Upload_transparent

S. Shalom Et M. Albert - 9-11 Conspiracies or Institutions

 
 
 
 
 
kiwi101

by kiwi101

Value This
Doc
Scribd
Average
     
Pages: 18 43
Words: 8995 13640
Characters: 55648 81678
Lines: 76 623
     
     
Letters per word: 6.19 5.99
Words per line: 118.36 21.89
Words per page: 499.72 317.21

Add to your reading list

Flag_red Flag this document

Document Information

529 Reads | 2 Comments

Description

Conspiracy Theory Gouvernement Institutional Analysis 9-11 Mossad World Trade Center

Word_16x16 18 Pages


Date Added

01/21/2009

Category
Tags
Groups
Copyright

Attribution Non-commercial

More info »

 

or use Facebook Connect

k3nd00d

k3nd00d

Wow, this paper and it's authors are pretty idiotic and ill rationalized. According to the thinking displayed in this paper, there must not ever be any actual conspiracies, there must not be any organizations out there with grandiose agendas, no such thing as propaganda or complicity in crimes. No wait, they acknowledge precisely and only the conspiracies heretofore deemed real by various media as of this day, but no more and no less. I suppose the authors dismiss all claims of JFK murder conspiracies despite the fact that the GODs of government found, in the late 70s, that there was likely a conspiracy (unfortunately they stopped at that point). At this point I'd like to invoke Ockham's Razor, as so many try to do against my point of view. Ockham's Razor tells me (if I must do this for demonstration purposes) that the simplest explanation, and thus most probable, is that there are concerted efforts to manipulate the American populace to be the support and engine behind global imperialism and control. Upon this grand chess board (written about by Zbigniew Brzezinski in his book "The Grand Chessboard") there are many smaller skirmishes and manipulations directed toward the larger end goals of the game. Finally, in regard to Ockham's Razor, it is absurd to invoke, in reality, because any so called "simplest answer" is firstly subjective and secondly may simply be incorrect and the assignment of a default degree of probability is foolish and ignorant.

07/29/2009
k3nd00d

k3nd00d

Wow, this paper and it's authors are pretty idiotic and ill rationalized. According to the thinking displayed in this paper, there must not ever be any actual conspiracies, there must not be any organizations out there with grandiose agendas, no such thing as propaganda or complicity in crimes. No wait, they acknowledge precisely and only the conspiracies heretofore deemed real by various media as of this day, but no more and no less. I suppose the authors dismiss all claims of JFK murder conspiracies despite the GOD of government found, in the late 70s, that there was likely a conspiracy (unfortunately they stopped at that point). At this point I'd like to invoke Ockham's Razor, as so many try to do against my point of view. Ockham's Razor tells me (if I must do this for demonstration purposes) that the simplest explanation, and thus most probable, is that there are concerted efforts to manipulate the American populace to be the support and engine behind global imperialism and control. Upon this grand chess board (written about by Zbigniew Brzezinski in his book "The Grand Chessboard") there are many smaller skirmishes and manipulations directed toward the larger end goals of the game. Finally, in regard to Ockham's Razor, it is absurd to invoke, in reality, because any so called "simplest answer" is firstly subjective and secondly may simply be incorrect and the assignment of a default degree of probability is foolish and ignorant. k3nd00d@yahoo.com

07/28/2009