Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
12Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Mobilemedia vs. Apple (verdict)

Mobilemedia vs. Apple (verdict)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 27,379|Likes:
Published by JoshLowensohn

More info:

Published by: JoshLowensohn on Dec 13, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

12/16/2012

pdf

text

original

 
I
0
J -
~~.
r--...~]~''{M
~_sl0c~©Ut~@
IN
THE
UNITED
STATES
DISTRICT
COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT
OF DELAWARE
MOBILEMEDIA IDEAS,
LLC
Plaintiff,
v.
APPLE INC.
Defendant.Dated: December 11, 2012
)
))
)
) Civ. No.
10-258-SLR)
))
)
VERDICT SHEET
Case 1:10-cv-00258-SLR-MPT Document 507 Filed 12/13/12 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 9858
 
We,
the jury, unanimously find as follows:
I.
U.S. Patent No. 6,070,068 ("The '068 Patent")
A.
Direct Infringement
1. Do
you find that MobileMedia has proven, by a preponderance of theevidence, that each and every limitation
of
claim 23 and/or claim 24 of the '068 patent
is
found
in
the accused Apple iPhones (hereinafter, "Apple's iPhones")?
Checking
'yes"
below indicates
a
finding for MobileMedia.Checking "no" below indicates
a
finding for the Apple.
Claim Verdict
on
directinfringement
23
~if
yes
0
no24
~yes
0
no
B.
Indirect Infringement -Inducing Infringement
2.
Do you find that MobileMedia has proven, by a preponderance of theevidence, that Apple has induced the infringement
of
claim 23 and/or claim 24 of the'068 patent?
Checking
"yes"
below indicates
a
finding for MobileMedia.Checking "no" below indicates
a
finding
for
the Apple.
Claim Verdict
on
inducementof infringement
23
0
yes
~no
24
0
yes
[1f
no
Case 1:10-cv-00258-SLR-MPT Document 507 Filed 12/13/12 Page 2 of 8 PageID #: 9859
 
C.
Validity
3.
Do
you find that Apple has proven,
by
clear and convincing evidence, that theasserted claims
of
the '068 patent are invalid
as
being anticipated?
Checking "no" below indicates
a
finding for the MobileMedia.Checking "yes" below indicates a finding for Apple.
Claim NoYes{VaHd)(Invalid,anticipated)
23
~
D
24
g'
D
4.
Do
you find that Apple has proven, by clear and convincing evidence, that theasserted claims of the '068 patent are invalid
as
being obvious?
Checking "no" below indicates
a
finding for the MobileMedia.Checking "yes" below indicates a finding for Apple.
ClaimNoYes{Valid){Invalid due toobviousness)
23
~
D
24
rt(
D
2
Case 1:10-cv-00258-SLR-MPT Document 507 Filed 12/13/12 Page 3 of 8 PageID #: 9860

Activity (12)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads
Filip Panđić liked this
Filip Panđić liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->