Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Torts_Damaages - Chart

Torts_Damaages - Chart

Ratings: (0)|Views: 18 |Likes:
Published by mkelly2109

More info:

Published by: mkelly2109 on Nov 19, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

11/19/2012

pdf

text

original

 
Additional Parties Who Can Recover Damages
Most tort suits involve a claim by the person who was directly injured by the defendant'snegligence: in an intersection collision case, the person struck and injured by the defendant willseek recovery for her injuries. In addition to the party directly injured, other parties may claimdamages as a result of the defendant's negligence. The need to recognize such claims is mostapparent in wrongful death cases, where the direct victim is incapable of being compensated. Inaddition, however, tort law has tried to strike an appropriate balance between compensating realinjuries on the one hand and avoiding the extension of tort liability beyond manageable limits.For example, most jurisdictions recognize the right of a spouse to recover for loss oconsortium--the society and companionship of the spouse, along with the economic and socialcosts that are associated. On the other hand, to extend the came right of recovery to any member of the immediate victim's family would greatly multiply the number of lawsuits handled by thesystem.
Wrongful Death
In cases where the defendant's negligence results in a person's death, the tort system must createa suitable remedy to measure the damage. The earliest historical approach to wrongful death wasessentially to ignore it, since the state's punishment of wrongful death (execution and forfeitureof goods) left nothing to be used for compensation. However, after courts declared their inabilityto create their remedy for wrongful death, legislatures responded by enacting one of two types ostatutes: so-called "wrongful death" statutes focused on the injury suffered by the immediatefamily of the decedent, and usually measured the economic loss suffered by the spouse or children (even the parents) of the decedent as a result of his or her premature death. On the other hand, other jurisdictions enacted "survival" statutes, which provide for the SURVIVAL of thecause of action. In other words, a legal entity was created (actually, simply recognized in the
3 Damages
Friday, December 04, 20094:59 PM
Tort Tree Page 1
 
form of the decedent's estate) that had a right to sue for compensation. The measurement insurvival act statutes tends to be the kind of damages the decedent would have been able to collecthad he lived. Again, wage loss was a prime consideration. In addition, statutes sometimes provide for recovery for emotional harms, either in the form of the loss of relationship suffered by the family members, or in the form of the ability to enjoy life that was lost by the decedentthrough his premature death. Since remedies for wrongful death are creatures of statute for themost part, careful attention must be paid to the specific provisions in the jurisdiction governingeach case.
Wrongful Birth/Life
In the case of a unhealthy child, however, most jurisdictions recognize the right of the parents to recover for the extraordinary costs associated with the child's disability. Finally,most jurisdictions refuse to recognize (or provide minimal recovery for) the child's claimthat he would have been better off never to have been born. This claim is raised only by achild born with significant disabilities, and most court--recognizing the metaphysicaldifficulty of evaluating life versus non-life--have either refused to recognize the cause of action or have granted only nominal damages.Most tort cases involve a clearcut injury such as a broken arm or a facial scar. Where thedefendant's negligence results in an unplanned pregnancy, however, damages are more difficultto assess. A typical case involves the failure of a sterilization or birth control measure, or thefailure of a healthcare professional to provide timely advice. The claim is that if the defendanthad used reasonable care, the pregnancy would not have occurred. Courts are divided on how toassess damages where the child is born otherwise healthy. Some jurisdictions have stated as amatter of policy that, while the expense of being pregnant and having the child, along with theassociated pain and suffering, can be compensated, no compensation is required for the cost(both financial and emotional) of rearing a child, since as a matter of law those costs areoutweighed by the benefit of the new family member. Other jurisdictions have permitted the juryon a case-by-case basis to assess the positive as well as the negative features of having a childand (using the Restatement test of imputed benefit) come up with a net damages assessment.
Bystander / Loss of Consortium
A final category of related parties who seek compensation includes those who were either  present at a gruesome, and were emotionally traumatized by observing the accident, or relativeswho suffer significant losses because of their dependence on the direct victim. Most jurisdictions permit recovery by a spouse for loss of "consortium"--literally, the society (and companionship)with the direct victim. In most jurisdictions a family member other than a spouse can recover only emotional damages if they were present at the accident scene. However, the law in this areais unsettled.
Calculating the Amount of Damages
Even where the categories of recoverable damages have been determined, and the eligible partieshave been identified, it remains to set an actual dollar amount. Several factors come into play toeffect this calculation.
“Excessive” Awards
A major emphasis of the tort reform movement was the claim that awards in personal injury suitswere excessive. Many jurisdictions responded by enacting limitations on the total amount of damages that could be recovered, particularly non-economic damages (such as pain andsuffering). Some of these statutes were held constitutional; other cases held that such limitationsviolated a variety of state constitutional rights, such as the open access of the courts, or the rightto a jury trial.
Collateral Sources
If the plaintiff is compensated from a source other than a tortfeasor, the traditional rule in most
Tort Tree Page 2

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->