Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................................. 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 2 2.0 GENERAL ................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Other Ongoing Projects ................................................................................................. 2 2.2 Streetcar Vehicle ........................................................................................................... 2 2.3 Alignment Geometry ..................................................................................................... 5 2.4 Design Speeds................................................................................................................ 6 3.0 STREETCAR STOPS ...................................................................................................... 7 4.0 CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSUMPTIONS ............................................................................ 8 4.1 Cross Slope and Roadway Reconstruction .................................................................... 8 4.2 Lane Width .................................................................................................................... 9 4.3 Track Structure/Pavement Reconstruction ................................................................... 9 4.4 Special Trackwork ........................................................................................................11 4.5 Drainage ......................................................................................................................11 4.6 ADA Accessibility/Upgrades ........................................................................................11 4.7 Bicycle Facilities ...........................................................................................................11 5.0 SYSTEMS ENGINEERING ASSUMPTIONS .................................................................... 12 5.1 Traction Power Supply System Requirements ............................................................12 5.2 OCS Infrastructure .......................................................................................................14 5.3 Streetcar Operational Control .....................................................................................15 5.4 Additional Systems Engineering Considerations .........................................................16 6.0 STREET LIGHTING ..................................................................................................... 16 7.0 UTILITIES ................................................................................................................. 17 7.1 Conflicts & Relocation Assumptions............................................................................17 7.2 Areas of Importance ....................................................................................................17 8.0 TRAFFIC ................................................................................................................... 17 8.1 Traffic Operations ........................................................................................................18 8.2 Traffic Signals...............................................................................................................18 8.3 Pavement Markings & Signage ....................................................................................19 9.0 STRUCTURAL............................................................................................................ 19 10.0 SURVEY ................................................................................................................... 19 10.1 Survey Control ...........................................................................................................19 10.2 Base Mapping ............................................................................................................19 10.3 Utility Field Mapping .................................................................................................19 10.4 Geotechnical Boring Locations ..................................................................................20 11.0 MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY ................................................................... 20
1.0
This report documents the proposed Basis of Design for conceptual and preliminary engineering of the Crystal City Streetcar. Presented herein are basic design parameters and assumptions that will form the basis of the civil, track, systems, structural, and utility engineering design effort. The objective is to deliver a preliminary engineering package consistent with Arlington County standards and within the established project goals and budget. The criteria herein are presented in an abbreviated form for higher level decision making. It is important that the assumptions stated in this document be reviewed and concurrence obtained to avoid miscommunication; an early consensus is also important to avoid impacts to the project design cost and schedule. This Basis of Design has been developed using information received from the County, from URSs experience with streetcar projects in urban environments similar to those found in the project area, other similar projects in the area (such as the Crystal City Potomac Yard Transitway, Columbia Pike Streetcar, and streetcar projects in the District of Columbia), and using guidelines such as WMATAs Tram/LRT Guideline Design Criteria. This is intended to be a living document upon entering advanced engineering efforts, the Basis of Design should be developed further and reevaluated to ensure that it remains consistent with the project goals and the Countys desires.
2.0
2.1 Other Ongoing Projects
There are other planned future projects that may impact the Crystal City Streetcar. It is important to consider these projects when developing conceptual designs or evaluating alternatives, as they could impact the feasibility and/or cost of this project. Provided below is a list of known projects in the vicinity of the Crystal City Streetcar. Coordination with these projects will be required during future phases of project development. Crystal City Potomac Yard (CCPY) Transitway Potomac Yard developments Columbia Pike Streetcar Pentagon City development between S. Eads St. and S. Fern St. Crystal City street improvements (including Crystal Drive, and reconstruction of Clark and Bell Streets) Future redevelopment in Crystal City
Assumed values for critical vehicle dimensions are shown in the table below. These values are based on characteristics of streetcar vehicles that are currently available for procurement in North America. Table 2.1 Assumed Ranges of Critical Specifications Desirable Max -
Min 82 feet (25m) mainline; 66 ft (20m) yard/storage track 66 feet 50% 1 mile 500 VDC
Vehicle Width Vehicle Length Boarding Height Percent Low Floor Wireless Operating Range Vehicle Weight (at crush load AW41) Axle Loading (at crush load) Consists Acceleration Braking Grade (sustained) Grade (< 1/4mile) OCS Voltage
1
8.0 feet (typical streetcar) 14 inches 2 miles 1-car only 3 mph/sec 3 mph/sec 750 VDC nominal
8.7 feet (Std. LRV) 82 feet 100% 141,200 Pounds (25m vehicle) 25,700 Pounds (25m vehicle) 6% 7% 925 VDC
AW4 represents the weight of the empty car plus the weight of the full capacity passenger load.
