P. 1
Entrepreneurial Community in Kansas City: From Fragmented to Collaborative?

Entrepreneurial Community in Kansas City: From Fragmented to Collaborative?

Ratings: (0)|Views: 19 |Likes:

A small set of metropolitan areas in the United States can be considered second-tier life sciences or technology regions. Kansas City is such an emerging second-tier region. The Kansas City metropolitan area was able to grow a small but specialized knowledge economy because of the presence of large firms and subsequent efforts to strengthen entrepreneurship. This paper presents data from twenty interviews conducted in the summer of 2012 with regional experts, venture capitalists, and entrepreneurs who have successfully raised risk capital.

The analysis of Kansas City’s entrepreneurial community shows, first, that large firms’ role as incubators of entrepreneurial startup companies seems to have diminished, and that there are weak connections between existing large firms and entrepreneurial ventures. Second, entrepreneurial exits in the form of mergers and acquisitions have increased and a small number of cashed-out entrepreneurs are reinvesting their funds and becoming engaged. Yet this process seems to be still in its beginning stages. Third, the region’s entrepreneurial community does not exhibit strong networking and collaboration. Rather, entrepreneurial ventures and industry connections exist much like “islands of excellence” without strong interconnections. Fourth, although the availability of funding has increased, local entrepreneurs perceive the accessibility and availability of funds—and the capacity local venture investors bring to the table—as limiting factors. At the same time, while the number of investment groups has increased, the investor community is still fragmented and not well connected. Fifth, the energy and collective effort to improve the Kansas City entrepreneurial community has increased and strengthened significantly since 2006 when a similar study was conducted.

Various groups and organizations have ensured a thickening of the entrepreneurial support infrastructure in the form of creation of incubators, establishment of financial incentives to invest in entrepreneurial ventures (i.e. angel tax credits), and the addition of effective mentoring and networking events. Yet the analysis of the data shows that Kansas City faces the drawbacks of a region characterized by organizational thinness in the form of weak endowment of firms and organizations that can fuel the entrepreneurial pipeline and a lack of interaction and networks among key members of the entrepreneurial community, which keeps the entrepreneurial economy fragmented. To overcome organizational thinness and fragmentation, this paper suggests focusing policy efforts on connecting key actors in the entrepreneurial economy such as existing large firms, entrepreneurial ventures, universities, and funding and mentoring organizations.

A small set of metropolitan areas in the United States can be considered second-tier life sciences or technology regions. Kansas City is such an emerging second-tier region. The Kansas City metropolitan area was able to grow a small but specialized knowledge economy because of the presence of large firms and subsequent efforts to strengthen entrepreneurship. This paper presents data from twenty interviews conducted in the summer of 2012 with regional experts, venture capitalists, and entrepreneurs who have successfully raised risk capital.

The analysis of Kansas City’s entrepreneurial community shows, first, that large firms’ role as incubators of entrepreneurial startup companies seems to have diminished, and that there are weak connections between existing large firms and entrepreneurial ventures. Second, entrepreneurial exits in the form of mergers and acquisitions have increased and a small number of cashed-out entrepreneurs are reinvesting their funds and becoming engaged. Yet this process seems to be still in its beginning stages. Third, the region’s entrepreneurial community does not exhibit strong networking and collaboration. Rather, entrepreneurial ventures and industry connections exist much like “islands of excellence” without strong interconnections. Fourth, although the availability of funding has increased, local entrepreneurs perceive the accessibility and availability of funds—and the capacity local venture investors bring to the table—as limiting factors. At the same time, while the number of investment groups has increased, the investor community is still fragmented and not well connected. Fifth, the energy and collective effort to improve the Kansas City entrepreneurial community has increased and strengthened significantly since 2006 when a similar study was conducted.

