()It oDU1 totf JtUa t<tfhdav;

j
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE (Jf UCJ Vf'.K/J
ST. JUDE MEDICAL, CARDIOLOGY
DIVISION, INC., ST. JUDE MEDICAL
SYSTEMS AB, and ST. JUDE MEDICAL S.C.,
INC.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
VOLCANO CORPORATION,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
) C.A. No. 1 0-631-RGA
)
)
)
)
)
SPECIAL VERDICT FORM
C.A. No. 10-631-RGA


@
Case 1:10-cv-00631-RGA-MPT Document 453 Filed 10/24/12 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 14298
ST JUDE'S U.S. PATENT NO. 6,112,598
QUESTION NO. 1:
Do you find that St. Jude has proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Volcano's
accused products, the Prime Wire, Prime Wire Prestige, Prime Wire Prestige Plus, Combo Wire,
and SmartWire II (the "Volcano Guide Wires"), infringe any of the following claims of U.S.
Patent No. 6,112,598?
YES [for ST. JUDE]
CLAIM3:
CLAIM 5:
CLAIM 12:
C.A. No. 10-631-RGA
NO [for VOLCANO]:
y/
/
,/
Case 1:10-cv-00631-RGA-MPT Document 453 Filed 10/24/12 Page 2 of 8 PageID #: 14299
ST JUDE'S U.S. PATENT NO. 6,248,083
QUESTION NO.2:
Do you find that St. Jude has proven by a preponderance of the evidence that the Volcano
Guide Wires infringe any of the following claims ofU.S. Patent No. 6,248,083?
CLAIM 1:
CLAIM2:
CLAIM 10:
CLAIM 14:
C.A. No. 10-631-RGA
YES [for ST. JUDE] NO [for VOLCANO]:
~
~
_L
V'
Case 1:10-cv-00631-RGA-MPT Document 453 Filed 10/24/12 Page 3 of 8 PageID #: 14300
ST. JUDE'S U.S. PATENT NO. 5,938,624
QUESTION NO. 3:
Do you find that Volcano has proven by clear and convincing evidence that any of the
following claims of U.S. Patent No. 5,938,624 are invalid as anticipated?
CLAIM 1:
CLAIM2:
CLAIM 10:
YES [for VOLCANO]
/
7
vi
C.A. No. 1 0-631-RGA
NO [for ST. JUDE]:
Case 1:10-cv-00631-RGA-MPT Document 453 Filed 10/24/12 Page 4 of 8 PageID #: 14301
ST. JUDE'S U.S. PATENT NO. 5,938,624
QUESTION NO. 4:
Do you find that Volcano has proven by clear and convincing evidence that any ofthe
following claims of U.S. Patent No. 5,938,624 are invalid as obvious?
YES [for VOLCANO] NO [for ST. JUDE]:
CLAIM 1:
CLAIM2:
CLAIM 10:
/
/
.,/
C.A. No. 1 0-631-RGA
Case 1:10-cv-00631-RGA-MPT Document 453 Filed 10/24/12 Page 5 of 8 PageID #: 14302
ST JUDE'S U.S. PATENT NO. 6,196,980
QUESTION NO. 5:
Do you find that Volcano has proven by clear and convincing evidence that any of the
following claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,196,980 are invalid as anticipated?
CLAIM 1:
CLAIM2:
CLAIM 10:
YES [for VOLCANO]
_L
v
7
C.A. No. 10-631-RGA
NO [for ST. JUDE]:
Case 1:10-cv-00631-RGA-MPT Document 453 Filed 10/24/12 Page 6 of 8 PageID #: 14303
ST JUDE'S U.S. PATENT NO. 6,196,980
QUESTION NO. 6:
Do you fmd that Volcano has proven by clear and convincing evidence that any of the
following claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,196,980 are invalid as obvious?
CLAIM 1:
CLAIM2:
CLAIM 10:
YES [for VOLCANO]
/
~
7
C.A. No. 1 0-631-RGA
NO [for ST. JUDE]:
Case 1:10-cv-00631-RGA-MPT Document 453 Filed 10/24/12 Page 7 of 8 PageID #: 14304
'
t
We, the jurors, by signing below, indicate our unanimous verdict.
C.A. No. 10-631-RGA
Case 1:10-cv-00631-RGA-MPT Document 453 Filed 10/24/12 Page 8 of 8 PageID #: 14305