The vehicle will be capable of drawing power from conventional overhead contact wire similar to those commonly found on light rail or modern streetcar systems. Supplemental means of propulsion through on-board power storage may be identified, but they are not essential. Information on dynamic vehicle envelopes will be assumed using conservative values until the time a specific vehicle is selected. This assumption anticipates the largest envelope that would be expected from readily available streetcar vehicles present in the U.S. market and any selection that deviated from this envelope would require less space. The following values will be used for preliminary engineering design: Curve radius 200 feet: 6.0 foot minimum offset from centerline Curve radius > 200 feet: 5.5 foot minimum offset from centerline The vehicle loading criteria was determined based on a range of values from typical modern streetcar vehicle specifications. Where applicable, the design shall consider loading conditions from both a two-truck 20-meter streetcar vehicle (such as the United Streetcar vehicle or the DRAFT Conceptual Engineering Basis of Design URS Corporation
Kinkisharyo Ameritram) and three-truck 25-meter streetcar vehicle (Siemens S70 or Kinkisharyo LRV). These conditions are shown in the figures below.
The geometry will incorporate desired operational features of the streetcar and its interface with automobile traffic. These include the following: Offsetting the streetcar alignment within shared lanes so that automobile drivers can avoid driving directly on the rails. Developing the track profile in order to minimize impacts to the existing roadway pavement.
3.0
The proposed stops for the Project will be designed to accommodate a typical modern streetcar vehicle which measures from 66 to 82 feet in length. An example of a typical stop layout is shown below.
10
(Optional bypass sidewalk shown) Figure 3-1 Typical Stop Layout The Crystal City Streetcar Project will incorporate two types of stops: those that are modified from the CCPY Transitway and those that will be newly constructed for streetcar use. Passenger amenities that are found with the Transitway stops will also be included with the new streetcar stops. It is assumed that the modifications required to the Transitway stops will be limited to structural improvements that will allow streetcar vehicles and buses to use the platforms while maintaining compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Typical streetcar stop design parameters and assumed amenities for each stop are reflected below: Track Grade through Platform: The track grade will meet the existing roadway or transitway grades; desirable longitudinal grades should be less than 2%. The platform grades will be in accordance with ADA guidelines. Stop Length: Streetcar stops will be approximately 75-90 feet long with a 60-foot long platform that is long enough to permit boarding from all doors on the vehicle. At some locations, existing conditions and right of way constraints may preclude the extension of streetcar stops beyond the length of a single car. Vehicle-Platform Interface: Bridge plates will be required for the streetcar vehicles in order to serve the stops that will accommodate both buses and streetcars. In order to provide ADA-compliant accessibility, accounting for the 14 inch boarding height of the streetcar vehicle (above top of rail) and the 10 inch height of the stop platform, the streetcar must be fitted with bridge plates. Stops located on the left side of the vehicle could be designed with a 14 inch height for level boarding without bridge plates, since those would be specifically for streetcar use and not shared with buses. DRAFT Conceptual Engineering Basis of Design URS Corporation
