@
A^P_ANP
N
MV_P
M
L
E
RRFEC
M
L
P
JF
^
PEPF
M
L
L
CM_A@E
L
MV_PJ
@
A^P_ANP
KvcqPfrd ?25?
KMJIQ O) WACCAED^
ei`
DMIAPJF C) WACCAED^#
Errfcceip~#|)
OEIH ML EDF_ANE# I)E)#
Errfccff)Im) 0@52$0:>7X@fnfdof 5?# ?25?TR
F_
N
V_AED
)Wf f|f~f pjf ~vddeq laiec kv`gdfip fipff` ai le|m ml errfccff) Pjf oeih `a` imp lacf f|a`finf ml pjf e~~agidfip ml pjf dmpgegf ei` ecm~p m da~rcenf` impf ella`e|apvipac pjf `eq ml pjf ~vddeq kv`gdfipjfeaig) Lcma`e _vcf ml Na|ac Rmnf`vf 5)652*n! rm|a`f~ pjep e~vddeq kv`gdfipdm|eip ~jecc ~f|f pjf dmpami ep cfe~p ?2 `eq~ oflmf pjfpadf lazf` lm pjf jfeaig# ei`
~jecc ec~m ~fr|f ep pjep padf nmaf~ ml eiq ~vdderq kv`gdfip f|a`finf mi wjanj pjf dm|eip rfcaf~ pjep je~ imp ecrfe`q offi lacf` wapj pjf nmvrp
)*Fdrje~a~ e``f`!8
~ffec~mDenh |) Nmddfrnaec Ai`v~) Rerh# Ain)
# 605 ^m)?` :22# :22*Lce) 0pj @NE 51:1!) Pjf mo|amv~ rvrm~f ml pjep vcf a~ pmga|f pjf repq mrrm~aig ~vddeq kv`gdfip padf pm eiecq{f pjf f|a`finfei` –nmipm|fp pjf lenpvec oe~a~ ml pjf dmpami)—
Dercer |) Uvainq ^pepf Oeih
# 0<> ^m) ?` 5?>># 5?>> *Lce) 5~p @NE 51:6!*napepami mdappf`!) Pjf vipadfcq lacaig~ jai`ff` errfcceip~‑ fllmp~ pm`flfi` pjf cew~vap)
_f|fr~f` ei` _fdei`f`
)G
_M^^
#N
MIIF_
#KK)# ei` N
MZ
#K
ENH
^)# E~~mnaepf Kv`gf# nminv)
+ + +
Williams v. Bank of America, 101 So. 3d 1288 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)
123
Reads
1
Readcasts
0
Embed Views
More From This User
Notes
Load more
