Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Churchill's roar and Bush's peep

Churchill's roar and Bush's peep

Ratings: (0)|Views: 3 |Likes:
Bush is faulted for using an us-against-them world view to direct his rhetoric. But another wartime leader used a no less dualistic world view to exhort his nation to heroism during World War II. So what was it about Winston Churchill's leadership that made that work for him and not for Bush?
Bush is faulted for using an us-against-them world view to direct his rhetoric. But another wartime leader used a no less dualistic world view to exhort his nation to heroism during World War II. So what was it about Winston Churchill's leadership that made that work for him and not for Bush?

More info:

Published by: Michael Lindenberger on Nov 25, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





P1 _ 03-30-2008 Set: 18:29:36Sent by: jrush OpinionCYANMAGENTAYELLOWBLACK
The Dallas Morning News
PSunday,March30, 2008
Think sharp.
“It is
not the duty of government
to bailout and reward those who actirresponsibly, whether they are bigbanks or small borrowers.” —
 JohnMcCain, presumptive GOP presidential nominee, on the government’s responseto the credit crisis (Los Angeles Times,Wednesday)
“So I made a mistake. That happens.
Itproves I’m human
, which you know, forsome people, is a revelation.” —
Hillary Rodham Clinton, apologizing for having grossly exaggerated the danger to her ona1996 visit to a military airbase in Bosnia(Associated Press, Wednesday)
“I do not think that’s
any of yourbusiness
.” —
Chelsea Clinton, to aquestioner at a campaign stop, whoquestioned her about her father’sdalliance with Monica Lewinsky (CNN,Thursday)
Tibet is not free!
Tibet is not free!” —
 Anonymous weeping Buddhist monk,embarrassing Chinese officials leading ahighly scripted tour of Tibet for Western journalists (The Associated Press,Thursday)
“People need to think not just aboutweight, but where they carrytheir weight. They need toknow if they’re
applesor pears
.” —
Rachel Witmer, research scientist and lead author of a study indicating that “apples” — peoplewith pot bellies —are more likely to suffer dementia asthey age (San FranciscoChronicle, Thursday)
“I don’t want the behavior. Little girlsare
walking around dressing likehoochies
, cursing and swearing andshowing disrespect toward their elders.In Islam, we believe in respect anddignity and honor.” —
 Aya Ismael, aCalifornia Muslim mother, on why shehomeschools her four children (The New York Times, Wednesday)
Our Q&A with Janis Burklund,director of theDallas FilmCommission
Why has Dallas long been in the shadowof Austin as a film town?
Dallas has long been an incrediblystrong, sizable film town and one of thetop markets in the film and videoproduction industry. Dallas is the largestproduction center in the state of Texas,and the film market is pretty diverse.And, of course, the AFI DallasInternational Film Festival puts a globalfilm spotlight on Dallas and brings thefilmmakers here to … get exposure tothe film community of the new Dallas.They have an outdated perception ofthis city from that TV show, which keepshanging on.The Texas Film Commission recentlyreleased a report that shows to datethat Dallas leads the state in qualifyingfilm incentive applicants with a total of47 out of 84 projects — the closestbeing Austin, with 21 total projects.
But people still think Austin is the Texasfilm capital.
Part of it is a perception issue, notunlike what’s described in the book
TheTipping Point 
. If you say something istrue long enough, and the right peopleare saying it, it starts to be believed.Austin has had a couple of big featurefilms, and they’ve got [Robert]Rodriguez and [Richard] Linklater livingthere. So you’ve got these big directorsliving there and saying, “This is a coolplace; it’s the Texas film capital” — that’swhat I mean by the tipping point.
What’s the specific economic impact offilm and television production in theDallas area?
The Film Commission is currentlyundergoing a third-party economicimpact study to understand how largeand significant the Dallas film industryis. However, we do know that the filmand television industry is a significanteconomic driver for Dallas. Film andtelevision projects that apply for stateincentives must spend at least $1 millionin Texas, shoot 80 percent of the projectwithin state borders and hire at least 70percent of actors, crew and extras inTexas. For commercials, infomercials,music videos and video games, theminimum spend is $100,000. So youcan see how making these projects inDallas and the state provides moneyinto our economic system.
The News
’ Rod Dreher blames the economic downturn onAmericans’ lack of self-discipline. Charles Duhigg analyzesthe risk of a full-blown depression.
Tough times ahead
This approach has been widely condemned as flawed even simple — and ultimately dangerous. That many of those who are fighting against America share similarly strident viewsabout good and evil has donenothing to quell the criticism.But in the longing for a morenuanced view of the world — anappeal to see the grayness of things — Mr. Bush’s critics fail toacknowledge that some of history’s biggest figures saw things in terms just as stark.Chief among them is WinstonChurchill, the endlessly fascinating prime minister of Great Britain whose great flawsand astounding foresight — notto mention mesmerizing oratory helped steer his nation back from the brink of destructionduring World War II.Throughout the 1930s, many of Britain’s leading figures hadexplained away the risingmilitarism in Germany as a natural, if regrettable, outcome of the Treaty of Versailles. Churchillhimself called Hitler “this
TROY OXFORD/ Staff illustration
Stark reality 
Is Bush channeling Churchill by saying some enemies are simply evil? asks
Michael Lindenberger
ew criticisms of President Bush have found a widerchorus of acceptance than the notion that hiscampaign against al-Qaeda has been marred by  world view of good versus evil, us versus them. Mr. Bushhas referred to Islamic terrorists as “evil doers,” to thenations of Iraq, Syria and Iran as the “axis of evil” and, onthe eve of the Iraq war, told the world “you are either withus or against us in the fight against terror.”
“You ask what is ourpolicy. I will say, it is towage war with all ourmight, with all thestrength that God cangive us, to wage waragainst a monstroustyranny, neversurpassed in the dark,lamentable catalogueof human crime. Youask what is our aim? Ican answer in oneword: Victory. Victoryat all costs. Victory inspite of all terror.Victory however longand hard the road maybe. For withoutvictory there is nosurvival.”
Winston Churchill
in his firstspeech as Prime Minister, 1940
“If we were not fightingand destroying thisenemy in Iraq, theywould not be idle. Theywould be plotting andkilling Americansacross the world andwithin our ownborders. By fightingthese terrorists in Iraq,Americans in uniformare defeating a directthreat to the Americanpeople. … We will neverback down. We willnever give in. And wewill never acceptanything less thancomplete victory.
George Bush
in his “Strategy forVictory” speech, October 2005
about WilliamManchester’s seminalbiography on Churchill.

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->