• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
1

In the 2005 National Drug Threat Survey
(NDTS), 92 percent of law enforcement
agencies in Washington State ranked
methamphetamine (meth) as the greatest drug
threat in their area.1While domestic
methamphetamine production decreased
sharply in the last five years, compared to these
smaller labs, drug trafficking organizations
(DTO) are now playing a larger role in the
production and distribution of
methamphetamine. Officials estimate that 75
percent of the methamphetamine in Washington
State was imported in 2005, compared with 50
percent in 2001.2

In response to shifts in the methamphetamine
market, the 2006 Washington State Legislature
directed the Washington State Institute for Public
Policy to study\u2026

\u2026\u201ccriminal sentencing provisions of
neighboring states for all crimes involving
methamphetamine. The institute shall
report to the legislature on any criminal
sentencing increases necessary under
Washington law to reduce or remove any
incentives methamphetamine traffickers
and manufacturers may have to locate in
Washington.\u201d3

1 Northwest High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA)
Program. (June 2006). Threat assessment. Seattle:
Office of National Drug Control Policy, p. 15.
2 Associated Press. (2006, August 31). As meth labs
decrease, traffickers fill the void.
<http://www.komotv.com/news/archive/4187206.html>
3 E2SSB 6239, Chapter 339, \u00a7 304, Laws of 2006.

This report includes information from states in the
Pacific Northwest (Washington, Oregon, and
Idaho) and examines:

\u2022
trends in methamphetamine-related use
and crimes;
\u2022

changes in both federal and state laws
restricting the sale of pseudoephedrine
(PSE), a major precursor in the
manufacture of methamphetamine;

\u2022

efforts by law enforcement to reduce the
supply of methamphetamine from
smaller clandestine labs as well as
larger distribution networks importing
the drug; and

\u2022

state and federal sentencing laws for
methamphetamine possession,
manufacture, and distribution.

Washington State has been noted as a leader in
the effort to curb methamphetamine abuse.
According to the National Crime Prevention
Council, \u201cwhat sets Washington State apart is its
commitment to coalesce local, state, and federal
efforts to combat methamphetamine in a
comprehensive, statewide initiative.\u201d4
Information about activities in neighboring states
will help ensure that statewide and local
initiatives have the greatest influence on reducing
methamphetamine supply and distribution.

4 National Crime Prevention Council. (2002).Resp ond in g
to methamphetamine, Washington State\u2019s promising
example. Washington D.C., p. 3.

Washington State
Institute for
Public Policy

110 Fifth Avenue Southeast, Suite 214
\u2022
PO Box 40999
\u2022
Olympia, WA 98504-0999\u2022
(360) 586-2677
\u2022
www.wsipp.wa.gov
January 2007
METHAMPHETAMINE CRIMES:
WASHINGTON\u2019S LAWS COMPARED WITH NEIGHBORING STATES\u2014REVISED
Suggested citation: Burley, Mason. (2007).
Methamphetamine crimes: Washington\u2019s laws compared
with neighboring states. Olympia: Washington State
Institute for Public Policy, Document No. 07-01-1901.
2
METHAMPHETAMINE USE

Methamphetamine is a stimulant that can be
injected, smoked, snorted, or ingested. In the
smoked form, methamphetamine is also referred to
as \u201cice,\u201d \u201ccrystal,\u201d or \u201ccrank.\u201d Methamphetamine
production and use has been associated with a
range of criminal behaviors, particularly property
crimes and identity theft. In June 2006, the
National Association of Counties (NACo) surveyed
county sheriffs to assess how methamphetamine
impacted local law enforcement. Nearly half (48
percent) the sheriffs reported that at least 20
percent of arrests are related to methamphetamine
in their counties.5As trafficking of
methamphetamine increases, many law
enforcement officials report that crimes related to
methamphetamine use are growing more violent.6
In the same NACo survey, 48 percent of sheriffs
reported an increase in domestic violence and 41
percent reported an increase in simple assaults
\u201cbecause of the presence of methamphetamine.\u201d

Methamphetamine is both highly addictive and
costs little to produce. Throughout the 1990s
methamphetamine use grew steadily in the West
and Northwest. In 1990, the lifetime prevalence
of crystal methamphetamine use in the Western
states was 5.1 percent for young adults (ages 19
to 28). In other regions, lifetime use stood at
about 2 percent for this population. By 2005, the

lifetime prevalence for use of crystal
methamphetamine had grown to 7.9 percent
among young adults in the West.7
5 National Association of Counties. (2006, July 18).The
criminal effect of meth on communities \u2013 A 2006 survey
of U.S. counties. Washington D.C.
6 Washington State Attorney General\u2019s Office (November
2005). Operation: Allied against meth \u2013 Task Force 2005
Final Report. Olympia: Washington State Office of the
Attorney General, p. 43.
7 L.D. Johnston, P.M. O\u2019Malley, J.G. Bachman, & J.E.
Schulenberg. (2006). Monitoring the future national
survey results on drug use, 1975\u20132005: Volume II,
College students and adults ages 19\u201345 (NIH Publication
No. 06-5884). Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug
Abuse.

