• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
 
State v Johnstone: Crimen Inuria: Incomplete Further Particulars
Page 1 of 11
LEGAL DELIVERY INFO: HAND (*), FAX/MAIL (#); EMAIL (@)
COURT REF: CAS 1340/7/07
(Ref: SAP 572/02; HC-CPD A 696-04; JAG 07-146)
TO: SNR. PROS. JACOBS (*) & ADV. ANTON ACKERMAN (#)
NPA: CapeTown & NPA: Priority Crimes Litigation Unit
Ref: Incomplete Further Particulars: Case: CAS 1340/7/07: State v. Johnstone; Plaintiff: Hon. Mrs. P.de Lille, MP, Leader of Independent Democrats Political Party
AND TO: HON. MR. MENDY TYULU, MAGISTRATE (*)
Capetown Magistrates Court
Ref: Incomplete Further Particulars: (1) The Further Particulars of 12 December 2008 contain NoNew Evidence, to this Crimen Inuria matter, dismissed from the Court Role, by MagistrateTyulu, on 02 June 2008.
CC (HONOURABLE TRANSPARENCY):
HON. MR. TONY LEON, MP (*) MR. J. CILLIERS & T. VAN ZYL, Advocates (#)Democratic AllianceMR. P. MIHALIK & G. BEALE, Advocates (*)
Ref: Incomplete Further Particulars (4) IncompleteInvestigation by SAPS: Prior Legal Correspondence
Notice of Legal & Political Delivery 
documentationdelivered to Plaintiff, on behalf of Defendant, byHon. Tony Leon, MP, DA.Ref: Incomplete Further Particulars: (5) Outstanding StateResponse to Defendant’s Offers
Notice of Legal & Political Delivery 
documentationdelivered to Plaintiff, on behalf of Defendant, by Hon.Tony Leon, MP, DA.
MR. MILTON DE LA HARPE, Attorney (*)LT. COL. DAVE GROSSMAN, Psychologist (@)MR. MALCOLM GEZZLER, Attorney (**)DR. BRAD BLANTON, PH.D, Psychologist (@)
Ref: Incomplete Further Particulars: (5) OutstandingState Response to Defendant’s Offers
Notice of Legal & Political Delivery 
documentationdelivered to Plaintiff, on behalf of Defendant, byHon. Tony Leon, MP, DA.Ref: Incomplete Further Particulars: (5) Outstanding StateResponse to Defendant’s OffersJAG 07-146: Critical Psychology's Assumptions &Practices Sustaining Patriarchal Social Injustice [$&CFB]Conformity Pressures(**) c/o Adv. Gary Beale
CONTENTS OF DOCUMENTATION:
Letter:
For the Record: State v Johnstone; ‘Crimen Inuria’: Incomplete Further Particulars
Annex i: Transcript: 2004 Court Record Letter by Brad Blanton, Ph.D,
SAP Case: 572/02: Re: Disclosure Trial:Lara Johnstone Psychological Integrity Reference
Annex ii: Letter: Tony Leon, MP to Lara Johnstone,
Notice of Legal and Political Delivery 
, 29 Jan ‘04Annex iii:News Article:
Woman Defies Court Over Rude De Lille SMS’s
, SAPA, 19 July ‘07Annex iv:Letter to Att. M. de La Harpe:
Representation: Re: Lara Johnstone, ‘Crimen Inuria’,
10 Dec ‘08Annex v:2 Data DVD’s:
 Alternative Perspectives to ‘Crimen Inuria’ Concepts
:
CIA & Pentagon: Lack of Political Will: Overpopulation, Terrorism & Resource Wars
, Nightline, 2000;
Energy, ExponentialFx & Population
, Dr. Alfred Bartlett;
Practicing Radical Honesty 
, Brad Blanton, PhD;
Politically Correct Language
, George Carlin;
Walking on Egg-Shells Language
, Pastor James Manning;
Iatrogenic Origin of AIDS
, Dr. L. Horowitz;
Obedience to Authority 
, Stanley Milgram;
Obedience to Authority 
, Sundance;
HAARP Psychotronics
,
Nick Begich;
Quiet Rage: The Stanford Prison Study 
,Stanford Uni.;
Exponential Growth Bomb
, Growth Busters;
Crude Impact
, Vista Clara & JJ Wood
State v. Johnstone: Crimen Inuria:http://crimeninuria.blogspot.com/
 
