My Answer (MA): “42.8 mph on the sidewalk because of an engineering flaw.”PR: Objection: “I am requesting on the street.”MA: “It can be programed to handle 40 mph; however, the law for class 1 NEVs is 18 mph; somore than 18 mph is grounds for a citation.”PR: Objection: “That is conjecture, if in a 40 mph zone, you must travel at 40 mph to berecognized as an NEV!”
Translation: So I am unable to determine how fast I wish to travel on the street?
MA: “I believe I can travel at 2 times bicycle velocity without interfering with posted speedlimits, as long as I am not interfering with traffic. The citation has no claim as a speeding violation andno indication of ANY traffic existing other than officer Hollis and myself.”PR: Objection: “I move to strike that comment since it is babble and not concerning driving inthe middle of the street, while being subject to injury because of slowness.”Judge: “Sustained.”MA: “Your honor that is ridiculous I have been riding bikes for 50 years now, without anyincidents generating citations, 70,000 miles.”Judge: “Mr. Sugar, you will not interrupt this court. Keep your mouth shut!”MA: “Your honor, may I submit Exhibit A demonstrating Carrollton has no usable sidewalks inthe region I am traveling.”Judge: “YOU should have done that at pretrial.”Prosecution: “I reject them because they are only pictures of sidewalks.”MA: “Good Grief,* I am through.” [* I may have used another explicative.]PR: “Every statement Mr. Sugar made was a lie, My copy of Texas Rules of the Road has nolisting of a Hybrid Mobility Scooter (to be treated as a bicycle), and identifies NEVs as a modified golfcart capable of 45 mph speeds, and must have license plates and proof of insurance.”MA: “Can I give you my copy of the rules of the road that are up to date?”Judge: “Mr. Sugar you are finished so keep those kind of outbursts to yourself.”“Guilty as Charged.”Obviously the charge of attempted murder on officer Hollis's part was dropped! And I was notallowed to prosecute!!
PR objections: 100% approvedMA objections: 100% deniedJudges interruptions for testimony given, that creates argumentative need for definitions: Zero
meaning no interest!
Testimony given by myself as a professional engineer? stricken because it included 5
grademath, and technical dwgs - so thinking is now legal abuse? because it was refused by prosecution.I left out Hollis's testimony since he was only a City Manager's pawn.
American Criminal System
And I am referring to above the bar, and not below it.
With the 5
circuit court of appeals eliminated, Constitutional 6
Amendment attorneys became ineffective, and now are classified as frivolous,