Track Alignment: Where possible, the track alignment should be tangent horizontally and vertically through the streetcar stop platform and for approximately 40 feet from either end of the designated boarding areas. When bridge plates are used, wider gaps between the vehicle and platform are acceptable because the bridge plate provides ADA-compliant access to the vehicle. Of the CCPY Transitway stops that are intended to be reused for the Crystal City Streetcar Project, only the stop at 23rd Street and Crystal Drive is on a curve (with radius greater than 21,000 ft); all other Transitway stops are on tangent. Width of Stop: The desirable stop platform width should be 12 feet or a minimum of 10 feet. Transitway stops that are along Crystal Drive will be constructed as a shared platform and through sidewalk. Platform Height: Typical curb height at the platform edge is approximately 10 inches to allow boarding of buses and streetcars at the same stop. Ingress and egress from the streetcar vehicle will therefore include bridge plates for ADA accessibility. In order to have level boarding for streetcars, provisions to accommodate shared use of stops by streetcars and buses would need to be made to ensure that there are no conflicts. Detailed evaluation of platform and vehicle (streetcar and bus) interfaces will be required in final design to address accessibility. ADA Access: Grades must be considered at all platform locations. Where the stop is to be integrated with the sidewalk, no steps may be used along the pedestrian route. New streetcar stops will have passenger amenities consistent with the CCPY Transitway stops. These are assumed to include lighting, shelters, benches, and identification signage, transit information, and trash receptacles, at a minimum. Other amenities, if any, will be determined as the design is developed further.
4.0
Significant project savings can be realized by minimizing unnecessary reconstruction and civil engineering improvements. It is assumed that a simple cost effective approach will be taken for the Crystal City Streetcar. The following sections describe some of the common features that have been used to deliver similar types of street-running transit systems around the country. These assumptions will serve as the basis of design.
Figure 4-1 Potential Cross Slope Table 4.1 Proposed Roadway Design Parameters Location on Cross Slope Desirable Maximum A (grade change) B (cross slope) C (cross slope) D (cross slope) E (cross slope) F (curb exposure) 3% +2% 2-4% 0% - 4-6% 6 inches 5% (2-3% at cross streets) +5% 4.5% 1-2% -7% 10 inches (at stops)
Most modern light rail and streetcar systems that include shared lanes have been constructed using embedded girder rail in a concrete track slab. The girder rail has a flangeway integrated with the rail head, which allows for a consistent flangeway that is suitable for mixed traffic applications. However, girder rail is only produced in Europe, and it will not satisfy Buy America requirements for projects that receive federal funding. Alternative rail sections produced in the United States can be used for embedded track, including traditional tee rail (e.g. 115 RE), which has been installed in several locations, or a 112 lb block rail section that has only recently started to be rolled domestically and has been installed in limited quantities in the U.S. and Europe. Figures 4-2, 4-3, and 4-4 show typical track slab designs for embedded track using girder, tee, and block rail sections.
Figure 4-3 Typical Embedded Tee Rail Track Structure (115 RE Rail Shown with Elastomeric Snap-on Flangeway)
10
Crystal City Streetcar Project Figure 4-4 Typical Unreinforced Embedded Block Rail Track Structure
4.5 Drainage
Existing drainage patterns will be maintained throughout the project wherever possible. Trackwork drainage will require the addition of inlets at the low point of sag vertical curves and near special trackwork switches. To address potential existing drainage concerns, minimum longitudinal curb grades will be maintained or introduced within the reconstruction area to the extent feasible. Drainage area maps for the Crystal City Streetcar Project area will be developed using a combination of survey, aerial photography, field observation, and GIS data. The existing drainage will be evaluated to determine if adjustments to existing inlets or the addition of new inlets is required. Arlington County and Virginia Department of Transportation methods and standards will be used for drainage analysis. Because the Crystal City Streetcar will be constructed in developed areas, it is expected that no additional stormwater management (i.e., BMPs) will be required.
11
racks or lockers. Bicycle facilities included as part of this project will be designed in accordance with County standards.
