• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download

Journal 22.
Downloaded from the Council for British Archaeology (South-West) website.
http://www.britarch.ac.uk/cbasw/

Journal 22.
Downloaded from the Council for British Archaeology (South-West) website.
across the site. The geophysical survey undertaken
closure identified by the geophysical survey
several linear features at the eastern
likely to be contempora
CAMELFORD SCHOOL EXCAVATIONS \u2013 SUMMER 2008 -
IRON AGE ACTIVITY REVEALED
Andy M Jones & Sean R Taylor
Introduction

During the course of the summer of 2008 archaeologists from the Historic Environment Service [HES], Cornwall County Council excavated the remains of an extensive Iron Age settlement at Sir James Smith\u2019s School at Camelford (SX 10224 83672),

in
advance
of

the redevelopment of the school\u2019s fields for sports pitches. The project was funded by Cornwall County Council and the team worked closely with the principal contractor Kier Western who assisted with the removal of modern

layers from the site, which covered
approximately 1 hectare.

An earlier archaeological assessment and geophysical survey by HES had indicated the potential for significant

buried archaeological remains to survive

by GSB Prospection Ltd located a later prehistoric (Iron Age) or Romano-British rectilinear enclosure on the western side of the development area, as well as several circular ditched structures and fragments of a field system.

Excavation

Figure 10-1: . Iron Age house (front) and the attached smaller iron working structure. The area of the field system is in the background (the \u2018island\u2019 encircled by temporary fencing) (Copyright HES,

Cornwall County Council).

Figure 10-3: Showing the northern side of the large penannular

enclosure
(Copyright HES, Cornwall County
Council).
The large en

was unaffected by the development, which meant that the archaeological excavations have been focussed upon the investigation of a fragmentary field system, two circular ring-gullied features, and two larger circular enclosures defined by ditches.

The excavation of

end of the stripped area revealed what appeared to be part of a field system. Intriguingly, one section of one of the ditches had been revetted with stone along its internal face. Finds recovered from this part of the site are probably Iron Age in date (circa 100 cal BC \u2013 AD 42) and the field ry with the archaeological features that lay to its west.

system is
http://www.britarch.ac.uk/cbasw/

Journal 22.
Downloaded from the Council for British Archaeology (South-West) website.
http://www.britarch.ac.uk/cbasw/

Journal 22.
Downloaded from the Council for British Archaeology (South-West) website.
fferent types of site, some
r of these was 15m in
s
and 10-3). It was defined by a
prised of three
oncentric ditches, which were up to 0.95m deep, was uncovered to the north-east of the
fferent types of site, some
r of these was 15m in
s
and 10-3). It was defined by a
prised of three
oncentric ditches, which were up to 0.95m deep, was uncovered to the north-east of the
Unexpectedly the investigation of the four circular
features revealed several di
atures revealed several di

probably associated with circular buildings but also two larger enclosures, which may well have been used for ceremonial purposes.

Two structures were found to be surrounded by ring-
gullies (Figure 10-1). The large

probably associated with circular buildings but also two larger enclosures, which may well have been used for ceremonial purposes.

Two structures were found to be surrounded by ring-
gullies (Figure 10-1). The large

diameter and appears to have contained a substantial post-built roundhouse with a south-facing doorway and a paved entrance. Attached to the eastern side of ller ring-gully 9m in diameter, which contained a hearth tructures were associated with pottery and stonework,

including notched slates and rubbing stones and are believed to be of later Iron Age date
(circa 100 cal BC \u2013 AD 42).

A large penannular enclosure 20m in diameter was located to the north of the ring-gullied structures (Figures 10-2

diameter and appears to have contained a substantial post-built roundhouse with a south-facing doorway and a paved entrance. Attached to the eastern side of ller ring-gully 9m in diameter, which contained a hearth tructures were associated with pottery and stonework,

including notched slates and rubbing stones and are believed to be of later Iron Age date
(circa 100 cal BC \u2013 AD 42).

A large penannular enclosure 20m in diameter was located to the north of the ring-gullied structures (Figures 10-2

Figure 10-2: . Cleaning the baulk section of the large penannular ditched feature (Copyright HES,

Cornwall County Council).
the large structure was a second sma
with evidence of iron working. Both
the large structure was a second sma
with evidence of iron working. Both

deep ditch, which was up to 1m deep, with an outer bank. The enclosure does not seem to have been a settlement site as the external bank would have rendered it indefensible, and the only feature within it was a single central pit, sealed by two large holed slates (Figure 10-4). A deposit of burnt bone and broken pottery was found in the terminal of the ditch, which might suggest feasting activity. The pottery from the upper fill of the ditch appears to be late Iron Age in date and this is supported by a preliminary radiocarbon

determination
from
residue on one of the potsherds 2015
\u00b1 35 BP: 110 cal BC- AD 70 (SUERC
necessary to establish when the enclo

Cornwall and is perhaps comparable to the smaller \u2018Royal\u2019 sites which are found in Ireland, or possibly the ring-barrows, which are often associated with them. If this analogy is correct it is likely that the enclosure was a communal site used for ceremonial gatherings and feasts.

Finally, a multiple ring-ditched enclosure up to 15m in diameter, com

deep ditch, which was up to 1m deep, with an outer bank. The enclosure does not seem to have been a settlement site as the external bank would have rendered it indefensible, and the only feature within it was a single central pit, sealed by two large holed slates (Figure 10-4). A deposit of burnt bone and broken pottery was found in the terminal of the ditch, which might suggest feasting activity. The pottery from the upper fill of the ditch appears to be late Iron Age in date and this is supported by a preliminary radiocarbon

determination
from
residue on one of the potsherds 2015
\u00b1 35 BP: 110 cal BC- AD 70 (SUERC
necessary to establish when the enclo

Cornwall and is perhaps comparable to the smaller \u2018Royal\u2019 sites which are found in Ireland, or possibly the ring-barrows, which are often associated with them. If this analogy is correct it is likely that the enclosure was a communal site used for ceremonial gatherings and feasts.

Finally, a multiple ring-ditched enclosure up to 15m in diameter, com
Figure 10-4: Holed slate from the pit in the centre of
the large penannular enclosure (Copyright HES,
Cornwall County Council).
-20414). However, further radiocarbon dating will be
sure was constructed. The site is very unusual for
-20414). However, further radiocarbon dating will be
sure was constructed. The site is very unusual for
cc
other sites (Figure 10-5). This enclosure was only partially exposed. Apart from tree bowls it
was devoid of features, which might suggest that it contained a small clump of trees.
other sites (Figure 10-5). This enclosure was only partially exposed. Apart from tree bowls it
was devoid of features, which might suggest that it contained a small clump of trees.
http://www.britarch.ac.uk/cbasw/
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...