Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
26Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Is the Moon Hollow

Is the Moon Hollow

Ratings: (0)|Views: 13,315 |Likes:
Published by bitbunker7929
The strongest evidence for it to be a 'hollow object' comes from the fact that when meteors strike the Moon, the latter rings like a bell. More specifically when the Apollo crew in November 20, 1969 released the lunar module, after returning to the orbiter, the module impact with the Moon caused their seismic equipment to register a continuous reverberation like a bell for more than an hour. The same effect occurred with Apollo 13's third stage which caused the Moon to ring for over three hours. So what's going on with the Moon?
The strongest evidence for it to be a 'hollow object' comes from the fact that when meteors strike the Moon, the latter rings like a bell. More specifically when the Apollo crew in November 20, 1969 released the lunar module, after returning to the orbiter, the module impact with the Moon caused their seismic equipment to register a continuous reverberation like a bell for more than an hour. The same effect occurred with Apollo 13's third stage which caused the Moon to ring for over three hours. So what's going on with the Moon?

More info:

Categories:Types, Research, Science
Published by: bitbunker7929 on Jan 29, 2009
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

11/24/2012

pdf

text

original

 
The best Forum on the net for UFO/Paranormal/Alien/Area51/9-11/Conspiracies etc. issuesVisit
ATS
:http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Earth's Moon and Human Evolution
source
:
http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/home/Frontpage/2008/07/18/02474.html
ByDr. N Huntley, Ph.D.
It has been established beyond all reasonable doubt that the Moon isnot what it appears; that it is not just another satellite orbiting a planet,Earth, but an entity which has thrown the minds of some of the greatestthinkers and scientific brains into a quandary and bewildermentunprecedented in the history of astronomy. Why haven't you heardabout this? Another government cover-up? How could Moon mysterieshave anything to do with government secrecy, and moreover could itrelate to the suppression of the space programme?Let us outline some of the extraordinary anomalies and mysteries surrounding this puzzle. Clearly notall data will be equally reliable but the abundance of interrelated information nevertheless gives anoverall picture which can be determined with some certainty. The first academic enigma must surelybe that the Moon is apparently in its wrong orbit for its size. However, this would presumably bebased on its assumed density. Technical reports claim a density of 3.3 for the Moon compared with5.5 for Earth. Astronomy data indicates that the internal regions of the Moon are less dense than theouter, giving rise to the inevitable but outrageous speculation that it could be hollow. The eminentand late scientist
Carl Sagan,
a typical sceptic, had made the statement, "A natural satellite cannot bea hollow object." But meaning here that if it is hollow, it is not a natural satellite -- and thereforeartificial.Possibly the strongest evidence for it to be a 'hollow object' comes from the fact that when meteorsstrike the Moon, the latter rings like a bell. More specifically when the Apollo crew in November 20,1969 released the lunar module, after returning to the orbiter, the module impact with the Mooncaused their seismic equipment to register a continuous reverberation like a bell for more than anhour. The same effect occurred with Apollo 13's third stage which caused the Moon to ring for overthree hours. So what's going on with the Moon?Two Soviet scientists,
Mikhail Vasin
and
Alexander Shcherbakov,
have spent much of theircareers examining the facts compiled on lunar phenomena. Their conclusion is that the Moon isartificial, possibly a hollowed-out planet, and that it was steered from some distant region of thegalaxy into a circular orbit around our planet (hence the extraordinary mystery of rock and Moon-dust age variations). They claim that intellectual life has existed in the Moon for eons.In 1968 as Apollo 8 moved into orbit around the Moon, the astronauts spotted a colossalextraterrestrial object, which then had disappeared on the next orbit. Photographs were taken, of course, but not released to the public. On another occasion when the lunar excursion module wasdown to 4-5 miles from the Moon's surface astronauts witnessed a UFO suddenly rise from a craterand rapidly disappear. In 1969,
"Buzz" Aldrin
was checking the lunar surface from orbit, when twoUFOs appeared, moved towards the Apollo rocket, hovered nearby, then to Aldrin's utterastonishment the UFOs joined to form one entity.Furthermore, astronauts of Apollo 11 saw a spacefleet of UFOs lined up in a crater. Almost everyMoon mission involved encounters with UFOs or UFO sightings, not to mention the discovery of many bases on the Moon's surface. Renowned astronomer
Patrick Moore
discovered over onehundred dome-like buildings. In fact, about one thousand such bases, dome-like structures of 
 