State v Johnstone: Crimen Inuria: Incomplete Further Particulars
Page 2 of 11
Lara Johnstone
16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, George, 6529Tel: (044) 870 7239 || Cell: (071) 170 1954
28 December 2008
Adv. Anton Ackerman Snr. Prosecutor JacobsHead: Priority Crimes Litigation UnitCapetown Prosecutor’s OfficePer: Facsimile/Registered MailPer Hand DeliverySirs,
For the Record: State v Johnstone; ‘Crimen Inuria’: Incomplete Further Particulars
Defendant’s Interpretation of (i) Magistrate’s 12 December 2008 instructions:
Concern for expeditious court proceedings in this matter, to avoid wasting thecourt’s time with issues that could be resolved professionally and expeditiouslyout of court
.
(ii) Honourable Legal Psychological Integrity Conduct Principles:
“A lawyer shall not suppress any evidence that he or his client has a legal obligation toreveal or produce.”“A public prosecutor or other government lawyer in criminal litigation shall make timelydisclosure to counsel for the defendant, or to the defendant if he has no counsel, of theexistence of evidence, known to the prosecutor or other government lawyer, that tends tonegate the guilt of the accused, mitigate the degree of the offense, or reduce thepunishment.”
BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THIS CORRESPONDENCE:
INCOMPLETE FURTHER PARTICULARS:
1.
No New Evidence : The Further Particulars of 12 December 2008 contain NoNew Evidence to this Crimen Inuria Case, dismissed from the Court Role byMagistrate Tyulu on 02 June 2008. (Dismissed when SAPS failed - due to a‘backlog’ - to produce the alleged Outstanding Warrants etc.).
2.
Outstanding Evidentiary Documentation: ‘Outstanding Warrants’ : Two Alleged‘Outstanding Warrants’, used by SAP Insp. Christian, to Arrest and DetainDefendant in this Crimin Inuria Matter, on 18 July 2008.
3.
Outstanding Due Process Documentation : Referral to Forensic Psychologist,Forensic Psychologist’s Report; and subsequent State Psychological Report:
4.
Incomplete Investigation by SAPS : to Plaintiff’s ‘Crimen Inuria’ allegations,considering Relevant Evidence Known to the Plaintiff, SAPS and NPA: PriorRelevant Legal Correspondence between Plaintiff and Defendant:
State v. Johnstone: Crimen Inuria: http://crimeninuria.blogspot.com/
 
State v Johnstone: Crimen Inuria: Incomplete Further Particulars
Page 3 of 11
DEFENDANT’S FURTHER NOTICE WRITTEN REPRESENTATION:
5.
As of Date, No State Response to Defendant’s Offers : (i) Offer for Negotiation,to withdraw Transfer of HC-CPD Appeal A696-04, to US Navy JAG, andproceed in the High Court, Cape Provincial Division; and (ii) Offer to Answerany of the State’s Relevant Questions should the State continue to allegeDefendant’s ‘Mental Incapacity’; submitted to the State, respectively; c/oand via Attorneys Mr. Gezzler and Mr. de La Harpe.
6.
Data DVD: Alternative Perspectives to ‘Crimen Inuria’ Concepts.
FOR THE RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE:
The Further Particulars of 12 December 2008 are Incomplete, as follows:
1.
No New Evidence : The Further Particulars of 12 December 2008 contain NoNew Evidence to this Crimen Inuria Case, dismissed from the Court Role byMagistrate Tyulu on 02 June 2008 (Dismissed when SAPS failed – due to a‘backlog’ – to produce the alleged Outsanding Warrants etc.).
On 02 June 2008, Magistrate Tyulu struck this crimen inuria matter from the Magistrate’s Court’sroll, due to the SAPS incomplete investigation, to provide required documentation to theFurther Particulars of 22 August 2007.The Further Particulars of 22 August 2007 were incomplete, the following documentation beingeither intentionally or negligently and irregularly withheld from the Defendant, and herCounsel, by the SAPS and/or NPA: (1) Two alleged outstanding Warrants, used by SAP InspectorChristian, to arrest and detain Defendant in this Crimen Inuria matter, on 18 July 2007; (ii)Outstanding Due Process documentation of 19 July 2007 Referral for State Psychological Report;(iii) Outstanding Prior Relevant Legal Correspondence between Plaintiff and Defendant.Accordingly, the Further Particulars of 12 December 2008 contain No New Evidence, noraforementioned Required Evidence; to this Crimen Inuria Matter struck from the Role byMagistrate Tyulu on 02 June 2008. Accordingly the Further Particulars of 12 December 2008, likethe Further Particulars of 22 August 2007, are incomplete.
2.
Outstanding Evidentiary Documentation: ‘Outstanding Warrants’ : Two Alleged‘Outstanding Warrants’, used by SAP INSP. Christian, to plausibly irregularlyor illegally arrest and detain Defendant in this Crimin Inuria Matter, on 18July 2007.
At the time of Inspector Christian’s arrest of Defendant, Inspector Christian stated hisjustification for the Arrest were two outstanding Warrants, one allegedly in Pietermaritzburgand one in Port Elizabeth.Defendant requested proof and copies of these alleged Outstanding Warrants, as per theConstitutional Principle “to be informed of the charge with sufficient detail to answer it.”Inspector Christian refused to provide proof of these alleged outstanding warrants, andproceeded to arrest and detain Defendant.The proof of these alleged Outstanding Warrants used to arrest and detain Defendant on 18 July2007, have yet to be provided by Inspector Christian, the South African Police Services, or theNational Prosecuting Authority; and were requested from the SAPS and the National ProsecutingAuthority, by Lara Johnstone; from Attorney Mr. Malcolm Gezzler, by Lara and Andre Johnstone,
State v. Johnstone: Crimen Inuria: http://crimeninuria.blogspot.com/
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...