Professional Documents
Culture Documents
N A S A TT &701 e. /
LOAN CQPY
AFWL KIRTLAND
by M a Sa Bobrou
Academy of Sciences USSR, Astronomical Council "Nauka" Press, Moscow, 1970
I
'
i
N A T I O N A L AERONAUTICS A N D SPACE A D M I N I S T R A T I O N
WASHINGTON, D. C.
JUNE 1972
By M. S. Bobrov
Translation of "Kol' tsa Saturna." Academy of Sciences USSR, Astronomical Council, "Nauka" Press, Moscow, 1970
$3.00
Present-day knowledge of Saturn's rings is reflected. The results of observations of Saturn's rings are analyzed in detail, and a number of conclusions as to the nature of the rings are formulated. Particular attention is given to the quantitative theory of change in the brightness of the rings with phase angle, which is then used to estimate the principal physical magnitudes that characterize the rings as a whole, as well as a typical particle of the rings. Questions concerned with the dynamics of the rings are discussed. The book is intended for scientists,graduate students, and students interested in research on objects in the solar system.
iii
............
...............
. . ....
...................................................
. . #3 .
fl
#2
of the Earth
3 3 4
6
7 7 8 9
10 10 10 11 19 21 21
............. .................... ........... ......................... I11. Astrophysical and Radioastronomy Data ..................... #7 . Introductory remarks ................................. # . Linear rotational velocities of the rings ............ 8 # . Visible and near ultra-violet spectral reflectivity ... 9 #10 . Infrared spectrometry ................................ #I1 . Polarization ......................................... #12 . Change in surface luminance with phase angle ......... #13 . Other photometric data ............................... #14 . Optical thickness ..................................... #15 . Radiometric and radioastronomical data ............... IV. Model of the B Ring . Properties of a Typical Particle .................................................. #16 . Absolute surface brightness of the B ring ............ #17 . Model of the ring. Albedo of a particle ............. #18 . The mechanism responsible for the observed ring phase curve .......................................... #19 . Conclusions concerning the structure of the B ring
I1 Changes in Ring Openings View from the Edge #4 Cycle of changes in ring openings #5 Observations of the dark side of the rings #6 "Disappearance" of the rings
. . .
27 2 9 34
39 39
41
49
51
.................
............................................. ................................. ........... ............................... ............................ VI . Ring Dynamics ............................................. #24. Ring rotation law .................................... #25 . Differential rotation and Its Consequence ............ #26 . The physical condition of the ring material .......... #27 . Stability ............................................
Analysis of Observations Made During Extremely Small Ring Openings #20 Introductory remarks #21 Illumination of the dark side of the rings #22 Analysis of observations for estimating the physical thickness of the rings #23 "Atmosphere" of the rings
. . . .
53 53
54
60
70
72
72 73 74
#28
75
81
..............................
VI1
. Theory of the Effect of Mutual Shading and Its Comparison with Observations .............................. #29 . Introductory remarks ................................. . The Seeliger approximation ...........................
. #32 . #33 .
#31 #34
#3O
85 85 85
The llcone-cylinderll approximation. without varianse in the sizes of particles taken into consideration The "cone-cylinder" approximation with variance in particle size taken into consideration Other solutions Discussion of the results Values of the Principal physical parameters of the rings List of Designations in the Formulas Used in the Theory of the Effect of Mutual Shading
....
87
99 114
114
APPENDIX
REFERENCES
.......... .....................................................
118 120
vi
. . .
"When we in fact see how this majestic arc is suspended over the equator of the planet with no visible means of support or connection, our mind can no longer remain at ease. We cannot become reconciled to this phenomenon as if it were some simple fact, we cannot describe it simply as the result of observations, and we cannot accept it without seeking for an explanation for it."
L * 5
Introduction
great many bodies that are contained within it, and the comparative shortness
of the distance between those bodies, makes them into a single, compact system
in which the individual satellite loses its individuality. Saturn's rings have a dual interest for the researcher. is the only cosmic formation of its type that we know of. special geometry, dynamics and other features. First of all, it It has its own
elements in the solar system, and in its own way is as characteristic as the ring of asteroids, as the Galilean satellites of Jupiter, or of the moon. In
a s i n g l e o b j e c t , b u t r a t h e r p a r t o f an incomparably b r o a d e r problem o f p h y s i c s
and cosmogony o f t h e s o l a r system.
A q u a n t i t a t i v e estimate of t h e p i t t i n g of t h e s u r f a c e of a
an i n d i r e c t estimate o f t h e i n -
t y p i c a l r i n g p a r t i c l e i s , a t t h e same t i m e ,
t e n s i t y of t h e flow of micrometeoric b o d i e s and of s o l a r c o r p u s c l e s a t t h e d i s t a n c e of Saturn. Another example of t h e p h y s i c a l connection between S a t u r n ' s r i n g s and t h e environment
s t h e probable i n t e r a c t i o n o f t h e i r m a t e r i a l with t h e magnetic
i n S a t u r n ' s magnetosphere should deform t h e magnetic l i n e s of f o r c e s s i g n i f i c a n t l y (Zheleznyakov, 1964; Z l o t n i k , 1967). To simply speak of cosmogony m a k e s t h e v e r y f a c t of t h e e x i s t e n c e of S a t u r n ' s r i n g s i n t h e s o l a r system important, and something t h a t cannot b e ignored. The p r o p e r t i e s of a t y p i c a l r i n g p a r t i c l e a r e of p a r t i c u l a r cosmoI n f a c t , according t o contemporary hypotheses, t h e r i n g s are
gonic i n t e r e s t .
t h i s i s so, t h e n t h e zone of S a t u r n ' s r i n g s i s v i r t u a l l y t h e o n l y p l a c e i n t h e s o l a r system where one can f i n d and i n v e s t i g a t e t h e remains of p r e p l a n e t a r y material. S a t u r n ' s r i n g s a s a whole a l s o a r e of c o n s i d e r a b l e i n t e r e s t t o t h e cosmog o n i s t because t h e dynamics of t h e r i n g s are, i n many r e s p e c t s , s i m i l a r t o t h e dynamics of a p r o t o p l a n e t a r y cloud, and can b e d e s c r i b e d by s i m i l a r equations. T h i s monograph a t t e m p t s t o g i v e a s e q u e n t i a l account of a l l of t h e obs e r v a t i o n a l and t h e o r e t i c a l m a t e r i a l b e a r i n g on S a t u r n ' s r i n g s (with t h e exception of t h o s e works t h a t a r e of l i t t l e s i g n i f i c a n c e , o r which a r e obs o l e t e ) and t o p o i n t out t h e c o n c l u s i o n s t h a t can b e drawn a s a r e s u l t conc e r n i n g t h e n a t u r e of t h e r i n g s . Our t a s k was made v e r y much more complicated I n v e s t i g a t i o n of S a t u r n ' s r i n g s
p l a n e t a r y medium, t h e p h y s i c s o f t h e s u r f a c e l a y e r of t h e moon, o p t i c s o f
So it i s obvious
w e r e taken, and w e have given o u r views concerning them. W e should add t h a t i t w a s not t h e t a s k o f t h e monograph t o provide p r e c i s e
numerical d a t a . These d a t a can be found q u i t e r e a d i l y i n handbooks.
W e pre-
f e r r e d t o u s e rounded e s t i m a t e s , o r t o i n d i c a t e t h e o r d e r s of magnitude.
I.
#l.
-
d e s c r i p t i o n , g i v i n g t h e appearance of r o t a t i o n around t h e p l a n e t .
The r i n g s ,
when t h e y open wide enough, appear i n t h e form o f a system of c o n c e n t r i c zones w i t h d i f f e r e n t b r i g h t n e s s e s ( F i g u r e l a ) . The boundary of a p a r t i c u l a r
zone i s seen a s a s h a r p , r a d i a l change i n b r i g h t n e s s o r a s a narrow, d a r k s l i t ( " d i v i s i o n " ) between t h e r i n g s , a s i f devoid o f m a t t e r . The p r i n c i p a l p a r t s of t h e zonal s t r u c t u r e a r e t h e A r i n g ( t h e o u t e r ) , t h e B r i n g ( t h e middle), and t h e C r i n g ( t h e i n n e r ) . The l a t t e r sometimes
The B r i n g i s t h e b r i g h t e s t
p a r t o f t h e system ( i n o p p o s i t i o n approximately equal t o t h e c e n t e r of S a t u r n ' s disk i n brightness. The A r i n g v i s u a l l y i s 0.6 weaker (Schoenberg, 1921) and Hepburn (1914), s t u d y i n g images of S a t u r n on p l a t e s
is p a r t i a l l y transparent.
i
!
__ _.__ ..
....
~ . % .
t a k e n by Barnard (19141, w a s a b l e t o
/a
I -
-. .-
. . .. . .
- .-
i-
i m a g e , because t h e c r a p e r i n g i t s e l f i s
an almost i n a c c e s s i b l e o b j e c t ) . The main d i v i s i o n i n t h e system i s l o c a t e d between t h e A and B r i n g s .
It
1675,
.._
C
The width of t h e C a s s i n i
d i v i s i o n i s about 5,000 k i l o m e t e r s , according t o Barnard (1914). #2. More P r e c i s e D e t a i l . Lyot (19531, observing S a t u r n
/9
F i g u r e 1. a S a t u r n w i t h r i n g s opened w i d e (photograph by Camichel, 1958). Ring A i s somewhat underexposed and r i n g C can b e seen i n a p r o j e c t i o n on t h e d i s k of Saturn. Resolution i s "0.411;b The r i n g s of S a t u r n from v i s u a l o b s e r v a t i o n s from P i c du Midi ( s k e t c h by Lyot, 1953). Contrast i s somewhat overdrawn; c Distribution of b r i g h t n e s s i n t h e eye of t h e r i n g s of Saturn along the major axisof t h e r i n g s (from v i s u a l o b s e r v a t i o n s made by D o l l f u s , 1963). The a n g u l a r dimensions t h e rings of are &own f o r t h e mean d i s t a n c e of S a t u r n from t h e sun (9.539 A U ) .
visually i n a
60 c e n t i m e t e r t e l e s c o p e
(1936 b ) i n l a r g e t e l e s c o p e s
m a t e c u r v e of b r i g h t n e s s d i s t r i b u t i o n
along t h e major axis o f t h e r i n g s ( F i g u r e I C ) . The c u r v e shows t h a t i n e s s e n c e t h e system b r i g h t n e s s changes w i t h d i s t a n c e from S a t u r n , and t h a t it i s s o l e l y t h e presence o f minima c r e a t e d by t h e d i v i s i o n s t h a t l e a d t o t h e conventional s e p a r a t i o n o f t h e system i n t o t h e l l i n d i v i d u a l f fA, B, and C r i n g s . Comparing D o l l f u s ' c u r v e w i t h L y o t ' s s k e t c h , ane i s r e a d i l y persuaded A t t e n t i o n i s drawn t o t h e wide zone of
took t h i s t o be a s i n g l e d i v i s i o n ( t h e so-called
Kuiper (1957 a ) i s of t h e o p i n i o n t h a t o n l y t h e C a s s i n i d i v i s i o n i s a
so t h e p o s s i b i l i t y i s not r u l e d
t h e width o f t h e A r i n g .
a t t h e same t i m e ,
the
The
s t a r s by S a t u r n i s 1.9 y e a r s .
( S e e l i g e r , 1881).
t i o n s o f stars by p l a n e t s a r e computed r e g u l a r l y by t h e B r i t i s h Astronomical A s s o c i a t i o n , and are p u b l i s h e d on a s y s t e m a t i c b a s i s i n t h a t o r g a n i z a t i o n ' s annual. Kirkwood (1884) w a s t h e f i r s t t o e x p l a i n t h e e x i s t e n c e o f t h e d i v i s i o n s by resonant p e r t u r b a t i o n s i n t h e o r b i t s of t h e p a r t i c l e s of S a t u r n ' s s a t e l l i t e s . A c t u a l l y , t h e p e r i o d of r e v o l u t i o n o f a p a r t i c l e i n s i d e any of t h e d i v i s i o n s
i s very c l o s e t o 1/2,
1/3,
...
t h e s i d e r e a l p e r i o d of one, o r of s e v e r a l This
in-
#3.
i s t h e p r i n c i p a l cause o f f i x e d e r r o r s .
I n view of t h i s , i t i s
d e s i r a b l e i n t h e n e a r f u t u r e t o check accepted dimensions by u s i n g o b s e r v a t i o n s made of t h e o c c u l t a t i o n s of s t a r s by t h e r i n g s . Table 1 l i s t s t h e r i n g dimensions, according t o Rabe (1928). TABLE 1
.~ ~.I__...
.-
..
. .-
.-
Detail
Wj t h
Actual r a d i u s , k i1 omet ers
~_ _ -~_ _
.
Seconds of A r c
K i 1omet e r s
. .-
--
A r i n g , o u t e r edge A r i n g , i n n e r edge
139,300
122,200 117,200
17,100
5,000
27,900
17.68
16.95
12.91 10.42 8.72
89,300
72, ooo
17,300
60,300
The a u t h o r s i n t e r p r e t e d
s a i d t h a t t h e i n n e r edge of t h e C r i n g c o i n c i d e s w i t h t h e e x t e r n a l , v i s i b l e , boundary of t h e p l a n e t s b a l l .
1. 1
V i e w from t h e Edge.
/11
#4.
.-
A s t h e p l a n e t moves i n i t s o r b i t , t h e
p l a n e o f i t s e q u a t o r , and t h e p l a n e of t h e r i n g s , move p a r a l l e l t o each o t h e r . The r e s u l t i s t h a t t h e a n g l e s o f e l e v a t i o n o f t h e sun and of t h e e a r t h above t h e plane of t h e r i n g s , A and A ' , of Saturn i n its o r b i t . olution change c o n s t a n t l y , depending on t h e p o s i t i o n
and two t i m e s when t h e r i n g s a r e t u r n e d t o t h e sun p r e c i s e l y on edge ( o r , i n o t h e r words, t h e sun i n t e r s e c t s t h e plane of t h e r i n g s ) . T h i s i s what t h e ob-
s e r v e r on e a r t h sees, b a s i c a l l y , b u t it must b e remembered t h a t t h e e a r t h does not c o i n c i d e w i t h t h e sun, b u t i n s t e a d h a s i t s own o r b i t a l motion. speaking, t h e r e f o r e , A ' Generally
A.
h g l e A ' w i l l change w i t h t h e s i d e r e a l p e r i o d
a more o r l e s s c l o s e approach t o t h e p l a n e of t h e r i n g s .
A t y p i c a l example
o f t h e t r i p l e i n t e r s e c t i o n of t h e p l a n e o f t h e r i n g s by t h e e a r t h i s t h e one t h a t t o o k p l a c e i n 1966 ( F i g u r e 3 ) . L e t u s add t h a t t h e i n t e r v a l s between t h e s u c c e s s i v e i n t e r s e c t i o n s of t h e p l a n e of S a t u r n by t h e sun are not equal. T h i s can be explained by t h e d i f /12
0
I
If66 fl
mag
M B7
/f67
Figure 3. Change i n t h e a n g l e s o f e l e v a t i o n o f t h e sun and t h e e a r t h , A and A , above t h e p l a n e of t h e r i n g s i n 1966. The e a r t h i n t e r sected t h e plane of t h e r i n g s t h r e e
times.
#5.
All
3.5.
What f o l l o w s i n p a r t i c u l a r
i s t h a t n e a r t i m e A = 0 (when I A
AI
h a s i t s g r e a t e s t v a l u e ) t h e s i g n s of
i m a g e and not t o o s m a l l a t e l e s c o p e a p e r t u r e .
Russel
(1908) p o i n t e d
QUt
that
The b r i g h t n e s s of t h e
/I3
All t h a t i s a v a i l a b l e
F i g u r e 4 i s an
A t y p i c a l f e a t u r e o f t h e d a r k s i d e i s t h e two p a i r s o f b r i g h t
The o u t e r condensations c o i n c i d e
They are a t t r i b u t a b l e
F i g u r e 4.
#6.
/14
i s zero.
But it i s ob-
0, s o t h e earth-bound
The case when A = 0 , t h a t i s , t h e t i m e of i n t e r s e c t i o n of t h e p l a n e of t h e r i n g s by t h e e a r t h , a c t u a l l y h a s not been observed under c o n d i t i o n s n e c e s s a r y f o r t h i s t o o c c u r up t o a s l a t e as 1966. t h a t f o l l o w , a r e c o n t a i n e d i n Chapter V. F u r t h e r d e t a i l s , and t h e r e s u l t s
1 1 1 .
/15
#7.
d i f f i c u l t t o i n v e s t i g a t e them.
Ring B, because of i t s b r i g h t n e s s ,
and because
it i s l o c a t e d i n t h e c e n t e r o f t h e system, i s r e l a t i v e l y more a c c e s s i b l e f o r
a s t r o p h y s i c a l work. Study of t h e A r i n g r e q u i r e s g r e a t e r s k i l l because it i s n o t as b r i g h t and because it i s a d j a c e n t t o t h e d a r k background o f t h e s u r rounding sky. The c r a p e r i n g i s weaker t h a n t h e B r i n g by approximately one and
i s d i r e c t l y contiguous t o i t , and by t h e d i s k o f t h e p l a n e t .
T h i s i s why most of t h e a s t r o p h y s i c a l i n v e s t i g a t i o n s made t o d a t e o f t h e r i n g s of S a t u r n i n v o l v e t h e B r i n g . Data on t h e A r i n g are v e r y m e a g e r , and
t h e c r a p e r i n g i s , f o r a l l p r a c t i c a l purposes, t e r r a incognita.
#8.
t h e p l a n e t w a s t h e s t u d y of t h e law o f r o t a t i o n o f S a t u r n ' s r i n g s by measuring t h e Doppler s h i f t of t h e l i n e s i n t h e spectrum of t h e gaps of t h e r i n g s . Observations w e r e made independently by B e l o p o l ' s k i y (1895) i n Pulkovo, by Deslandres (1895) i n P a r i s , and by K e e l e r (1895) i n t h e Licks Observatory. The p r i n c i p l e s involved i n making t h e measurements are c l e a r i n F i g u r e Table 2 l i s t s t h e numerical r e s u l t s (Sharonov, 1958). A s w i l l b e seen from t h e d a t a i n Table 2 , t h e measured v e l o c i t i e s are i n good concordance w i t h K e p l e r ' s . Consequently, any r i n g p a r t i c l e can be con-
5.
i n a c i r c u l a r o r b i t a t Keplerian v e l o c i t y .
I n f a c t , however, t h i s i s Perturbations
/16
The
Detail
I
- _ - _
Linear v e l o c i t y , km/s
( Kepl e r )
A r i n g , o u t e r boundary Middle of t h e r i n g
15.4
B r i n g , inner boundary
I
I
21.0
20.5
, . P o s i t i o n of s l i t
.....
.._._, .
.Ii ..
.....
/.
.......
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . .d
2 . '
Figure 5.
P o s i t i o n o f t h e spectrograph s l i t and t h e Doppler s h i f t o f t h e l i n e s i n t h e s p e c t r a of t h e eyes of S a t u r n ' s r i n g s and of t h e p l a n e t ' s d i s k caused by r o t a t i o n (from Belopol 1 s k i y , Deslandres, and K e e l e r ) .
~~
#9.
Tikhov i n Pulkovo.
4100
1, whereas
1 = 4000
1, v i r t u a l l y
without a t t e n u a t i o n .
made a d e t a i l e d check o f t h e e f f e c t , u s i n g a g r e a t d e a l o f material o b t a i n e d from o b s e r v a t i o n s ( s p e c t r a o f S a t u r n and o f t h e r i n g s , t a k e n by B e l o p o l ' s k i y i n 1906 and 1909, n e g a t i v e of S a t u r n w i t h moderately open r i n g s made by Tikhov i n 1909 and by B e l o p o l ' s k i y i n 1911, u s i n g t h e
a t t h e r e d end o f t h e spectrum,
1 .