diameter around 700 feet, have been witnessed. Astronomy records extending back 200 yearsindicate no such artefacts until about the 1950s (remember the book entitled
 Alternative III?).
Manyof the UFO encounters by the astronauts were stated to be of a positive nature in which unintrusiveassistance was given.It has been found that asteroids and meteors not only create shallow craters on the Moon's surface butproduce a convex floor to the crater instead of concave as expected, supporting the idea of a rigidshell. Countless other pieces of evidence from astronomers and NASA scientists began to reveal thatsome 2-3 miles down there appear to be dense layers of metal -- which would explain why the craterswere convex. But the most astonishing conclusion is that the only theory which can completelyexplain all the anomalies is that the Moon is hollow with a shell about 20 miles thick --mostly metal.Note that
mascons
(higher concentrations of mass) found in the
marias
cause fluctuations in gravityand have never been satisfactorily explained.Moreover, these structural anomalies were supported by two publications, one
Time Magazine,
whichunwittingly revealed the gravity value of the Moon relative to Earth by publishing the distance fromEarth to Moon of the null point between them, indicating a gravitational force some 60 -70 % of Earth. Furthermore, some people noticed the feeble plumage of the rocket exhaust as the module rosefrom the Moon's surface---explained away by NASA as due to the vacuum. But what about some of the telltale and suspicious features observed during the first Armstrong and Aldrin Moon landing.The American flag was seen briefly to wave in... a breeze? But we are told there is no air on theMoon. The flag was then starched. Also we saw dust kicked up by the astronauts clearly drifting in...what? Dust particles do not drift in vacuum -- they cling together. And what about the feeble leaps of the astronauts off the Moon's surface -- were their spacesuits and backpacks really so heavy? TheMoon is supposed to be about one-sixth the gravity of Earth.Thus we now know that air is present, and the feeble rocket exhaust could not be due to a vacuum.Moreover, the exhaust was apparently too weak to account for the necessary power to escape fromsuch a gravitational pull in relationship to the size of the module, which was not large enough tocontain the necessary fuel to escape the Moon's high gravity. Was antigravity propulsion secretlybeing used as a booster?The covert government have long since sent 'astronauts' into outer space in antigravity spacecrafts.They apparently had the so-called cosmospheres about 40 years ago, some larger than the old andmassive dirigibles. They seized the antigravity research data from the Nazis, and have since thenreverse-engineered captured spacecrafts and negotiated deals with aliens involving antigravitytechnologies.The more thorough have been the investigations of the Moon the more bizarre the results have been.Probably one of the most startling was that moonquakes occurred like clockwork. Moreover, thefluctuations on each occasion were the same. This is impossible for natural conditions which alwaysobey fractal distributions. Furthermore, a study of rock samples reveal an age of 5.3 billion years, andthat not only is the Moon older than the Earth, estimated to be about 4.6 billion years, but that it isolder than the solar system (and by theoretical standards as old as the universe).What about the surface of the Moon? Several television viewers wrote explaining that they spottedone of the astronauts pick up what appeared to be a glass bottle and remark, "My God, I don't believeit, look at this ..." Then the television screen went blank. Other viewers observed the extremedifficulty astronauts had when drilling down a few inches into the Moon's marias and that when thedrill bit was pulled out, metal shavings were visible. Rocks were found to contain brass, mica,titanium, and elements uranium 236 and Neptunium 237 not previously found in nature.Astronomy literature reports the sighting of a 12-mile bridge-like structure over the Sea of Crisis in1954 by
John O'Neile,
and in the 1950s astronomer
Morris K. Jessup
realised that UFOs had bases
 
