Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
5Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Alki Bittorrent

Alki Bittorrent

Ratings:

5.0

(1)
|Views: 83|Likes:
Published by TorrentFreak_

More info:

Published by: TorrentFreak_ on Nov 14, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

07/13/2013

pdf

text

original

 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728BAKER MARQUART LLPJaime Marquart (Bar No. 200344) jmarquart@bakermarquart.comRyan Baker ( Bar No. 214036)rbaker@bakermarquart.comChristian Anstett ( Bar No. 240179)canstett@bakermarquart.com10990 Wilshire Blvd, Fourth Floor Telephone: (424) 652-7800Facsimile: (424) 652-7850Attorneys for All PlaintiffsUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTCENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIAWESTERN DIVISIONSUGAR HILL MUSIC, SOLIDPRODUCTIONS, STEVEN BATIZ,TONY BELL, DETRON BENDROSS,DERRICK BRAXTON, REGINALDBROOKS, ELIJAH BROWN,HORACE BROWN, OSCAR BROWN, LUTHER CAMPBELL,JONATHAN CARLTON, SOLOMONCONNER, DAYQUAN DAVIS,DOUGLAS DAVIS, KAREEMDAVIS, SOLAMIN DAVIS,EMMANUEL RAMONE DEANDA,DREW CARTER, NACOLBIEEDWARDS, VANCITO EDWARDSJOHN FLETCHER, WILLIE FINCH,ISAAC FREEMAN, JR., DARRYLGIBSON, JALIL HUTCHINS,EMANON JOHNSON, KEITHJONES, ORAN “JUICE” JONES,TARSHA JONES, NAILAHLAMEES, DANA MCCIEESE,BARRY MOODY, JEFF REDD,QUAME RILEY, ANTHONYROBINSON, NICHOLAS SANCHEZ,CASE NO. CV11-9437 DSF (JCx)
PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OFMOTION AND MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION;MEMORANDUM OF POINTS ANDAUTHORITIES IN SUPPORTTHEREOF;DECLARATION OF CHRISTIANANSTETT; NOTICE OF MANUALFILING; AND [PROPOSED]ORDER FILED CONCURRENTLYHEREWITH
 Hearing Date: February 25, 2013Time: 1:30p.m.Judge: Hon. Dale S. Fischer Courtroom 840Trial Date: none set
 
Case 2:11-cv-09437-DSF-JC Document 42 Filed 11/09/12 Page 1 of 32 Page ID #:551
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728JONATHAN SHINHOSTER,DIAMOND SMITH, REMINISCESMITH, GERALD SPENCE, CHRISSTOKES, IRENE STOKES,JUANITA STOKES, WILLIAMTENNYSON AND THE TENNYSONESTATE, CARL THOMAS, JEFFTHOMKINS, RONDELL TURNER,RICKY WALTERS, KEVINWILLIAMS, YOLANDA WHITAKE,JOSEPH WILLIAMS, RAHEEMWILLIAMS, CASE WOODWARD,ATTRELL AND JARRETT CORDES,MITCHELL GRAHAMPlaintiffs,vs.CBS INTERACTIVE INC., CNET NETWORKS, INC.Defendants.
Case 2:11-cv-09437-DSF-JC Document 42 Filed 11/09/12 Page 2 of 32 Page ID #:552
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
TO DEFENDANTS AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on February 25, 2013,
1
at 1:30p.m., or as soonthereafter as the matter may be heard in Courtroom 840, located at 255 E. TempleStreet, Los Angeles California 90006, before the Honorable Dale S. Fischer,Plaintiffs Sugar Hill Music,
et al 
(“Plaintiffs”) will and hereby do move this Court pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65 for a preliminary injunction torestrain Defendants CBS Interactive Inc. and CNET Networks, Inc. (“Defendants”)from:a.
 
directly or indirectly enabling, facilitating, permitting, assisting,soliciting, encouraging or inducing any public consumer of Defendants indownloading a peer-to-peer (“P2P”) software program based on the bittorrent protocol, including but not limited to uTorrent, Frostwire, Speedlord, FireTorrent,GetTorrent, TorrentRover, MovieTorrent, Vuze, and WireBooster; b.
 
hosting, linking to or otherwise providing for download any peer-to-peer (“P2P”) software program based on the bittorrent protocol, including but not limited to uTorrent, Frostwire, Speedlord, FireTorrent, GetTorrent,TorrentRover, MovieTorrent, Vuze, and WireBooster; and,c.
 
encouraging, soliciting or inducing the infringement of copyrighted works, directly or indirectly, through the use of P2P software.Plaintiffs make this motion on the grounds that plaintiffs are likely to succeedon the merits of their inducement claim as Defendants distribute bittorrent software programs capable of widespread copyright infringement while simultaneously
1
This date was agreed to in advance between counsel to accommodate variousholiday schedules of counsel and clients, and a stipulated briefing schedule willfollow. The later hearing date was agreed to with the understanding that theadditional time from filing to hearing would not be argued as evidence of delay.
Case 2:11-cv-09437-DSF-JC Document 42 Filed 11/09/12 Page 3 of 32 Page ID #:553

Activity (5)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
1 thousand reads
Toaster97 liked this
yk02 liked this
Timothy Lee liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->