Various groups and organizations have ensured a thickening of the entrepreneurial support infrastructure in the form of creation of incubators, establishment of financial incentives to invest in entrepreneurial ventures (i.e. angel tax credits), and the addition of effective mentoring and networking events. Yet the analysis of the data shows that Kansas City faces the drawbacks of a region characterized by organizational thinness in the form of weak endowment of firms and organizations that can fuel the entrepreneurial pipeline and a lack of interaction and networks among key members of the entrepreneurial community, which keeps the entrepreneurial economy fragmented. To overcome organizational thinness and fragmentation, this paper suggests focusing policy efforts on connecting key actors in the entrepreneurial economy such as existing large firms, entrepreneurial ventures, universities, and funding and mentoring organizations.

More info:

Published by: The Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation on Dec 03, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

09/17/2013

pdf

text

original

 
9
 
 
LATVLYVLAL\VBJK O@GG\ABTRBA EJA_J_ OBTR8NV@G NVJCGLATLD T@ O@KKJF@VJTB^L0A`~lgflv 69:6
 
:
 
LATVLYVLAL\VBJK O@GG\ABTRBA EJA_J_ OBTR8NV@G NVJCGLATLD T@ O@KKJF@VJTB^L0A`~lgflv 69:6Mlbel Gjrlv 
Yv`nlss`v `n Lo`a`gbo Cl`cvjymrBastbt|tl `n Cl`cvjymr . Olatlv n`v Vlcb`ajk Lo`a`gbo Dl~lk`yglat\ab~lvsbtr `n Flva+ _btxlvkjad
:
 
¢ 69:6 fr tml Lbac Gjvb`a Ej|nngja N`|adjtb`a! Jkk vbcmts vlslv~ld!
:
Joea`kldclglats8 B `|kd kbel t` joea`kldcl tml nbajaobjk s|yy`vt `n tml Ej|nngja N`|adjtb`a! Btmjae Hjabaj Elkklv+ Gjvbj M`yn+ jad H`ajs C|vtalv -jkk st|dlats jt tml \ab~lvsbtr `n Flva ba _btxlvkjad"n`v tmlbv ba~jk|jfkl vlsljvom jssbstjaol ba tmbs yv`hlot! _ylobjk tmjaes c` t` Rjs|r|eb G`t`rjgj+ _lab`v _om`kjv jt tml Ej|nngja N`|adjtb`a+ jad mbs o`kkljc|ls Ojglv`a O|smgja+ Ajtl @ks`a+ Klsj Gbtomlkk+jad Djal _tjacklv n`v tmlbv s|yy`vt jad jd~bol! B jks` jyyvlobjtl tml bkkbacalss `n tml batlv~bl yjvtalvst` gjel tbgl ba tmlbv f|sr somld|kls t` smjvl tmlbv basbcmts btm gl!
 
