• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • 1
    CommentGo Back
Download
 
U.S. DISTRICT COURTMIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDATAMPA DIVISIONMARK A ADAMS,Appellant,vs. Case No. 8:08-cv-1570-T-26CORPORATE SPORTS MARKETINGGROUP, INC. et al.,Appellees. _______________________________/ 
APPELLEES’ MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD ON APPEAL ANDEXTEND THE TIME PERIOD FOR FILING AN ANSWER BRIEF TO ONEWEEK FOLLOWING THE TRANSMITTAL OF THE COMPLETE RECORD
Appellees, CORPORATE SPORTS MARKETING GROUP, INC., et al., byand through their undersigned counsel, move this Court for the entry of an Orderpermitting supplementation of the record on appeal with the documents itemizedon the attached list and extending the time for Appellees to file and serve theiranswer brief to one week after the transmittal of the supplemental record, and asgrounds would show:1. This is an appeal from a Default Judgment entered againstAppellant on April 22, 2008 in Adversary Case No. 8:06-ap-00185-PMG basedupon Appellant’s intentional refusal to answer the Complaint after being given atleast four opportunities. Appellant also seeks relief from the subsequent OrderDenying Discharge of Debtor entered on April 23, 2008 in Bankruptcy Case No.8:05-bk-29501-PMG, based upon the Default Judgment in the AdversaryProceeding.
 
 2
2. After initiating this appeal, Appellant failed to file and serve adesignation of the items to be included in the record on appeal or a statement ofthe issues to be presented as required by Fed.R.Bank.P. 8006. As a result, theClerk of the Bankruptcy Court transmitted a limited record to this Court on August15, 2008. (Docs. 1-2)3. After Appellant failed to file his initial brief on time, this Courtentered an Order directing Appellant to file his initial brief on or before September8, 2008. (Doc. 6)4. On September 8, 2008, Appellant sought an extension of time andcomplained that the Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court had not transmitted acomplete record. (Doc. 7)5. On September 9, 2008, this Court ordered the Appellant to insurethat the “entire record on appeal” be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or beforeSeptember 23, 2008. (Doc. 8)6. On September 22, 2008, Appellant filed in the Bankruptcy Court adesignation of items to be included in the record on appeal and a statement ofthe issues to be presented designating only portions of the record to betransmitted.7. On September 29, 2008, the Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court, ratherthan transmitting the entire record ordered by this Court, only transmitted theincomplete record designated by the Appellant. (Docs. 9-11) As Appellant’sappeal raises entirely procedural issues, the procedural course of the case isimportant for a full exposition. Also, Appellant has omitted important and
 
 3
significant documents, such as the complaint and amended complaint in theadversary proceeding, documents evidencing that Appellant did not timely file hisbankruptcy schedules and statement of financial affairs and sought an extensionof time to do so, documents evidencing that Appellees withdrew a timely filedobjection to discharge and dischargeability based upon the Bankruptcy Court’sextension of time, and many other extensions of time sought and obtained byAppellant in the course of the bankruptcy proceeding.8. As a result of the confusion and procedural irregularity caused bythe
pro se 
Appellant’s actions, Appellees have never been afforded anopportunity to file a designation of additional items to be included in the record.9. In order to permit this case to be decided on a complete record,Appellees would request that this Court enter an Order directing the BankruptcyClerk to transmit to this Court the items identified on the attached list.10. Appellees have been diligently preparing the Answer Brief but willnot be able to conclude the brief with appropriate record citations until after therecord is supplemented. Appellees would request that the Court allow one weekfollowing the supplementation of the record for Appellees to file and serve theAnswer Brief.11. No party will be prejudiced by the Court’s granting the reliefrequested herein. A denial would severely prejudice Appellees.WHEREFORE Appellees, CORPORATE SPORTS MARKETING GROUP,INC. et al., move this Honorable Court for the entry of an Order permitting
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
markadamsjdmba

Some clown, probably little Timmy Weber, liked this document. However, it's an example of the many frivolous and fraudulent motions filed by Weber. See my Motion to Vacate Order Allowing Weber to Supplement Record for clarification.

reply06 / 10 / 2010
markadamsjdmba

If you use Weber’s motion as a guide for preparing a motion to supplement the record on appeal, you will almost certainly have your motion denied unless of course, you’re connected like Weber and Battaglia claim to be.

06 / 10 / 2010
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...