Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
12-11-05 Zernik v Fischer (7650-12) – Petition to compel Stanley Fischer, Governor of the Bank of Israel to perform his duties - Re-filing of Process

12-11-05 Zernik v Fischer (7650-12) – Petition to compel Stanley Fischer, Governor of the Bank of Israel to perform his duties - Re-filing of Process

Ratings: (0)|Views: 19 |Likes:
In Zernik v Fischer (7650-12), petition to compel Stanley Fischer, Governor of the Bank of Israel to perform his duties, Petitioner Zernik alleges that through unconditional submission to FATCA, Stanley Fischer replaced his loyalty to the State of Israel and its laws with loyalty to another nation and its laws, or loyalty to financial institutions and their interests.
In filing the original commencing record in this case, on October 23, 2012, Division Head in the Office of the Clerk stamped the paper "RECEIVED", but refused to sign the stamp in the designated place. The filing of the commencing paper later failed to be noted in the online public access system of the Court.
In re-filing of process on November 5, 2012, Division Head in the Office of the Clerk stamped the paper "RECEIVED", and signed the stamp in the designated place. (see page 1 of the Hebrew record) The re-filing of the commencing paper was later falsely noted in the online public access system of the Court as "filing of an appeal process".
In Zernik v Fischer (7650-12), petition to compel Stanley Fischer, Governor of the Bank of Israel to perform his duties, Petitioner Zernik alleges that through unconditional submission to FATCA, Stanley Fischer replaced his loyalty to the State of Israel and its laws with loyalty to another nation and its laws, or loyalty to financial institutions and their interests.
In filing the original commencing record in this case, on October 23, 2012, Division Head in the Office of the Clerk stamped the paper "RECEIVED", but refused to sign the stamp in the designated place. The filing of the commencing paper later failed to be noted in the online public access system of the Court.
In re-filing of process on November 5, 2012, Division Head in the Office of the Clerk stamped the paper "RECEIVED", and signed the stamp in the designated place. (see page 1 of the Hebrew record) The re-filing of the commencing paper was later falsely noted in the online public access system of the Court as "filing of an appeal process".

More info:

Categories:Business/Law, Finance
Published by: SELA - Human Rights Alert - Israel on Nov 07, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/13/2014

pdf

text

original

 
1/2 
Human Rights Alert (NGO)
Joseph Zernik, PhD
 
"
 
PO Box 31440, Jerusalem 91313, Israel;
 
 josephzernik@humanrightsalertngo.org
;
91313
 
"3144
 
12-11-05
Zernik v Fischer (7650-12) – Petition to compel Stanley Fischer,Governor of the Bank of Israel to perform his duties - Re-filing ofProcess
In Zernik v Fischer (7650-12), petition to compel Stanley Fischer, Governor of the Bank of Israel to perform his duties, Petitioner Zernik alleges that through unconditional submission to FATCA,Stanley Fischer replaced his loyalty to the State of Israel and its laws with loyalty to another nation and its laws, or loyalty to financial institutions and their interests.In filing the original commencing record in this case, on October 23, 2012, Division Head in the Office of the Clerk stamped the paper "RECEIVED", but refused to sign the stamp in the designated place. The filing of the commencing paper later failed to be noted in the online public access system of the Court.In re-filing of process on November 5, 2012, Division Head in the Office of the Clerk stamped the paper "RECEIVED", and signed the stamp in the designated place. (see page 1 of the Hebrew record) The re-filing of the commencing paper was later falsely noted in the online public access system of the Court as "filing of an appeal process".
# Record Page #1
12-11-05 Zernik v Fischer (7650-12) – Re-filing of Process [English translation - jz]
22
12-11-05 Zernik v Fischer (7650-12) – Re-filing of Process [Hebrew original]
3LINKS:
[1]
 
12-11-04 FATCA, Stanley Fischer in the High Court of Justice of the State of Israelhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/112124727/  
 
2/2 
Excerpts from the November 5, 2012 Re-filing of Process:Notes
:1. The hand-notations (in cursive font below) on the face page of the paper, were added duringthe filing process, pursuant to explicit instructions of Attorney Ben Tovim, UnrepresentedParties Division in the Office of the Clerk.2. The text, starting "
II.
 
Petition for a Conditional Decree
"- on page 1, is identical to thetext in the original filing
[1],
except for pages 12-13 of the Hebrew document, relative to theAffidavit and its acknowledgement by a licensed attorney.
LINKS:
[1] 12-10-23
Dr Joseph Zernik v Governor of the Bank of Israel Stanley Fischer (7650/12)
Petition in theHigh Court of Justice of the State of Israel
 
http://www.scribd.com/doc/110868553/ 
 
Corrected court record, jz
In the Supreme Court in Jerusalem, Sitting as the High Court of JusticeBagatz 7650/12
Dr Joseph Zernik, Peitioner v Governor of the Bank of Israel Stanley Fischer, Respondent
Request for Correction of court record, jz
Petition for a Conditional Decree – Re-filing
I.
 
Petition for a Conditional Decree – Repeat filing
The Petitioner herein again files for registration the Petition record. The Petitioner, who is not anattorney, discovered a material defect in the original filing – regarding the Affidavit. That matteris corrected in instant repeat filing. Therefore, the Petitioner asks that the Court rescind theregistration of the entry into registration of the Petition, filed on October 23, 2012, if entered intoregistration at all, and enter into registration instant record as the commencing paper in instantprocess. The Petitioner also hopes that adequate notations would appear both under "Events"and under "Requests", relative to the entry of instant record as the commencing paper in thisprocess.
II.
 
Petition for a Conditional Decree
 
The Supreme Court
Unrepresented PartiesDivision
 November 5, 2012
EXAMINED/RECEIVED
[hand signature of Ben Tovim-jz]
Signature:__________ 

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->