S
ince the 1980s, many climatologists have claimed thathuman activity has caused the near-surface airtemperature to rise faster and higher than ever before inhistory. Industrial carbon dioxide emissions, they say, willsoon result in a runaway global warming, with disastrousconsequences for the biosphere. By 2100, they claim, theatmospheric carbon dioxide concentration will double,causing the average temperature on Earth to increase by1.9°C to 5.2°C, and in the polar region by more than 12°C. Just a few years earlier, these very same climatologists hadprofessed that industrial pollution wouldbring about a new Ice Age. In 1971, thespiritual leader of the global warmingprophets, Dr. Stephen H. Schneider fromthe National Center for AtmosphericResearch in Boulder, Colorado, claimedthat this pollution would soon
reduce
theglobal temperature by 3.5
°
C.
1
Hisremarks were followed by more officialstatements from the National ScienceBoard of the U.S. National ScienceFoundation,
”
...[T]he the present time of high temperatures should be drawing toan end ... leading into the next glacialage.
”
In 1974, the board observed,
“
During the last 20 to 30 years, worldtemperature has fallen, irregularly at firstbut more sharply over the last decade.
”
2
No matter what happens, catastrophicwarming or catastrophic cooling, some-how the blame always falls upon
“
sinful
”
human beings and their civilization
—
which is allegedly hostile and alien to theplanet.In 1989, Stephen Schneider advised:
“
To capture the publicimagination ... we have to ... make simplified dramaticstatements, and little mention of any doubts one might have.... Each of us has to decide the right balance between beingeffective and being honest.
”
3
This turned out to be an
“
effec-tive
”
policy: Since 1997, each of approximately 2,000American climate scientists (only 60 of them with Ph.D.degrees) received an average of $1 million annually forresearch;
4, 5
on a world scale, the annual budget for climateresearch runs to $5 billion.
6
It is interesting that in the UnitedStates, most of this money goes toward discovering the changeof global climate and its causes, while Europeans apparentlybelieve that man-made warming is already on, and spendmoney mostly on studying the effects of warming.Governments of many countries (but not the United States,Australia, or Russia) signed the infamous Kyoto Protocol,which is aimed at the mandatory reduction of oil, coal, andgas combustion. Should this convention be universally imple-mented, the drop in world temperature would be hardly per-ceptible, but there would be a drastic and very noticeableregression in the economy. In 2100, under the mandatoryemission restrictions of the Kyoto Protocol, the temperaturewould be diminished by 0.2
°
C, or, to use the figures of theglobal warmers, with Kyoto, the temperature increase that wewould experience in the year 2094, would be postponed untilthe year 2100. Thus, the Kyoto Protocol buys the world sixyears.
7
But the losses resulting from the compliance with the KyotoProtocol would reach $400 billion in the United States alone.The reduction of the world domestic prod-uct, when added up across the whole cen-tury, would reach $1.8 trillion, while theso-called benefits of the emissions reduc-tion from the Kyoto Protocol are around$0.12 trillion.
8
By 2050, in WesternEurope and in Japan, the Gross NationalProduct would be reduced by 0.5 percentin comparison with 1994; in EasternEurope, this reduction would reach 3 per-cent, and in Russia 3.4 percent.
8
Expertsworking for the Canadian governmentconcluded that the implementation of theKyoto Protocol would necessitate energyrationing, which would resemble the gaso-line rationing during World War II.
9
Climate Change Reflects NaturalPlanetary Events
In fact, the recent climate developmentsare not something unusual; they reflect anatural course of planetary events. Fromtime immemorial, alternate warm andcold cycles have followed each other, with a periodicity rang-ing from tens of millions to several years. The cycles weremost probably dependent on the extraterrestrial changesoccurring in the Sun and in the Sun
’
s neighborhood.Short term changes
—
those occurring in a few years
—
arecaused by terrestrial factors such as large volcanic explosions,which inject dust into the stratosphere, and the phenomenonof El Ni
ñ
o, which depends on the variations in oceanic cur-rents. Thermal energy produced by natural radionuclides thatare present in the 1-kilometer-thick layer of the Earth
’
s crust,contributed about 117 kilojoules per year per square meter of the primitive Earth. As a result of the decay of these long-livedradionuclides, their annual contribution is now only 33.4 kilo-joules per square meter.
10
This nuclear heat, however, plays a minor role among theterrestrial factors, in comparison with the
“
greenhouse effects
”
caused by absorption by some atmospheric gases of the solarradiation reflected from the surface of the Earth. Without thegreenhouse effect, the average near-surface air temperaturewould be
–
18
°
C, and not +15
°
C, as it is now. The most impor-
21st CENTURY
Winter 2003-200453
Get out the fur coats, because global cooling is coming! Aworld-renowned atmospheric scientist and mountaineer, who has excavated ice out of 17 glaciers on 6 continents in his 50-year career, tells how we know.
Courtesy of
Polityka
magazine
The Polish-language weekly
Polityka
featured a shorter version of this article as a cover story, July 12, 2003.
Add a Comment