Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
5Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Michelle Malkin

Michelle Malkin

Ratings: (0)|Views: 158|Likes:
Published by Timothy

More info:

Published by: Timothy on Jan 24, 2009
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

06/27/2014

pdf

text

original

 
 
Michelle Malkin 
 
Michelle Malkin is a Filipino Neo Con who is trying to justify Japanese Americans filled insideconcentration camps during World War II in her recent book “In Defense of Internment.” It’s timeslike these that the love of liberty should ascend into a higher level.
For the record, tons ofFilipino Americans and others of other ethnic groups are Patriots. So, I want to make thatperfectly clear. She’s a nationally known journalist and a FOX News contributor whoresides in Maryland.
Although her earlier book called “Invasion” indeed rightfully outlined theimmigration problems that continue to sustain itself inside America. Michelle is totally wrong oncivil liberties and the racial profiling of individuals. Her simple arguments to promote theinternment of Japanese human beings are that there was a Japanese threat on the West Coast[proven by top secret “MAGIC messages”], and other ethnic groups were inside the Americanconcentration camps like Europeans (like Germans and the Italians) during WWII. Also, MichelleMalkin further contends that many were allowed to leave and hundreds voluntarily moved intointernment camps.
Reason Magazine wrote that many of the men who proposed
 
 
or implemented the internment camps during WWII didn't know about theMAGIC cables (and the vast majority of Japanese people weren't involvedwith spying at all). Many of the Japanese citizens didn't have a trial at all,but were kidnapped into concentration camps. In her book, she wants noMuslims to be in the military to have combat roles in the Middle East(including the establishment of internment camps today for certain people).This generalization of Muslim Americans is inappropriate to say the least.You couldn't make up this stuff
.
Racial profiling as a necessity to be advanced is hermotto. Michelle makes mention that the $16.5 billion federal bipartisan federal reparations law forJapanese internees and evacuees was a disaster. My rebuttals to these immoral comments byMalkin are easy and sweeping. Even if there were a Japanese espionage threat; the procedure torespond ought to be investigations of those accused with due process.There is absolutely no need for the basic allowance of 112,000 people into select concentrationcamps at all. That action lead by the U.S. government was highly an overreaction. Internmentcamps, regardless if other ethnic groups were allowed in (FDR indeed sent German, Italians,Hungarians, Romanians, and Bulgarians into concentration camps), are still wrong. It’s wrongbecause those Japanese people are innocent and were not convicted of guilt under a court of law.After the war, Japanese and German Americans lost their jobs, had to sell their property, and hadto rebuild their lives all over again.Surprisingly, Michelle loves the Democratic, FDR Gestapo policies. What Malkin failed to point outis that FDR knew of the Pearl Harbor attack and did nothing to avert it. (
She should read MarkEverson Willer’s book entitled, “Pearl Harbor: The Mother of All Conspiracies” whichproves it 100%
). The criminal FDR devised the Office of Censorship, conscription of 10 millionmen, food rationizing, and allowed civilian bombings. What a pity that a woman so intelligent likeMichelle Malkin could be so hoodwinked. Racial profiling is a concept that I’ve always opposedsince you judge a criminal by just cause and by the content of someone’s character [and actions]not by the color of one’s skin, creed, or race. The ante-9/11 world would give us more inspirationto boost our civil liberties and rights. To degrade our rights is futile for real. Evil terrorism can be
 
 
done by people not of Arab descent also. In actuality, this terrorism war is fake (since al-Qaeda iaCIA/ISI invention) and the Bush government years ago have acted as real terrorists (with depleteduranium exploding in Iraq, the torture of detainees, and the violations of our civil liberties).The Elite created al-Qaeda in the 1980’s and funded Saddam Hussein since 1959 (via the CIA).Since the late 1970’s, Zbigniew Brzezinski and other Western elites funded the muhajedeen inorder to get the Soviets out of Afghanistan.
Osama bin Laden was one of the muhajedeenmembers who later formed al-Qaeda out of his MAK organization in the 1980’s. To protectourselves by watching our borders is fine, but anti-civil liberty measures decreasefreedoms instead of making us safe
. The justification for that is suppressing rights can lead thegovernment to have a higher risk to bring fascism unto the people. Remember that a police stateand terror go hand and hand. The financial money used is debatable, but to not send reparationsto the Japanese victims is out of the question. Reparations for Japanese people who sufferedWWII internment camps is totally justified, because compensation for bad treatment towardoppressed people are moral, biblical, and just. J. Edgar Hoover and Earl Warren just were one ofthe many architects of the internment camp system for the Japanese Americans.
This was apretext for the government in this new millennium to develop FEMA camps to housedissenters in this fake war on terrorism. Author and diplomat Peter Dale Scott exposedhow the government created Operation ENDGAME.
That was a Homeland Security plan toremove anyone deemed “illegal aliens” and “potential terrorists.” Also, Kellogg, Brown and Roothad been award a $385 million contract by Homeland Security to construct detention andprocessing facilities in the event of a national emergency. This is shocking, but true.
She evenlied and say that a Marine didn't kill a dog in Iraq. Malkin claim that no Marine threw a dogover a cliff. Yet, later it was discovered that the Marine admitted that he threw the puppyover the cliff and killed it
.
Lance Corporal David Motari is the name of the Marine whodid it as it was caught on tape.

Activity (5)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads
Timothy liked this
Timothy liked this
Timothy liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->