• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
 
1 Corinthians 10:14-17 (Belgic Confession, article 35)
One Loaf 
14
Therefore, my dear friends, flee from idolatry.
15
I speak to sensible people; judge for yourselves what I say.
16
Is not the cup of thanksgiving for which we give thanks a participation in the blood of Christ? And is not the bread that we break a participation inthe body of Christ?
17
Because there is one loaf, we, who are many, are one body, for weall partake of the one loaf.
Brothers and sisters in Christ,Eating supper together is becoming less and less of a reality in our society. When I was younger living at home our dinners werenever around the table. We’d go into the kitchen, grab a plate of food.One or two of us might sit at the kitchen table. Someone elsewould sit in front of the TV. One of us would go eat in a bedroomwhile doing some homework. Our house was divided – whichreally represented some of the problems in our house.I think it’s the same with the Lord’s Supper.There are a lot of very strong feelings about the Sacrament. Therehave been many battles – many struggles – theological difficulties – divisions and fights. And some are still going on – and thetemptation is to start picking sides and carry on the fights.Let’s go to war with the Roman Catholics again about the mass – or let’s take on Zwingli and his memorial supper. Or children at thetable – that one’s fresh and interesting – let’s have a go at that tosee if we can move forward. Now the debates are useful – again we need to define our beliefsand understand what the Scriptures teach and what they don’t.We’ll do some of that tonight.But they also highlight a greater reality within the church. That weeat at a divided table. Where we sit down at our own meals and
1
 
don’t pay attention to anyone else. We watch our own shows. Or go to our own rooms.This evening I’m going to make three statements about the Lord’sSupper – none of them are new to us – but they are central to our doctrine and more important: they address this reality of a dividedchurch and they call us back from division – back to the table.The first statement, on the surface, is controversial coming from areformed pulpit.
I. The Lord’s Supper is the body and blood of Jesus Christ.
Right away our theological minds are starting to make connections.Paul, in verse 14, reminds us to “flee from idolatry.” We shift our thinking to Lord’s Day 80 in the Heidelberg Catechism andremember the Roman Catholic mass of the late 1500s. Words liketransubstantiation enter our vocabulary and not in a pleasant way.Fiery sermons from long ago stir up our blood.All of a sudden, like the good reformed thinkers that we are, we become very uncomfortable with the word “IS”. So much so thatour first inclination is to redefine the word or replace it in a waythat better reflects our thinking.The Lord’s Supper “represents”, or it “demonstrates” or it“remembers” the body and the blood of Christ… Now this is a useful reformed response. I, like many pastors andtheologians, have quoted the notorious former president out of context in saying “it all depends upon what your meaning of theword `is’ is” because we are more subtle in our thinking aboutmatters of faith – there’s always something that is nuanced in thethings we believe.
2
 
And there are certainly things that we don’t mean when we say thatthe bread is Christ’s body and the wine is his blood.We do have to understand that “IS” doesn’t mean physically.There’s this old joke about a young boy whose pastor-father wasaway at the hospital. When he asked his mother where his father was he wondered whether he was visiting the sick people there.She responded, “No, he’s there donating blood.” To which hereplied “They do know that it’s just grape juice, right?!?”The physical reality that is going on in the Sacrament isrepresentative. The bread and the wine are not changed intoanything else. It’s bread and it’s wine – sometimes whole wheatand sometimes Merlot and grape juice.The Belgic Confession says in article 35: “To represent to us thisspiritual and heavenly bread Christ has instituted an earthly andvisible bread as the sacrament of his body and wine as thesacrament of his blood.”We know this – the supper does represent, demonstrate andremember through the earthly and visible – our theology hasn’tchanged on this in over 400 years and it existed within streams of Roman Catholic thinking right back to the beginning of the churchwhen Jesus first instituted the Supper.But still we say “IS” for a very important reason: our salvationdepends on connecting to the very real body and blood of Christ.This representation that we find here on our table is arepresentation of reality. When we eat bread and wine we taste bread and wine. But our spirits – the totality of our existence – hastasted body and blood – again from the Confession:
3
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...