Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
College of Engineering at the University of Utah - Fall 2012 Newsletter

College of Engineering at the University of Utah - Fall 2012 Newsletter

Ratings: (0)|Views: 454|Likes:

Fall 2012 newsletter from the College of Engineering at the University of Utah.More informationhttp://www.coe.utah.edu/publications

Fall 2012 newsletter from the College of Engineering at the University of Utah.More informationhttp://www.coe.utah.edu/publications

More info:

Copyright:Traditional Copyright: All rights reserved


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF or read online from Scribd
See more
See less




fforts by the University of Utah’s College of Engi-neering to improve and grow its programs are suc-ceeding and being recognized nationwide.As the leader in a statewide effort to increase engi-neering and computer science degrees in Utah, theCollege of Engineering is helping our state, regionaland national economies grow. We are pleased to
report that the College is making signicant strides
toward this goal: in 2012, we awarded a record-high721 degrees, putting the College in the top 40 U.S.engineering programs in bachelor’s, master’s andPh.D. degrees awarded.Our teaching and research standing also continuesto grow. In the latest issue of U.S. News & WorldReport’s “America’s Best Colleges” rankings of under-graduate programs, the College of Engineering contin-ued its steady climb, moving up two spots to #64 (of 346 colleges of engineering) in the nation. Our gradu-ate ranking is consistently higher (#54 in the nationin 2012), and the university as a whole ranked #17 inForbes Magazine’s “Top 100 Best Buy Colleges.” TheCollege had $74.7 million of external research expen-ditures in 2011.
TrajEcTOry fOr GrOwTh
“The growth in research quality and quantity, and theincreases in the number of graduates are examples of whatcan be accomplished when the State, University, privatedonors, and the College work together,” says RichardBrown, dean of the College of Engineering, “The result hasbeen a stream of well-educated engineers and computer
scientists who are nding excellent jobs and building the
2 Newsletter WINTER 2012
ightweight and stiff as a board: a plastic foam is beingused to protect Utah’s natural gas pipelines from rup-turing during earthquakes.“If an earthquake occurs, high-pressure gas lines areone of the most important items to protect,” says StevenBartlett, associate professor of civil engineering at the Uni-versity of Utah. “If they rupture and ignite, you essentiallyhave a large blowtorch, which is catastrophic.”Bartlett has partnered with natural-gas company Questarto use large expanded polystyrene blocks called “geo-foam” as a protective cover for natural gas pipelines buriedunderground. One-hundredth the weight of soil with similarstrength, geofoam blocks don’t erode or deteriorate.“This low-impact technology has an advantage in urbanenvironments, particularly if you need to realign gas lines or
utilities without affecting adjacent buildings or other facili
-ties,” says Bartlett.
Geologists expect when a major earthquake strikes the
Wasatch fault zone in the Salt Lake Valley, a fault rupturelikely will make the valley drop down relative to the moun-tains, causing a buried pipeline to lift up. However, mostburied pipelines lie under six to eight feet of compactedsoil—too much for a pipe to bear without rupturing,Bartlett says.Numerical simulations of earthquake fault ruptures per-formed by Bartlett and his students show a geofoam-protected pipeline on the valley side of the Salt Lake Citysegment of the Wasatch fault could withstand up to fourtimes more vertical force than traditional soil cover.Questar asked Bartlett to develop a strategy for protect-ing buried pipelines crossing earthquake faults in urbanareas such as 3300 South in Salt Lake Valley. Rather than
gut a major thoroughfare, Bartlett proposed a “slot trench”
design in which a block of geofoam is placed in a narrowtrench between a pipeline and the pavement above. If thepipeline begins to lift up, it will displace the geofoam block 
and compress it without sacricing the material’s overall
integrity. As the geofoam is compressed further, it will slideupward along the trench sidewalls and could damage thepavement above, but the pipeline will remain intact.Compared with compacted soil, geofoam is competitivewhen total construction costs are considered, Bartlettsays. What’s more, geofoam requires typical road embank-ment construction times of one month, compared with 12to 15 months using traditional methods.“When there are sensitive utilities involved, seismic stress-es or time is a factor, this technology wins hands down,”says Bartlett.
University of Utah College of Engineering3 

Activity (33)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
1 thousand reads
Kumar Rishikesh liked this
AyuwandiraFS liked this
Nirav Desai liked this
Kashif Ali Awan liked this
non-stop liked this
Uhrin Imre liked this
Aytul Akseli liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->