The d i s k spectrum
w a s b r i g h t e r t h a n t h a t o f t h e r i n g s over v i r t u a l l y a l l of t h e v i s i b l e p a r t ,
b u t t h e d i f f e r e n c e i n b r i g h t n e s s g r a d u a l l y decreased w i t h r e d u c t i o n i n A.
N e a r 4500 %, t h e b r i g h t n e s s o f t h e s p e c t r a was
B,
t h a t o f t h e d i s k spectrum o n l y t o 4020
a.
It w a s e s t a b l i s h e d
creased and became much b r i g h t e r than t h e mean b r i g h t n e s s o f t h e d i s k i n t h e v i o l e t . Tikhov's work, t a k e n i n t h e whole, e s t a b l i s h e s t h e f a c t t h a t t h e b l u e i s t h e most i n t e n s e zone o f t h e B r i n g i n S a t u r n ' s e q u a t o r i a l b e l t . Lack o f a
o r selective.
following c o n s i d e r a t i o n s .
/18
12
of t h e B r i n g n e a r t h e p o i n t s of i t s meeting w i t h t h e p l a n e t ' s d i s k w a s t h e equal of t h a t a t t h e edges of S a t u r n ' s d i s k , and t h i s w a s t h e case f o r a l l rays. This t h e n l e d Tikhov t o conclude t h a t i t w a s p o s s i b l e t h a t t h e
m a t e r i a l of t h e r i n g w a s v e r y s i m i l a r i n i t s r e f l e c t i v i t y t o t h a t o f S a t u r n ' s atmosphere, t h a t i s , t h a t t h e m e a n d i a m e t e r of t h e r i n g p a r t i c l e s w a s l e s s t h a n t h e l e n g t h o f t h e l i g h t wave (recognizing however t h a t s p e c i a l r e s e a r c h would b e r e q u i r e d t o a r r i v e a t a f i n a l answer t o t h i s q u e s t i o n ) . never been confirmed. This conclusion h a s
The e q u a t o r i a l b e l t on t h e d i s k o f S a t u r n w a s p a r t i c u l a r l y d a r k i n Wood r a i s e d t h e q u e s t i o n ,
the ultraviolet.
"Is t h i s e f f e c t due ( a l b e i t i n
I n p o i n t of f a c t , t h e geometry
of t h e e q u a t o r i a l b e l t i s such t h a t such i n t e r p r e t a t i o n cannot be precluded. However, Wright found t h a t on h i s photographs t h e c r a p e r i n g made a d a r k b e l t on t h e d i s k o n l y i n t h e r e d , whereas t h e r e was no shadow of t h e c r a p e r i n g on t h e d i s k i n t h e u l t r a v i o l e t . Consequently, if t h e darkening of t h e equator-
i t s l i g h t s c a t t e r i n g p r o p e r t i e s d i f f e r e d s i g n i f i c a n t l y from t h e l i g h t s c a t t e r i n g p r o p e r t i e s of t h e c r a p e r i n g . Wood's photographs t o o show a gradual r e d u c t i o n i n t h e d i f f e r e n c e i n t h e b r i g h t n e s s of t h e A and B r i n g s w i t h r e d u c t i o n i n t h e wavelength, w i t h A much weaker t h a n B i n t h e i n f r a r e d and yellow, b u t o n l y s l i g h t l y weaker t h a n B i n t h e v i o l e t and u l t r a v i o l e t . Wright l s photographs, on t h e o t h e r hand, show P r e s e n t day
approximately t h e same r a t i o of r i n g b r i g h t n e s s f o r a l l f i l t e r s .
d a t a on t h e s p e c t r a l r e f l e c t i v i t y of t h e A and B r i n g s show t h a t Wright's results were close t o the true results. The r e s u l t s obtained by Wood are t h e
e v i 0 1 t photo graphs.
It would b e n e c e s s a r y t o u s e l i g h t f i l t e r s f o r t h e photography, t o p r i n t
photometric scales, and, i f p o s s i b l e , t o e l i m i n a t e i n s t r u m e n t a l e f f e c t s , i n o r d e r t o judge t h e r e l a t i o n s h i p between t h e r e f l e c t i v i t y of t h e A and B r i n g s and t h a t o f S a t u r n s d i s k i n v a r i o u s p a r t s o f t h e spectrum. Barabashov and Saturn
/19 -
using a m a g n i f i c a t i o n
corresponding t o t h e real i m a g e , b u t w i t h no g r a d a t i o n s of b r i g h t n e s s , w a s c u t from t h i c k w h i t e paper, and w a s photographed p a r a l l e l t o t h e instrument i n o r d e r t o exclude i n s t r u m e n t a l e r r o r s ( d i f f r a c t i o n , chromatic a b b e r a t i o n , scatt e r i n g i n t h e photographic l a y e r , e r r o r s i n t h e microphotometer, and o t h e r s ) . The a r t i f i c i a l p l a n e t w a s photographed through t h e same f i l t e r s , and w i t h t h e
Lighting of t h e a r t i f i c i a l p l a n e t w a s
s e l e c t e d s o t h a t t h e background and t h e d e n s i t y of t h e i m a g e on t h e n e g a t i v e s would be a s c l o s e a s p o s s i b l e t o t h e r e a l Saturn. The d e n s i t y d r o p a t t h e boundaries of t h e i m a g e on t h e microphotograms o f t h e a r t i f i c i a l p l a n e t w a s more o r l e s s smooth, r a t h e r t h a n s t e p - l i k e . This w a s
r a d i a l p r o g r e s s of b r i g h t n e s s i n t h e eyes o f t h e r i n g s along t h e i r major axes. The completeness w i t h which i n s t r u m e n t a l e r r o r s w e r e e l i m i n a t e d can b e judged by t h e p o s i t i o n and depth of t h e minimum, corresponding t o t h e C a s s i n i d i v i s i o n , and by t h e r a t i o of th.e A and B r i n g b r i g h t n e s s e s . The p o s i t i o n of t h e minimum The
14
metry provided by Schoenberg (19211, t h e photographic photometry provided by Camichel (1958) using a yellow f i l t e r , and t h e photographic photometry of F r a n k l i n and Cook (1965), provide magnitudes of 0.59, tively].
0.47,
e n t i r e l y ( a p p a r e n t l y because t h e a r t i f i c i a l p l a n e t method does n o t c o r r e c t f o r d r i v e and atmospheric f l i c k e r e r r o r s ) and t h i s should b e remembered during i n t e r p r e t a t ion. The a u t h o r s found t h a t t h e b r i g h t n e s s of t h e most i n t e n s e A r i n g zone changed from 0.129 t o 0.150 and
0.154
0.775,
and 0.862
f o r t h e most i n t e n s e B r i n g zone.
0.194,
and 0.179.
I n o t h e r words, t h e b r i g h t n e s s of t h e A r i n g
F i g u r e 6.
r/R i s t h e d i s t a n c e from t h e c e n t e r of t h e d i s k i n p a r t s of t h e b/bc i s t h e b r i g h t n e s s as a percentage e q u a t o r i a l r a d i u s of t h e p l a n e t . of t h e b r i g h t n e s s of t h e c e n t e r o f t h e d i s k . Curves 1, 2, and 3 were c o n s t r u c t e d f o r photographs i n which r e d , yellow, and b l u e f i l t e r s , r e s p e c t i v e l y , had been used.
15
equated t o t h e c e n t e r o f t h e d i s k .
The B r i n g b r i g h t n e s s i n t e r m s of t h e c e n t e r o f S a t u r n ' s d i s k i n c r e a s e d g r e a t l y w i t h d e c r e a s e i n t h e wavelength, i n complete concordance w i t h t h e res u l t s o b t a i n e d by B e l o p o l ' s k i y and Tikhov. F i n a l l y , it w a s found (and t h i s a l r e a d y h a s been pointed o u t i n #3) t h a t i n b l u e l i g h t t h e space between t h e i n n e r edge of t h e C r i n g and t h e b a l l of S a t u r n h a s a b r i g h t n e s s d i f f e r i n g s i g n i f i c a n t l y from z e r o , i n d i c a t i v e of t h e presence i n t h i s space of evacuated, s e l e c t i v e l y d i f f u s i n g matter. This r e g i o n i s com-
stars, 9 C e t i
and 51 P e g a s i ,
w e r e obtained.
D e t a i l s of t h e o r d e r of
H e w a s un-
s u c c e s s f u l i n o b t a i n i n g A and C r i n g s p e c t r a s u i t a b l e f o r measurement purposes. The spectrophotometric measurements w e r e made i n two s t a g e s : (1) comparison
36 i / m m n e a r H 1;
of 9 C e t i
High d i s p e r s i o n spectrograms o f S a t u r n w e r e t a k e n f o r phase a n g l e s = O " . F J ~ . ~ ,O " 3 7 I . 7 , and 2'38l.5. Comparison w i t h t h e d i s k showed t h e marked
1)
16
so w i t h t h e accuracy o f w i t h i n 0.01.
The t i e - i n t o t h e sun and t o t h e stars p r e s e n t e d g r e a t e r d i f f i c u l t i e s . Without going i n t o d e t a i l , l e t u s simply p o i n t o u t t h a t t h e average from t h e comparisons made o f t h e spectrum o f S a t u r n ' s d i s k w i t h t h e s p e c t r a of t h e Sun, Moon, and 9 C e t i , w i t h A.
concordance i n t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n of t h e i r b r i g h t n e s s e s o v e r t h e spectrum. Knowing mB difference it i s e a s y t o f i n d t h e unknown 0 ' F i g u r e 7 shows t h i s g r a p h i c a l l y . A s w i l l b e seen, m - m does not
R + ,
and m
4600 1, and f o r l a r g e 1 t h e r e i s a s l i g h t
1 .
I n f a c t , as w i l l b e seen from F i g u r e
7, i n t h e i n t e r v a l of change i n
A i n v e s t i g a t e d (4000- 6500
1)
0
t h e magnitude mg
mh
changes
1.5, whereas t h e
change i n t h e magnitude o f m
mB i s 0.5.
The w i d e l y h e l d view a s t o t h e b l u e
t h a t t h e B r i n g p a r t i c l e s should b e l o n g e r o r even much l o n g e r , t h a n t h e l e n g t h o f t h e l i g h t wave. There is no more r e c e n t work i n spectrophotometry o f S a t u r n ' s r i n g s . Cook
and F r a n k l i n (1965) found t h e b l u e and v i s u a l b r i g h t n e s s of t h e A and B r i n g s i n s t e l l a r magnitudes p e r s q u a r e second of arc i n t h e s o - c a l l e d UBV* system. m The r e s u l t was t h e same v a l u e f o r t h e c o l o r index, B V = +0.86, f o r b o t h m V = +0.64 ( S t e b b i n s and Kron, 1956), f o r S a t u r n rings. F o r t h e sun B m m +0.98, according t o F r a n k l i n and Cook (19651, and +1.04, according t o H a r r i s
/22
(1963).
case o f S a t u r n , w e come t o t h e c o l o r d i f f e r e n c e s i n t h e o b j e c t s w e are i n t e r e s t e d i n a s compared w i t h t h e sun (see Table 3 ; t h e moon h a s been added a s a -- - _ _ - _ _ _ _ *UBV ( u l t r a v i o l e t blue v i s u a l ) i s a photometric system i n which t h e s t e l l a r magnitude i s found f o r each body i n t h r e e p a r t s of t h e spectrum, t h e u l t r a v i o l e t , t h e b l u e , and t h e v i s u a l .
17
I"o0
..
0 0
photometry ( h i s c o l o r d i f f e r e n c e s f o r S a t u r n and f o r t h e B r i n g i n b l u e l i g h t a r e
./,n3U 4'TU -
OY77
and
- -la
t ! -
O?b,
0
: l
. -
,'
CJJJ
LilU
SflJff G'i'Y3
6JJff
connected w i t h t h e i l l u m i n a t i o n o f t h e r i n g by S a t u r n ' s d i s k .
independent c o n f i r m a t i o n of t h i s f a c t i s Shayn's o b s e r v a t i o n t h a t no traces o f even t h e most powerful a b s o r p t i o n b e l t s observed i n t h e spectrum o f S a t u r n ' s d i s k w e r e discovered i n t h e spectrum of t h e r i n g .
TABLE 3
__
Saturn's disk A and B r i n g s Moon
Reference - -
__
____ -
+Of34
+0.22 +0.29
of00
0.00 0.00
r i n g b e r e s p o n s i b l e f o r t h e e f f e c t discussed.
/2 -3
it can o n l y r e s u l t i n s i g n i f i c a n t i n c r e a s e i n t h e c o l o r i n d e x f o r t h e r i n g s i n
t h e case o f extremely s m a l l e l e v a t i o n s o f t h e sun o v e r t h e i r p l a n e ( A
1.5").
I t t h e r e f o r e i s more p l a u s i b l e t o a s s o c i a t e t h e c o l o r o f t h e B r i n g d i r e c t l y
w i t h t h e c o l o r of t h e s u r f a c e o f t h e r i n g p a r t i c l e s . vations Although i n f r a r e d obsert h e reflec-
(#lo)
show t h a t t h e p a r t i c l e s a r e covered w i t h h o a r f r o s t ,
#lo.
w a t e r f i l t e r 2/3 mm i n t h i c k n e s s .
w i t h b e t t e r equipment, and t h e s e o b s e r v a t i o n s confirmed t h e previous r e s u l t s . Not t o o long ago t h e i n f r a r e d spectrum of S a t u r n ' s r i n g s was once a g a i n
i n v e s t i g a t e d by Moroz (1961) a n d by t h e team o f Shnyrev, Grechushnikov, and Moroz (1964). The former i n v e s t i g a t e d t h e i n t e g r a l r a d i a t i o n from S a t u r n , i n -
c l u d i n g t h e d i s k , and t h e widely opened r i n g s , i n t h e 0.9 t o 2.5 micron range. The t r a c e s showed i n t e n s i t y maxima a t 1.63 t o 1.80 and 2.0 t o 2.5 microns. Comparison w i t h t h e i n f r a r e d t r a c e o f J u p i t e r , o b t a i n e d using t h e same i n strument, l e d t o t h e conclusion t h a t t h e s e m a x i m a are a t t r i b u t a b l e t o S a t u r n ' s r i n g s , and n o t t o i t s d i s k . The r e f l e c t e d s p e c t r a of snow and h o a r f r o s t w e r e Hoarfrost c r y s t a l s are s m a l l e r t h a n snow The i n f r a r e d
s t u d i e d as p a r t o f t h e program.
Shnyrev, Grechushnikov, and Moroz used t h e i n f r a r e d i n t e r f e r o m e t r i c technique and obtained s e p a r a t e i n t e r f e r e n c e p a t t e r n s f o r t h e d i s k and f o r t h e rings. The a u t h o r s a p p l i e d t h e F o u r i e r transform t o t h e s e p a t t e r n s and The
c o n s t r u c t e d spectrograms of t h e s e o b j e c t s ( F i g u r e 8a).
19
I
F i g u r e 8.
L I
/micron
CJ
/micron
a I n f r a r e d s p e c t r a of r i n g s ( s o l i d l i n e s ) and o f S a t u r n ' s d i s k (dashed l i n e s ) , a c c o r d i n g t o Shnyrev, e t a l , (1964); b i n f r a r e d spectrum o f S a t u r n ' s r i n g s according t o Mertz and Coleman (1966); c and d l a b o r a t o r y s p e c t r a of i c e ( h o a r f r o s t ) and ,paraformaldehyde (powder), according t o Mertz and Coleman (1966).
w i t h a F o u r i e r t r a n s f o r m (Mertz, 1965) coupled t o a 61 inch t e l e s c o p e , a r e v e r y hard pressed t o f i n d agreement between t h e r i n g spectrum and t h e i c e p a r t i c l e hypothesis. These a u t h o r s found heavy a b s o r p t i o n i n t h e r i n g spec-
see
The a u t h o r s a r e not e n t i r e l y c o n f i d e n t t h a t t h e i r r e s u l t s a r e
A' =
5.6'1,
s o t h e f a c t t h a t some p a r t
It i s proposed t h a t t h e o b s e r v a t i o n s be r e p e a t e d d u r i n g
t h e n e x t epoch o f l a r g e r i n g openings.
/25
Shnyrev, et a1 ( d u r i n g l a r g e opening) showed no t r a c e s o f a b s o r p t i o n a t 1.66 microns. Second, i f one makes a g r a p h i c a l summation o f t h e t r a c e s of t h e in-
f r a r e d s p e c t r a of r i n g s and d i s k , one e a s i l y o b t a i n s t h e 1.66 micron minimum observed by Mertz and Coleman ( a s w i l l b e seen q u i t e w e l l i n F i g u r e 8a). t e n d t o t h e view t h a t t h e e f f e c t of t h e s c a t t e r e d l i g h t from t h e d i s k w a s a c t u a l l y s u b s t a n t i a l d u r i n g t h e s e o b s e r v a t i o n s , and t h a t t h e r e is no b a s i s
We
20
- ... . . . . .
.. .
I I.
f o r t h e r e j e c t i o n of t h e i c e p a r t i c l e ( o r of p a r t i c l e s covered w i t h a l a y e r of
i c e ) hypothesis.
r a t e i s e x c e p t i o n a l l y low ( t h e p r e s s u r e of w a t e r vapor i s of t h e o r d e r of
mm H g ) .
A t t h e t i m e o f t h e o b s e r v a t i o n s (see
-~
Polarization.
~
Lyot
polarization properties.
6-10-3) p o l a r i z e d i n a p l a n e passing
T h i s t y p e of p o l a r i z a t i o n i s i n concordance w i t h
t h e conclusion t h a t t h e p a r t i c l e s a r e covered w i t h i c e c r y s t a l s , or w i t h t h e more general i d e a t h a t t h e s u r f a c e l a y e r of a t y p i c a l p a r t i c l e c o n s i s t s of some t y p e of good r e f l e c t i n g powder. normal t o t h a t i n d i c a t e d above. There a l s o i s p a r t i a l p o l a r i z a t i o n i n a p l a n e This t y p e of p o l a r i z a t i o n i n d i c a t e d t h a t t h e
p a r t i c l e s are e l o n g a t e d , or s t r i a t e d i n t h e d i r e c t i o n of t h e i r o r b i t a l motion. The c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of t h e p o l a r i z a t i o n of t h e A r i n g a r e more complex. #12. Luminance w i t h Phase Angle. Change i n -S u r f a c e ~~
i s not i n e x c e s s of 6.5",
g r e a t l y with phase.
astronomy, o b s e r v e r s u s u a l l y e x p r e s s s u r f a c e luminance i n s t e l l a r magnitudes p e r u n i t a r e a ( p e r s q u a r e second o f a r c , f o r example) and p l o t it on a graph a s a f u n c t i o n of t h e phase a n g l e T h i s graph i s known as t h e phase curve.
