123456789101112131415161718192021222324251
Official - Subject to Final Review
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - xABIGAIL NOEL FISHER, :Petitioner : No. 11-345v. :UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN, :ET AL. :- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - xWashington, D.C.Wednesday, October 10, 2012The above-entitled matter came on for oralargument before the Supreme Court of the United Statesat 11:04 a.m.APPEARANCES:BERT W. REIN, ESQ., Washington, D.C.; on behalf ofPetitioner.GREGORY G. GARRE, ESQ., Washington, D.C.; on behalf ofRespondents.DONALD B. VERRILLI, JR., ESQ., Solicitor General,Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.; for UnitedStates, as amicus curiae, supporting Respondents.
Alderson Reporting Company
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252
Official - Subject to Final Review
C O N T E N T SORAL ARGUMENT OF PAGEBERT W. REIN, ESQ.On behalf of the Petitioner 3ORAL ARGUMENT OFGREGORY G. GARRE, ESQ.On behalf of the Respondents 31ORAL ARGUMENT OFDONALD B. VERRILLI, JR., ESQFor United States, as amicus curiae, 58supporting the RespondentsREBUTTAL ARGUMENT OFBERT W. REIN, ESQ.On behalf of the Petitioner 72
Alderson Reporting Company
123456789101112131415161718192021222324253
Official - Subject to Final Review
P R O C E E D I N G S(11:04 a.m.)MR. REIN: Mr. Chief Justice, and may itplease the Court -CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: Well, I get to saythat this is Case Number 11-345, Fisher against theUniversity of Texas at Austin. And you get to say -ORAL ARGUMENT OF BERT W. REINON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONERMR. REIN: Mr. Chief Justice, General Sutertrained me too well.Mr. Chief Justice, and members of the Court,and may it please the Court:The central issue here is whether theUniversity of Texas at Austin can carry its burdenapproving that its use of race as an admissions-plusfactor in the consequent denial of equal treatment,which is the central mandate of the Equal ProtectionClause, to Abigail Fisher met the two tests of strictscrutiny which are applicable.First -JUSTICE GINSBURG: Mr. Rein, before we getto that, because the Court is supposed to raise it onits own: The question of standing. The injury -- ifthe injury is rejection by the University of Texas, and
Alderson Reporting Company
Search History:
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
p.
Supreme Court oral arguments, Fisher v University of Texas
The Supreme Court held oral arguments on Oct. 10 in an important Texas affirmative action case, Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin. Here is a transcript of the proceedings.
588
Reads
1
Readcasts
1.2K
Embed Views
More From This User
Notes
Load more
