• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
 
Levy Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2COL ApplicationPart 3, Environmental Report
Rev. 09-iCHAPTER 9 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTIONTABLE OF CONTENTSSection Title Page9.0ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION.........................9-19.1NO-ACTION ALTERNATIVE........................................................9-19.2ENERGY ALTERNATIVES...........................................................9-29.2.1ALTERNATIVES THAT DO NOT REQUIRE NEWGENERATING CAPACITY...........................................................9-39.2.1.1Initiating Conservation Measures......................................9-39.2.1.2Reactivating or Extending Service Life of ExistingFacilities............................................................................9-59.2.1.3Purchasing Power from Other Utilities or Power Generators........................................................................9-59.2.2ALTERNATIVES THAT REQUIRE NEW GENERATINGCAPACITY...................................................................................9-69.2.2.1Wind..................................................................................9-99.2.2.2Geothermal.....................................................................9-129.2.2.3Hydropower.....................................................................9-129.2.2.4Solar Power....................................................................9-139.2.2.5Wood Waste (and Other Biomass).................................9-169.2.2.6Municipal Solid Waste.....................................................9-179.2.2.7Energy Crops..................................................................9-189.2.2.8Petroleum Liquids (Oil)...................................................9-199.2.2.9Fuel Cells........................................................................9-209.2.2.10Coal.................................................................................9-209.2.2.11Natural Gas.....................................................................9-219.2.2.12Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle.........................9-229.2.3ASSESSMENT OF REASONABLE ALTERNATIVE ENERGYSOURCES AND SYSTEMS.......................................................9-239.2.3.1Coal-Fired Generation....................................................9-239.2.3.2Natural Gas Generation..................................................9-269.2.3.3Combination of Alternatives............................................9-289.2.4CONCLUSION............................................................................9-329.2.5REFERENCES...........................................................................9-339.3SITE SELECTION PROCESS....................................................9-409.3.1SITE COMPARISON AND SELECTION PROCESS..................9-40
 
Levy Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2COL ApplicationPart 3, Environmental Report
Rev. 09-iiTABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED)Section Title Page9.3.2PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA SITE SELECTIONPROCESS OVERVIEW..............................................................9-429.3.2.1Progress Energy Florida Site Selection Process............9-469.3.3SUMMARY RESULTS OF THE ALTERNATIVE SITESENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT EVALUATION..............................9-619.3.3.1Crystal River Site............................................................9-629.3.3.2Dixie Site.........................................................................9-679.3.3.3Highlands Site.................................................................9-719.3.3.4Putnam Site....................................................................9-759.3.3.5LNP Site..........................................................................9-799.3.4SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS.............................................9-819.3.5REFERENCES...........................................................................9-829.4ALTERNATIVE PLANT AND TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS......9-1259.4.1HEAT DISSIPATION SYSTEMS..............................................9-1259.4.1.1Screening of Alternative Heat Dissipation Systems......9-1279.4.1.2Analysis of Preferred Heat Dissipation Alternative —Mechanical Draft Cooling Tower...................................9-1319.4.1.3Summary of Alternative Heat Dissipation Evaluation....9-1369.4.2CIRCULATING WATER SYSTEMS.........................................9-1409.4.2.1Intake and Discharge Systems.....................................9-1429.4.2.2Water Treatment...........................................................9-1539.4.3TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS....................................................9-1569.4.3.1Corridor Selection.........................................................9-1579.4.3.2Establishment and Definition the Project Study Area...9-1589.4.3.3Quantitative Evaluation.................................................9-1619.4.3.4Qualitative Evaluation...................................................9-1639.4.3.5Candidate Corridor Evaluation......................................9-1639.4.4PUBLIC OUTREACH................................................................9-1669.4.4.1Utility Search Conferences...........................................9-1669.4.4.2Community Working Groups.........................................9-1679.4.4.3Community Outreach....................................................9-1679.4.5REFERENCES.........................................................................9-167
 
Levy Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2COL ApplicationPart 3, Environmental Report
Rev. 09-iiiLIST OF TABLESNumber Title9.2-1 Impacts Comparison Table9.2-2  Air Emissions from Alternative Power Generation Facilities9.3-1 Process Used for Screening the Region of Interest9.3-2 Screening Criteria Used for the Evaluation of Potential Sites9.3-3 Criterion Weight Factors Used for the Evaluation of Potential Sites9.3-4 Technical Evaluation Screening for Potential Sites9.3-5 Summary of Screening Evaluation for Potential Sites9.3-6 Screening Criteria Used for the Evaluation of Candidate Sites9.3-7 General Technical Evaluation for Candidate Sites9.3-8 General Technical Evaluation for Alternative Sites9.3-9 Summary of the Alternative Site Studies9.3-10 Composite Rating Comparison of Alternative Sites9.3-11 State and Federal Threatened and Endangered Species PotentiallyOccurring in Citrus County9.3-12 Crystal River Site Minority and Low Income Population9.3-13 State and Federal Threatened and Endangered Species PotentiallyOccurring in Dixie County9.3-14 Dixie Site Minority and Low Income Population9.3-15 State and Federal Threatened and Endangered Species PotentiallyOccurring in Highlands County9.3-16 Highlands Site Minority and Low Income Population9.3-17 State and Federal Threatened and Endangered Species PotentiallyOccurring in Putnam County
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...