-6 /2
i s as important as a knowledge of
21
I n both c a s e s w e o b t a i n i n f o r m a t i o n
t h a t , a f t e r it has been d e c i p h e r e d , provides d a t a on t h e f e a t u r e s of s t r u c t u r e beyond t h e l i m i t s of r e s o l u t i o n of earth-bound t e l e s c o p e s , The first s y s t e m a t i c measurements of t h e s u r f a c e luminance of S a t u r n ' s r i n g s as a f u n c t i o n of
Cy
1917).
m e t r i c standard.
r i n g s i n d i v i d u a l l y , and Schoenberg obtained t h e mean luminance of t h e A and B r i n g s (some s u b j e c t i v e magnitude n o t s t r i c t l y d e f i n e d by t h e o b s e r v e r ) . Schoenberg w a s n o t s a t i s f i e d w i t h h i s r e s u l t s and l a t e r on made a second series of o b s e r v a t i o n s (Schoenberg 1933), using t h e same photometer. d i f f e r e d from t h e .first i n many r e s p e c t s : and b l u e ) w e r e u s e d ; The second series
(1) f o u r f i l t e r s ( r e d , yellow, g r e e n ,
( 2 ) many more p o i n t s n e a r CY = 0;
(3) t h e o b j e c t measured
was t h e s u r f a c e luminance of t h e most i n t e n s e zone of t h e B r i n g . The observer found t h a t t h e phase curves o b t a i n e d using t h e d i f f e r e n t f i l t e r s showed no s y s t e m a t i c d i f f e r e n c e s . This opened up t h e p o s s i b i l i t y of p r e s e n t i n g
Schoenberg's d a t a i n t h e form of a s i n g l e phase curve less s u s c e p t i b l e t o random e r r o r s t h a n t h e c u r v e s o b t a i n e d when t h e f i l t e r s were used. o b s e r v a t i o n s of s u r f a c e luminance values w e r e n o t published. Complete t a b l e s of Schoenberg's
a r t i c l e c o n t a i n s b u t seven averages of t h e v a l u e s f o r each f i l t e r , and i n d i c a t e s t h e number of observed v a l u e s f o r each average, These averages m a k e it
(weight t a k e n i n accordance with t h e number of observed v a l u e s This mean v i s u a l phase curve f o r t h e B r i n g is one of t h e
f o r each f i l t e r ) . b e s t t o date.
Its e m p i r i c a l e q u a t i o n is i n t h e form
(12.1)
where
$ ,
is t h e s t e l l a r magnitude of t h e luminance* of t h e B r i n g ( s t e l l a r
~-~
~
The f r s t e l l a r magnitude of luminance" p, f r e q u e n t l y r e q u i r e d i n astrophotometry, is a s s o c i a t e d w i t h t h e conventional s u r f a c e luminance, b , by t h e r e l a t i o n s h i p $ = -2.5i0g b + c, where t h e value of t h e c o n s t a n t C depends on t h e u n i t s chosen. S p e c i f i c a l l y , i f b is expressed i n a p o s t i l b s ("white luxest'), and i f B is expressed i n s t e l l a r magnitudes p e r s q u a r e second of a r c , t h e n C = 13-92 22
II I
111
II
I1 I 111 1111111 I I1
is t h e phase a n g l e a t S a t u r n (minutes of a r c ) .
H e r e w e have taken i t t h a t
BB( 0 )
'
is t h e s t e l l a r magniEq.
L7 2
(12.1)
provides
2 6O30').
it is l i n e a r i n t h e c o o r d i n a t e s ( l o g
B B 1.
More r e c e n t photometric measurements of s u r f a c e luminance of t h e B r i n g a s a f u n c t i o n of 12 have been made by Lebedinets (1957) and F r a n k l i n and Cook
(1965).
Lebedinets used t h e photographic photometry methodology i n t h e form developed by Barabashov i n t h e Khar'kov Observatory. values a s f u n c t i o n s of
Cy
H e found 20 B r i n g s u r f a c e luminance
a b l e , although random s c a t t e r i n g of t h e p o i n t s is q u i t e broad. F r a n k l i n and Cook measured t h e t o t a l luminous f l u x f o r S a t u r n , and f o r t h e widely opened r i n g s , and d i d so p h o t o e l e c t r i c a l l y . u l t r a v i o l e t , and r e d , were used. Four f i l t e r s , yellow, b l u e ,
I n o r d e r t o e v a l u a t e t h e c o n t r i b u t i o n of
f l u x e s from t h e d i s k and from t h e A and B r i n g s , t h e observers simultaneously obtained a s e r i e s of l a r g e - s c a l e , p h o t o m e t r i c a l l y c a l i b r a t e d n e g a t i v e s of S a t u r n on e f f e c t i v e wavelengths extremely c l o s e t o those f o r t h e p h o t o e l e c t r i c observations. These l a t t e r w e r e obtained by using a n o t h e r t e l e s c o p e . The photo-
graphs taken with t h e r e d and u l t r a v i o l e t f i l t e r s were u n s a t i s f a c t o r y , hence t h e observers s e l e c t e d only t h e yellow and blue (some 20 of t h e b e s t n e g a t i v e s i n each c o l o r ) . Without going i n t o f u r t h e r d e t a i l , l e t us simply p o i n t out t h a t t h e measurement of t h e o p t i c a l d e n s i t y of t h e r i n g s and of t h e d i s k appearing on t h e negat i v e s s e l e c t e d made i t p o s s i b l e t o determine (as a f u n c t i o n of CY) t h e percentage of luminous f l u x a t t r i b u t a b l e t o t h e d i s k and t o t h e r i n g s i n d i v i d u a l l y . nances t h e n were expressed i n B and V u n i t s on t h e UBV scale.* Lumi-
23
A obvious shortcoming i n t h e o b s e r v a t i o n s made by F r a n k l i n and Cook is n t h e i n d i r e c t method t h e y used t o o b t a i n t h e surface luminance of t h e r i n g s . The c a l c u l a t i o n of f i n a l luminance v a l u e s r e q u i r e d many i n t e r m e d i a t e r e d u c t i o n s t h a t could have i n t r o d u c e d s y s t e m a t i c e r r o r s , and t h e u s e of photographic photometry i n c r e a s e d s i g n i f i c a n t l y t h e p r o b a b l e e r r o r s i n t h e measurements. I n our view, t h e b e s t way t o i n d i c a t e t h e magnitude of t h e probable e r r o r s would be t o c o n s t r u c t A and B r i n g luminance phase curves d i r e c t l y from t h e photographic d a t a . The a u t h o r s d i d not do t h i s , u n f o r t u n a t e l y , and a l l of t h i s
of t h e work done by F r a n k l i n and Cook however, l i e s i n t h e great number of observed luminance v a l u e s t h a t are more o r less uniformly d i s t r i b u t e d over t h e e n t i r e phase curve. The B r i n g phase c u r v e s obtained by Lebedinets, l i k e t h o s e of F r a n k l i n and Cook, a r e i n good concordance w i t h Schoenberg's curve
(1933), so it can
L8 2
known.
of p u r e l y p h o t o e l e c t r i c measurements of t h e s u r f a c e luminance of t h e A and B r i n g s i n d i v i d u a l l y , because such a s e r i e s would be a b l e t o d e t e c t f i n e r e f f e c t s t h a t now are masked by random and s y s t e m a t i c e r r o r s ,
)I,
Q
n e s s , b B ( 0 ) , of t h e B r i n g when Schoenberg
= 0, can be o b t a i n e d is by e x t r a p o l a t i o n .
p o i n t s extremely c l o s e t o
= 0 , show t h a t e v i d e n t l y $,(O)
'center
Om. 06,
24
where $ is t h e s t e l l a r magnitude of t h e b r i g h t n e s s (see t h e f o o t n o t e page 22.) Taking a l l of t h i s i n t o c o n s i d e r a t i o n , w e can reduce a l l B r i n g phase curve o b s e r v a t i o n s t o a s i n g l e z e r o by comparing them w i t h Eq. comparison on t h e assumption t h a t @ B ( 0 ) = assumption, namely, t h a t @,(O) = @ center E q . (12.1), w e come t o t h e e x p r e s s i o n
$,(CY)
(12.11,
and basing t h e
- $,(O)
= 0.270
log
Cy
0?153
N w l e t u s change t h e o
(12.2)
o r d i n a t e s of t h e Lebedinets and F r a n k l i n and Cook phase curves i n such a way t h a t f o r a s i n g l e , d e f i n i t e v a l u e of CY, w i t h t h o s e of Eq. (12.2). s a y J a , t h e y have
$,(a) values i d e n t i c a l
As will
be s e e n q u i t e r e a d i l y , t h e phase curves d e r i v e d by a l l t h e a u t h o r s are i n good concordance each with t h e o t h e r . The phase curve shape is very c h a r a c t e r i s t i c . down, somewhat c o n v e n t i o n a l l y , i n t o t h r e e s e c t i o n s : The curve can be broken
(1) t h e i n i t i a l s e c t i o n
(Oo 2
Cy
2 0'25')
a;
( 2 ) t h e t r a n s i t i o n s e c t i o n (0'25'
<
- e 3'); Cy
and ( 3 ) t h e s a t u r a t i o n s e c t i o n ,
is much s m a l l e r t h a n i s t h e case f o r t h e i n i t i a l s e c t i o n .
L e t u s p o i n t o u t f u r t h e r t h e extreme a c u t e n e s s of t h e maximum f o r the b r i g h t -
n e s s CY = 0.
This p r o p e r t y s t a n d s o u t p a r t i c u l a r l y s h a r p l y i f p o l a r c o o r d i n a t e s
It s u g g e s t s t h a t w i t h i n
/30
Figure 9.
[l
Lebedinets
(1957); 3 and 4
F r a n k l i n and Cook
r e s p e c t i v e l y ) ] ; Luminance of B r i n g ( i n polar c o o r d i n a t e s ) .
(a) as a f u n c t i o n of t h e phase a n g l e
cy
f o r c e s one t o conclude t h a t i n t h i s d i r e c t i o n t h e c o n t r i b u t i o n of s c a t t e r i n g of t h e h i g h e s t o r d e r s t o t h e t o t a l b r i g h t n e s s
is s m a l l .
26
i n nature.
= 0.
#13.
t h e eyes of t h e r i n g s .
m i n luminances w a s o .039.
t o Om.20.
ing. Fesenkov used a r e v e r s i n g prism t o show t h a t t h i s e f f e c t is not physiol o g i c a l i n nature. The d i r e c t cause of t h e e f f e c t is unknown, but it should
be remembered t h a t t h e e a s t e r n eye d i f f e r s from t h e western i n terms of t i m e of i n s o l a t i o n . The p a r t i c l e s of t h e e a s t e r n eye only come o u t of t h e shadow
of t h e b a l l of S a t u r n , whereas t h e r e g i o n of t h e western eye is occupied by p a r t i c l e s s u b j e c t e d t o t h e e f f e c t of d i r e c t s o l a r r a d i a t i o n f o r approximately h a l f t h e p e r i o d of r e v o l u t i o n . The dependence of t h e s u r f a c e b r i g h t n e s s of t h e r i n g s on t h e a n g l e s of e l e v a t i o n of t h e sun and of t h e e a r t h , A and A ' , above t h e plane of t h e r i n g s was t h e s u b j e c t of wide-ranging i n v e s t i g a t i o n by Camichel (19581, who used t h e photographic method, and by Maggini (19371, who used t h e p h o t o e l e c t r i c method. Camichel's r e s e a r c h was conducted under e x c e l l e n t astronomical c l i m a t i c coriditions from t h e P i c du Midi Observatory. The s e r i e s of photographs (taken
w i t h a yellow f i l t e r ) cover t h e p e r i o d 1943-1957, or approximately h a l f of t h e o r b i t a l p e r i o d of Saturn. between 26 t o 27Q. The change i n A and A ' w a s from between 2 t o 3" t o
L31
01t.4.
is n o t n e g l i g i b l y s m a l l .
F i g u r e 10 shows t h e 27
luminance of t h e A and B r i n g s , as c o r r e c t e d by u s f o r t h e phase dependence by using Eq. (12.11, and p l o t t e d as a f u n c t i o n of A. Despite t h e considerable
s c a t t e r i n g of t h e p o i n t s , t h e r e d u c t i o n i n t h e B r i n g luminance w i t h r e d u c t i o n i n t h e a n g l e of e l e v a t i o n A , is r e a d i l y s e e n . effect
F i g u r e 10.
I n t h i s r e g a r d , l e t u s n o t e t h e v i s u a l r e s u l t s o b t a i n e d by Barnard
(1909),
i n accordance w i t h which t h e A r i n g can be more luminous t h a n t h e B r i n g when openings a r e s m a l l . The luminance v a l u e s o b t a i n e d by Camichel n e a r A = 2 t o underestimated because of halation,
3" are s i g n i f i c a n t l y
Maggini The r e s u l t s
s o a r e n o t completely dependable.
s t u d i e d t h e r e g i o n of v e r y s m a l l values of A p h o t o e l e c t r i c a l l y .
i n c r e a s e d from 0'38'
t o 3"Ol'.
nance with r e d u c t i o n i n A .
of t h e e a r t h , A ' , w a s n o t observed.
v i s i b l e opening over t h e p e r i o d of o b s e r v a t i o n , shows t h a t t h e darkening of t h e r i n g s w i t h r e d u c t i o n i n A is a r e a l e f f e c t , and is n o t t h e r e s u l t of i r r a d i a t i o n , The c o r r e c t n e s s of t h i s c o n c l u s i o n can be confirmed independently by t h e simultaneous i n c r e a s e i n t h e c o l o r e q u i v a l e n t f o r t h e r i n g s (curve J i n Figure 11). A t t h e s a m e t i m e , no d e f i n i t e dependence of J on A ' w a s observed, Coloration
is i n d i c a t i v e of t h e s t r a t i f i c a t i o n of t h e r i n g p a r t i c l e s i n terms of s i z e along
t h e z - c o o r d i n a t e ; t h e percentage of s m a l l p a r t i c l e s i n c r e a s e s w i t h d i s t a n c e 28
from t h e mean p l a n e of t h e r i n g s .
W e s h a l l r e t u r n t o t h i s q u e s t i o n i n #23.
h fJUU
F i g u r e 11.
Color e q u i v a l e n t J = m
Camichel n o t only found a dependence of s u r f a c e luminance on a n g l e of e l e v a t i o n A , but a l s o some i n t e r e s t i n g azimuthal e f f e c t s : (1) t h e s u r f a c e lumi( 2 ) t h e r e is a
#14.
-t i c a l Op
Thickness*
L33
( a ) observations
There a r e two methodsthat can be used t o a s s e s s t h i s important parameter, one t h a t c h a r a c t e r i z e s t h e degree of t r a n s p a r e n c y of t h e r i n g s : of t h e v i s i b i l i t y of S a t u r n s d i s k through t h e r i n g s ; o c c u l t a t i o n s of s t a r s by t h e r i n g s . The s t a r t i n g p o i n t f o r method ( a ) is t h e obvious r e l a t i o n s h i p
( b ) o b s e r v a t i o n s of t h e
* L e t u s r e c a l l t h a t t h e o p t i c a l t h i c k n e s s of a p l a n e - p a r a l l e l l a y e r f o r a normally i n c i d e n t beam can be d e f i n e d by t h e r e l a t i o n s h i p To = - l n ( I / I o ) , w h e r e Io and I are l i g h t i n t e n s i t i e s b e f o r e and a f t e r t h e beam has passed through t h e = exp To. Payer. I n o t h e r words, ( P / I o )
29
l111111llI I
b'=bexp-( where
' 0
(14.1)
b'
is the visible surface brightness of that part of Saturn's disk covered by the ring under consideration and illuminated by the sun through this ring;
is the surface brightness of that part of Saturn's disk when it is not covered by the ring and is illuminated by the sun directly;
A and A'
are the angles of elevation of sun and earth above the pane of the rings;
To
Camichel's data (1958) permit the use of this formula to evaluate TOA, the optical thickness of the A ring. where b This observer found a mean of b
A = 0.57be,
and b are the surface brightness of the A ring and of Saturn's equae torial zone, respectively. The A ring is partially transparent, and Saturn's
Polar zone brightness i equal to 0,87b s when not occulted, sponding to 0.08b e e' From whence, and in accordance with Q. (14.1)
= 2,30 (Ig 0, 37 2
(14.2)
where
A0
at the
(14.2) will yield a correct order of magnitude, but can conhalation, and for which Camichel's
tain some degree of error attributable to data were not corrected (see #l3).
in brightness that could be observed in Camichel's observations was about 0 0 . .5 Accordingly, he was able to see the polar zone of Saturn through the A ring when b t = 0.05b
A = 0.028b e
(14.11, we obtain 7
oA
= 0.7.
05 .
w i l l provide a q u i t e c o r r e c t r e p r e s e n t a t i o n of t h e v a l u e of t h e o p t i c a l t h i c k n e s s of t h e A r i n g , b u t it i s d e s i r a b l e t o make f u r t h e r assessments, p r e c i s e l y corrected f o r halation. Method ( b ) , as h a s been p o i n t e d o u t , i s based on o b s e r v a t i o n s of o c c u l t a t i o n s of stars by t h e r i n g s . v i s u a l ones. To d a t e t h e o n l y types of such o b s e r v a t i o n s are
They have been made mostly by amateurs u s i n g low and medium powered
i n s t r u m e n t s (D
< < 50 c m ) .
H e r e w e w i l l c o n s i d e r t h e case of good i m a g e s ( f o r
t = r1
+ t,
where r
Let b
t h e r i n g i s r,
A');
(14.4)
where G
i s t h e equipupillary magnification;
G i s t h e m a g n i f i c a t i o n r e s o l v i n g t h e i m a g e of t h e star;
( G ) and ;( * G ) a r e t h e mean b r i g h t n e s s of t h e star when not o c c u l t e d o ( G m a g n i f i c a t i o n ) , and d u r i n g o c c u l t a t i o n ( G m a g n i f i c a t i o n ) , r e s p e c t i v e l y .
On t h e o t h e r hand
Remembering t h a t
r* = pe/2G,
where p
(14.6)
(TJL)
- 1O:L12]. '
(14.7)
31
I111111IlI 1I Ill I lI
H e r e t h e function f ( r * / r
) s i g n i f i e s t h e p e r c e n t a g e of luminous f l u x from t h e
I n Eq.
p a r t of t h e s t e l l a r i m a g e bounded by r a d i u s r*.
(14.7) w e t o o k it t h a t
(1961);
The minimum
e '
that m
to
w a s t h e s t e l l a r magnitude of t h e star ( a t t h e z e n i t h ) .
Sytinskaya
(1949)
- -
--
--
. _
--
and r i n g s on 28 A p r i l
1957
T h i s is why two of i t s s h o r t 4
w a s used.
F i r s t of a l l , t h e computed v a l u e of
t u r n s o u t t o be somewhat The
/35
84 p e r c e n t ( a s i s t h e c a s e i n t h e c l a s s i c a l d i f f r a c t i o n p a t t e r n .
(14.7)).
Moreover, t h i s i s n o t t h e o n l y
T
S t r i c t l y speaking, Eq.
(14.1), on which o u r e s t i m a t e of
through
S a t u r n ' s d i s k i s an extended e x a g g e r a t i n g t h e t r u e v a l u e of
source.
T
D i s r e g a r d f o r t h i s f e a t u r e can l e a d t o
and i t is p o s s i b l e t h a t h e r e i n l i e s t h e r e a s o n
give a g r e a t e r random s c a t t e r .
It is
54 p e r c e n t
32
A t t h e same t i m e , o b s e r v a t i o n of a s t a r o c c u l t e d by t h e r i n g s undoubtedly
1957.
The pheno-
menon w a s observed v i s u a l l y be W e s t f a l l (see Heath, 1958) i n a 20 i n c h r e f r a c t o r ( m a g n i f i c a t i o n 320). The o b s e r v e r d i d n o t have a photometer and e s t i m a t e d t h e
W e have
/36
small p a r t n e a r t h e c e n t e r ) .
F i g u r e 13 also shows t h a t t h e o p t i c a l t h i c k n e s s
Cassini division
Cassini division
II
Seen weakly
F i g u r e 13.
w e r e n o t t r a n s p a r e n t f o r t h e star.
~
These m n e s w e r e wider i n t h e B r i n g .
~
Zones t h a t were p a r t i a l l y t r a n s p a r e n t f o r t h e star were observed i n both r i n g s . ~. ..._ - __ Note t h a t t h e v a l u e s of t h e magnitudes pe and E can change s i g n i f i c a n t l y , depending on o b s e r v a t i o n c o n d i t i o n s .
