rdavm

This message is to jamessavik!! Splitting of atoms is not natural, its antinature and only antinature can destroy energy. Science say: Energy can't be created, nor can it be destroyed. Thats not true! First they state that energy cant be created, thats BS becos the universe create its own energy all the time by spiritual idea and the energy created is by the growth of the spiritual form. They also say that energy cant be destroyed, thats BS too. U only need a anti nature form of finematter (energy) and natural energy will be lost, this has to do with the resonance harmonics. If any balance in the nature is corrupted by non natural finematter then resonance in the anti natural state force corruption of natural balance/energy and therefore jing and jang consept does not count. If the sun was what you say it is then the sun would not be able to create life as it would be anti nature. The planets are sub-suns and we live on a sub sun and if it was correct that the sub-sun we live on was nuclear or whatever it would not be able to create live due to anti nature. We are extreme primitive on this planet, we do not know jackshit about noting and we have many 1000 years left before we know as much as the Pleiadian people who says that the sun is not fusion. Anyone that dont know that the Pleiads is real is just simply more primitive than Jesus was, and whatever u think about that I dont care, I seen the pleiads my self and whatever otter think, at a personal level I know that the pleiads are out there and I also know that they talk true no matter what otter says. Things will be proven by time and many theories will just stay a theory. Albert Einstein was a big idiot, and many of his theories is already being proved wrong. Nikola Tesla was much much more inteligent than Albert. Albert is full of shit and he does not deserve the place in the history books. Funny thing is that Tesla is almost forgotten about and seldom mentioned in any history books. I know why... He was a treath to the public money system becos he told the true and invented devices that worked with nature, not agenst nature. While Albert didn't and they lived in same time frame with made Albert a better canidate to "selibrate" becos he didnt say things or invent things that was a treath to the money system. Albert was put in to the light and blowed up big time to overcome tesla public attention. Thats a controlled brain manipulation by the governments who saw that Albert was perfect for the sake and goal to take of so much attention as possible from Nikola Tesla. Wake up! Once Albert had become famous, government had full controll of him and used him to say that it was not possible to travel faster than light. So Albert was indead very stupid, he was the perfect target for greedy governments that didnt want us to know that aliens can travel here, and the reason for that is simple... They do not want the general science community to even start think that this was possible becos that would mean the end of brain washing people to think that OIL is the only thing we can have to power your car. People would automatically start think that if aliens come here, then they are for sure not using oil to get here and therefore there must be some otter energies.... And bingo there you go!! If the world was to know that aliens come here then 1+1=2 and ohhh Over Unity is possible, we dont need oil, we are just controlled to believe it. Anyway much talk just for the point of Albert, Billy Meier, etc... But needed info! Sun is not fusion, just ask Semjase and you may get to know, thats if you aren't so primitiv that she wont dare to try use your brain reseptors for communication. I meet Semjase back in 1984 and in afther time she sent me video's and ideas to my brain, she also talked to me many times, the "tele" way. Read www.semjase.net its 100% true all the material there. Some link in Eng to with leads to Semjase talking about the sun.

rdavm

About planet earth: For years I had tryed to convince the science community that the earth is growing larger and larger and thats becos energy is compressed inside the earth and make matter out of energy, but they wont listen. Some stupid scientists have even tryed to tell that the internal core of the planet is a nuclear prosess, that is as well a lot of BS. According to the Pleiads from the planet ERRA there are only Suns and sub-suns with make a lot of cence, in otter spoken language: The planet erath is a sub-sun and prosesses inside earth make matter from energy due to wery high compression raito and heat.

rdavm

About big bang: For more than 25 years I have sayd to the science comunity that there was no big bang, but they are to primitive in theyr thinking patterns and wont listen. It is not with any reason possible that there was ever a big bang and I do not think it ever was a big bang, I think the universe was born slowly by time, and there is math that the aliens use to explain how it was born. 222-555-777 and the rest for thouse who know this math is easy, yet to long to explain. Anyway, BIG BANG theory is BS and will allways just be a fantasy.

