remained elusiveuntil Chambon’s and Roeder’s groups found that thespecific activity of each RNA polymerase could beresolved based upon their differential sensitivities to
α
-amanitin (Gniazdowski
et al.
, 1970; Kedinger 
et al.
,1970; Weinmann and Roeder, 1974; Weinmann
et al.
,1974), a drug isolated from the death cap fungus,
 Amanita phalloides
, that inhibits 50% activity of RNApolymerase II at low concentrations (0.02
µ
g/mL) andthat of RNA polymerase III at high concentrations(20
µ
g/mL; Weinmann
et al.
, 1974). Using
α
-amanitinsensitivity assay with endogenous RNA polymerasespresent in isolated nuclei, Roeder and Rutter (1970) dis-covered that RNA polymerase I is primarily involvedin transcribing 18S and 28S ribosomal RNAs, whileRNApolymeraseIItranscribesmRNAs,andRNApoly-merase III is responsible for synthesis of cellular 5SrRNA, tRNAs, and adenovirus VA RNAs. These resultswereconsistentwiththefindingthatRNApolymeraseIis localized within nucleoli, the sites for rRNA synthe-sis, whereas RNA polymerase II and III are normallypresent in the nucleoplasm (Roeder and Rutter, 1970;Zylber and Penman, 1971; Weil and Blatti, 1976).The fourth RNA polymerase, recently identified inplants to facilitate the production of small interferingRNA (siRNA) involved in RNA-directed DNA methy-lation and transcriptional silencing and formation of heterochromatin, is also present in the nucleus andis resistant to
α
-amanitin (Herr 
et al.
, 2005; Kanno
et al.
, 2005; Onodera
et al.
, 2005). Although this plant-specific RNA polymerase IV appears to be nonessentialfor viability, it exhibits unique properties not sharedby other nuclear RNA polymerases. Interestingly, an
α
-amanitin-resistant single-polypeptide nuclear RNApolymerase (spRNAP-IV), structurally unrelated to themultisubunit plant RNA polymerase IV, has been ad-ditionally found in human HeLa cells (Kravchenko
et al.
, 2005). This spRNAP-IV enzyme, encoded by analternative transcript derived from the mitochondrialRNA polymerase gene (
POLRMT 
) that also encodesthe single-polypeptide mitochondrial RNA polymerase(mtRNAP), lacks the N-terminal 262-amino acids en-compassing the mitochondrial targeting sequence butcontains the same C-terminal 968 amino acid cat-alytic region of mtRNAP. While spRNAP-IV appears tobe structurally distinct from
α
-amanitin-sensitive RNApolymerase II, it represents a second RNA polymeraseable to transcribe a subset of mRNA-encoding genesthat do not contain the core promoter elements andregulatory sequences commonly found in RNA poly-merase II-transcribed genes.Clearly, the findings that each of these eukaryoticRNA polymerases has unique biochemical properties,as exhibited by their distinct chromatographic elutionprofile, nuclear localization, and differential sensitivityto
α
-amanitin, and that RNA polymerase I has 14 sub-units, while RNA polymerase II and III possess 12 and17 subunits, respectively, suggest that these three clas-sical eukaryotic RNA polymerases and the newly iden-tified plant RNA polymerase IV and human spRNAP-IV are unlikely to play a functionally redundant rolein the cell. However, these enzymes do share a com-mon property in transcribing a diverse set of DNA se-quences, although they lack sequence-specific recogni-tion ability to correctly specify the transcription startsite unique to each gene. For site-specific initiation, ad-ditional proteins are necessary to form an initiation-competent RNA polymerase complex. Here, we review
106
M. C. Thomas and C.-M. Chiang
 D o w nl o ad ed  A t : 03 :14 19  J a n u a r y 2009
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...