ITSM: it’s aboutmanaging change
There was a time when information technologyfunctioned as a set of discrete tools supporting discretebusiness processes. That is no longer the case. Forcorporations today, critical business processes arehighly dependent on and integrated with IT; the twoare essentially inseparable. The demands on corporateIT executives have therefore become both broader andmore exacting. While raw system performance,reliability, and cost effectiveness is still crucial, it is nolonger enough: the corporate IT service deliveryorganization must also support highly adaptable,measurable, scalable, consistent and controllable ITprocesses that are tightly coupled with the businessprocesses that rely on them.IT Service Management (ITSM) is a proven andeffective framework for accomplishing this. But thereason ITSM is so effective is that it drives fundamentalchange within the IT organization, from how itmanages its processes, technology assets, and vendorsto how it deploys personnel.Implementing ITSM is therefore as much aneducational and change management task as aprocess design and technology task.
ITIL: means to an end
ITIL was conceived from the beginning as a means toachieve transformative change. It began as a projectlaunched by the government of the United Kingdom(U.K.) in the early 1980s. Faced with a seriouseconomic downturn, the government recognized it mustdevelop innovative ways to improve IT serviceefficiencies and thereby lower costs. To do this, theBritish Central Computer and Telecommunications Agency (CCTA), an executive Cabinet Office agencydedicated to improving the delivery of public servicesthrough IT, developed a set of best practice-basedITSM processes. These were documented using acommon glossary of terms and published in anintegrated series of 40 books. The series, sinceupdated and packaged as seven books, is nowreferred to as the IT Infrastructure Library (ITIL).Recognizing the value of the ITSM processes definedby the ITIL, companies and governments around theworld have since adopted them. Independentorganizations such as the IT Service ManagementForum (itSMF) have been founded to share ITIL bestpractices. Many consulting and educational firms nowoffer ITIL training and certification programs for ITprofessionals.
“Corporations cannotrespond flexibly and quicklyto markets, customer demands,and regulatory obligationsunless they are supported byflexible, reliable, service-oriented IT infrastructures thatare tightly focused on meetingthe needs of the corporations’internal customers.”
Leveraging ITIL was a natural extension of HP’s commitment to helpingcorporations enhance the value of their IT infrastructures. HP beganworking with ITIL in 1993 and is today a recognized leader in ITSMbest practice implementation. HP has been instrumental in establishingmany itSMF chapters, and continues to contribute to existing chapterswhile actively supporting the formation of new chapters worldwide.HP’s ITSM experts contribute regularly to ITSM literature anddocumentation; HP has also enhanced its ITSM leadership andpresence through strategic acquisitions of industry-leading ITILeducation and consulting firms, and IT asset and service managementsoftware providers.
HP’s ITSMhistory
Yet like all tools, ITIL-defined processes are limited byhow effectively they are used. In particular,implementing ITSM as a set of discrete, tactical toolswithout simultaneously reengineering IT processes self-limits the effect of ITSM.Yet the majority of IT organizations are vulnerable toapproaching ITSM in precisely this way. Typically, ITorganizations were founded and have subsequentlyevolved along functional or architectural componentlines. But in today’s business environment, functioningas a reactive IT organization is a potential businessliability with significant negative consequences.Corporations cannot respond flexibly and quickly tomarkets, competition, customer demands, andregulatory obligations unless they are supported byflexible, reliable, service-oriented IT service deliveryorganizations that are tightly focused on meeting theneeds of the corporations’ internal customers.Conversely, failing to meet a corporation’s criticalbusiness needs has significant consequences for bothIT organizations and corporations. IT organizations riska loss of trust and potential budget decreases.Corporate risks include dysfunctional operation, failure
3
Add a Comment
ddaderleft a comment