Read without ads and support Scribd by becoming a Scribd Premium Reader.
 
1Center or American Progress | Wind Power Helps to Lower Electricity Prices
Wind Power Helps to LowerElectricity Prices
Richard W. Caperton October 10, 2012
Introduction
Here’s somehing ha shouldn’ surprise anyone: A company ha benes rom highpower prices is lobbying or policies ha would raise power prices or consumers. Whashould surprise everyone, however, is he sheer audaciy o heir eor: using a deeply awed sudy o argue ha ax incenives or wind power are “disorionary” while argu-ing or he exac same incenives or heir preerred echnologies.Earlier his summer Exelon Corporaion, a large U.S. power generaor and uiliy opera-or, began quiely lobbying agains exending he producion ax credi or wind energy.Is eor gradually became more public, and has now eruped ino a ull-scale war on he wind indusry.
1
In ac, he American Wind Energy Associaion erminaed Exelon’s mem- bership in he associaion.
2
And Exelon is now ouing a sudy by he NorhBridge Group,an economic and sraegic consuling rm, ha purpors o show ha he producion ax credi is deeply harming consumers by—ge his—saving hem oo much money.
3
 Exelons argumen is srange bu has gained some racion among wind energy oppo-nens on Capiol Hill. Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-N) and Rep. Mike Pompeo (R-KS),or example, jus penned an ediorial in Te Wall Sree Journal parroing NorhBridge’sclaims.
4
Forunaely, hough, he acs are on he side o wind power.Tis issue brie will show how he wind producion ax credi benes our economy, while also shedding ligh on Exelon’s eors agains he wind indusry by:
•
Explaining he aniconsumer moives behind Exelon’s aniwind argumens
•
Describing how nuclear power—Exelons primary power source—could be subsi-ued or wind in Exelon’s argumens, which shows ha heir concern is really windpower and no marke disorionsLe’s begin wih he benes or consumers.
 
2Center or American Progress | Wind Power Helps to Lower Electricity Prices
Consumers benefit from cheap power but Exelon doesn’t
I’s criical ha we keep Exelon’s undamenal moivaions in mind. Exelon is in he busi-ness o selling power, and would preer ha power o be expensive.Sudies show ha wind energy lowers power prices in wholesale markes,
5
so i’sperecly raional or Exelon o oppose wind power. Bu Exelon’s argumen abou heproducion ax credi huring consumers is deeply misleading. Beore digging ino heirargumen, however, we need o review how wind power drives down prices.Much o Exelon’s power is sold in compeiive wholesale power markes, which allow power generaors (like Exelon) o sell power o local disribuion uiliies, which in urnsell ha power o businesses and homeowners. Compeiive markes all operae on a“single clearing price” basis, which means ha all generaors ge paid he same amounor heir power, no mater how much i coss o produce. Tis aucion mehod ensuresha every generaor bids in he lowes price hey’re willing o accep or heir power. While he deails are exremely complicaed—he rules or he marke ha operaesin he mid-Alanic area are more han 2,000 pages long, or example
6
—he basics areairly sraighorward. Every generaor in he marke ells he marke operaor how muchpower hey’re willing o provide and a wha cos. A he same ime, every disribuionuiliy ells he marke operaor how much power hey need o buy. Te marke operaorhen sacks up he generaors rom lowes o highes bid.Ten, saring a he lowes bid, he marke operaor adds up all o he bids unil hey have enough power o mee he disribuion uiliies’ demands. Te las bid acceped becomes he “clearing price”—he price he disribuion uiliies pay or all o heirpower, and he price ha every generaor receives.o see how wind impacs power markes, consider he hypoheical examples displayedin Figure 1. Say a marke has ve dieren generaors: a wind arm, a nuclear reacor, acoal-red power plan, an efcien and modern naural gas power plan, and an olderand less efcien naural gas plan. Each o hese plans will oer o sell power a heprice ha covers heir operaing cos. On he oher side o he marke, disribuion uili-ies need o buy 3,000 megawats o power. Tis means he marke operaor will hensack up he bids rom lowes o highes and hen add up he bids unil enough powercan mee he 3,000 megawats o demand.In he rs example he marke will clear a $50 per megawat-hour o elecriciy. Now,consider wha happens o his marke i someone builds a new 500-megawat wind arm,as shown in he second example. Te need or power hasn’ changed a all, so he cheap-es 3,000 megawats will sill deermine he clearing price. In his case, he marke now clears a $30 per megawat-hour o elecriciy.
 
3Center or American Progress | Wind Power Helps to Lower Electricity Prices
Tis eec o wind power driving down wholesale prices is known as “price suppres-sion” or he “meri order eec,” and is benes are well known. gA recen sudy o heMidwes Independen Sysem Operaor, or example, ound ha large amouns o windcould save consumers $200 per year.
7
 While he benes or consumers are clear, exising generaors lose some pros. In heoriginal scenario, he nuclear reacor—le’s say is owned by Exelon—was making $40per megawat-hour more han heir operaing cos. (Tis isn’ echnically “pro,” sincesome o his $40 goes oward covering xed coss.) In he later scenario, he reacor isonly making $20 more han heir operaing coss.O course, while Exelon makes $20 less, consumers save $20 on heir power bill.
 The production tax credit is not “distortionary
Exelon knows ha saying wind power is bad because i saves money or consumers ishardly a winning argumen, so hey’ve made a slighly dieren argumen o avoid hereal issue. Tey are now ouing a Sepember repor by he NorhBridge Group, whichconcludes ha “[producion ax credi]-driven negaive prices direcly conic wihhe perormance and operaional needs o he elecric sysem and wih ederal energy policies supporing well-uncioning compeiive wholesale markes.
8
Wha hey mean by his: Wind arms are paying grid operaors o ake heir power, which is reporedly disoring elecriciy prices in wholesale markes.
Note: This is a hypothetical example for illustrative purposes and is not intended to represent any particular power system.
 $50/MWh$30/MWh$20/MWh$10/MWh$0/MWh3,000 MW500 MW
Wind
900 MW
Nuclear
600 MW
Coal
500 MW500 MW
Old gas
 $30/MWh$20/MWh$10/MWh$0/MWh3,000 MW500 MW
Wind
500 MW
Wind
600 MW
Coal
500 MW
New gas
500 MW
Old gas
900 MW
Nuclear
FIGURE 1
Adding more wind power reduces prices in electricity markets
In the frst example (on the let), the market clearing price is $50. In the second example (on the right), more wind pushes the mostexpensive plants out o the mix, and the clearing price is reduced to $30.
Search History:
Searching...
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
  • p.
  • More From This User

    Notes
    Load more