Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
14Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
4188

4188

Ratings: (0)|Views: 330|Likes:
Published by sabatino123

More info:

Published by: sabatino123 on Nov 17, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

11/21/2012

pdf

text

original

 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
19292295.1
 
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDERRE: OPP’N BRIEF TO HYNIX MOTIONSCASE NO. 00-20905-RMW
Gregory P. Stone (SBN 078329)Steven M. Perry (SBN 106154)Fred A. Rowley, Jr. (SBN 192298)MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP355 South Grand Avenue, 35th FloorLos Angeles, California 90071-1560Telephone: (213) 683-9100Facsimile: (213) 687-3702Email: Gregory.Stone@mto.comEmail: Fred.Rowley@mto.comPeter A. Detre (SBN 182619)MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP560 Mission Street, 27th FloorSan Francisco, California 94105-2907Telephone: (415) 512-4000Facsimile: (415) 512-4077Email: peter.detre@mto.comAttorneys for RAMBUS INC.Rollin A. Ransom (SBN 196192)SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP555 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000Los Angeles, California 90013-1010Telephone: (213) 896-6000Facsimile: (213) 896-6600Email: rransom@sidley.comUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISIONHYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., et al.,Plaintiffs,vs.RAMBUS INC.,Defendant.CASE NO. CV 00-20905 RMW
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]ORDER PERMITTING ACONSOLIDATED OPPOSITION TOHYNIX’S MOTIONS
Date: December 19, 2012Time: 2:00 p.m.Location: Courtroom 6 (4th Flr.)Judge: Hon. Ronald M. Whyte
Case5:00-cv-20905-RMW Document4188 Filed11/16/12 Page1 of 4
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
19292295.1
 - 1 -
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDERRE: OPP’N BRIEF TO HYNIX MOTIONSCASE NO. 00-20905-RMW
1. On October 17, 2012, Hynix filed the following motions in the above-captioned matter: (a) Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Reply to Defendant andCounterclaim Plaintiff Rambus Inc.’s Amended Counterclaim; (b) Motion for SummaryJudgment or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment on the Issue of the CollateralEstoppel Effect of Reexaminations of Rambus’s Patents; and (c) Motion for New Trial, or in theAlternative, Motion for Stay (collectively, the “ Hynix Motions”).2. On November 5, 2012, Hynix filed a Supplemental Memorandum insupport of the Hynix Motions.3. Pursuant to the Stipulation and Order Adjusting Briefing Schedule andHearing Date, entered November 15, 2012, Rambus’s opposition papers to the Hynix Motions aredue on November 20, 2012.4. Under Local Rule 7-4, Rambus is permitted to file an opposition brief of upto 25 pages in response to each of the Hynix Motions, for a total of 75 pages. Under Local Rule7-4, Hynix is permitted to file a reply brief of up to 15 pages regarding each of the HynixMotions, for a total of 45 pages.5. In the interest of judicial efficiency, the parties stipulate that Rambus shallbe permitted to file a single consolidated opposition brief, not to exceed 55 pages, in response tothe Hynix Motions. //  //  //  //  //  //  //  //  //  // 
Case5:00-cv-20905-RMW Document4188 Filed11/16/12 Page2 of 4
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
19292295.1
 - 2 -
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDERRE: OPP’N BRIEF TO HYNIX MOTIONSCASE NO. 00-20905-RMW
6. The parties further stipulate that Hynix shall be permitted to file eitherthree reply briefs, not to exceed fifteen pages each or, at Hynix’s election, a single consolidatedreply brief not to exceed 40 pages regarding the three Hynix Motions.IT IS SO STIPULATED.Dated: November 16, 2012 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLPSIDLEY AUSTIN LLPBy:
 /s/ Jeffrey Y. Wu
 Jeffrey Y. WuAttorneys for RAMBUS INC.Dated: November 16, 2012 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLPKILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTONLLPBy:
 /s/ Jeffrey Y. Wu for Theodore G. Brown III 
 Theodore G. Brown IIIAttorneys for HYNIXSEMICONDUCTOR INC., HYNIXSEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA INC.,HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR U.K. LTD.,and HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR GmbH
ORDER
 IT IS SO ORDERED.Dated: November _, 2012Hon. Ronald M. WhyteUnited States District Judge
Case5:00-cv-20905-RMW Document4188 Filed11/16/12 Page3 of 4

Activity (14)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
ddmc14780 liked this
Dave Weaver liked this
Steven Nash liked this
Bob Armel liked this
Dominick Saso liked this
William Joh liked this
Fred Newman liked this
ddmc14780 liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->