33
W can conclude, t h e r e f o r e , t h a t i n g e n e r a l e
is higher than
'
0.5
to
OB-
1.
(14.8)
Some B r i n g zones are even more t r a n s p a r e n t . The methods d e s c r i b e d h e r e cannot be a p p l i e d t o t h e C r i n g because of t h e s p e c i f i c d i f f i c u l t i e s t h a t a r i s e i n connection w i t h i t s l a c k of b r i g h t n e s s . v a l u e s adopted f o r T The
oc
t a i l e d a n a l y s i s of t h i s o b s e r v a t i o n and concluded t h a t
oc
i n c r e a s e s monotoni-
13'1 .2
/3 7
I t w a s supposed t h a t t h e p a r t i c l e s
(1951) e s t i m a t e d t h e e q u i l i b r i u m temperature of a t y p i c a l p a r t i c l e
of S a t u r n ' s r i n g s t o be between
60"
and 70K.
were covered by h o a r f r o s t and t h a t t h e y were screened p e r i o d i c a l l y from t h e sun by each o t h e r , ar.d by t h e b a l l of Saturn.
maximum of i n t r i n s i c h e a t r a d i a t i o n of the p a r t i c l e w i l l be
41-48 microns,
l i m i t s of t h e e a r t h ' s atmosphere.
Moreover, r a d i o a s t r o n o m i c a l o b s e r v a t i o n s can
< 1, where p i s t h e
34
Radio radiation from Saturn has been measured by Kutuza et al. (1965), at
8 mm, by Welch et al. (1966), at 1.53 cm, by Cook et al. (19601, at 3.45 cm, by Hughes (1966), at 6.0 cm, by Rose et al. (19631, at 9 4 cm, by Drake (19621, .
A
=
at 10.0 cm, by Davies et al. (l964), at 11.3 cm, and by Davies and Williams (1966), at 21.2 cm. The values for the brightness radio-temperature of Saturn, Tb, ob-
tained by these authors are shown in Figure 14 as a function of the wavelength (the open circles; the vertical lines show probable errors in the determinations rises with C h , although the conb siderable scatter in the points does not enable us to fix the law of rise with as cited in the articles).
A s will be seen, T
confidence.
The reason for the rise is the greenhouse effect (the larger A , the
deeper the layers of the atmosphere from which the radiation is being recorded), or the presence of a nonthermal component (radiation from the radiation belts, similar to that observed for Jupiter). If the second possibility is what
occurs, radio radiation from Saturn definitely should be polarized, and this is what has been found by Rose et al. (1963), at 9.4 cm. strong (20 These authors reported
to the axis of rotation of the planet (in the case of the corresponding radiation from Jupiter the electric vector is perpendicular to the axis of rotation; Zheleznyakov (1964) showed that the difference in orientation can be explained by the effect of the rings on the shape of the radiation belts). However, observaFor
tions made by other radio astronomers have not confirmed Rose's results.
example, Davies et al. (1964), observed no polarization at 11.3 cm, and arrived at the conclusion that its upper limit is less than 6 percent.
So, the question
138
is not completely settled, and further observations are needed in order to resolve it. But whatever the nature of the rise in T with Ch, it can be expected that b when 1 is small enough the radio brightness temperature of Saturn should be close to the infrared brightness temperature. Today we can place the old results ob-
tained by Pettit and Nicholson (19241, and by Menzel, Coblentz, and Lampland 125" to 130K, as well as more recent observations by (1926), which yielded T b Murray and Wildey (1963), and by Low (1964, 1966), at infrared wavelengths. Murray and Wildey used a germanium photoresistance on a 19-inch reflector and worked in the transmission window between 8 and 13 microns.
No traces of infra-
red emission from Saturn were found, so it follows that in this band of
35
wavelengths T < lO5'K. L w measured o b t h e emission from S a t u r n w i t h an inf r a r e d photometer i n t h e C a s s e g r a i n l s focus of an 82-inch r e f l e c t o r i n t h e
P
I
. . 1 ..
The corresponding T
w e r e 93
* 3OK,
values
confirming t h e c o r r e c t -
n e s s of t h e c o n c l u s i o n s reached by Murray and Wildey, and showing t h a t t h e o l d estimates of t h e i n f r a r e d b r i g h t n e s s temperature of Saturn a p p a r e n t l y w e r e exaggerated.
- I
.-L. L.. ...
J
The mean of Low's r e s u l t s is F i g u r e 14. B r i g h t n e s s temperature of S a t u r n a t r a d i o wavelengths. The c i r c l e s a r e f o r temperature normalized f o r t h e f u l l d i s k of S a t u r n ( t h e " c o l d , completely t r a n s p a r e n t " r i n g s hypothesis). The c r o s s e s and tria n g l e s a r e f o r temperature c a l c u l a t e d through JZq. (15.2) when TK = 30" and 65 OK ( t h e llwarm, p a r t i a l l y t r a n s p a r e n t " rings hypothesis). The h o r i z o n t a l arrow is t h e i n f r a r e d b r i g h t n e s s t e m p e r a t u r e a t A = 10 and 20 microns (Low, 1964, 1966) normalized f o r t h e p a r t of S a t u r n ' s d i s k n o t screened by t h e r i n g s . shown by t h e h o r i z o n t a l arrow a t t h e
/39
As
U
w i l l be s e e n from t h e f i g u r e , a l l TL
it s t i l l i s hard t o s a y whether t h e
temperature found by Low is t h e asymptote t o which t h e r a d i o temperat u r e t e n d s w i t h r e d u c t i o n i n A. The
(1966) n o t e s t h a t h i s v a l u e f o r t h e b r i g h t n e s s temperature of S a t u r n i s
H e does n o t provide numerical v a l u e s f o r r i n g
t h e radioastronomers proceed from t h e assumption t h a t t h e emission s o u r c e i s t h e t o t a l a r e a of S a t u r n ' s d i s k when t h e y make t h e t r a n s i t i o n from t h e measured flow of t h e emission t o T T h i s , however, i g n o r e s t h e v i s i b l e a r e a of t h e r i n g s , b' n o t o n l y i n t h e e y e s , b u t i n f r o n t of t h e d i s k as w e l l . This is t h e e q u i v a l e n t
36
I
of t h e "cold, completely t r a n s p a r e n t " r i n g s . I n t h e g e n e r a l case, t h a t of t h e
"warm, p a r t i a l l y t r a n s p a r e n t " r i n g s , however, t h e mean r a d i o b r i g h t n e s s temperat u r e of t h e S a t u r n p l u s r i n g s system can be found through t h e e x p r e s s i o n (with an accuracy up t o f i r s t o r d e r s c a t t e r )
-
T=
),
(15.1)
where
A'
The magnitudes x and y are expressed i n percentages of t h e t o t a l a r e a of S a t u r n ' s disk. They have been t a b u l a t e d by Schoenberg (1929) a s a f u n c t i o n of A ' .
It is n o t d i f f i c u l t t o see t h a t
=.
d i s k is T dTby
W e used
T = 3 0 K (W t h 7 r 0 measurements a g r e e with t h e
p a r t i a l l y t r a n s p a r e n t " r i n g s hypothesis.
The
L40
l b K a t 1 = 3.45 c m .
1 1 6 " ~ o r Td when f
37
6 5 " ~ t o o high a is
Cook's p o i n t .
A t t h e s a m e t i m e i t should be emphasized t h a t t h e
30K v a l u e obtained h e r e
f o r t h e temperature of t h e r i n g s i s u n j u s t i f i a b l y low, s o t h e f a c t t h a t S a t u r n ' s r i n g s a r e more t r a n s p a r e n t a t r a d i o wavelengths t h a n t h e y are a t o p t i c a l wavel e n g t h s cannot be precluded. e x i s t i n g d a t a is t o reduce 7
0
I n f a c t , a l l t h a t need be done t o s a t i s f y a l l to
P r o p e r t i e s of a Typical P a r t i c l e .
ri _ ~ . s #16. Absolute Surface B_g h t n e_s _of t h e B Ring _ The preceding c h a p t e r s have d e a l t w i t h o b s e r v a t i o n a l d a t a . about a n a l y z i n g a l l of t h i s primary information. of o u r a t t e n t i o n w i l l be t h e B r i n g .
L e t u s now set
A s b e f o r e , t h e primary o b j e c t
L e t u s , as o u r f i r s t s t e p , compute t h e
a b s o l u t e s u r f a c e b r i g h t n e s s , b ( O ) , of t h e most i n t e n s e zone of t h e B r i n g when B ~y = 0. Knowledge of b ( 0 ) w i l l make i t p o s s i b l e t o estimate t h e s p h e r i c a l B albedo* of a p a r t i c l e and t o draw some c o n c l u s i o n s a s t o t h e p a r t i c l e ' s n a t u r a l phase function. The term Itabsolute b r i g h t n e s s " w i l l be used i n t h e sense of
0
"brightness i n b
u n i t s , " where b
i s t h e b r i g h t n e s s of an a b s o l u t e l y white,
i n a v i s u a l system.
i s t o r e p r e s e n t t h e v a l u e as
BB(o) = B c
where p. 2 2 ) ; c i s t h e c e n t e r of S a t u r n ' s d i s k .
m - 0.06,
(16.1)
B i s t h e b r i g h t n e s s , expressed i n s t e l l a r magnitudes ( s e e f o o t n o t e on
Converting t h e magnitudes i n Eq.
(16.1)
.
in b
0
(16.2) units.
I t should b e . n o t e d
/42
used i n Eq.
(16.2)
as t h e photometric s t a n d a r d t o be a
* S p h e r i c a l albedo i s a dimensionless magnitude equal t o t h e r a t i o of t h e luminous f l u x s c a t t e r e d i n a l l d i r e c t i o n s by t h e body t o t h e luminous f l u x i n c i d e n t on it ( g i v e n t h e c o n d i t i o n t h a t t h e body i s i l l u m i n a t e d by a beam of p a r a l l e l The analogous magnitude f o r a p l a n e a r e a i s c a l l e d t h e p l a n e albedo. rays). I f t h e r a y s a r e i n c i d e n t on t h e a r e a i n a d i r e c t i o n normal t o i t , one can t h e n speak of t h e plane-normal albedo.
** B r i g h t n e s s , expressed i n b0 u n i t s , i s a l s o c a l l e d t h e llluminance f a c t o r , " or I f v i s i b l e albedo , I t i n astrophotometry. 39
is o n l y an i n t e r m e d i a t e magnitude.
We w i l l ,
0 C
u n i t s , and bo i s i n f a c t s t a b l e .
and by Lebedinets
(1957) p h o t o g r a p h i c a l l y , by comparing
(1939).
and b l u e ) and o b t a i n e d t h e r e s p e c t i v e f o u r b
values.
a single b
4.
TABLE
0.68
0.48
~
(1957)
- _ _
Absolute measurement t e c h n i q u e s a r e complicated, and i n v o l v e many i n t e r mediate o p e r a t i o n s w i t h a l l of t h e s y s t e m a t i c and random e r r o r s i n h e r e n t i n such o p e r a t i o n s , t h e magnitude of which it i s d i f f i c u l t t o estimate. T h i s i s pre-
c i s e l y why t h e divergence i n t h e b /b v a l u e s l i s t e d i n Table 4 i s s o g r e a t . c o But one can r e a d i l y c a l c u l a t e b /b i n d e p e n d e n t l y , and e s t i m a t e t h e probable c o e r r o r i n t h e c a l c u l a t i o n s , by s t a r t i n g with t h e v i s u a l s t e l l a r magnitude of Saturn (without t h e r i n g s )
y,t h e
a r e a of S a t u r n ' s d i s k w ( i n seconds of a r c ) ,
and t h e darkening toward t h e limb of S a t u r n ' s d i s k , and which can be expressed by t h e r a t i o 'i;/bc, W obtain e where
(16.3
where E
(3
i s t h e b r i g h t n e s s of an o r t h o t r o p i c , a b s o l u t e l y w h i t e s u r f a c e placed
/43 -
a t a d i s t a n c e from t h e e a r t h normal t o t h e i n c i d e n t s o l a r r a d i a t i o n ( o u t s i d e t h e
e a r t h ' s atmosphere); F$
40
The v a l u e of E/b
C'
"12
u)
= =
m 0 .89 f
7%; E(3
1.35-10 5
=
5,
9.54
.~.
Albedo of a P a r t i c l e .
g r a l , q ( e x p r e s s i n g t h e a n g u l a r d i s t r i b u t i o n of t h e l i g h t s c a t t e r e d by t h e p a r 7
- 2
P
where z
I t i s n o t shown
W s h a l l c a l l t h i s model a " o n e - p a r t i c l e t h i c k n e s s e
(17.2) signi-
This i s a % a n y - p a r t i c l e
t h i c k n e s s system."
i $ L r __ ~~
(17.3
41
Recognizing t h a t
1, we s e e t h a t t h e Eq.
(17.2)
model can be c h a r a c t e r i z e d
/44 -
by f r e q u e n t c o l l i s i o n s between t h e p a r t i c l e s .
t o t h e f a c t t h a t t h e c o l l i s i o n s are i n p a r t i n e l a s t i c .
t h a t takes p l a c e as a r e s u l t of nonideal e l a s t i c i t y of c o l l i s i o n s r e s u l t s i n a s e c u l a r r e d u c t i o n i n i n c l i n a t i o n s and e c c e n t r i c i t i e s i n p a r t i c l e o r b i t s . Calculations led J e f f r e y s t o t h e conclusion t h a t over a period of t i m e t h a t w a s s h o r t as compared w i t h t h e a g e of t h e s o l a r system, S a t u r n ' s r i n g s should have been transformed i n t o a o n e - p a r t i c l e t h i c l m e s s system. But, as w i l l be seen i n
n o t , a t t h i s p o i n t , o p t i n f a v o r of e i t h e r model.
(a)
albedo, a
One-particle t h i c k n e s s system.
~
m a '
i s equal t o one f o r v i s u a l r a y s .
They w i l l be p a r t i c l e s of i c e (#lo) i n t h e c a s e of
p a r t i c l e s encounters very s e r i o u s d i f f i c u l t i e s .
i s cosmogonic i n n a t u r e .
f l u e n c e of p l a n e t o c e n t r i c r a d i a t i v e b r a k i n g , which i s analogous t o t h e atmospheric b r a k i n g of a r t i f i c i a l e a r t h s a t e l l i t e s and which would f o r c e t h e p a r t i c l e s t o f a l l i n t o t h e c e n t r a l body ( t h e p l a n e t ) . T h i s problem w a s reviewed by Radziyevskiy
0.95-10 7pR 2 G l n ( r o / r t ) ,
(17.4)
where 9 i s t h e p a r t i c l e r a d i u s (cm); 6 i s t h e p a r t i c l e d e n s i t y ( g / c c ) ;
to r
t-
Applying Eq.
Franklin
42
values
f o r p i n Eq.
( i c e ) , R = 9.54 AU, r
s e n t i n n e r l i m i t of t h e C r i n g ) , w e o b t a i n tively.
y e a r s ) some 100 t i m e s !
Another p o s s i b i l i t y
( a l s o of s l i g h t p r o b a b i l i t y ) i s t h a t t h e r i n g s are s e v e r a l o r d e r s of magnitude younger t h a n any typical body i n t h e s o l a r system. Thus, w e have e l i m i n a t e d f r o m f u r t h e r c o n s i d e r a t i o n microscopic p a r t i c l e s , and w i l l now proceed t o look i n t o p a r t i c l e s of macroscopic s i z e ( p
&
5 3
cm).
It
can be expected t h a t t h e a c t i o n of m i c r o m e t e o r i t e s and s o l a r c o r p u s c u l a r r a d i a t i o n would have l e f t t h e s u r f a c e l a y e r of t h i s s o r t of p a r t i c l e v e r y rough, and t h a t i t would resemble t h e moonls s u r f a c e l a y e r (somewhat s i m i l a r t o I f c a s t l e s i n the air," and t h e l i k e ) . Consequently, t h e v a l u e c l o s e t o t h a t can be taken f o r t h e phase i n t e -
I t a l s o i s n a t u r a l t o suppose t h a t t h e s u r f a c e
T
l a y e r i s t h i c k enough f o r
0. 3
Moreover, we know t h a t t h e b r i g h t n e s s of t h e
M
r i n g i n opposition is [bB(0)/bol
0.65.
L e t u s r e c a l l t h a t w e do have a c a s e
T
i n t h e o n e - p a r t i c l e t h i c k n e s s system when
m e t r i c a l , with t h e s c a t t e r maximum d i r e c t e d backward (toward t h e l i g h t s o u r c e ) . The s p h e r i c a l albedo of t h e p a r t i c l e i n t h i s system need n o t be high i n o r d e r t o Then we can i g n o r e m u l t i p l e s c a t t e r i n g from p a r t i c l e ensure t h a t b ( 0 ) = 0.65b B 0 t o p a r t i c l e , j u s t a s w e can t h e d a r k l a n e s between p a r t i c l e s ( e r r o r s have o p p o s i t e s i g n s and c a n c e l each o t h e r , a p p r o x i m a t e l y ) , and we can i d e n t i f y bg(0) with t h e mean b r i g h t n e s s of t h e d i s k of t h e p a r t i c l e i n t h e f u l l phase
(17.5
This approximation r e s u l t s i n a r e a d i l y o b t a i n a b l e m a j o r i z i n g e s t i m a t e of t h e s p h e r i c a l albedo of a p a r t i c l e i n t h e system. l e f t hand s i d e of Eq. particle (17.6) A c t u a l l y , t h e magnitude on t h e
43
where q i s t h e phase i n t e g r a l .
(17.8)
where t h e s u b s c r i p t s p and D are magnitudes t h a t e q u a t e t o t h e p a r t i c l e and t o t h e moon.
> a A s a m a t t e r of f a c t , i n t h e Eq. (17.5) approxig P gD. mation a = 0.65, whereas t h e t a b u l a t e d v a l u e i s a = 0.106 ( A l l e n , 1960). 9 P g D S i n c e t h e i n d i c a t r i x f o r t h e p a r t i c l e can be considered t o be c l o s e t o t h e i n d i Nw note t h a t a o c a t r i x f o r t h e moon, t h i s i n e q u a l i t y means t h a t t h e p a r t i c l e ' s r e f l e c t i v i t y i s h i g h e r t h a n t h e moon's. But g e n e r a l c o n s i d e r a t i o n s , as w e l l as l a b o r a t o r y i n v e s -
t y p e s u r f a c e , t h e e l o n g a t i o n of t h e i n d i c a t r i x (toward t h e l i g h t s o u r c e ) de-
creases w i t h i n c r e a s e i n t h e body's r e f l e c t i v i t y .
we can w r i t e t h e f o l l o w i n g i n p l a c e of Eq.
>
l , and
(17.8)
g D
f o r t h e e f f e c t of t h e moon's o p p o s i t i o n . when a g P
= 0.65+22h,
g D
0.145.
Then,
and a
SP D
0.067
a
In
SP P
> 0.30+22%.
(17.10)
(17.10) r e s u l t i n d i c h t e s t h a t t h e B r i n g i s n o t a o n e - p a r t i c l e t h i c k n e s s
c u l a t e t h e b r i g h t n e s s o f t h e l a y e r as a p p l i c a b l e t o d i e l e c t r i c p a r t i c l e s s c a t t e r e d
b = b 1 + Ab,
b r i g h t n e s s of f i r s t and h i g h e r o r d e r s of s c a t t e r i n g .
(17.11)
Since t h e c a l c u l a t i o n is
If q i s
The monochromatic phase f u n c t i o n of d i e l e c t r i c microscopic s p h e r e s w i t h i n d i c e s of r e f r a c t i o n m = 1.33 and approximately 130 ( W a l t e r , 1957, parameter H == 2rrp/h,
1959; Giese
1961), depending on t h e
p i s t h e r a d i u s of t h e sphere.