The most reliable estimate of recent
methamphetamine use in the overall population
comes from the National Survey on Drug Use
and Health (NSDUH). As a result of changes in
this survey, annual statistics for
methamphetamine use prior to 2002 cannot be
compared to recent data. Since 2002, however,
there are indications that the overall use of
methamphetamine may be stabilizing. Exhibit 1
shows that between 1.5 and 1.7 percent of adults
between the ages of 18 and 25 reported using

methamphetamine in the past year. This age

group represents 30 to 40 percent of all
methamphetamine users. Among all persons
(age 12 and older), 0.5 to 0.7 percent of the
population reported methamphetamine use in the

last year.
Exhibit 1

Percentage of Total Population Reporting
Methamphetamine Use in the Past Year:
National Survey of Drug Use and Health
2002 \u2013 2005

Age
2002
2003
2004
2005
18-25
1.7%
1.5%
1.6%
1.6%
12 and older
0.7%
0.6%
0.6%
0.5%

Source: National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)
Series <http://webapp.icpsr.umich.edu/cocoon/SAMHDA-
SERIES/00064.xml?token=1>

States with the highest rates of
methamphetamine use are displayed in Exhibit 2.
To compare state data from the NSDUH, multiple
years must be grouped together to adjust for
lower overall responses in each state. As Exhibit
2 shows, western and mid-western states make
up the vast majority of states with the highest
incidence of methamphetamine use.

3
Exhibit 2

Percentages of Persons Reporting Past Year
Methamphetamine Use, by States with Highest
Use: 2002, 2003, 2004, and 2005

State
Age 18 \u2013 25
Age 12
and Older
Nevada
3.81
2.02
Wyoming
4.58
1.47
Montana
3.08
1.47
Oregon
3.62
1.24
Idaho
3.24
1.24
Nebraska
2.80
1.24
Arkansas
4.41
1.23
Arizona
2.26
1.22
New Mexico
2.96
1.16
North Dakota
2.54
1.13
California
2.48
1.13
South Dakota
2.91
1.12
Hawaii
2.13
1.09
Colorado
2.70
1.07
Iowa
2.14
1.07
Washington
3.00
1.03
Utah
1.77
0.94
Kansas
1.75
0.92
Missouri
2.81
0.91
Oklahoma
3.68
0.89
Minnesota
3.84
0.88
Alabama
2.82
0.84
Mississippi
1.93
0.83
Alaska
2.29
0.64
West Virginia
2.09
0.52
Source: Office of Applied Studies (OAS), SAMHSA.
(2006, September 27). State estimates of past year
methamphetamine use. <http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/
2k6/stateMeth/stateMeth.htm>
TREATMENT DATA

National treatment data from the Treatment
Episode Data Set (TEDS) show an overall
nationwide increase in the number of treatment
admissions (to facilities licensed by state
substance abuse agencies) for methamphetamine.
In 1995, methamphetamine was the primary drug
in 3.7 percent of all publicly funded treatment
admissions. By 2004, methamphetamine
treatment represented 8.2 percent of all publicly
funded treatment admissions.8

8United States Department of Health and Human
Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration. (September 2006). Treatment episode
data set (TEDS): 1994-2004. (DASIS Series S-33, DHHS
Publication No. (SMA) 06-4180).

National data on treatment for methamphetamine
do not tell the entire story, however. In 2005,
more than one-third of treatment admissions
were related to methamphetamine usage in four
states (Hawaii, Nevada, Idaho, and California).
Among many western and mid-western states,
methamphetamine cases accounted for more
than 15 percent of treatment admissions. Exhibit
3 illustrates the regional differences in
methamphetamine treatment from 1995 to 2005.
For the years examined, methamphetamine use
(for all adults and young adults) in Washington
State was lower than many other states in the
western U.S.

RESTRICTIONS ON SALE OF PSEUDOEPHEDRINE
PRECURSORS

The most common ingredient in methamphetamine
is pseudoephedrine or ephedrine, usually found in
cold medicine. Pseudoephedrine is chemically
changed to methamphetamine using household
ingredients such as ether, paint thinner, acetone,
anhydrous ammonia, iodine crystals, red
phosphorus, drain cleaner, battery acid, and
lithium. The process to create methamphetamine
is fairly simple, but highly dangerous and toxic. For
every pound of methamphetamine created, five to
six pounds of toxic byproducts are generated.

Since January 2005, 42 states have enacted
restrictions on the retail sale of ephedrine and
pseudoephedrine products. These restrictions
generally fall into the following categories:

\u2022
Display of products for sale.
\u2022

Who can sell and purchase products,
along with requirements for logging
transactions.

\u2022
Quantity of product that can be sold within a
certain timeframe.
\u2022
Packaging.9
9 National Alliance for Model State Drug Laws
(NAMSDL). (2006, September 13). Restrictions on over
the counter sales/purchases of products containing
pseudoephedrine. Alexandria, VA: NAMSDL.
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...