6
 
L}lo|tb~l _|ggjvr
 J sgjkk slt `n gltv`y`kbtja jvljs ba tml \abtld _tjtls oja fl o`asbdlvld slo`ad'tblv kbnlsoblaols `v tloma`k`cr vlcb`as! Ejasjs Obtr bs s|om ja lglvcbac slo`ad'tblv vlcb`a!Tml Ejasjs Obtr gltv`y`kbtja jvlj js jfkl t` cv` j sgjkk f|t sylobjkbxld ea`kldcllo`a`gr floj|sl `n tml yvlslaol `n kjvcl nbvgs jad s|fslz|lat lnn`vts t` stvlactmlalatvlyvlal|vsmby! Tmbs yjylv yvlslats djtj nv`g tlatr batlv~bls o`ad|otld ba tmls|gglv `n 69:6 btm vlcb`ajk l}ylvts+ ~lat|vl ojybtjkbsts+ jad latvlyvlal|vs m` mj~ls|oolssn|kkr vjbsld vbse ojybtjk!Tml jajkrsbs `n Ejasjs Obtr
s latvlyvlal|vbjk o`gg|abtr sm`s+ nbvst+ tmjt kjvcl nbvgs
v`kl js bao|fjt`vs `n latvlyvlal|vbjk stjvt|y o`gyjabls sllgs t` mj~l dbgbabsmld+ jadtmjt tmlvl jvl lje o`aalotb`as fltlla l}bstbac kjvcl nbvgs jad latvlyvlal|vbjk~lat|vls! _lo`ad+ latvlyvlal|vbjk l}bts ba tml n`vg `n glvclvs jad joz|bsbtb`as mj~lbaovljsld jad j sgjkk a|gflv `n ojsmld'`|t latvlyvlal|vs jvl vlba~lstbac tmlbv n|adsjad flo`gbac lacjcld! Rlt tmbs yv`olss sllgs t` fl stbkk ba bts flcbaabac stjcls! Tmbvd+tml vlcb`a
s latvlyvlal|vbjk o`gg|abtr d`ls a`t l}mbfbt stv`ac alt`vebac jado`kkjf`vjtb`a! Vjtmlv+ latvlyvlal|vbjk ~lat|vls jad bad|stvr o`aalotb`as l}bst g|om kbel
bskjads `n l}olkklaol
btm`|t stv`ac batlvo`aalotb`as! N`|vtm+ jktm`|cm tml j~jbkjfbkbtr`n n|adbac mjs baovljsld+ k`ojk latvlyvlal|vs ylvolb~l tml joolssbfbkbtr jad j~jbkjfbkbtr`n n|ads
jad tml ojyjobtr k`ojk ~lat|vl ba~lst`vs fvbac t` tml tjfkl
js kbgbtbac njot`vs! Jt tml sjgl tbgl+ mbkl tml a|gflv `n ba~lstglat cv`|ys mjs baovljsld+ tml ba~lst`v o`gg|abtr bs stbkk nvjcglatld jad a`t lkk o`aalotld! Nbntm+ tml lalvcr jad o`kklotb~llnn`vt t` bgyv`~l tml Ejasjs Obtr latvlyvlal|vbjk o`gg|abtr mjs baovljsld jadstvlactmlald sbcabnbojatkr sbaol 699> mla j sbgbkjv st|dr js o`ad|otld!^jvb`|s cv`|ys jad `vcjabxjtb`as mj~l las|vld j tmboelabac `n tml latvlyvlal|vbjks|yy`vt banvjstv|ot|vl ba tml n`vg `n ovljtb`a `n bao|fjt`vs+ lstjfkbsmglat `n nbajaobjkbaolatb~ls t` ba~lst ba latvlyvlal|vbjk ~lat|vls -b!l! jaclk tj} ovldbts"+ jad tml jddbtb`a`n lnnlotb~l glat`vbac jad alt`vebac l~lats! Rlt tml jajkrsbs `n tml djtj sm`s tmjtEjasjs Obtr njols tml dvjfjoes `n j vlcb`a omjvjotlvbxld fr `vcjabxjtb`ajk tmbaalss batml n`vg `n lje lad`glat `n nbvgs jad `vcjabxjtb`as tmjt oja n|lk tml latvlyvlal|vbjkybylkbal jad j kjoe `n batlvjotb`a jad alt`ves jg`ac elr glgflvs `n tmllatvlyvlal|vbjk o`gg|abtr+ mbom ellys tml latvlyvlal|vbjk lo`a`gr nvjcglatld! T``~lvo`gl `vcjabxjtb`ajk tmbaalss jad nvjcglatjtb`a+ tmbs yjylv s|cclsts n`o|sbacy`kbor lnn`vts `a o`aalotbac elr jot`vs ba tml latvlyvlal|vbjk lo`a`gr s|om js l}bstbackjvcl nbvgs+ latvlyvlal|vbjk ~lat|vls+ |ab~lvsbtbls+ jad n|adbac jad glat`vbac`vcjabxjtb`as!
 

Activity (3)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads
mvalenzu liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->