1 = 0.555 micron,
w e o b t a i n p l i m i t s 0.9-35.4
microns, r e s p e c t i v e l y .
What
around
7.15.
Assuming
SP
1, w o b t a i n e
bl
= a
1/7-15 = 0.14.
(17.12)
45
W e can e s t i m a t e t h e t e r m
scattering. systems.
U n f o r t u n a t e l y , t h i s t h e o r y h o l d s o n l y w i t h many-particle t h i c k n e s s
0 '
L e t u s take a n exaggerated v a l u e f o r T
s a y 3 , i n o r d e r t o avoid
u n d e r e s t i m a t i n g Ab.
0.41
as com-
Comparing t h i s r e s u l t w i t h
cB(0) 0.65 =
( a s w e l l as w i t h t h e o t h e r i n b
units)
microscopic d i e l e c t r i c s p h e r e s does n o t s a t i s f y t h e photometric d a t a . One can r a i s e t h e o b j e c t i o n t h a t microscopic p a r t i c l e s expected i n S a t u r n ' s r i n g s should be c r y s t a l s , r a t h e r t h a n t r u e spheres. phase f u n c t i o n c a l c u l a t i o n s f o r c r y s t a l s . Unfortunately, t h e r e a r e no
However, i f c r y s t a l o r i e n t a t i o n i s
c h a o t i c , t h e r e s u l t s should be c l o s e t o t h o s e f o r spheres.
If t h e o r i e n t a t i o n
1958, f o r example).
These d a t a f a i l t o
opaque white s p h e r e s r e f l e c t i n g i n accordance w i t h Lambert's l a w ( a l t h o u g h t h e amount of l i g h t s c a t t e r e d backward i n t h i s c a s e i s s u f f i c i e n t ) . (b) Many-particle t h i c k n e s s system. T h i s i s t h e c l a s s i c a l case considered
/48 -
i n t h e t h e o r y of m u l t i p l e s c a t t e r i n g of l i g h t ( a f l a t l a y e r of s c a t t e r i n g medium with o p t i c a l t h i c k n e s s
T
0
(1953),
5 lists o u r
0.62 as t h e
W selected e
46
0.65.
T h i s produces no s i g n i f i c a n t change i n
TABLE 5
f o r second 1 md h i g h e r orler s c a t t e r i n g
c
~-
___
70
b, (0)
- . .
Ab b
Under study
_ _
1 1 1 1
3
0 0 0
0 0
1 1 1 1 1
+3 -3
0 0 0
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
0 8 . 0 7 . 0.6
3.3
2.7 4.9
4.0 3.7
0.24
03 .1
0.20
0.17 0.31 0.08 0.14 0.12 0.08 0.06
E f f e c t o f bg ( 0 E f f e c t o f -r0 E f f e c t of x Effect of a
I n Table 5 ,
i s t h e o p t i c a l t h i c k n e s s of t h e l a y e r , b g ( 0 ) i s t h e b r i g h t n e s s
i s t h e r a t i o of t h e
The follow-
i n g parameter w a s used t o c a l c u l a t e s c a t t e r i n g of o r d e r s h i g h e r t h a n t h e f i r s t
and i s a measure of t h e e l o n g a t i o n of t h e i n d i c a t r i x .
x1 i s equal t o zero i n
I 1
/49
I n o r d e r t o avoid any c o n f u s i o n , l e t u s p o i n t o u t
47
IllI
11.
There is y e t a n o t h e r comment t o be made, one based on p r i n c i p l e , i n addit i o n t o t h e p u r e l y formal comment a l r e a d y made. Table The magnitude of a l i s t e d i n
5 i s n o t t h e albedo of an i n d i v i d u a l p a r t i c l e i n t h e system, s t r i c t l y
l a s of t h e t h e o r y of m u l t i p l e s c a t t e r i n g .
a w i t h t h e albedo of t h e p a r t i c l e .
W i n t r o d u c e an e r r o r by i d e n t i f y i n g e
emphasized t h e fact t h a t t h e observed extreme s h a r p n e s s of t h e B r i n g phase funct i o n m a x i m u m when cy = 0 ( F i g u r e 9b) s u g g e s t s t h e primacy i n t h i s d i r e c t i o n of t h e e f f e c t s of f i r s t o r d e r s c a t t e r i n g ; t h a t i s , on t h e s m a l l n e s s of Ab/b as compared w i t h u n i t y . The r e s u l t s of t h e d i r e c t c a l c u l a t i o n s i n terms of t h e t h e o r y
5 , confirm t h i s f a c t , so long as t h e
I t i s more r e a l i s t i c t o
There i s no o b j e c t i o n t o iden-
even when a = 1.
0.06 t o 0.08.
5.
T
0
and b ( 0 ) v a l u e s l i s t e d i n t h e t a b l e as parameters B In known from o b s e r v a t i o n ( t h e accuracy of which i s w i t h i n d e f i n i t e bounds). W w i l l consider t h e e such c a s e t h e d a t a i n t h e t a b l e e n a b l e u s t o e s t a b l i s h what t h e x(n) and Ab/b v a l u e s f o r some a ought t o be s o t h a t , when o b s e r v a t i o n s w i l l be obtained. conclude t h a t : 1. Microscopic, d i e l e c t r i c , d i f f r a c t i n g ( c o n s e q u e n t l y t r a n s p a r e n t ) s p h e r e s 1, x(n)
1, a b ( 0 ) v a l u e s a t i s f y i n g t h e B In turn, t h i s w i l l m a k e it possible f o r us t o
T
0
f o r which a -
- 0.56
f y t h e many-particle t h i c k n e s s models, because t h e y cannot provide t h e observed b B ( 0 ) value. 2. A b s o l u t e l y w h i t e s p h e r e s , s c a t t e r i n g i n accordance w i t h Lambert's l a w almost s a t i s f y t h e minimum observed v a l u e bB(0) = 0.51 of E q .
[x(n) = 2.71,
(16.4).
48
/50
l i f e span f o r microscopic p a r t i c l e s i n S a t u r n ' s r i n g s , w e should suppose t h a t t h e s o l e s o u r c e of p a r t i c l e s such as t h e s e i s t h e f r a c t i o n a t i o n of macroscopic p a r t i c l e s when t h e y c o l l i d e w i t h each o t h e r . Consequently, t h e per-
3.
The
It can be a n t i c i -
p a t e d t h a t because of t h e c o n s t a n t a c t i v i t y of m i c r o m e t e o r i t e s and of s o l a r c o r p u s c u l a r r a d i a t i o n on t h e s u r f a c e of t h e p a r t i c l e s , t h e i r phase f u n c t i o n w i l l be extremely c l o s e t o t h e moon's phase f u n c t i o n , f o r which, w i t h t h e e f f e c t of opposition taken i n t o consideration, x(n) =
9.43.
The d a t a i n Table
5 confirm
0.6 and
= 1, and c o n s i s t i n g of p a r t i c l e s with a =
x ( n ) = 7.9,
F i n a l l y , i t can be s t a t e d t h a t a many-particle t h i c k n e s s system having t h e b r i g h t n e s s of t h e B r i n g , and c o n s i s t i n g p r i m a r i l y of macroscopic p a r t i c l e s with a phase f u n c t i o n s i m i l a r t o t h a t of t h e moon ( r e f l e c t i n g s u r f a c e i n terms of m a s s ) w i l l have an albedo f o r t h e p a r t i c l e s of
- 0.5
- 0.6
(17.15)
3.
( e h r e l s , 1956, 1957; Gehrels e t a l , 1964; Hapke, 1963; Hapke and van Horn, 1963). W e s h a l l c a l l i t t h e Gehrels-Hapke e f f e c t , f o r purposes of b r e v i t y .
49
L e t u s a t t e m p t t o estimate t h e r e l a t i v e c o n t r i b u t i o n of each e f f e c t t o t h e
r e s u l t a n t phase curve. of f a c t , i n The c o n t r i b u t i o n of d i f f r a c t i o n i s small.
/51
As a matter
$,
- $,
x Om.6
A s a m a t t e r of
f a c t , t h i s e f f e c t can give a phase curve resembling i n shape t h e phase curve f o r S a t u r n ' s r i n g s o n l y f o r t h e c o n d i t i o n t h a t t h e albedo of t h e p a r t i c l e i s v e r y low. T h i s can be seen q u i t e w e l l i n t h e example of t h e G a l i l e a n s a t e l l i t e s
H a r r i s ( 1 9 6 2 ) , proceeding from
0.585 f o r a l l t h e s e b o d i e s , found s p h e r i c a l
r e s p e c t i v e l y , f o r them.
and 0.15,
o t h e r G a l i l e a n s a t e l l i t e s , t h e phase c u r v e s a r e p r a c t i c a l l y s t r a i g h t l i n e s , or a r e o n l y s l i g h t l y curved, w i t h a c u r v a t u r e t h a t remains almost unchanged with cy. But t h e main photometric f e a t u r e of C a l l i s t o i s i t s v e r y low albedo (0.15, as compared with 0.29 t o 0.54 f o r t h e o t h e r t h r e e s a t e l l i t e s ) . Another s a t e l l i t e
T h e o r e t i c a l r e s e a r c h (Hapke,
van Horn, 1963) a l s o confirm t h a t t h e l l l o g a r i t h m i c f lbehavior of t h e phase curve n e a r o p p o s i t i o n can be observed o n l y i n t h e c a s e of b o d i e s w i t h low albedo.
( a s p h e r i c a l body w i t h a s u r f a c e such as t h i s
2 0.09).
A t t h e same t i m e , we s a w i n
0.3,
and i n t h e c a s e of t h e
50
II I I I . 1 11 . 1 1.1 1 1
I111 II I
many-particle
lllogarithmicfl
e f f e c t near opposition.
I n t h i s regard,
/52
p, h a s an o r d e r
S p e c i f i c a l l y , i t can be 0.5 b r i g h t n e s s of t h e B r i n g .
0.6,
t h a t i s , have a v a l u e s a t i s f y i n g t h e observed
3.
-~
Typical P a r t i c l e
cy
1 sin
A,
(19.1)
I n Chapter V I 1 it w i l l be
<
< 3'.
I t i s obvious t h a t t h e o n e - p a r t i c l e
t h i c k n e s s system can s a t i s f y t h e c o n d i t i o n of E q .
(19.1) o n l y when v a l u e s of A
1ll11l1 I Ill I I
are v e r y s m a l l .
extremely n o n l i n e a r i n t h i s i n t e r v a l t o A
28.
Second, t h e mean d i s t a n c e between a d j a c e n t p a r t i c l e s ought t o be s h o r t enough t o provide f o r a comparatively high p r o b a b i l i t y of mutual shading. In
5 10-3.
(19.2)
= 1, and
b r i g h t n e s s a t o p p o s i t i o n equal t o B r i n g b r i g h t n e s s .
0.5 t o 0.6.
Macroscopic p a r t i c l e s w i t h t h e s e p r o p e r t i e s ( l l b l o c k s f f )should comprise t h e overwhelming p e r c e n t a g e of t h e m a s s and r e f l e c t i n g s u r f a c e of t h e r i n g , b u t t h i s does not p r e c l u d e t h e presence of s m a l l e r p a r t i c l e s ( l f d u s t 1 l )i n t h e volume of t h e r i n g . The l i f e of such system ( I t b l o c k s A c t u a l l y , although t h e
mogonically speaking.
w i l l be swept o u t of t h e
r i n g volume c o n t i n u o u s l y because of r a d i a t i v e b r a k i n g , t h e c o l l i s i o n s between Ilblocks w i l l r e s u l t i n t h e fragmentation of t h e i r s u r f a c e l a y e r and t o t h e appearance of new Ildust p a r t i c l e s . system i n which 7
0
C o l l i s i o n s i n a many-particle t h i c k n e s s
1 should be f r e q u e n t
S a t u r n s r i n g s w a s d e t e c t e d r e l i a b l y by Maggini
small ( s e e F i g u r e 11).
52
V.
# . ntroductory a I
[ L e t u s emphasize t h e f a c t t h a t a n g l e q , correspon-
(22.211.
There a r e two ways i n which t h e problem can be solved. 1. Observe t h e r i n g s when A i s e x a c t l y e q u a l t o zero.
A t t h i s time t h e
i s i l l u m i n a t e d by d i r e c t s o l a r l i g h t , i t s t r u e b r i g h t n e s s , be, should be of t h e
o r d e r of b r i g h t n e s s of t h e B r i n g a t l a r g e openings, whereas t h e b r i g h t n e s s of t h e dark s i d e , b d , should be from 2 t o 2 1/2 o r d e r s of magnitude l e s s ( t h e subs c r i p t s left and d f l d e s i g n a t e t h e edge and dark s i d e of t h e r i n g s , r e s p e c t i v e l y ) . r a t i o w i l l be g r e a t l y reduced A s a p r a c t i c a l m a t t e r , t h e magnitude of t h e b /b e d because of t h e apparent expansion of t h e image of t h e edge, b u t d e s p i t e t h i s f a c t , given t h e corresponding v i s i b i l i t y c o n d i t i o n s , t h e presence of a b r i g h t edge w i l l show up i n t h e form of some asymmetry i n t h e photometric s e c t i o n of t h e eyes. F u r t h e r d e t a i l s d e a l i n g w i t h t h e s e two methods of a r r i v i n g a t an observed
e s t i m a t e of z
w i l l be d i s c u s s e d i n #22.
53
/55 -
s e a r c h i n g f o r a g a s , o r d u s t , atmosphere,
I l l u m i n a t i o n o f t h e Dark S i d e o f t h e Rings
(a)
I l l u m i n a t i o n of t h e d a r k s i d e o f t h e _ _ - _ Saturn. ball of -
Russel (1908)
w a s t h e f i r s t t o o b t a i n t h e c o r r e c t o r d e r of magnitude of t h i s e f f e c t .
c u l a t i o n can be expressed by t h e formula (bA/bl)
= 1/2
H i s cal-
[(I?R
2 2 sin P)/(Igr
2 sin p)] f
((Y
)f
((Y
(21.1)
'z
and I
as observed from t h e e a r t h ;
the situation.
54
(21.1)
50" a t t h e R u s s e l 1 p o i n t .
Taking p = 9ff.07, me
- m5
cy5
= -2Gm.60
= cyp
- 0m .88
-2F.48
= 2/7,
' z e
(R/r)
M
9.539,
= 90", f 5 ( 9 0 " )
1/10, approximately, R u s s e l l o b t a i n e d
/56
The i n t e n s i t y of t h e
i l l u m i n a t i o n of t h e d a r k s i d e w a s c a l c u l a t e d f o r a s e r i e s o f p o i n t s along t h e major axis of t h e r i n g s , and along a s e c a n t normal t o t h e major axis and i n t e r secting it at theRussellpoint,
as w e l l as f o r t h e R u s s e l l p o i n t .
The r e s u l t s
of t h e review can be formulated as follows. The cy = 90" v a l u e f o r t h e R u s s e l l p o i n t i s i n a c c u r a t e . I t would be P more c o r r e c t t o measure cy from t h e d i r e c t i o n t o t h e photometric c e n t e r of gra1.
14" f o r t h e R u s s e l l
v a l u e w i l l t h e n be 40%g r e a t e r t h a n it i s i n
Analogous c o r r e c t i o n f a c t o r s can be i n t r o d u c e d f o r a l l t h e o t h e r p o i n t s .
55
...
. .
..
.. .
-..
..
.-
h - e s e n t day v a l u e s of m and p a r e -26 -73 ( A l l e n , 19501, and 811.80 8 (Rabe, 1928). When t h e y a r e s u b s t i t u t e d i n t o Eq. (21.1) i n p l a c e o f t h e v a l u e s 2. accepted by R u s s e l l , t h e r e s u l t i s changed by
6% i n a l l (on t h e lower s i d e ) .
is equivalent t o adopting
According t o Lambert's
law
f ( 9 0 ) = 0.318, so t h a t f ( 9 O o ) = f ( 9 O 0 )= 0.101.
Contemporary r e s e a r c h ( s e e
/57 -
The l a t t e r y i e l d s f ( 9 O o ) = 0.24.
f ( 9 0 " ) f o r Venus h a s p r e c i s e l y
t h i s v a l u e (Danjon,
c o i n c i d e s w i t h t h e phase f u n c t i o n of t h e Rayleigh s c a t t e r i n g r i g h t up t o
looo).
1933).
l i g h t source a r e s m a l l .
v i s i b l e from t h e R u s s e l 1 p o i n t i s 30" i n a l t i t u d e and somewhat i n excess of t h a t i n a:ziimuth. A wide-angle source such as t h i s w i l l g r e a t l y reduce t h e shadow on
0.08.
With a l l of t h i s i n mind, we c a l c u l a t e d t h e behavior of t h e d a r k s i d e b r i g h t n e s s i n t h e eyes ( a l o n g t h e major a x i s , and a l o n g t h e normal s e c a n t through t h e Russel p o i n t ) , u s i n g two assumptions
1)
where f
'z
(a)
= f P
(a)
= f L ( p ) and 2 )
(a)
= f
(Q) = f
(a),
16.
The s o l i d curve i s f o r t h e assumption t h a t S a t u r n ' s b a l l and t h e p a r t i c l e ref l e c t i n accordance with Lambert 1 s law. The dashed curve i s f o r t h e assumption t h a t t h e y r e f l e c t i n a manner s i m i l a r t o t h a t f o r Venus.
56
A s w i l l be s e e n , t h e b r i g h t n e s s of t h e d a r k s i d e d i m i n i s h e s w i t h d i s t a n c e
from t h e Russel p o i n t a l o n g t h e secant. ratio The mean magnitude of t h e b'/b d l f o r t h e Lambert. phase f u n c t i o n , and 3.6-10-3 f o r t h e phase f u n c t i o n
i s 5.4010'~
of Venus.
The bA/bl
at
a t t r i b u t a b l e t o d i f f u s e l y transmitted s o l a r --
p a r t of t h e t h e o r y of m u l t i p l e s c a t t e r i n g . c a l c u l a t i o n s f o r t h e A and B r i n g s . indicatrix.
