Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Iso 17025 Question

Iso 17025 Question

Ratings: (0)|Views: 1 |Likes:
Published by tkh9535241

More info:

Published by: tkh9535241 on Nov 09, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





Questions for Laboratories to be Accredited
Dr. Muayad Koji Talal Khalid HassanPresident of KSQCA QC & QM Expert
These questions are designed 
to assist testing and calibration laboratories set up a quality managementsystem that conforms to (ISO 17025:2005), the international standard for laboratory quality management systems. Compliance with this standard provides a globally accepted base for laboratory accreditation. The standard specifies the management and technical requirements to be met by testing and calibration laboratories in both their organization and their management of quality.
 Answering these
questions will
enable laboratories to identify where their current operations meet therequirements of ISO 17025 as well as the areas where they do not. It will also guide them in developsystems capable of achieving compliance. These questions are put in the a way to cover mostrequirements of ISO 17025 and classified them to categories that makes compliance easier to achieve:
1. The quality system and its components:
The work was done by a properly qualified person who had been trained in the relevanttechnical operations and had access to all information necessary to the proper execution of thework?
The method used was technically sound and appropriate to the sample and to the requirementsof the client?
The equipment used was properly maintained and calibrated at the time the data wasgenerated?
All appropriate quality control checks were carried out and the results of such controls fell withinthe specifications? With respect to your management and organization.
Are there clearly assigned responsibilities for management of quality?
Are procedures in place specifically designed to ensure quality is maintained?
Are these procedures documented?
Do you have a mechanism for approval of this documentation and for ensuring that all copiesissued are kept up to date?
Do you monitor the arrangements for managing quality to ensure they are fully implementedand being followed by all?
Where quality problems occur do you have a mechanism for taking corrective action which seeksto develop the quality system so that a recurrence of the problem is unlikely?
Do you have a mechanism for identifying potential quality problems and taking action to preventthem materializing?
Do you have a mechanism for identifying opportunities to improve the effectiveness of yourquality system?
2. Monitoring and maintenance of the quality system:
Do you have a mechanism for checking that your arrangements for quality management arebeing operated on a day-to-day basis by all staff? 
Where this is found not to be the case, do you have a mechanism for taking corrective action toensure that the situation is remedied and not likely to recur? 
Do you use the information from any quality problem to enable you to identify where thequality system can be improved and do you act on this? 
Do you have mechanisms to monitor trends in quality performance so that failures can beanticipated and dealt with before they become critical? 
Do you have mechanisms in place to scrutinize the quality system for areas where improvementsmight be possible? 
Do you review the performance of your quality system to determine whether it is delivering theobjectives which you have identified for it? 
Do you have a record of the qualifications and experience of your staff, with objective evidence of their qualifications, for example copies of certificates? 
Do you have a clear record with regard to your proposed scope of accreditation of whichmembers of staff are authorized to conduct each test or calibration? 
Do you have a documented procedure for training staff in quality issues and technical procedures,including tests? 
Do you have a documented procedure for conducting evaluation of the competence of staff after training and before authorizing them for the procedure in which they weretrained? 
Do you have a system for recording training, including objective evidence of competence? 
Do you have a mechanism for identifying which staff conducted each procedure, test or calibration? 
Accommodation and environmental conditions
Have you considered whether there are any environmental factors in your laboratory which might impact on the validity of tests or calibrations? 
 Are you conducting any tests or calibrations where the published procedure which you claim to follow includes a requirement for the work to be done under specific environmental conditions, for example temperature or humidity? 
If there are such factors, do you have procedures in place to control and monitor them? 
Do you have any activities which need to be separated to avoid, for example, crosscontamination? 
Do you have procedures in place which will create an objective, auditable record that environmental conditions which might affect tests or calibrations are controlled and monitored? 
Do you have clear instructions to staff on actions to be taken when conditions move out of specification? 
Test and calibration methods, method validation and quality control:
Do you have a set of methods specified as acceptable for use in your laboratory? 
 Are they documented to the extent necessary to ensure they are applied properly and consistently? 
Does your laboratory use standard methods which are published and widely accepted? 
If not, have you evidence to show that the methods you are using are fit for the purpose claimed and acceptable to your clients? 
Have you determined the accuracy, precision and, where relevant, the limit of detection of themethods which you use, including standard published methods? 
Do you run routine quality control samples and evaluate the results before releasing data? 
Do you monitor trends in quality control results in order to anticipate possible problems? 
Have you tested your methods and laboratory by use of certified reference methods and/or inter laboratory comparison
Do you have a system for commissioning equipment and verifying its performance and calibration before it is used for test or calibration work? 
Do you have a plan for periodic calibration and verification of the performance of all equipment which affects the validity of measurements? 
Do you have records showing that this plan is followed and which enable the status of any equipment to be verified at any point in its history of use? 
Is equipment subject to regular checks or calibrations labeled so that its status can be seenimmediately by users? 
7. Traceability of measurement:
Have you identified all the measuring equipment which is involved, directly or indirectly, inmeasurement or calibration and which, if not properly calibrated, would affect the validity of measurements? 
Is this equipment calibrated in a manner which provides traceability to the international measurement system? 
Do you have a management procedure to ensure that the calibration is maintained at all times,i.e. recalibration is conducted as necessary and, where possible, equipment is monitored so that any drift away from calibration will be detected? 
Do you have records which could be audited to confirm the calibration status of the equipment at any point in the past? 
Administration of work and sample tracking:
Do you have procedure for logging samples into your laboratory? 
 Are all samples uniquely numbered as soon as practicable after receipt? 
Does your system ensure that samples are stored securely and in a way that will preserve themagainst any changes which may affect data generated from them? 
Do you have a system for ensuring that the procedures required to be carried out on samples areclearly communicated to laboratory staff? 
Do you have a procedure to ensure reports are checked to make sure they correspond to the raw data? 
Recording of results and associated data:
Does your system ensure that all observations are recorded at the time when they are made? 
In this record, is the raw data always preserved so that any problems can be investigated? 
Do you have a policy on how amendments to entries on laboratory records are to be made? 
Does the system allow the person making any record to be identified? 
Computer systems:

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->