Philosophers, thinkers, and writers advocated the theory of representative parliaments ata time when peoples were unconsciously herded like sheep by kings, sultans andconquerors. The ultimate aspiration of the people of those times was to have someone torepresent them before such rulers. When even this aspiration was rejected, people wagedbitter and protracted struggle to attain this goal.
After the successful establishment of the age of the republics and the beginning of the eraof the masses, it is unthinkable that democracy should mean the electing of only a fewrepresentatives to act on behalf of great masses. This is an obsolete structure. Authoritymust be in the hands of all of the people.
The most tyrannical dictatorships the world has known have existed under the aegis ofparliaments.
The party is a contemporary form of dictatorship. It is the modern instrument of dictatorialgovernment. The party is the rule of a part over the whole. As a party is not an individual, itcreates a superficial democracy by establishing assemblies, committees, and propagandathrough its members. The party is not a democratic instrument because it is composedonly of those people who have common interests, a common perception or a sharedculture; or those who belong to the same region or share the same belief. They form aparty to achieve their ends, impose their will, or extend the dominion of their beliefs,values, and interests to the society as a whole. A party's aim is to achieve power under thepretext of carrying out its program. Democratically, none of these parties should govern awhole people who constitute a diversity of interests, ideas, temperaments, regions andbeliefs. The party is a dictatorial instrument of government that enables those withcommon outlooks or interests to rule the people as a whole. Within the community, theparty represents a minority.
The purpose of forming a party is to create an instrument to rule the people, i.e., to ruleover non-members of the party. The party is, fundamentally, based on an arbitraryauthoritarian concept - the domination of the members of the party over the rest of thepeople. The party presupposes that its accession to power is the way to attain its ends,and assumes that its objectives are also those of the people. This is the theory justifyingparty dictatorship, and is the basis of any dictatorship. No matter how many parties exist,the theory remains valid.
The existence of many parties intensifies the struggle for power, and this results in theneglect of any achievements for the people and of any socially beneficial plans. Suchactions are presented as a justification to undermine the position of the ruling party sothat an opposing party can replace it. The parties very seldom resort to arms in theirstruggle but, rather, denounce and denigrate the actions of each other. This is a battlewhich is inevitably waged at the expense of the higher, vital interests of the society. Some,if not all, of those higher interests will fall prey to the struggle for power betweeninstruments of government, for the destruction of those interests supports the oppositionin their argument against the ruling party or parties. In order to rule, the opposition partyhas to defeat the existing instrument of government.
To do so, the opposition must minimize the government's achievements and cast doubt onits plans, even though those plans may be beneficial to the society. Consequently, theinterests and programs of the society become the victims of the parties' struggle forpower. Such struggle is, therefore, politically, socially, and economically destructive to thesociety, despite the fact that it creates political activity.