rdavm

Meier- 'today I have a lot of questions, when you allow.Semjase - If there are not too many. Semjase- if there are not too many Meier- I don't know; my first concerns the matter/rough-material stuff. what actually is it? Semjase - matter is a sizable idea. It is a solid form of energy, being sizable. Meier- That is evident, but how does it originate? Semjase - The principle is very easy, but I am not allowed to tell it. but it is such, that all energy can be changed into solid matter. It is also necessary, to bundle the concerned energy securely and to concentrate it highly, thus it may be converted into solid matter. By this, the elementary building blocks of the solid components of matter are generated; neutron, proton and electron. From those then form the atoms and the variety of chemical compounds, which then in their different aggregation states form the solid outer manifestation, which is known to your scientists. Solid energy as well as the original energy are of the same value in each direction. This means, origin energy is absolutely matter, as origin matter is absolutely energy as well. This means that, without exception, everything in the Universe consists of matter or energy. Both terms, energy and matter, represent basically one and the same, but precisely in their separate forms: finematerial and coarse-material. Coarse-material is matter; finematerial is energy. Meier- well, allright, but this doesn't explain my question . I namely want to know how matter rises originally. Semjase - From out of basic energy, of course. Meier- You render too less precise. I think, that before the basic energy, there must be something else. Because, from what I know, always two individual units, belonging together, result in a unit again..... Semjase - You are tireless, and you give me a predicament. Meier - I don't' intend to. Semjase - okay now, I shall explain all for you, as far as I shall be allowed, though you seem to know more in this respect, then we know about you: matter is the embodiment of idea. As energy, the matter is finmaterial; and as matter, just highly concentrated and condensed. one can generate both kinds by apparatus, which you already do in different ways. Normally they are generated quite naturally, that is by spiritual forces, which is preceded by idea. The basic source for this is The Creation, a vast spiritual reservoir, a factor, which again embodies the original energy. From it rises idea. The force of Spirit then (which and who again embodies energy) condenses and concentrates the idea to finematerial energy, which then by still higher concentration becomes coarsematerial, or matter ....... Meier- Then in fact, the whole Universe is, inside and out, only of finematerial and coarsematerial energy (which is) compressed and concentrated idea? Semjase - Certainly. Meier- But then, what is this vast spiritual formation, the factor of The Creation? Semjase - It consists of idea, condensed in itself towards itself to originate spiritual energy. We as well do not know much more about this.

NYK007

Hi, Science is a very interesting subject. We all are familiar with this subject. This subject is full of knowledge. NYK <a href=http://makemoney.bizoppjunction.com>Make Money</a>

DanBarZohar

I posted a new version of this document with the fonts corrected. http://www.scribd.com/doc/3247933/The...

m3onish

I couldn't see anything. Have you retracted your paper?

DanBarZohar

Hi jamessavik, The sun energy is produced from the magnetic fields by magnetic induction according to Faraday's Law. The magnetic fields that cross the sun produce strong electric currents that heat the sun. The hot red wires of toasters are example of heating by an electric current. The current neutrino experiments show conflicting evidence and there are many future experiments that will try to clear this. The magnetic fields from the center of the galaxy does not reach the sun directly but through numerous magnetic eddies that prevalent in the galactic disk. Here are the main points of the theory that easily explain it: 1. The sun energy source is from magnetic fields from the galactic center. 2. The heat from the magnetic fields leads to high energy collision between particle in the sun core that creates new particle and increase the sun mass. 3. All the stars in the galaxy create new mass so the total mass and the size of the galaxy is increasing. 4. The stars in the galaxy eject dust that freefall to the galactic center super massive black hole. Thorough the dynamo effect the gravitational potential energy of the dust is converted to magnetic fields. 5. As the galaxy mass and size increase, distance arm of the galaxy is detached form the main galaxy to create a new galaxy. 6. Galaxies spawn new galaxies and the total number of galaxies in the universe increase. 7. The universe expands and accelerates from the increase in the number of the galaxies. 8. The Big Bang cosmological model is replaced by a new cosmological model that resembles the steady state theory.

jamessavik

without fusion, how do you account for the suns energy budget? How do you account for solar neutrinos at the appropriate energy levels? How do you account for magnetic fields which decline with the square of the distance? If magnetic fields from the center of the galaxy effect the sun, the limit of the field strength is as close to zero as you can get. One must first understand the science before you write a paper: the authors discription of dark energy, magnetic fields, Einstein, the Big Bang aren't just wrong, they are embarrassing. As science, this paper is a heaping, steaming pile of crap.

PHYTANJA فيزياء طنجة

can'I see the french version, think you

jamessavik

Garbage

King Tesla

Holy crap for crap. First it was y2k, then global warming is getting weirder and weirder, then i have to think about the earth actually gaining volume over the millenia, NOW THIS? But it MAKES SO MUCH SENSE... thanks for sharing...