• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
 
Depopulation of a Planet
Thinning Out The "Useless Eaters"An Unspoken NWO Agenda
 Part I: Historical PerspectivePart II:What you can’t see
will
hurt you!Part III:No easy Answers!Part IV:A Picture EmergesPart V:U.N. Rings the AlarmPart VI:The Final Chapter 
A Report by RICK MARTIN
 
Part I: Historical Perspective
 11/19/95Many writers have spoken of intentional plans by certain Elite to thin-out the world'spopulation; it's a recurring theme among so-called conspiracy theorists. There arefrequent references to "useless eaters", which includes the bulk of mankind. Most, whenhearing of plots to depopulate the planet, simply say under their breath, "Yeah, right," ormore often, while shaking their head, "You're nuts." But when there is a carefulexamination of writings by prominent authors of this century, pieces of the puzzlecertainly do fall into place - pieces which support the contention that there are certainindividuals, if not entire governments, who have implemented a program of globalgenocide in an effort to salvage and corner "resources".What you will be reading in this series on
 Depopulation Of A Planet 
are selected writingsfrom a wide cross-section of viewpoints and political leanings. I will be using "their" owndocuments, their own words, to weave a fabric which, in the end, will be a tapestry of undeniable clarity for those with eyes to see.Without the historical foundation upon which to base understanding, writing aboutcurrent efforts at depopulation, through the use of viruses and microorganisms, wouldhave far less significance. So please stay with it as you read and it will come together. Irealize that some of this initial material may seem dry, but it is important for a broaderunderstanding of this critical and timely issue.
THOMAS MALTHUS
Thomas Robert Malthus was a parson of the English State Church and an economist wholived from 1766-1834. He is best known for his writing
 An Essay On The Principle Of 
 
Population
, published in 1798. His main idea is that populations increase more rapidlythan food supplies. So, he claimed, there would always be more people in the world thancan be fed, and
wars and disease will be necessary to kill off the extra population
.Malthus did not claim to be the originator of this idea, although it has come to be knownas the "Malthusian Theory". Malthus based his argument on the works of Condorcet,David Hume, Adam Smith, Defoe, Sir James Steuart, Townsend, Franklin, and others.Malthus'
 Essay
suggested to Charles Darwin the relationship between progress and thesurvival of the fittest. This was the basic idea in Darwin's theory of evolution.
GEORG WILHELM HEGEL
Turning to the
New American Encyclopedia
, we read, "Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel(1770-1831), German philosopher of idealism who had an immense influence on 19thand 20th-century thought and history. During his life he was famous for his professoriallectures at the University of Berlin and he wrote on logic, ethics, history, religion andaesthetics. The main feature of Hegel's philosophy was the dialectical method by whichan idea
(thesis)
was challenged by its opposite
(antithesis)
and the two ultimatelyreconciled in a third idea
(synthesis)
which subsumed both. Hegel found this method bothin the workings of the mind, as a logical procedure, and in the workings of the history of the world, which to Hegel was the process of the development and realization of theWorld Spirit
(Weltgeist)
. Hegel’s chief works were
Phenomenology of the Mind 
(1807)and
Philosophy Of Right 
(1821). His most important follower was Marx."In the book edited by Carl J. Friedrich entitled
The Philosophy of Hegel
, Hegel writes in
The Philosophy of History
, "In the Christian religion God has revealed Himself, giving tomen the knowledge of what He is so that He is no longer secluded and secret. With thispossibility of knowing Him, God has imposed upon us the duty to so know Him. Thedevelopment of the thinking spirit, which has started from this basis, from the revelationof the Divine Being, must at last progress to the point where what was at first presentedto the spirit in feeling and imagination is comprehended by thought. Whether the time hascome to achieve this knowledge depends upon whether the final end of the world has atlast entered into actual reality in a generally valid and conscious manner."Hegel concludes with, "World history, with all the changing drama of its histories, is thisprocess of the development and realization of the spirit. It is the true theodicy, the justification of God in history. Only this insight can reconcile the spirit with worldhistory and the actual reality, that what has happened, and is happening every day, is notonly not 'without God', but is essentially the work of God."In his work 
 A History Of Western Philosophy
,Bertrand Russellwrites, "Throughout thewhole period after the death of Hegel, most academic philosophy remained traditional,and therefore not very important. British empiricist philosophy was dominant in Englanduntil near the end of the century, and in France until a somewhat earlier time; then,gradually, Kant and Hegel conquered the universities of France and England, so far astheir teachers of technical philosophy were concerned."
 
Russell continues, "[Condorcet1743-1794]...was also the inventor of Malthus's theory of population, which, however, had not for him the gloomy consequences that it had forMalthus, because he coupled it with the necessity of birth control. Malthus's father was adisciple of Condorcet, and it was in this way that Malthus came to know of the theory."Of Hegel, Russell writes in part, "Hegel does not mean only that, in some situations, anation cannot rightly avoid going to war. He means much more than this. He is opposedto the creation of institutions - such as a world government - which would prevent suchsituations from arising, because he thinks it is a good thing that there should be wars fromtime to time. War, he [Hegel] says is the condition in which we take seriously the vanityof temporal goods and things. (This view is to be contrasted with the opposite theory, thatall wars have economic causes.) War has a positive moral value: 'War has the highersignificance that through it the moral health of peoples is preserved in their indifferencetowards the stabilizing of finite determinations.'"Still quoting Bertrand Russell, "The Philosophical Radicals were a transitional school.Their system gave birth to two others, of more importance than itself, namely Darwinismand Socialism. Darwinism was an application to the whole of animal and vegetable life of Malthus's theory of population, which was an integral part of the politics and economicsof the Benthamites - a global free competition, in which victory went to the animals thatmost resembled successful capitalists. Darwin himself was influenced by Malthus, andwas in general sympathy with the Philosophical Radicals. There was, however, a greatdifference between the competition admired by orthodox economists and the struggle forexistence whichDarwinproclaimed as the motive force of evolution. 'Free competition,'in orthodox economics, is a very artificial conception, hedged in by legal restrictions.You may undersell a competitor, but you must not murder him. You must not use thearmed forces of the State to help you to get the better of foreign manufacturers. Thosewho have not the good fortune to possess capital must not seek to improve their lot byrevolution. 'Free competition,' as understood by the Benthamites, was by no means reallyfree."Darwinian competition was not of this limited sort; there were no rules against hittingbelow the belt. The framework of law does not exist among animals, nor is war excludedas a competitive method. The use of the State to secure victory in competition wasagainst the rules as conceived by the Benthamites, but could not be excluded from theDarwinian struggle. In fact, though Darwin himself was a liberal, and though Nietzschenever mentioned him except with contempt, Darwin's
Survival Of The Fittest 
led, whenthoroughly assimilated, to something much more like Nietzsche's philosophy than likeBentham's. These developments, however, belong to a later period, since Darwin's
OriginOf Species
was published in 1859, and its political implications were not at firstperceived."
KARL MARX
In his 1843 writing from The Kreuznach Manuscripts:
Critique Of Hegel's Philosophy Of  Right 
[from Discussion Of The Princely Power, Comments On Hegel's 279] Karl Marxwrites, [quoting:]
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...