6 lists t h e r e s u l t s of our
The c a l c u l a t i o n s w e r e made f o r a s p h e r i c a l
Because t h e i n d i c a t r i x f o r t h e s c a t t e r i n g of t h e r i n g m a t e r i a l i s
-- O"35'
2"20'
0.M
0.01
0.01
0 35
2 20
0.04
2 20
0 35
0.04
0.01
0 35
2 20
0.01
0.04
W used t h e contour of b r i g h t n e s s d i s t r i b u e
57
/58
6 , when
ey
S o l a r r a d i a t i o n d i f f u s e l y t r a n s m i t t e d Ahrough t h L C a s s i n i -~diyisiog; -
o p t i c a l t h i c k n e s s of t ~ d i v i s ~ - o L e. t u s suppose t h a t t h e s c a t t e r i n g proper~
t i e s of t h e p a r t i c l e s f i l l i n g t h e C a s s i n i d i v i s i o n a r e i d e n t i c a l with t h o s e of
the particles f i l l i n g the B ring. The problem i s t o f i n d t h a t v a l u e of t h e op(T
/59
t i c a l t h i c k n e s s of t h e C a s s i n i d i v i s i o n
observational data:
oC d
) t h a t w i l l s a t i s f y t h e following
A S 1
2; '
( 2 ) v i s i b i l i t y ( a t s i t e s of e x t e r n a l b r i g h t c o n d e n s a t i o n s ) of d a r k s p o t s
when t h e r i n g h a s i t s i l l u m i n a t e d s i d e t u r n e d toward t h e e a r t h and A i s o f t h e o r d e r of 2; '
( 3 ) n o n - v i s i b i l i t y of t h e double b r i g h t l i n e of t h e C a s s i n i d i v i s i o n on
t h e d a r k s i d e of t h e r i n g s between t h e e x t e r n a l and i n t e r n a l condensations;
( 4 ) t h e s i g n i f i c a n t e x c e s s of t h e b r i g h t n e s s of t h e o u t e r condensations
over t h e b r i g h t n e s s of t h e d a r k s i d e . n a l condensations v i s u a l l y a r e S p e c i f i c a l l y , when A t
6 t o 8 t i m e s b r i g h t e r t h a n t h e d a r k s i d e (Barnard,
1908a) ,
Our c a l c u l a t i o n s r e v e a l e d t h a t w e can o b t a i n s a t i s f a c t o r y concordance w i t h
-~
5 . 6 ~ . Because
c a n be a t t r i b u t e d t o t h e l i g h t d i f f u s e l y t r a n s m i t t e d through t h e C a s s i n i d i v i -
58
sion.
w i t h t h e C r i n g ) e v i d e n t l y can be a t t r i b u t e d t o t h e l i k e d i f f u s i o n of l i g h t through o t h e r o p t i c a l l y t h i n zones, s p e c i f i c a l l y through t h e d i v i s i o n between t h e B and C r i n g s , and through t h e zone near t h e i n n e r p a r t of t h e C r i n g where
T~~
T h i s assumption i s s t r e n g -
1907; Barnard,
Figure
17. a
t h e C a s s i n i d i v i s i o n a s seen from t h e e a r t h when s i n A ' = 0.04; b t h e o r e t i c a l d i s t r i b u t i o n of apparent b r i g h t n e s s ( e x c e s s over d a r k s i d e b r i g h t n e s s ) along t h e major axis of t h e r i n g s ( t e l e s c o p e with 0.6 t o 1.0 meter, r e s o l u t i o n O'I.375; c e n t r a l peak of aperture s t a r image c o n t a i n s 30 p e r c e n t of t o t a l luminous f l u x ) .
--
-.
3
' \
Figure 18.
T h e o r e t i c a l d i s t r i b u t i o n of t h e a p p a r e n t b r i g h t n e s s i n t h e image o f t h e dark s i d e o f t h e r i n g s along a s e c a n t normal t o t h e major a x i s a t a d i s t a n c e of 121l.9 from t h e c e n t e r o f S a t u r n ( o b s e r v a t i o n cond i t i o n s t h e same a s t h o s e i n t h e preceding f i g u r e ) .
1 component of b r i g h t n e s s from d i f f u s i o n o f l i g h t through t h e n o r t h and south branches of t h e C a s s i n i d i v i s i o n ; 2 summed b r i g h t n e s s from both branches; 3 component o f b r i g h t n e s s from dark s i d e o f A and B r i n g s when t h e C a s s i n i d i v i s i o n w a s missing
59
.... .
#22.
(a)
Observations of d a r k s i d e .
The p r e s e n c e of a f u l l y i l l u m i n a t e d edge
from t h e c e n t e r of S a t u r n
= 20 and 10 km.
When z
= 10 km, t h e b r i g h t n e s s o f t h e r i g h t maximum on
t h e r e s u l t a n t curve is
9 p e r c e n t h i g h e r t h a n t h e b r i g h t n e s s of t h e l e f t .
It i s
probable t h a t t h i s i s c l o s e t o t h e lower l i m i t of d e t e c t i o n by v i s u a l methods. F u r t h e r , i f it i s assumed t h a t t h e r e s o l u t i o n i s double t h e above (011.187), t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n o f t h e b r i g h t n e s s of t h i s same s e c a n t w i l l b e t h a t shown i n F i g u r e l 9 b (zo = 10 km). The peaks c r e a t e d by t h e C a s s i n i d i v i s i o n have much greater The r e s u l t is t h a t t h e
i n t e n s i t y i n t h i s c a s e t h a n t h e y do i n t h e p r e v i o u s one.
Figure 19.
r e s o l u t i o n OIl.375. The bold f a c e and dashed c u r v e s are t h e t h e o r e t i c a l contours f o r e 20 and 10 km; b r e s o l u t i o n 011.187, z 10 km.
0 %
0 %
60
Figure 20.
r e s o l u t i o n 011.375;
o w
r e s o l u t i o n 011.187.
Conditions a r e more f a v o r a b l e along t h e s e c a n t p a s s i n g through t h e A r i n g eye, t h a t i s , outside t h e Cassini division. brightness distribution. F i g u r e 20 shows t h e corresponding
/62
E v i d e n t l y , asymmetry i n t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n of b r i g h t n e s s
0
5 km.
However, t h i s
of S a t u r n i n (b)
1966.
The r i n g s t r a n s m i t a luminous f l u x t o t h e e a r t h I f t h e r e c e i v e r is sensi-
Observations of edge.
t i v e enough t o d e t e c t t h e l i n e of t h e r i n g s beyond t h e b a l l of S a t u r n , w obe t a i n d a t a on which t o b a s e an e s t i m a t e of t h e low l i m i t of z t h e r e had been no s u c c e s s i n o b t a i n i n g a p o s i t i v e e f f e c t . T h i s a u t h o r found t h a t when A ' = 0 , t h e expected b r i g h t n e s s of t h e r i n g
0
Up t o
1966,
61
material.
t h a t t h e s i t u a t i o n i s somewhat more f a v o r a b l e f o r v i s u a l or p h o t o e l e c t r i c o b s e r v a t i o n s because t h e widening of t h e l i n e of t h e r i n g i s less i n cases such as these. Let u s assume we observe t h e passage of t h e e a r t h through t h e p l a n e of S a t u r n ' s r i n g s under i d e a l c o n d i t i o n s , when o n l y t h e d i f f r a c t i o n a u r e o l e p l a y s any s i g n i f i c a n t r o l e . The c a l c u l a t i o n s made t o determine t h e i n t e n s i t y of t h i s
component of t h e a u r e o l e y i e l d b r i g h t n e s s e s of
-4
1 1 . , 8 10
is the brightness
dard" i m a g e q u a l i t y ( r e s o l u t i o n OIl.375,
along t h e
/63 -
6.91.10
cp s e c arc
(22.2)
= bc, and ba = 5 . 1 0 - ~ b ~( c o n t r a s t w i t h t h e b r i g h t n e s s of t h e
25%), we o b t a i n h
- 0.26
km
(22.3 )
The o r d e r of z
mountain observatory.
62
= 0 i s simple, a t obser-
and S a t u r n w i l l be .high enough above t h e horizon t o observe ( v i s u a l l y or photoe l e c t r i c a l l y ) whether or not t h e l i n e s of t h e r i n g s d i s a p p e a r , a f t e r which Eq. (22.1), or one s i m i l a r t o i t ,
i s used f o r t h e c a l c u l a t i o n .
Unfortunately, t h e
Consequently, s u c c e s s f u l o b s e r v a t i o n s
t h e f a c t t h a t t h e o b s e r v e r ' s t a s k should i n c l u d e not o n l y e s t a b l i s h m e n t of t h e f a c t of v i s i b i l i t y , or n o n - v i s i b i l i t y of t h e r i n g s on t h e c r i t i c a l n i g h t , b u t a l s o t h e o b t a i n i n g of evidence of t h e f a c t t h a t h i s eyes observed t r a n s i t of t h e e a r t h through t h e p l a n e of t h e r i n g s . The a u t h o r , t o g e t h e r with D o l l f u s , made t h e f i r s t attempt t o o r g a n i z e a p a t r o l such as t h i s i n 1966 ( w i t h i n t h e framework of t h e Commission on P h y s i c s of P l a n e t s of t h e I n t e r n a t i o n a l Astronomical Union).
I t w a s p o s s i b l e t o observe
two t r a n s i t s of t h e e a r t h , and one t r a n s i t of t h e sun through t h e p l a n e of t h e r i n g s , as w e l l as two q u i t e long p e r i o d s of v i s i b i l i t y of t h e d a r k s i d e of t h e r i n g s (see F i g u r e 3 ) . More t h a n t e n f i r s t - c l a s s o b s e r v a t o r i e s i n t h e e a s t e r n and western hemispheres p a r t i c i p a t e d i n t h i s cooperative venture. The program d i s t r i b u t e d t o t h e o b s e r v e r s
(Bobrov, 1966) envisaged not o n l y o b s e r v a t i o n s designed t o s o l v e t h e main problem, t h a t of e s t i m a t i n g t h e t h i c k n e s s of t h e r i n g s , but doing o t h e r work as w e l l , t h e /64 d e s i r a b i l i t y of t h e i m p o s i t i o n of which w a s determined by t h e s p e c i a l l o c a t i o n of t h e r i n g s r e l a t i v e t o t h e e a r t h i n 1966. Recommendations included making
The r e s u l t s of t h e i n t e r n a t i o n a l c o o p e r a t i v e o b s e r v a t i o n s of S a t u r n i n 1966 showed t h a t i n f a c t t h e c o r r e c t i o n f a c t o r f o r t h e ephemeris time A I = 0 i s some 5 hours ( D o l l f u s and Focas, 1968; Kiladze, 1968). The s i g n of t h e c o r r e c t i o n f a c t o r i s p o s i t i v e f o r passage o f t h e e a r t h on t h e south s i d e of t h e p l a n e o f t h e r i n g s and n e g a t i v e . f o r passage on t h e n o r t h s i d e . The e r r o r of t h e c o r r e c t i o n f a c t o r f o r t h e o b s e r v e r i s e s t i m a t e d a t .&2 hours.
63
(1937), i s e n t r a i n e d i n t h e p l a n e o f t h e r i n g s , t o check
t u r b i n g i n f l u e n c e of l i g h t s c a t t e r e d by t h e r i n g s ( p a r t i c u l a r l y i n t h e p e r i o d of t h e i r d a r k s i d e v i s i b i l i t y ) made many types of o b s e r v a t i o n s of S a t u r n ' s d i s k and s a t e l l i t e s f a v o r a b l e , i n c l u d i n g d e t e r m i n a t i o n of t h e i n t e g r a l s t e l l a r magnit u d e of t h e d i s k , and i t s dependence on t h e phase a n g l e , photometry, spectro-
photometry, spectroscopy of t h e d i s k and of d e t a i l s of t h e d i s k , and of observat i o n s of t h e covering of t h e s a t e l l i t e s by t h e atmosphere and by t h e edge of S a t u r n ' s d i s k , as w e l l as o b s e r v a t i o n s of t h e e c l i p s e of t h e s a t e l l i t e s . The m a j o r i t y of t h e o b s e r v a t o r i e s t h a t took p a r t i n t h e
1966 p a t r o l observa-
t i o n s obtained a wealth of m a t e r i a l , much of it unique i n many ways, t h a t h e l p s e x p l a i n many of t h e q u e s t i o n s concerned w i t h t h e p h y s i c s of t h e S a t u r n system, particularly its rings. The primary p r o c e s s i n g i s completed and r e s u l t s o b t a i n e d
64 n i g h t s ) , and a s i m i l a r
r i n g s i n t h e Lowell Observatory f o r
14 n i g h t s .
U n f o r t u n a t e l y , t h e equipment
n o t e s t h a t t h e measured i n t e n s i t i e s were g r e a t l y d i s t o r t e d by d i f f u s e d l i g h t from S a t u r n ' s d i s k ( t h e b r i g h t n e s s of which Texereau f a i l e d t o a t t e n u a t e ) , and t h a t t h e image q u a l i t y changed g r e a t l y from n i g h t t o n i g h t . These i s o l a t e d f a i l u r e s a r e recognized as being i n e v i t a b l e , t o some e x t e n t , because t h e measurements r e q u i r e d were v e r y d e l i c a t e , and involved many d i f f i c u l ties.
/65
64
F i g u r e s 21a through e i l l u s t r a t e t h e most important r e s u l t s of t h e p a t r o l o b s e r v a t i o n s of S a t u r n ( o t h e r t h a n t h e work done by Kozyrev, more about which i n #23 F i g u r e 21a reproduces t h e photography on which, f o r t h e f i r s t t i m e , t h e r e
w a s d e t e c t e d t h e p r e v i o u s l y unknown t e n t h s a t e l l i t e of S a t u r n ( D o l l f u s , 1967).
T h i s s a t e l l i t e , c a l l e d Janus, r o t a t e s around t h e p l a n e t a t a d i s t a n c e of three e a r t h r a d i i from t h e o u t e r l i m i t of t h e A r i n g , and has a s t e l l a r b r i g h t n e s s of
14.
D o l l f u s discovered it by
basing h i s e f f o r t s on h i s own i d e a t h a t t h e C a s s i n i d i v i s i o n by i t s v e r y e x i s t e n c e w a s r e s p o n s i b l e f o r t h e resonance p e r t u r b a t i o n s , n o t of Mimos, b u t of a body c l o s e r t o S a t u r n , a conclusion a r r i v e d a t a s a r e s u l t of new, more p r e c i s e micrometric measurements made o f S a t u r n ' s r i n g s i n t h e P i c du Midi Observatory (Figure IC). F i g u r e s 21b and c a r e t h e c u r v e s f o r t h e i n t e n s i t y of t h e l i n e of t h e r i n g s ( i n terms of t i m e ) d u r i n g t h e October and December t r a n s i t s of t h e e a r t h through t h e i r plane. These c u r v e s , obtained by t h e photographic photometry method by
Kiladze, and D o l l f u s and Focas, r e s p e c t i v e l y , are an important s t e p forward i n t h e i n v e s t i g a t i o n of S a t u r n ' s r i n g s . They made i t p o s s i b l e for t h e f i r s t time W w i l l discuss e
t o f i n d t h e o r d e r s of t h e p h y s i c a l t h i c k n e s s e s of t h e r i n g s . t h e s e curves i n d e t a i l a t t h e end of t h i s s e c t i o n .
F i g u r e 21 d h a s been t a k e n from Feibelman (19671, and demonstrates t h e s u c c e s s f u l e f f o r t t o confirm t h e e x i s t e n c e of t h e s o - c a l l e d D r i n g (of t h e extens i o n of t h e r i n g system beyond t h e l i m i t s of t h e A r i n g ) .
I t w a s s o dim t h a t
i t could be seen o n l y n e a r t h e p o s i t i o n on t h e edge, and t h e n o n l y when condit i o n s w e r e such t h a t t h e e n t i r e r i n g system had i t s d a r k s i d e t u r n e d t o t h e earth. A s w i l l be seen from t h e f i g u r e , t h e D r i n g l i n e e x t e n d s f o r a d i s t a n c e
65
II
F i g m e 21e shows one more result of Dollfus and Focas' photometry, measurements of the luminance of the dark side of the rings as a function of the elevation of the sun above their lighted side. These are the first, and as yet the Prior to 1966, estimates
of dark side brightness were based on old, vjsual.observations made by Barnard, Slipher, and G a f f , as well as by an approximate calculation of the illumination of the night side by light reflected by the ball of Saturn, and by light diffi-lsely transmitted through the thickness of the rings from the day side ( 2 ) #1. The
observations made by Dollfus and Focas now make it possible to check these caiculations. Agreement seems to be completely satisfactory.
0
4f 3l
4L.f
. . *4u
44JJZl
Figure 21. Materials illustrating the results of the international cooperative observation s made of the Saturn system in 1966.
4O.4
66
December 1966
a P r i n t from a p l a t e o b t a i n e d by D o l l f u s on P i c du Midi on 15 December 1966. The luminance of S a t u r n ' s d i s k w a s a r t i f i c i a l l y a t t e n u a t e d by a f a c t o r of 140 The r i n g s have t h e i r d a r k s i d e t u r n e d t o t h e e a r t h and by an absorbing band. The i n s i d e p a r t s of t h e image of t h e r i n g s a r e almost edge-on ( A ' = OO29.5). s i n k i n t o t h e i n t e n s i v e a u r e o l e of S a t u r n ' s d i s k . The arrow p o i n t s t o t h e new, Change i n t h e i n t e n s i t y of t e n t h s a t e l l i t e of S a t u r n , discovered by D o l l f u s ; b t h e r i n g s d u r i n g t h e t r a n s i t of t h e e a r t h through t h e i r p l a n e i n October 1966, i n t h e d i r e c t i o n from t h e l i g h t e d s i d e t o t h e d a r k (photometric measurements made t o e s t i m a t e r i n g t h i c k n e s s e s ; Kiladze, 1968); c S i m i l a r measurement of i n t e n s i t y of r i n g s i n December 1966, when t h e e a r t h i n t e r s e c t e d t h e p l a n e of Bottom View t h e r i n g s i n t h e o p p o s i t e d i r e c t i o n ( D o l l f u s , Focas, 1968); d of S a t u r n on 14 November 1966; Top M i c r o d e n s i t o g r m along t h e l i n e X-X. The decay i n t h e c e n t e r corresponds t o t h e p o s i t i o n of t h e v i s i b l e t h i n l i n e of t h e D r i n g (Feibelman, 1967); e Luminance of t h e d a r k s i d e of t h e r i n g s as a f u n c t i o n of t h e a n g l e of e l e v a t i o n of t h e sun o v e r t h e i r l i g h t e d s i d e ( D o l l f u s , Focas , 1968).
Let u s add t h a t t h e D o l l f u s and Focas photometry a l s o c o n t a i n s d a t a on t h e luminance of t h e l i g h t e d s i d e of t h e r i n g s i n terms of t h e phase a n g l e when t h e r i n g openings a r e extremely s m a l l . m a t e r i a l as well. T h i s i s t h e f i r s t time f o r such o b s e r v a t i o n a l
t o t h e October one ( K i l a d z e ) , d i f f e r i n g from it o n l y by t h e o r d e r of movement i n terms of time of t h e s t e e p and f l a t branches (corresponding t o t h e b r i g h t and dark s i d e s of t h e r i n g s ) . near A ' The i n t e n s i t y w i t h i n t h e l i m i t s of each branch Significant
m i n i m u m c o i n c i d i n g w i t h t h e p o i n t of i n t e r s e c t i o n of t h e branches.
s e c t i o n g i v e s a rounded minimum.
A ellipticalm n
If t h e t h i c k n e s s i n c r e a s e s toward t h e o u t e r
The presence of an absorbing
67
m i n i m u m o c c u r s a t t h e i n t e r s e c t i o n of t h e two branches.
a p p l i e s with equal f o r c e t o t h e plane-parallel
r i n g s hypothesis.
= 2.8
km, w i t h a root-mean-square
A t the
same time, as i n t h e c a s e of t h e #21 c a l c u l a t i o n s , i t i s assumed t h a t t h e s u r f a c e b r i g h t n e s s of t h e edge i s equal t o t h e b r i g h t n e s s of t h e most i n t e n s e zone of t h e B r i n g a t l a r g e openings. S i n c e t h e t r u e behavior of t h e i n t e n s i t y i n t h e t r a n s i t s e c t i o n i s unknown, s t r i c t l y speaking we have no r i g h t t o assume i n t h e c a s e of t h e r i n g t h i c k n e s s c a l c u l a t i o n s , t h a t t h e y are p l a n e - p a r a l l e l . I n t h a t c a s e , though, e s t i m a t e s of by t a k i n g an
r i n g t h i c k n e s s can be p u r e l y formal i n n a t u r e .
So we must f i n d
2;
approach t h a t w i l l be as f r e e as p o s s i b l e from a r b i t r a r y hypotheses. This c a l c u l a t i o n can be made i f w u s e t h e r e s u l t s of t h e measurements e D o l l f u s and Focas made of t h e i n t e n s i t y of t h e d a r k s i d e image v e r y c l o s e t o A ' = 0 ( F i g u r e 21c) on 17 December 1966. night. Three images were o b t a i n e d on t h a t
The midpoint of t h e o b s e r v a t i o n s o c c u r r e d a t t =
UT, when A ' = 0 i n t h e l l p l a n e - p a r a l l e l ' l approximation w a s t = 1966 December 0 d h h 18 03 .O, from whence to t = 7 .8 ( a t t h e end of t h e c a l c u l a t i o n we can c o n s i -
d e r t h e e f f e c t an e r r o r i n
0 '
random or s y s t e m a t i c , o c c u r r i n g as a r e s u l t of h a s on t h e z
I(t) 0.39010 -3 =
y ( t ) with
/69
l i n e of t h e r i n g s by t h e d a r k s i d e luminous f l u x .
