• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
 
THE ANTI COMMUNITARIAN MANIFESTO
 by Niki F. Raapana and Nordica M. FriedrichFree online edition since 2003
NEW on April 1, 2008
:
ABSTRACT
of the
Anti Communitarian Manifesto 
. Commentswelcome.
HARDCOPY:
The first ACL Books' edition of the Manifesto is available now for $20 USD. 5 x8 inch spiral bound, 140 pages, includes additional materials, references and commentarywhile leaving the original online thesis intact. Email for ordering details or go to the 2020book order page and replace the word 2020 with Manifesto.
PART ONE:
What is the Hegelian Dialectic?
 
December 25, 2002 
 Introduction :
Why study Hegel?
 1.
The origins of deductive and inductive reasoning
 2.
Webster's definition of the Hegelian dialectic
 3.
How the Hegelian dialectic changed the formula for deductive reasoning
 4.
Why it is almost impossible for a layman to understand the Hegelian dialectic
 5.
The communitarian purpose for the Hegelian dialectic
 6.
How we interpret the history of the Hegelian dialectic
 7.
The Anti Communitarian League's conclusion
 8.
Four examples of the power of the semantics in the dialectic
 9.
Four different impressions of the modern Hegelian dialectic theory
 
Introduction : Why study Hegel?
 "... the State 'has the supreme right against the individual, whose supreme duty is to be amember of the State... for the right of the world spirit is above all special priveleges.'"-- Author/historian William Shirer, quoting Hegel in
The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich 
 (1959)
"Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain..."
 
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel
(1770-1831) was a 19th century German philosopher andtheologist who wrote the
Science of Logic
in 1812. For many historians,
Hegel
is "perhapsthe greatest of the German idealist philosophers."In 1847 the London Communist League(Marx and Engels, pictured left) used
Hegel's theory of the dialectic
to back uptheir economic theory of communism. Now,in the 21st century, Hegelian-Marxistthinking affects our entire social and politicalstructure.The
Hegelian dialectic
is the framework forguiding our thoughts and actions intoconflicts that lead us to a predeterminedsolution. If we do not understand how theHegelian dialectic shapes our perceptions ofthe world, then we do not know how we arehelping to implement the
vision for thefuture
.Hegel's dialectic is the tool which manipulates us into a frenzied circular pattern of thoughtand action. Every time we fight for or defend against an
ideology
we are playing anecessary role in Marx and Engels' grand design to advance humanity into a dictatorship ofthe proletariat. The
synthetic
Hegelian
solution
to all these conflicts can't be introducedunless we all take a side that will advance the agenda. The Marxist's global
agenda
ismoving along at breakneck speed. The
only way 
to stop land grabs, privacy invasions,expanded domestic police powers, insane wars against inanimate objects (and transientverbs), covert actions, and outright assaults on individual liberty, is to step outside thedialectic. Only then can we be released from the limitations of controlled and guided thought.When we understand what motivated Hegel, we can see his influence on all of our destinies.Then we become real players in the very real game that has been going on for at least 224years. Hegelian conflicts steer every political arena on the planet, from the United Nations tothe major American political parties, all the way down to local school boards and communitycouncils. Dialogues and consensus-building are primary tools of the dialectic, and terror andintimidation are also acceptable formats for obtaining the goal.Calverton Private School has posted a great visual chart
explaining the dialectic
.The ultimate
Third Way
agenda is world government. Once we get what's really going on,we can cut the strings and move our lives in
original directions
outside the confines of thedialectical madness. Focusing on Hegel's and Engel's ultimate agenda, and avoiding gettingcaught up in their impenetrable theories of
social evolution
, gives us the opportunity to thinkand act our way toward freedom, justice, and genuine liberty for all.Today the dialectic is active in every political issue that encourages taking sides. We can seeit in environmentalists instigating conflicts against private property owners, in democratsagainst republicans, in greens against libertarians, in communists against socialists, in neo-cons against traditional conservatives, in community activists against individuals, in pro-choice versus pro-life, in Christians against Muslims, in isolationists versus interventionists,in peace activists against war hawks.
 
No matter what the issue, the invisible dialectic aims to control both the conflict and theresolution of differences, and leads everyone involved into a new cycle of conflicts. We'redefinitely not in Kansas anymore.
1. The origins of deductive and inductive reasoning
 Methods for reasoning are mathematical formulas that base their conclusions onideas, experiences, or information from outside sources. It was introduced to theworld by the Greeks in the 4th century B.C. Aristotle gave us the foundations for themost often used methods for logical and critical thinking.
Deduction
is a process thatmoves from the general to the specifics.
Induction
moves from the specifics to thegeneral.Kemerling (2002) explains: "In a deductive argument, the truth of the premises issupposed to guarantee the truth of the conclusion; in an inductive argument, the truthof the premises merely makes it probable that the conclusion is true."Here is a chart from Whitworth College
explaining inductive and deductivereasoning
.At Lander University:
Philosophy 103: Introduction to Logic: The Nature ofLogic
.
The History of Western Philosophy
posted at marxists.org.Deductive reasoning is often defined as pre-Enlightenment thinking because it'sbased in the commonly held belief that God created the universe. Inductivereasoning is considered to be the scientific, non-religious formula that gainedauthority after the enlightenment. Aristotle wasn't all that concerned about whichmethod was preferred, or best used, but a well-founded scientific argument that usesdeductive and/or inductive reasoning establishes strong premises that relate directlyto the conclusion.Man's capacity to reason beyond the knowable can be seen in modern universalprinciples, such as with the theory that said the earth was round and not flat. Forcenturies the established religious belief was that the earth was at the center of theuniverse, and the naked eye tells us the earth is flat and the sun goes up and down.The deductive principle was that God created the universe and man was created inGod's image, which placed the earth at the center of God's universe. This belief alsodesignated the monarchy and the established church as the divinely appointed rulersof man. Unseeable, unprovable conclusions (such as the earth is round and the earthcircles the sun) were formed under an inductive form of reasoning based in man'sabilty to
think 
beyond what can be seen or is commonly
believed 
. The originalmethods for reasoning based its premises on commonly held
truths 
and usedmathematical principles to advance mankind into realms of greater knowledge andtruth.
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...