on the Moon (and so does the government of course). Other strange lunar phenomena are: theobservation by Dr.
Frank Harris
of a black body on the surface, 250 miles long and 50 miles wide;clouds and lightning; strange moving shadows and objects, and spire-like structures thousands of feethigh; a huge boulder with tracks (behind it) from inside a crater to the rim (uphill); the shrinking,over a period of time, of the crater Luna from six miles in diameter to one and a half miles; 'hill'effects in craters appearing and disappearing in a few hours; over 800 substantial observations madeby scientists of blinking and flashing lights; the results of NASA photographs of the lunar surface,indicating several large pyramid structures, strange rifts in the surface with entrances, massivegirders, machinery and some 1000 kilometre blocks of metal, alongside tears in the surface. Thisreveals massive subsurface interior 'plumbing', huge crosses a mile long, and enormous excavatingequipment.Professional astronomers have gradually been discouraged from investigating these observations,referred to as Transient Lunar Phenomena, and all such Fortean observations are now only of interestto the amateur.Our satellite has long since been established as being extremely dry but this information has beencontradicted by the appearance of clouds on the surface. On one occasion a cloud of water vapourappeared covering more than 100 square miles. And it has been reported that strange clouds appear atlightning speed. The capture theory that the Moon was pulled into its orbit by the Earth was oncefavoured but the circular orbit of the Moon invalidated it. As already mentioned the Moon is thewrong size and in the wrong orbit. It is too big and too far out. It does not rotate relative to Earth; thesame side always faces the Earth. And what about the amazing 'coincidence' of the eclipsephenomenon. The position and size of the Moon is precisely that necessary to eclipse the Sun's disc.Scientific experts, including NASA investigators believe that the Moon is hollow -- it is the onlyexplanation. The velocity of sound has been found to increase with depth and at 40 miles it is too fastfor the speed of propagation through rock substance.'Spaceship Moon' is the brainchild of the two Soviet researchers but many others agree with thetheory, including NASA scientists at JPL and an Oxford University physicist. The capture theory isnow back in favour but with a significant adjustment that the Moon was steered into orbit.It might be worth a comment on the recent 'conspiracy theory' that astronauts never actually went tothe Moon. DVDs and television programmes have proffered that, in particular, photographs allegedlytaken on the Moon were faked. In fact one can see clearly in the photographs that the shadows of objects on the Moon were
not 
parallel as they would be if the shadows were cast by the Sun, ratherthan by studio lighting. Further evidence has been given. But we may know from earlier suspicionsthat NASA has a propensity for faking scenes -- for example, the view of the interior of the shuttlefaking an outer-space mission when actually on the ground. Thus the conclusion, and personalopinion of the author, is that both scenarios are correct: astronauts did land on the Moon,
and 
NASAhas produced faked photographs.Was the space programme cut because further encounters with UFOs might blow the governmentcover-up? Even more important than this, allowing the public to increase their confront and interestin the subject of Extraterrestrials would eventually lead to a worldwide awakening of the humanrace's true heritage, the causes of our downfall, the falsification of our history, and ultimately thedisclosure and eradication of the control mechanism.We see that the Moon mysteries are intimately bound up with extraterrestrial sightings andinvolvement, in particular, the conclusion of the two Russian scientists that the Moon is artificial andhollow. Is this a favourable omen for the human race or a harbinger of something more ominous.Why was the Moon directed to retain continuously a dark side? A side of the Moon we never see.Also police records referring to increased crime during the full Moon are commonplace. A study of 

Activity (26)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
1 thousand reads
akakios0 liked this
triamazikamno liked this
Wilhelm Glocke liked this
alanmoran liked this
connect2world liked this
jookut liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->