• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
Numerical Base Notation© 2009 by James Robert Batek3 rules and only 3always in bracketsconventionalways a right subscriptconventionalways in base two**mandate**unless expressed in numerical base notation itself, then it doesn't have to be; orunless the subject is a variable, then a base is usually meaningless.Examples532
[111]
is in base seven855
[12 [1010] ]
is in base twelve855
[12]
is improperAlways in base two:Viewed naively, which is all one can expect of history, but with intelligence, whichis not inconsistent with naiveté, Arabic numerals whose largest example in anumber expressing places is Q can derive their values according to any baselarger than Q. My two conventions create an accounting eddy, which is all one cando for naiveté. An eddy instigates solution of its intent by honoring intelligence innaiveté. A discrimination of two numbers forces a guess that base variation isknown to the author and this makes it likely he regards base 2 as unique in thevariation because it alone has only one neighbor among bases. This assigns it therole of ending the solution of base discrimination.Always in brackets:It could be argued that brackets are a complete extraneousness and should not bemade a rule. I would argue differently. As the discussion below the examples,about expressing the base in base two, shows, the effect of discriminationbetween two numbers is a definite object here, and to leave the baseundifferentiated in its appearance leaves the function of discrimination entirely toplacement in one of the four appendages to the subject—left superscript, rightsuperscript, left subscript, and right subscript. These appendages are usedeverywhere in science and mathematics and do not have much discriminationpower by themselves. Their use is somewhat automatic when one is trying to fit awealth of information into a tight space and so they really say nothing about thenature of their occupants. On the other hand, one number without brackets andone number with them is a small but definite discrimination. Even so, it must beadmitted that no rigorous relations have been invoked here and thus this rule is
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...