his character itself. Only since Goethe's 'Dichtung und Wahrheit' can we talk about real autobiographies, since only theauthor himself can report adequately, if at all, about the inner process of his maturing and about the ways of his feeling.Therefore, autobiographies have commanded the literary field in the West during the past century, when men have beenapt and able to introvert in a systematic way and thus to explore the vast field of their inner life. Such efforts haverecently found their highest pitch in the psychologist C. G. Jung's fascinating account of the ups-and-downs of his inner development even to the very depths of his unconscious.In India we find beginnings of such autobiographical statements as early as the Upanishads and again in our own time, partly influenced by Western trends. Autobiographies by Yogis have been extremely rare, partly because the Yogi iswell aware of the importance of keeping and living with a secret and partly because he properly shares the secret onlywith God and not with the people in his surroundings who are less aware of the subtle workings of inner tendencies.Only in a few instances have great men of wisdom in India revealed themselves to us in self-descriptions, likeYogananda, Ramdas and Sivananda. In most cases it has been Westerners who, because of their search for stimulationfrom a foreign way of self-introspection, have discovered and published the achievements of the Indian masters of Yoga, so did Paul Brunton reveal Ramana Maharishi to the West and also to India, and so Romain Rolland becamefascinated with Ramakrishna, Friedrich Heiler with Sadhu Sundar Singh, Annie Besant with Krishnamurti, Jean Herbertwith Ramdas. Now James Hillman and F. J. Hopman have discovered Gopi Krishna, whose sensational autobiographythey help to publish and to interpret in the psychological way.It remains for me, as an historian of world religions, to introduce this book by putting it into the framework of Indianreligious history. For Gopi Krishna is of unusual interest, first as an example of a most thorough-going mixture of Eastand West, and secondly as a self-taught prophet of an original kind. Gopi Krishna's approach appears as a great surprise because in his book, except for the last chapter, there is no mention of spirituality, religion and metaphysics. GopiKrishna's endeavours appear as a historical laboratory in which he, the author, develops genuinely in himself whatothers have developed before him. But he re-mains independent of his fore-runners, who frequently have wound up insterile intellectual formulae. By contrast, this self-taught, Guru-less author remains genuine in all his discoveries.Being exposed to Gopi Krishna's experiences is like meeting a space traveller who seemingly for no purpose has landedon a strange and unknown star without the standard equipment of the professional astronaut, and who simply reportsabout the bewildering landscape around him, colourfully, truthfully, without really knowing exactly what he has found.We have here, in this wholly unintellectual personality, a classical example of a simple man, uneducated in Yoga, whoyet through intense labour and persistent enthusiasm, succeeds in achieving, if not Samadhi, yet some very high state inYoga perfection, based entirely on his inner feeling development and not at all on ideas and traditions. Gopi Krishna isan extremely honest reporter, to the point of humbleness. Since he does not claim great powers and achievements, one iseven more willing to accept his detailed descriptions of inner changes as exact reports. Thus, one of the consequences of his autonomous training is the aliveness of his account.To understand the amazing unusualness of Gopi Krishna's account one might try to imagine in turn the feelings of anIndian Yogi reading the records of a Westerner, who, as a layman, reports about his strange encounters with God andChrist without the background of theological knowledge and discipline and yet trying to find his own way through thelabyrinth of his emotions without the guidance of any psychology but with an old-fashioned body of religiousconcepts—a bewildering picture indeed.Lacking the guiding hand of a master, it is Gopi Krishna's fate to be thrown from one despair into another, hecticups-and-downs, the daily bread of this sensational experience. Like Faust, Na Ro Pa and many others, he finds asolution several times in his life only at the point of death. Even commonplace events take on an enormous character and lead him into depressions and dangers almost to the point of ruination. His own analysis of that situation is that theawakened Kundalini went up into the Pingala instead of into the Sushumna where it rightfully belongs. Where does allthis lead him? To constant light-awareness, shimmering halo-consciousness but interrupted repeatedly by years of relapse and illness.The comforting aspect of these often quite negative experiences is however that Gopi Krishna is never driven to pride, but remains aware of his own helplessness in front of the stunning events of his inner life. In best Indian tradition hedoes not ever feel himself to be the maker or creator of his own thoughts and feelings; he does not assume any falseleadership in the course of his development but confesses to be nothing but a victim of positive and negative forces. Heis buffeted by them and feels like a 'dumb and helpless witness to the show' (p. 151).All this proves that Gopi Krishna's is a typical explorer's mentality. Everywhere we meet a certain detachment, boldness,curiosity, independence and acceptance of everything that happens inwardly. He is equally interested in positive andnegative events. Never do we find any anticipation of fixed results, but like one of the early alchemists he remains ready
Leave a Comment