5.0
General systems requirements typical of a streetcar system similar to the proposed project are listed below. The systems elements that will be required and discussed are: Traction Power Supply System (TPSS) Requirements Overhead Contact System (OCS) Infrastructure Streetcar Operational Control
12
additional fire safety and drainage issues to be resolved. The power control equipment layout would likely require a unique, site specific design, which would be more costly and require additional installation, site testing and commissioning work tasks. Because of these reasons, underground substations are generally not recommended. For the purpose of this effort, it is assumed that all substations will be above ground, prefabricated units with architectural treatment and/or landscaping. Future vehicle technologies may allow for partial operation of the streetcar using on-board stored power. The conceptual design for the Crystal City Streetcar currently assumes that conventional overhead trolley wire will be the power source throughout the project, and wireless technologies may be considered at some point in the future.
13
14
In order to prevent premature failures of transit system facilities, utilities, and other underground structures, measures to address soil corrosion, stray current corrosion, and atmospheric corrosion will be included in the project design criteria.
5.3.3 Communications
Communications for the streetcar system are intended to be similar to other modern streetcar systems currently in operation in the United States. Dispatching of the streetcar vehicles will be accomplished via conventional radio equipment, similar to a transit bus. Automatic Vehicle Location is intended to be provided as well. At traction power substation locations, a limited Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system will be provided to monitor operations and detect problems within the unit. It is assumed that communication with the streetcar operation center will be via two-way radio or phone line.
15
The fare structure for the streetcar system has not been defined for this project, and a means for collection of fares has not been determined. Provisions must be made to allow for the following fare collection system methods: On-board On platform ticket vending Fare-less operation Contactless fare collection system
6.0
In future stages of design, a detailed inventory of the horizontal and vertical position of each light fixture will be needed to evaluate the position of the fixture relative to the proposed trolley wire. The main concern is providing safe maintenance access to change the bulb of the light fixture in proximity to the high voltage overhead trolley wire. There are Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulated clearance requirements that apply to minimum clearances and will vary depending upon if the maintenance crew is OSHA qualified or not. For the purpose of this Project, it is assumed that OSHA qualified crews will be maintaining the lights, which requires a minimum clearance of three feet, eight inches from the trolley wire to the luminaires on the pole mast arms. If non-qualified personnel are maintaining the lights, a minimum clearance of ten feet is required. Further discussion with Arlington County, VDOT, and Dominion Virginia Power will be required to establish guidelines acceptable to all parties.
16
7.0
The approach to utility relocation is an extremely important design element to establish guidelines as early as possible during the project development phase. Utilities are an area in which every locality has unique guidelines based on the policies of a particular utility owner or agency. Existing Utility Composite Drawings will be prepared for the conceptual design submittal using record drawings, utility maps and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) data obtained from Arlington County and the utility companies. In areas where more detailed utility information is critical for the conceptual engineering design or development of cost estimates, subsurface utility engineering (SUE) will be performed. The final designer for the streetcar should verify and obtain accurate horizontal and vertical information for all existing utilities using SUE methods as required.
8.0
The implementation of streetcar service within existing streets in Arlington County will require evaluation and likely adjustments to traffic operations and traffic signals. Many factors will need to be considered during the design. A brief discussion of typical traffic-related design issues that should be considered for this type of project are described in the following sections.
17
18
9.0
Assumptions for structures that may be affected by the streetcar will be described in a separate report.
10.0
10.1 Survey Control
The basis of survey control for this project is the Virginia State Plane, North Zone (1983). Existing Arlington County control stations will be used to establish survey control. Should any supplemental survey be required, additional control points will be created.
obtained in critical areas along the corridor to supplement the mapping created from data records.
11.0
The maintenance and storage facility requirements for the Crystal City Streetcar Project will be coordinated with the Columbia Pike Streetcar Project. Potential sites and functional requirements for the maintenance and storage facility (or facilities) will be identified and documented in a separate report.
20