68
( t ) = 5bd/bc, where b i s t h e d a r k s i d e d d brightness. The magnitude of t h e b /b r a t i o can be found from t h e g r a p h i c i n d c F i g u r e 21e, remembering t h a t C corresponds t o A = 2O.750. T h i s y i e l d s bd/bc = h 15.3-10-~, With r e s p e c t t o 5, to t = 7 .% corresponds t o 5 = 3 4 x .
t u d e by I d / ( t ) . I t i s obvious t h a t I
The d a r k s i d e c o n t r i b u t i o n t o t o t a l i n t e n s i t y t h e n i s I ( t ) = d 3.4-10'3.15.3*10'3 = 0.052-10-3, t h a t i s , 0.13 t h e measured i n t e n s i t y T(t). second of arc. T h i s important r e s u l t i n d i c a t e s t h a t a t time t t h e luminous f l u x from t h e d a r k s i d e w a s low compared w i t h t h e t o t a l luminous f l u x , The 0.87 remainder of i n -
t e n s i t y e v i d e n t l y w a s c o n t r i b u t e d by t h e luminous f l u x from t h e edge of t h e r i n g s , and t h i s makes i t p o s s i b l e t o f i n d t h e v a l u e of r i n g t h i c k n e s s without r e s o r t t o t h e e s t i m a t e s made by Ki1adz.e and D o l l f u s and Focas, Putting ring
The random e r r o r i n t on t h i s r e s u l t .
h ( e s t i m a t e d by t h e o b s e r v e r s as +2 ) has almost no e f f e c t
0
to
Nor
For example, i f w t a k e e does t h e v a l u e used f o r b /b have much e f f e c t on z d c 0 12.0*10-3 f o r bd/bc, r a t h e r t h a n 15.3-10-3, as we d i d above, ( t h e f i g u r e i s from D o l l f u s ' o b s e r v a t i o n s on t h e n i g h t preceding t h e December t r a n s i t of t h e e a r t h h t = 7 .8. through t h e p l a n e of t h e r i n g s ) , we w i l l have z = 3.7 lan when t
0
0
(22.4)
e s t i m a t e as q u i t e r e l i a b l e .
3 4 km, which i s 22 p e r c e n t h i g h e r t h a n .
The d i s c r e -
pancy can be explained simply by t h e s y s t e m a t i c e r r o r s i n t h e photometry, b u t a t t h e same time t h e f a c t t h a t what i s suggested h e r e i s some d e v i a t i o n of t h e f i g u r e of t h e r i n g s from p l a n e - p a r a l l e l cannot be precluded. q u e s t i o n of whether or not t h e t
0
This r a i s e s t h e
69
s e l v e s as a p l a n e - p a r a l l e l
system when t h e y a r e n o t v e r y c l o s e t o t
0 '
so t h a t
t h e i r i n t e r s e c t i o n w i t h t h e mid-plane
c l o s e t o t h e t i m e of i n t e r s e c t i o n of t h e branches.
fact t h a t t
found i n t h e p l a n e - p a r a l l e l
approximation w i l l n o t , g e n e r a l l y
speaking, be t h e t i m e of t h e i n t e n s i t y minimum f o r t h e l i n e o f t h e r i n g s , b u t
/70
n e c e s s a r y t o remember t h e poor d e f i n i t i o n of t h e boundaries of t h e f i g u r e of t h e r i n g s , t h a t i s , t h e gradualness of t h e r e d u c t i o n i n t h e v o l u m e t r i c d e n s i t y of t h e r i n g m a t e r i a l w i t h approach t o t h e b o u n d a r i e s , as w e l l as t h e gas-dust flatmosphereffof t h e r i n g s (#23). d a t a i n t h e d i r e c t proximity of t But t h i s c o n s i d e r a t i o n w i l l r e q u i r e photometric
0 '
The t h i c k n e s s of t h e
I t i s of t h e o r d e r of 3 t o
kilometers.
r i n g s w a s t h e e f f e c t of some r e s i d u a l b r i g h t n e s s i n t h e space between t h e i n n e r boundary of t h e C r i n g and t h e b a l l of S a t u r n , discovered i n b l u e l i g h t by Barabashov and Semeykin (1933; s e e #3 of t h i s book). F i g u r e 11) discovered two o t h e r e f f e c t s :
Maggini
(1937; s e e #l3,
r e s u l t e d i n a decay i n t h e
0
presence of some evacuated m a t e r i a l above t h e p l a n e of t h e r i n g s (Maggini even r e p o r t s t h a t he w a s a b l e t o observe it v i s u a l l y , and t h a t it blanketed t h e p l a n e of t h e r i n g s on both s i d e s . however). In T h i s has n o t been confirmed by o t h e r o b s e r v e r s ,
70
o b s e r v a t i o n s of t h e shadow of t h e r i n g s on t h e b a l l of S a t u r n ( s e e Kozyrev,
1968).
s o t h e p a t h o f t h e s o l a r r a d i a t i o n i n s i d e t h e suspected l!atmosphere!l of t h e
r i n g s w a s long enough for it t o be observed. The o b s e r v e r found t h e NH
band t o
be s t r o n g e r i n t h e shadow of t h e r i n g s , and t h e CH
4 weaker, t h a n o u t s i d e it ( i n -
d i c a t i o n s of t h e hothouse e f f e c t c r e a t e d by t h e atmosphere!! of t h e r i n g s )
mass
(a ) r
shown by t h e observed f a c t
(a) a t th
(%I. h
This i s
r i n g r o t a t i o n l a w f o r t h e c o n d i t i o n t h a t t h e r e i s l i t t l e disapperance of
as
The c o n t r a r y , extreme c a s e i s a homogeneous d i s k without compared w i t h ! % h c e n t r a l condensation. I t would r o t a t e as would a s o l i d body. If the ratio were n o t v e r y s m a l l , t h e r i n g r o t a t i o n l a w would be somewhere between t h e s e two extreme cases. But t h e s p e c t r o s c o p i c d a t a on r i n g v e l o c i t y as a f u n c t i o n of r
S t r u v e (1898) attempted t o e s t i m a t e
(zr/jk) from
as w e l l .
It i s v e r y d i f f i c u l t t o s e p a r a t e t h e e f f e c t s .
I n f a c t , a more or l e s s
v a l i d s o l u t i o n t o t h e problem r e q u i r e s a knowledge of t h e d e n s i t y d i s t r i b u t i o n
l a w i n t h e b a l l of t h e p l a n e t , as w e l l as t h e p r e c i s e v a l u e f o r t h e f l a t t e n i n g
of Saturn. A c t u a l l y , knowledge of both t h e s e magnitudes (and p a r t i c u l a r l y of Consequently, S t r u v e s e s t i m a t e of 3 /.rL. = r h c i t e d i n a l l t h e handbooks, i s viewed as without foundation by Brower
and Clemence
Yabushita adds t h a t i t i s be a r r i v e d a t o t h e r t h a n by
ar/ncannot h
1961) made s e v e r a l a t t e m p t s of
(1965) l a t e r on.
W s h a l l d i s c u s s t h i s q u e s t i o n i n Chapter V I I . e
/k from s
dynamic
#25.
t i a l rotation.
whence
ties.
W a l s o can w r i t e As(+,) e
tAv
= 1/2&Ar.
where
u)
i s t h e angular v e l o c i t y
of t h e i n s i d e edge of t h e zone; A s i s t h e r e l a t i v e displacement i n t h e two p o i n t s , which, a t time t = 0 , have i d e n t i c a l azimuths and a r e l o c a t e d a t d i s t a n c e A r from each o t h e r .
L e t u s u s e T and n t o d e s i g n a t e t h e p e r i o d of r o t a t i o n and t h e num-
AS
3140
lane
(25.4)
Such i s t h e displacement of p o i n t s of t h e i n n e r boundary of a zone 1000 lun wide w i t h r e s p e c t t o p o i n t s on i t s o u t e r boundary d u r i n g one r e v o l u t i o n ( r e g a r d l e s s of r ) . Here a few words need be s a i d about t h e s o - c a l l e d Roche l i m i t and i t s r e l a t i o n s h i p t o r i n g dynamics. According t o Roche, (18501, t h e homogeneous, u n f l a t -
t r a l body a t d i s t a n c e r S = 2.45
where r
4 6 x rp,
/73
73
Some a u t h o r s raise t h e q u e s t i o n of whether S a t u r n ' s r i n g s l i e i n s i d e t h e Roche l i m i t , or whether t h e y are, i n p a r t , beyond t h a t l i m i t , and t h e n t h e y proceed t o d i s c u s s t h e p h y s i c a l and cosmogonic consequences of t h i s f a c t . be seen from Eq. of 6s. (25.51,
As w i l l
t h e r e p l y t o t h e first q u e s t i o n depends on t h e v a l u e
S p e c i f i c a l l y , i f it is t a k e n t h a t 6 s = 3 ( s t o n y p a r t i c l e s ) , i t w i l l
s e e m t h a t S a t u r n ' s r i n g s l i e i n s i d e t h e Roche l i m i t , b u t o n l y i n p a r t .
it i s taken t h a t hS
side the l i m i t .
But i f
1 ( i c e p a r t i c l e s ) , t h e r i n g s w i l l l i e almost e n t i r e l y i n -
So f a r as c o n c l u s i o n ( I ) i s concerned, i t should be p o i n t e d o u t t h a t
according t o J e f f r e y s
4 km.
Thus, t h e q u e s t i o n of
t h e n a t u r e of t h e p a r t i c l e s h a s no r e l a t i o n t o Roche's l i m i t ( p r o v i d i n g it i s n o t assumed t h a t t h e r i n g s were formed as a r e s u l t of t h e explosion of a comp a r a t i v e l y l a r g e s a t e l l i t e t h a t approached t h e p l a n e t t o a d i s t a n c e l e s s t h a n Roche ' s l i m i t , a h y p o t h e s i s t h a t has no c o n f i r m a t i o n i n contemporary cosmogony). Conclusion I1 l a c k s p e r s u a s i o n as w e l l because Eq.
r e f l e c t i v i t y , and t h e A and B r i n g s would be s u b s t a n t i a l l y l e s s b r i g h t t h a n t h e y i n f a c t are. They could be made up of j u s t hydrogen and helium. Other s u b s t a n c e s Yet r i n g spec-
cannot remain l i q u i d a t T -
/74
74
trometry
(#lo)
h a s d e t e c t e d t h e presence of s o l i d H 2 0 ,
and n o t l i q u i d hydrogen,
or helium.
because t h e r i n g s have d i f f e r e n t i a l r o t a t i o n , t h e y can be a system of many narrow, c o n c e n t r i c , r i n g - l i k e zones, or a f l a t cloud made up of many t i n y s a t e l -
lites.
Laplace (1802) e l i m i n a t e d t h e f i r s t p o s s i b i l i t y .
H e proved t h a t a
c r o s s - s e c t i o n of a r i n g such as t h i s , and Maxwell (1859) showed t h a t t h e s t a b i l i t y of a r i n g such as t h i s can be achieved o n l y by t h e a d d i t i o n t o i t a t one p o i n t of a s a t e l l i t e w i t h m a s s corresponding t o 4 1 / 2 m .
The o b s e r v a t i o n s a r e n o t i n
Consequently,
The r e s e a r c h t h a t has been done on t h e problem of t h e s t a b i l i t y of S a t u r n ' s r i n g s i s extensive. O t h a t r e s e a r c h , t h a t of Duboshin (1940) c o n t a i n s i n addif Hagihara
(1963) i n c l u d e s a l i s t of l a t e r e f f o r t s .
r i n g s t a b i l i t y p r i m a r i l y from t h e p h y s i c a l s i d e .
Hence, we c e r t a i n l y
w i l l not be a b l e h e r e t o d i s c u s s a l l of t h e a v a i l a b l e p a p e r s on t h e s u b j e c t .
(a)
w e l l a s t h a t of a r i n g c o n s i s t i n g of independent p a r t i c l e s .
wave, a t a f i x e d moment i n t i m e , has what i s , g e n e r a l l y speaking, an a r b i t r a r y shape, b u t t h a t i t can be r e p r e s e n t e d by t h e sum of t h e elementary waves through
a Fourier series.
of t h e waves w i l l remain f i n i t e
/75
75
I1l1111I I l
(27.1)
w,
t h e smaller
/u rcZ should
6 r < 1/300 h 5 ,
were s a t i s f i e d . Here 6
(27.2) If
and 6
a r e r i n g and S a t u r n d e n s i t i e s , r e s p e c t i v e l y .
t h e c o n d i t i o n s of Eq.
(27.2) ignored d i f f e r e n t i a l r o t a t i o n .
But
s i n c e t h e l a t t e r p l a y s s o important a r o l e i n t h e c a s e of S a t u r n ' s r i n g s ( # 2 5 ) ,
( 2 7 . 2 ) , i s g r e a t l y underestimated.
They found t h a t t h e
6 5'
W shall ree
Maxwell d i s c u s s e s
t h i s a t t h e end of h i s paper.
c o l l i s i o n s ( n o t e n t i r e l y e l a s t i c ) w i l l l e a d t o t h e r a d i a l expansion of t h e r i n g ,
76
M a x w e l l also points t o
/76
made a q u a n t i t a t i v e a n a l y s i s of this c a s e ( f o r two elementary r i n g s ) and found t h a t t h e system can be maintained s t a b l e , p r o v i d i n g i t s m a s s i s s m a l l enough as compared with S a t u r n ' s m a s s . J e f f r e y s (194713) took t h e next s t e p i n t h e d i s c u s s i o n of t h e e f f e c t s of c o l l i s i o n s on S a t u r n ' s r i n g s .
H e c o n c e n t r a t e d on t h e d i s s i p a t i o n of energy
a t t r i b u t a b l e t o t h e p a r t i a l l y i n e l a s t i c n a t u r e of t h e c o l l i s i o n s , and concluded t h a t t h e d i s s i p a t i o n g r a d u a l l y should s u p p r e s s t h e o s c i l l a t i o n s of t h e p a r t i c l e s n e a r t h e mean p o s i t i o n s , and t h a t , f i n a l l y , t h e r i n g should be converted i n t o a c o l l i s i o n l e s s system one p a r t i c l e t h i c k . J e f f r e y s estimated t h a t t h i s process
should t a k e p l a c e over a v e r y s h o r t p e r i o d of t i m e , cosmogonically speaking. J e f f r e y s assumed t h a t t h e f i n i t e c o n d i t i o n of t h e r i n g system he found d i d not c o n t r a d i c t o b s e r v a t i o n a l d a t a , i n c l u d i n g t h e photometric d a t a . This i s not
so, i n fact.
A o n e - p a r t i c l e t h i c k n e s s system w i t h t h e b r i g h t n e s s of t h e B r i n g
prevent t h e r i n g s from r e a c h i n g a s t a t e of complete f l a t t e n i n g . But t h e n t h e system i s not c o l l i s i o n l e s s , t h e energy of t h e o s c i l l a t i o n s of t h e p a r t i c l e s g r a d u a l l y i s d i s s i p a t e d , and t h e o n l y p o s s i b i l i t y of p r e v e n t i n g complete f l a t t e n i n g l i e s i n a continuous replenishment of t h i s energy by some source w i t h adequate c a p a c i t y . w i l l be t a k e n up i n #28. (c) Latest research. A s w e a l r e a d y have p o i n t e d o u t , M a x w e l l ' s work r e T h i s w a s wide-ranging The p o s s i b l e mechanisms of such replenishment
t h e o r e t i c a l r e s e a r c h i n which t h e a u t h o r s analyzed seven models of r i n g systems. They used M a x w e l l ' s method; t h a t i s , t h e y reviewed t h e compression and expansion waves propagating i n t h e r i n g s , and assumed t h a t i f t h e amplitudes of t h e waves
77
r o s e without l i m i t , i n s t a b i l i t y would r e s u l t .
st a b i li t y
H e con-
s i d e r e d two t y p e s of waves, one of which i s t h e r e s u l t of t h e t a n g e n t i a l component of t h e o s c i l l a t i o n s of t h e p a r t i c l e s i n t h e azimuthal d i r e c t i o n , t h e o t h e r t h e r e s u l t of t h e r a d i a l component, and propagated r a d i a l l y . Retaining t h e
terminology used by C o o k and F r a n k l i n , we w i l l c a l l t h e s e two t y p e s t h e t a n g e n t i a l and r a d i a l waves. Maxwell n o t e d , and C o o k and F r a n k l i n confirmed, t h e f a c t t h a t This w a s
/77
Eq. (27.2).
w i l l be d i s c u s s e d l a t e r ) i s t h e a u t h o r s ' p o i n t of depai-ture.
g/cm
and t h a t it i s u n s t a b l e i f t h e mean d e n s i t y i s g r e a t e r t h a n
1.04 g/cm
l i m i t s of t h e r e g i o n i n which t h e c r i t i c a l v a l u e of t h e 2 3
can be o b t a i n e d a t once from t h e s e e s t i m a t e s . Actually
r4r a t i o
i s contained
(Lh/s:$)
where r
n(r2
2 r l ) zo'r
(27.3
and r a r e t h e i n t e r n a l and e x t e r n a l r a d i i of t h e r i n g system; Sr i s 1 2 10 t h e mean d e n s i t y of t h e r i n g s . S u b s t i t u t i n g r = 0.89-1010 c m , r = 1.39.10 cm, 1 2 5 cm, and u s i n g t h e 6 e s t i m a t e c i t e d above, we o b t a i n z = 10
0
78
Yabushita
He
H i s results differ
-< ( % d a $ m a x 4su
(d)
~
/78
The a u t h o r s proceeded on t h e assumption t h a t azimuthal waves with a wave f r o n t extending over t h e e n t i r e width of t h e r i n g , and r a d i a l waves with a wave f r o n t extending over t h e e n t i r e circumference of t h e r i n g , could e x i s t . assumption has a p h y s i c a l b a s i s . Neither
I n f a c t , t h e r e i s no p h y s i c a l r e a s o n f o r t h e
c r e a t i o n i n a r i n g with d i f f e r e n t i a l r o t a t i o n of compression ( e x p a n s i o n ) of t h e o r d e r of 10,000 k m i n l e n g t h extending i n t h e r a d i a l d i r e c t i o n , or of t h e format i o n of a r a d i a l l y propagating r i n g - l i k e p e r t u r b a t i o n i n which a l l p a r t i c l e s would o s c i l l a t e i n i d e n t i c a l phase over 360". T h i s i s so because t h e c r i t e r i a
of s t a b i l i t y , based on s i m i l a r assumptions, cannot be t r u s t e d . Here t h e q u e s t i o n of t h e shape of t h e d e n s i t y p e r t u r b a t i o n t h a t o c c u r s when t h e r i n g approaches a s t a t e of g r a v i t a t i o n a l i n s t a b i l i t y i s of much i n t e r e s t . The answer i s a s follows. The most probable answer i s t h a t i n c r e a s e i n
w i l l c r e a t e random f l u c t u a t i o n s i n d e n s i t y , r a t h e r t h a n waves.
The o n l y shape
(mr
4)
I t should be g r e a t l y f l a t t e n e d w i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e
(mr4). We
(mr/lnlz)
were s o l a r g e t h a t t h e e f f e c t of
79
(e)
O b s e r v a t i o n a l i n d i c a t i o n s t h a t t h e r i n g ? =e
f a r from u n s t a b l e .
