Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
6Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Dominion Response to Smartmatic Oct 17, 2012

Dominion Response to Smartmatic Oct 17, 2012

Ratings: (0)|Views: 189|Likes:

More info:

Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

12/22/2012

pdf

text

original

 
 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARESMARTMATIC INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION,SMARTMATIC USA CORPORATION, andSMARTMATIC INTERNATIONAL HOLDING B.V.,Plaintiffs,v.DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS INTERNATIONALCORPORATION, DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS, INC.,DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS CORPORATION, andIRON MOUNTAIN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTYMANAGEMENT, INC.,Defendants.))))))))))))))) DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS INTERNATIONALCORPORATION and DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMSCORPORATION,Counterclaim-Plaintiffs,v.SMARTMATIC INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, andSMARTMATIC HOLDING BV,Counterclaim-Defendants.)))))))))))))C.A. No. 7844-VCPDOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS INTERNATIONALCORPORATION and DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMSCORPORATION,Third-Party Plaintiffs,v.SMARTMATIC TIM CORPORATION,Third-Party Defendant.)))))))))))) 
ANSWER, VERIFIED COUNTERCLAIM, AND VERIFIED THIRD PARTYCOMPLAINT OF THE DOMINION DEFENDANTS
REDACTED VERSION:FILED: October 17, 2012
 
EFiled: Oct 17 2012 04:34PM EDTTransaction ID 47114728Case No. 7844-VCP
 
 
 2Defendants Dominion Voting Systems International Corporation (“DominionInternational”), Dominion Voting Systems Inc. (“Dominion US”) and Dominion Voting SystemsCorporation (“Dominion Canada”) (collectively “Dominion”) hereby respond to the VerifiedComplaint (“Complaint”) of Plaintiffs Smartmatic International Corporation (“SmartmaticInternational”), Smartmatic USA Corporation (“Smartmatic USA”), and SmartmaticInternational Holding B.V. (“Smartmatic Netherlands”) (collectively, “Smartmatic”) as follows:
I. PARTIES
1.
 
Plaintiff Smartmatic International Corporation (“Smartmatic International”) is acorporation organized and existing under the laws of Barbados.RESPONSE NO. 1:
 
Dominion lacks knowledge or information sufficient toform a belief as to the truth of the allegations in Paragraph 1 of the Complaint.2.
 
Plaintiff Smartmatic USA Corporation (“Smartmatic USA”) is a corporationorganized and existing under the laws of Delaware.RESPONSE NO. 2:
 
Dominion lacks knowledge or information sufficient toform a belief as to the truth of the allegations in Paragraph 2 of the Complaint.3.
 
Plaintiff Smartmatic International Holding B.V. (“Smartmatic Holding”) is acorporation organized and existing under the laws of the Netherlands.RESPONSE NO. 3:
 
Dominion lacks knowledge or information sufficient toform a belief as to the truth of the allegations in Paragraph 3 of the Complaint.4.
 
Plaintiffs Smartmatic International, Smartmatic USA and Smartmatic Holdingwill hereinafter collectively be referred to as “Smartmatic.”RESPONSE NO. 4:
 
Paragraph 4 of the Complaint contains Smartmatic’scharacterization of the parties to which no responsive pleading is required.5.
 
Defendant Dominion Voting Systems International Corporation (“DominionInternational”) is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Barbados.
 
 3RESPONSE NO. 5:
 
Dominion admits the allegations in Paragraph 5 of theComplaint.6.
 
Defendant Dominion Voting Systems, Inc. (“Dominion Voting”) is a corporationorganized and existing under the laws of Delaware.RESPONSE NO. 6:
 
Dominion admits the allegations in Paragraph 6 of theComplaint.7.
 
Defendant Dominion Voting Systems Corporation is a corporation organized andexisting under the laws of Canada.RESPONSE NO. 7:
 
Dominion denies the allegations in Paragraph 7 of theComplaint. By way of further response, Dominion clarifies that Dominion Canada is acorporation organized and existing under the laws of Ontario, Canada.8.
 
Defendants Dominion International, Dominion Voting, and Dominion VotingSystems Corporation will hereinafter be collectively referred to as “Dominion.”RESPONSE NO. 8:
 
Paragraph 8 of the Complaint contains Smartmatic’scharacterization of the parties to which no responsive pleading is required.9.
 
Defendant Iron Mountain Intellectual Property Management, Inc. (“IronMountain”) is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Delaware.RESPONSE NO. 9:
 
Dominion lacks knowledge or information sufficient toform a belief as to the truth of the allegations in Paragraph 9 of the Complaint.
II. BACKGROUND FACTSA. Introduction
10.
 
This lawsuit arises out of Dominion’s failure to honor its commitments toSmartmatic and its interference with Smartmatic’s business relationships in the Philippines,Mongolia, and Puerto Rico.RESPONSE NO. 10:
 
Dominion denies the allegations in Paragraph 10 of theComplaint, except admits that Smartmatic purports to bring a lawsuit against Dominion.

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->