Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Reinforcement of Concrete Structures

Reinforcement of Concrete Structures

Ratings: (0)|Views: 18|Likes:
Published by Sreedhar Patnaik.M

More info:

Categories:Topics, Art & Design
Published by: Sreedhar Patnaik.M on Oct 25, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





There are numerous examples, around the world, of “spalling concrete” found on structures
within marine and inland urban and industrial environments. Clearly, there is a need toimplement effective corrosion control methods in order to extend the long-term durability of steelreinforced concrete.Methods proposed for the corrosion protection of reinforcement do not, in any way, replace orusurp the importance of good quality concrete as the pri
mary source of “barrier protection”
against corrosive attack of steel reinforcement. What is pro
posed in this paper is a “belt andbraces”, cost effective and site practical method, of improving corrosion prote
ction of embeddedreinforcement, before actual placement within a structure, i.e. prior to, during delivery to site and
final installation. In short, “pr
vention is better than cure”.
The cost of adequate prevention carried out during the stages of design and execution areminimal compared to the savings they make possible during the service life and even more so,compared to the cost of rehabilitation, which might be required at later dates. The so-called De
Sitter’s “law of five” can be stated as follows: one dollar spent in getting th
e structure designed and built correctly is as effective as spending $5 when the structure has been constructed but corrosion has yet to start, $25 when corrosion has started at some points, $125 when corrosionhas become widespread. Ref No.3.
There are several methods of corrosion protection, such as, but not limited to the following:
The use of membrane-type coatings applied to the surface of concrete structures.
Painting the outer concrete surface to provide barrier protection.
Addition of corrosion inhibitors to concrete.
The use of stainless steel or 3CR12 as a substitute of normal carbon steel reinforcement.
Cathodic protection of the reinforcement.
Application of a coating to the reinforcement itself, i.e. epoxy coatings and specifically zinc intheform of hot dip galvanizing.While these various methods provide varying degrees of success, this paper will examine thespecific aspects of corrosion protection by the appli
cation of hot dip galvanizing for “barrier
tection” (2
line of defence) with the added benefit of cathodic protection (3
line of defence) achieved by the fact that zinc is electro-
negative to carbon steel. The main “barrierprotection” (1
line of defence) is of course the concrete cover of the embedded reinforcement.It is abundantly clear that many misconceptions persist with regard to the use of hot dipgalvanizing as a corrosion protection system for reinforcement.This paper addresses many of these issues in order to facilitate informed decision making, duringthe designstage for projects where reinforced concrete is to be used as a structural component.It is known from practical experience and site investigations, around the world and specificallyalong the Southern African coastline, as well as at numerous inland locations that
“The life to
the first maintenance of an uncoated steel bar reinforced concrete structure which hasfailed by concrete spalling after approximately 10 years, could have been extended to over
30 years if the re-bar had initially been hot dip galv
This postulation assumes aquality concrete cover of 40mm minimum with >40 MPa strength concrete (ordinary PortlandCement).
 Ref No.1
.It is generally accepted that such concrete quality as well as correct site placement, presentspractical difficulties that cannot always be avoided. A zinc coating, in the form of hot dipgalvanizing, is suggested as a practical, and economical approach aimed at enhancing thedurability of reinforced concrete.2.FACTORS AFFECTING DURABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETESTRUCTURES1.EnvironmentCorrosion attack and hence, ultimate service life of any material, is dependent on theenvironment in which such components are situated. The external environment is a major factorto be considered when designing all types of structures, and reinforcedconcrete is no exception.It is the environment that carries the corrosive inducing elements and compounds such asoxygen, chlorides, sulphur dioxide and water to name but a few. Structures located along thecoastline, which are exposed to prevailing winds from off the sea, are subjected to a greaterdegree of corrosion attack than at most inland sites. This applies particularly in the spray zonebecause of the presence of chloride containing moisture in an oxygen rich environment. Sulphurdioxide containing atmospheres encountered in polluted industrial areas can be even more severe.It is essential to assess the degree of corrosion pertaining at each specific site whether inland or ina coastal region. Determine the microclimatic conditions, whether coastal or inland.There are many examples of the effective use of hot dip galvanized reinforcement in corrosivemarine and industrial environments both in Southern Africa and throughout the world. Many of these examples date back to thelate 1950s and early 1960s.2.Quality of ConcreteThe quality and permeability of concrete represents the most important or critical factor to beconsidered when reviewing corrosion control and/or protection of the embedded reinforcement.Concrete permeability (1
line of defence) is influenced by the following factors, referred to asthe four
oncrete Mix-
Low concrete permeability is a function of the bonding between the aggregateand the cement, water/cement ratio and size and grading of the aggregate.
Adequate and controlled compaction has an influence on both the quality of theconcrete and its permeability.
Site curing procedures influence permeability and ultimately concrete quality andstrength.
 Depth of 
Depth ofcover over the embedded reinforcement is of major significancewhen corrosion prevention of steel is being considered. Notwithstanding the depth of concretecover required in terms of the specification, the final cover is often determined or limited bypractical considerations at the time of the actual placing or pouring of the concrete. Thereinforcement could shift within the shuttering or formwork and this could remain undetecteddue to practical restrictions during the pouring process. Practical aspects encountered duringconstruction could compromise final depth of covers.Indications of the reduction of the initiation time of corrosion due to local reductions in thethickness of the concrete cover in some areas of the structure is halved with respect to its nominalvalue, in these areas the initiation is reduced to less than one quarter of that predicted. Thisanalogue is only valid when concrete is exposed to chlorides.
 Ref No.3.
In other words considering a chloride environment the following is possible.
24mm nominal concrete cover estimated 100years to initiation of reinforcement corrosion.
With the reduction of the nominal concrete cover to half, (12mm) estimates reduce to 15 yearsto initiation of reinforcement corrosion. Refer to annex C.
3From the above, it is clear that the structural performance of reinforced concrete and the onsetof corrosion of the reinforcement is largely determined by the quality of the concrete andpractical placement of the embedded steel reinforcement. It is therefore clear that provision of corrosion protection to the reinforcement, by hot dip galvanizing, does not replace therequirement for good quality concrete. The purpose of corrosion protection of reinforcement is toextend the ultimate service life of the structure once the corrosive agents, present in an aggressiveenvironment, have penetrated the concrete cover. Consider
Fig No.1.
3.STRUCTURAL FAILURE DUE TO CORROSIONIn order to place the need for hot dip galvanizing of reinforcement into context, we must firstdiscuss a typical failure of a reinforced concrete structure, due to corrosion of the reinforcement.The following photographs illustrate the sequence of events leading to the ultimate failure of areinforced concrete structure.
Fig No.2a to 2d.
3.4 &3.5
Ingress of corrosive substances, isfirst indicated by
Rust Staining
Cracks appear
Fig No.1
While minimum cover may bespecified the actual coverultimately achieved is frequentlydependant on practical siteconsiderations.

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->