Doesthepossessionofacommonlanguagetrumpgeographywhenitcomestoissuesofidentity,intergrouprelationsandperceptionsabouttheconditionofminority?RarelyisthequestionsubjectedtoabettertestthanintheCanada’sNationalCapitalRegion wherefrancophonesliveinrelativelycloseproximityacrosstheQuebecandOntarioborderswhereinformertheFrenchlanguagepopulationrepresentsthemajorityinGatineau,QuebecandtheminorityintheOttawa,Ontario.VeryoftenseparatedgeographicallybyonlyafewkilometresfrancophonesoneithersideoftheOntario/Quebecborderliveunderdifferentlegislativeregimeswhenitcomestolanguage.Notonlydoesthelegislationdifferbutthemessagedirectedtowardslanguagecommunitiesisalsodifferentandthisisalsothecaseforimmigrantsandethnicminoritiesasregardstheirrespectiveprocessofadaptation.ThedegreeofcommutingbetweenthegroupsacrosstheprovincialbordermakesperhapsforthemostmixedofmessageswhenitcomestoissuesoflanguageandculturaldiversityanditalsogivesrisetodivergentperceptionsaroundtheconditionandpresenceofEnglishandFrenchrespectivelydependingonwhereoneresidesandhowtheyunderstandtheirsurroundingenvironment.Doesasharedlanguagetrumpgeographywhenitcomestotheperceptionsoffrancophonesonopposedsidesoftheprovincialborder?Asweshallobserveitdoesonmattersofnationalidentityaswellasonlanguageissuesbuttoalesserdegree.ThestudyisimportantnotonlyasanexampleofhowminoritiesandmajoritiesshareacommonspacebutalsointheCanadiancontextoverhowwellbilingualismworksinthecapitalpartofthecountrywhichineffectpossessessymbolicimportancefortherestofthecountryasregardstheimportanceofofficiallanguages.