• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
 
MD591SM7
Page 1
Participants' Questionnaires — Release 1 Train-the-Trainer — February 2
Note: This is a complex spreadsheet. To display properly, export file to its native format.
Instructor name:
Jenny Green
Resource persons: Module1:
Pete Pink
Module2:
Pete Pink
Total of Respondents:
4Participant 1Participant 2Participant 3Participant 4
Average
Course Content
1. Course objectives clearly stated at beginning of course.991010
9.50 
2. Course materials were easy to read.991010
9.50 
3. Course content was easy to relate to.891010
9.25 
4. Participant adequately prepared to take course.991010
9.50 
5. There was enough time to complete each workshop.991010
9.50 
6. Course content covered the objectives of the course.991010
9.50 
7. Training materials supported course objectives.10101010
10.00 
Total: 9.009.1410.0010.00
9.54
Course Facilities
8. Training location provided all facilities participant required.10101010
10.00 
9. Classroom equipment in good working order10101010
10.00 
10. Classroom was a suitable environment for learning.10101010
10.00 
11. Training facilities adequate for instruction purposes.10101010
10.00 
Total: 10.0010.0010.0010.00
10.00 
Instructor 
12. Instructor was punctual.10101010
10.00 
13. Instructor was knowledgeable.891010
9.25 
14. Instructor clear in presentation of course material.991010
9.50 
15. Instructor was organized.991010
9.50 
16. Instructor kept participants motivated.991010
9.50 
17. Instructor provided useful feedback.8999
8.75 
18. Instructor followed-up on unanswered questions.991010
9.50 
19. Instructor provided summary of major points covered.9101010
9.75 
Total: 8.889.259.889.88
9.47 
Resource Team / Subject Matter Experts
20. SMEs were able to answer questions.991010
9.50 
21. SMEs followed-up on unanswered questions.991010
9.50 
22. SMEs were a valuable asset to the course.991010
9.50 
Total: 9.009.0010.0010.00
9.50 
Overall Training Experience
23. Level to which part. felt course obj. had been achieved.991010
9.50 
24a. Level of understanding of the methodology.991010
9.50 
24b. Level of understanding of Participant Guide components.99109
9.25 
24c. Level of understanding of Instructor Guide components.99109
9.25 
24d. Level of understanding of Learning/Instructional tools.9999
9.00 
24e. Level of understanding of Assigned Course Content.99109
9.25 
Question 24 Total:
99109
9
25. Did participant feel provided with adequate tools?yesyesyesyes
Total Course Score, Q1-Q22:
9.59
Participant Questionnaire Statistics — Release 1 Train-the-Trainer — February 2
Questions
  ____________________________ 
Note:
Blank in table means that respondent did not answer the question.
 
MD591SM7
Page 2
Stnd. Deviation Median0.58 
9.50 
0.58 
9.50 
0.96 
9.50 
0.58 
9.50 
0.58 
9.50 
0.58 
9.50 
0.00 
10.00 
0.58 
9.57 
0.00 
10.00 
0.00 
10.00 
0.00 
10.00 
0.00 
10.00 
0.00 
10.00 
0.00 
10.00 
0.96 
9.50 
0.58 
9.50 
0.58 
9.50 
0.58 
9.50 
0.50 
9.00 
0.58 
9.50 
0.50 
10.00 
0.62 
9.56 
0.58 
9.50 
0.58 
9.50 
0.58 
9.50 
0.52 
9.50 
0.58 
9.50 
0.58 
9.50 
0.50 
9.00 
0.50 
9.00 
0.00 
9.00 
0.50 
9.00 
0 
9
0.56 10.00 
Frequency Bin
 
MD591SM7
Page 3
SME Team9.50Instructor9.47Facilities10.00Content9.54Total Score Average9.59Total Score Deviation0.564
Median
Content9.57Facilities10.00
Question 23, Training Effectiveness Score, Response Frequency
Instructor9.5610%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%RRP9.500000000002
Standard Deviation
Content0.58Facilities0.00Instructor0.62RRP0.52
Level of Understanding 
Q. 24 Average
9Course Content9.25Tools9.00Instructor Guide9.25Participant Guide9.25Methodology9.50
Background Information
1. Job titles:2. How many years has the participant been employed in this position?
Summation:
less than 121-324-67-93. How did the participant rate his/her level of computer literacy?
Summation:
4ExcellentGoodAverage2AdequatePoor 
Population
 
#Respondents
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...