There
analyzed as i f t h e r i n g s were an o b j e c t n o t s u s c e p t i b l e t o d i r e c t o b s e r v a t i o n s . I n p o i n t of f a c t , d u r i n g t h i s c e n t u r y t h e r i n g s have been thoroughly s t u d i e d by Lowell, Barnard, Lyot, D o l l f u s , Camichel, Kuiper, and o t h e r v e r y experienced o b s e r v e r s under c o n d i t i o n s p r o v i d i n g good, and even e x c e l l e n t , images and h i g h resolution. Not a t r a c e of moving, heterogeneous r i n g material h a s been observed
and minor azimuthal t o resonancy w i t h t h e i n t e r n a l s a t e l l i t e s of S a t u r n ( # l ) , d i f f e r e n c e s i n b r i g h t n e s s , such as t h e nonuniform b r i g h t n e s s of t h e e y e s , and t h e l i k e (#13). The c a u s e s of t h e azimuthal e f f e c t s a r e unknown, but t h e i r d e f i -
f i e d t o s a y t h a t t h e y a r e connected with dynamic i n s t a b i l i t y . So f a r as t h e minimum nonuniformity t h a t can be observed i n t h e dimensions of S a t u r n ' s r i n g s from a high mountain o b s e r v a t o r y ( P i c du Midi, or Lowell, f o r example) i s concerned, i t s magnitude i s of t h e o r d e r of O t ' . l l i k e n o n u n i f o r m i t i e s , and of t h e o r d e r of 0".2 t o O't.4 t o 0".2 for ring-
f o r b r i g h t or d a r k s p o t s
t h a t a s p o t from 1400 t o 2800 km i n diameter would be destroyed by d i f f e r e n t i a l r o t a t i o n w i t h i n one, or two, r e v o l u t i o n s (one day, or l e s s ) . mity with a diameter of
The m a s s
80
#28.
Mechanisms _That _ P o s s i b l. P- e v e n t Complete F l a t t e n i n g of t h e Rings . -_ y r . ~Let u s t u r n t o t h e problem touched upon i n #27, t h a t of t h e former J e f f r e y s
s i o n s should occur between t h e p a r t i c l e s , and t h e r e should be continuous d i s s i p a t i o n of t h e p a r t i c l e o s c i l l a t i o n energy. J u s t what mechanisms are t h e r e t h a t
can be involved i n r e p l e n i s h i n g t h e energy c a p a b l e of p r e v e n t i n g t h e complete f l a t t e n i n g of t h e r i n g s d u r i n g t h e l i f e span of t h e s o l a r system? One obvious mechanism i s t h a t of g r a v i t a t i o n a l p e r t u r b a t i o n s of t h e p a r t i c l e s by S a t u r n ' s s a t e l l i t e s . The p e r t u r b a t i o n s could be of s e v e r a l types: short-
Resonance p e r t u r b a t i o n s a r e e f f e c -
t i v e o n l y f o r narrow zones, w i t h i n t h e l i m i t s of which t h e r e i s commensurability of t h e p e r i o d s of r o t a t i o n of p a r t i c l e s and s a t e l l i t e s ( t h a t i s , f o r t h e d i v i sions). They c a n n o t , t h e r e f o r e , prevent t h e complete f l a t t e n i n g of t h e r i n g Short-period p e r t u r b a t i o n s a r e of g r e a t e s t i n t e r e s t i n t h e
system as a whole.
C a l c u l a t i o n s made a t our r e q u e s t
by t h e Shternberg S t a t e Astronomical I n s t i t u t e provided t h e f o l l o w i n g r e s u l t s . P e r t u r b a t i o n s from t h e accumulation of t h e o r b i t s of p a r t i c l e s of M i m a s , Tethys, and T i t a n c r e a t e amplitudes of o s c i l l a t i o n of p a r t i c l e s along t h e z c o o r d i n a t e of 16, tem.
/80
particle.
t r a n s p a r e n t zones of t h e r i n g s ( i n t h e i n t e r n a l zones of t h e C r i n g , for example), where c o l l i s i o n s a r e extremely r a r e . C o l l i s i o n s should be f r e q u e n t i n t h e A and B r i n g r e g i o n s . show t h i s , l e t u s compute t h e 1/z
0
In order t o
of t h e f r e e p a t h of a p a r t i c l e t o t h e r i n g t h i c k n e s s .
and o p t i c a l t h i c k n e s s (28.1)
= T 2Nao/R, I
81
where N i s t h e number of p a r t i c l e s i n t h e r i n g ;
R i s t h e volume of t h e r i n g .
The m e a n l e n g t h of t h e f r e e p a t h f o r t h e p a r t i c l e i s
I = 1:j.i - ! / ~ ~ , o 2 ~ ~ ~ ,
Comparing these expressions, we obtain
IJZo
(28.2)
3 14 ]~Z.G,.
= 1, t h e v a l u e s
(28.3)
0 f o r t/z
When r
= T = OA
0
0.6 and r
, respectively.
= T
OB
Thus, c o l l i s i o n s i n t h e A and B r i n g s a r e f r e q u e n t .
c o l l i s i o n s , g e n e r a l l y speaking ( t h e p r o b a b i l i t y of what would be c e n t r a l c o l l i s i o n , s t r i c t l y speaking, i s z e r o ) , t h e t r a n s f e r of p u l s e moment i s accompanied by f r e q u e n t conversions of d i f f e r e n t i a l r o t a t i o n energy i n t o random p a r t i c l e motion energy n e a r t h e i r mean p o s i t i o n s ; i n t o "heat.
It
Dissi-
u.
as a f u n c t i o n of t h e mean v e l o c i t y of
W e w i l l assume t h a t t h e r e d u c t i o n i n energy a t t r i b u t a b l e
but i f t h e c o l l i s i o n s a r e f r e q u e n t , t h e behavior of t h e system w i l l be c l o s e t o t h e c a s e of completely e l a s t i c c o l l i s i o n s . b u t i o n w i l l b e c l o s e t o Maxwellian. Since t h e system i s unusually f l a t , and s i n c e Specifically, velocity d i s t r i -
A i s extremely s m a l l ,
t h e random motion of a p a r t i c l e along t h e z c o o r d i n a t e ( t h a t i s , normal t o t h e plane of t h e r i n g ) can be considered a harmonic o s c i l l a t i o n i n S a t u r n ' s gravitational f i e l d .
I t s amplitude t h e n i s
(28.4)
82
where u
i s t h e component of t h e random v e l o c i t y i n t e r m s of t h e z c o o r d i n a t e
2 2 -2 S u b s t i t u t i n g E = 1/2 m w z and kT = 1/3 m c 2 = 1/8 m u (where c and P are t h e mean-square and t h e mean v e l o c i t i e s , r e s p e c t i v e l y ) , w e o b t a i n 2 2 2 n ( z ) = n ( 0 ) exp (-4cu a /nu
1.
2 ;
(28.6)
L e t us i n t r o d u c e t h e e f f e c t i v e p h y s i c a l t h i c k n e s s
o eff'
satisfying the
condition (28.7)
A comparison of Eq.
u = ut3
o eff
/ 6
(28.8)
84 p e r c e n t of a l l t h e p a r t i c l e s can b e contained
eff planes.
0
-Z
N w l e t us estimate t h e z o
v a l u e t h a t can be maintained c o n s t a n t f o r t i m e
Tr2
2 (du)/dr)
(28.9)
*ere
of t h e medium).
is
E = y 5/2r, m P P
(28.10)
(%/r 3 1,
( 28.11 )
83
(28.3)
and (28.81,
i n p l a c e of Eq.
we obtain
-r 5/2dr
implying
= (3
zt eff/8 G o ) d t ,
( 28.12)
/82
(r
= l.OO-lO1o
cm) w a s ,
0
a t t h e beginning of t h e e x i s t e n c e of t h e r i n g
o eff
35 m
( 28.14
do i s t o d e f i n e z
3.5.
z
0
aPP
120 m
(28.15)
f o r 5-10
9 years.
t h i s e s t i m a t e i s t h e low l i m i t for z
0
**
aPP' (28.8) and (28,141, t h e mean The
-.
. _
__
Equation i s i l l e g i b l e i n o r i g i n a l t e x t
Translation editor.
84
VII.
i83
#29.
I n t r o d u c t o r y Remarks
A s soon a s w e have e s t a b l i s h e d t h a t t h e mutual shading of t h e p a r t i c l e s
of t h e r i n g s , z
(#22) and of t h e p a r t i c l e d e n s i t y ,
t h e t o t a l mass of t h e r i n g s , thickness,
T
mr,
( # I & ) e n a b l e s u s t o e s t i m a t e t h e mean r a d i u s , p, ,
of the ring. The mechanism involved i n t h e mutual shading e f f e c t i s v e r y simple, q u a l i t a t i v e l y speaking. Let u s suppose t h a t w have a p l a n e - p a r a l l e l e layer
t h a t i s , t h a t w have a many-particle t h i c k n e s s e
f a r t h e r from it.
t h e time of exact o p p o s i t i o n (a, = 0 ) , because every p a r t i c l e s h i e l d s i t s own shadow. With i n c r e a s e i n cy, t h e shadows g r a d u a l l y emerge from t h e d i s k s of t h e and t h e mean b r i g h t n e s s of t h e system diminishes. H also w a s the f i r s t t o e
particles,
W a r e indebted t o S e e l i g e r f o r t h i s concept. e
The r e a d e r should keep i n mind t h a t t h e t h e o r e t i c a l r e s e a r c h done by S e e l i g e r on t h e phase f u n c t i o n of S a t u r n s r i n g s , and i t s a s s o c i a t i o n with t h e s t r u c t u r e of t h i s o b j e c t , was c a r r i e d out almost 80 y e a r s ago, b e f o r e spect r o g r a p h i c o b s e r v a t i o n s were made of r i n g r o t a t i o n ( B e l o p o l s k i y , Deslandres,
/84
85
formu-
degree of phase f o r S a t u r n ' s phase c o e f f i c i e n t , a v a l u e f a r i n e x c e s s of J u p i t e r ' s phase c o e f f i c i e n t (0.015) and of t h e phase c o e f f i c i e n t s of o t h e r planets. S e e l i g e r showed t h a t he w a s extremely p e r s p i c a c i o u s by p o s t u l a t i n g
t h a t t h i s f a c t could be a t t r i b u t e d t o t h e " m e t e o r i t i c " s t r u c t u r e of S a t u r n ' s rings. The i d e a of t h e " m e t e o r i t i c " s t r u c t u r e was borrowed from M a x w e l l (1859).
made up of p a r t i c l e s of i d e n t i c a l s i z e , but h i s second paper included g e n e r a l i z a t i o n of a t h e o r y d e a l i n g with t h e case of p a r t i c l e s n o t a l l of t h e same s i z e . The sun w a s r e p l a c e d by a p o i n t source of l i g h t a t i n f i n i t y , and
it w a s t a k e n t h a t t h e p a r t i c l e s w e r e macroscopic, d i f f u s e l y r e f l e c t i n g spheres.
The n a t u r a l phase f u n c t i o n of t h e p a r t i c l e was t a k e n i n t o c o n s i d e r a t i o n by i n t r o d u c i n g a f a c t o r t h a t was dependent on cy. S e e l i g e r , i n t h i s approximation,
obtained formulas f o r c a l c u l a t i n g t h e phase f u n c t i o n . Figure 22. Discrepancy between S e e l i g e r f s phase curves and t h e observat i o n a l curves.
1, 2 , 3 - t h e o r e t i c a l phase c u r v e s (Seel i g e r , 1887) f o r D = = 3.75-10-3 6.25. 10-3and 1 . 2 5 0 1 0 - ~ , c o r r e c t e d f o r t h e n a t u r a l e f f e c t of p a r t i c l e phase and f o r h i g h e r o r d e r s c a t t e r i n g ; c i r c l e s are t h e means from Schoenberg Is o b s e r v a t i o n s (1933) ; 4 - observed phase curve f o r B r i n g , cons t r u c t e d using t h e s e p o i n t s [ E q . (12.111.
D i r e c t measurements of t h e s u r f a c e b r i g h t n e s s of t h e A and B r i n g s a s a f u n c t i o n of cy (Hertzsprung, 1919; Schoenberg, 1921, 1933) d e t e c t e d a g r e a t d i s crepancy between S e e l i g e r ' s t h e o r e t i c a l phase curve and t h e o b s e r v a t i o n a l d a t a
86
( F i g u r e 22).
t h e s e d i s c r e p a n c i e s a r o s e because S e e l i g e r ' s approximation d i d n o t reproduce t h e c o n d i t i o n of S a t u r n ' s r i n g s a c c u r a t e l y enough, t h e angular dimensions of t h e s o l a r d i s k ( - 3 ' . 5 ) , i n t h a t (1) he d i s r e g a r d e d ( 2 ) he d i d n o t c o n s i d e r
/85 -
It w i l l be reviewed i n t h e
i n t h e S i z e s of
P a r t i c l e s Taken i n t o Consideration The shadow of a p a r t i c l e i n S e e l i g e r ' s approximation i s an i n f i n i t e l y long c y l i n d e r , because of h i s l i m i t a t i o n ( 1 ) . The volume behind t h e p a r t i c l e , i n which t h e r i n g m a t e r i a l i s s h i e l d e d from t h e observer by t h e d i s k of t h e p a r t i c l e , t o o i s an i n f i n i t e l y long c y l i n d e r . "cy1 inder-cy1 i n d e r " approximation.
W e can c a l l t h i s scheme t h e
- -
...
/---.-.
-_
F i g u r e 23.
The element de belongs t o a p a r t i c l e a r b i t r a r i l y s e l e c t e d a t depth z , measured from p l a n e fl ( c l o s e s t t o t h e s u n ) . The s t r a i g h t l i n e s M S and M are d i r e c t e d E toward t h e sun, and toward t h e e a r t h , r e s p e c t i v e l y . C i s t h e cylinder of s h i e l d i n g ; U i s t h e cone of shading; p i s t h e p a r t i c l e r a d i u s ; cy i s t h e phase a n g l e ; A and A ' are t h e a n g l e s of e l e v a t i o n of t h e sun and e a r t h over t h e p l a n e of t h e r i n g s .
87
L e t u s remove l i m i t a t i o n
(11,
of S a t u r n from t h e sun, t h e d i s k of t h e l a t t e r h a s an a n g u l a r r a d i u s of
cp
= 11.676;
l/cp w 2.0'10 3
(31.1)
/86 -
is the p a r t i c l e radius.
remain i n f i n i t e l y long c y l i n d e r s .
(a)
__IiL___;
t h e c e n t e r of volume sun, r e s p e c t i v e l y .
by t h e d i s k of t h e p a r t i c l e considered.
w i l l c a s t i t s shadow on de.
as b l a c k w t h an accuracy of w i t h i n f i r s t o r d e r s c a t t e r i n g , s o t h a t t h e
element de w i l l be seen from t h e e a r t h only f o r t h e p e r i o d of time when t h e c e n t e r s of a l l t h e other N-1 p a r t i c l e s of t h e r i n g s ( N i s t h e number of a l l
p a r t i c l e s ) w i l l be o u t s i d e t h e s o - c a l l e d volume of p r o b a b i l i t y
v=c+u-w,
where W i s p a r t of V, t h e t o t a l of C and U. The p r o b a b i l i t y t h a t de w i l l be seen i s
11 : z
(31- 2 )
[ ( R - V)/f?]"-' zz
C S ~ (-
TJN/R),
(31- 3 )
For
where R is t h e volume of t h e r i n g .
n
(31.4)
p -4 z .
Further, i f t h e volumetric density is
4
3- z[? (IV/R)
(31.5)
T h i s means t h a t f o r a l l elements
(31.4) can be s a t i s f i e d by p r a c t i c a l l y
(31.6)
88
where
i s t h e v a l u e of F
phase f u n c t i o n .
W e can, t h e r e f o r e , w r i t e t h e following e x p r e s s i o n f o r t h e amplitude of
t h e change i n r i n g b r i g h t n e s s when
a changes from
0 t o cym a x x 6 O . 5 :
Since, when a = a
max
w<c+u,
(31.8)
(31.9)
while
v(0)
c.
(31.10)
and t h e volume of U i s a f u n c t i o n
v a l u e , and we can t a k e it t h a t
A'
= A.
(31.11)
It i s convenient t o i n t r o d u c e a new v a r i a b l e
Then
(31.13)
and
(31.14)
In p l a c e of Eq.
(31.71, we o b t a i n
(31.151, 'r
and
i s t h e o p t i c a l t h i c k n e s s , p r e v i o u s l y determined
(28.11,
x 0 r: (cps,/p sin A ) = -. 4
(31.16)
89
is the brightness created by first order scattering. A s already has 1 been indicated by Eq. (17.11), the total brightness, with higher order scatterwhere b ing taken into consideration, is b = b1
i
Ab.
(31-17)
Since the interval of change in a for Saturn is very small, it can be taken that (31.18) Then we can use the following equation to make the transition from b ( a 1 max )/
where Ab(0) can be computed through formulas and tables for the theory of multiple scattering of light. The results of the calculations of the Ab(O)/b(O)
L88
ratio for Saturn's rings have already been presented in #17 (see Table 5 . ) Ab(O)/b(O) is of the order of 10 percent, or less, for particles with a
- 0.6,
and the phase function is similar to that of the moon, and this is extremely close to actual conditions. The factor f(amax)/f(0) can be computed as follows. Since the spherical
albedo of a typical ring particle is now low, the natural effect of opposition of the particles (the Gehrels-Hapke effect) is slight.
0 ral phase curve for a particle in limits ( < a
linear, so that .1-pmx Cf (amax)/f(0) 1 = 2 5 2 ' a a , where p is the particle phase coefficient. P
Eqs. ( 31 2 0
(31.15),
They make it
possible to compute the amplitude of the effect of mutual shading when the penumbra is ignored. The results of the calculations converted to stellar magnitudes are shown in Figure 24 (the solid curve). The dashed curve shows similar results ob-
tained when the penumbra was taken into consideration (see the next section). We used
7
= 1, A = A ' =
= 0.10, and p
= 0.024.
90
The p h y s i c a l i m p l i c a t i o n is q u i t e clear. Since t h e cones of t h e shadows cast by t h e p a r t i c l e s have a f i n i t e l e n g t h , t h e p r o b a b i l i t y of mutual shading dimin i s h e s w i t h i n c r e a s e i n t h e mean d i s t a n c e between a d j a c e n t p a r t i c l e s . But t h e
mean d i s t a n c e can o n l y i n c r e a s e when t h e r e is a r e d u c t i o n i n D. F i g u r e 24. T h e o r e t i c a l amplitude, Ammax, of t h e e f f e c t of mutual shading i n s t e l l a r magnitudes a s a f u n c t i o n of log D. The s o l i d curve w a s computed w i t h t h e penumbra ignored; t h e dashed curve w i t h t h e penumbra t a k e n int o consideration. The amplitude i s g r e a t l y dependent on D. The i n f l u e n c e of t h e penumbra is slight. A s opposed
t o t h i s , t h e shadows i n S e e l i g e r ' s approximation a r e i n f i n i t e l y long c y l i n d e r s , and, as a r e s u l t , t h e p r o b a b i l i t y of t h e mutual shading does n o t depend on t h e mean d i s t a n c e between p a r t cles. Let u s p o i n t o u t t h a t Eq.
N
(si.16 1
0
demonstrates t h e dependence of x
on D.
It is n e c e s s a r y t h a t D
>
according
(31.16), w e f i n d t h a t x
l / 3 and D
lom3.
be achieved when t h e c o n d i t i o n is x
1.
(31.15), w e can
is present.
This t e r m d e s c r i b e s t h e photometric p r o p e r t i e s of t h o s e l a y e r s of
L e t u s c a l l them t h e " s u r f a c e
"deep l a y e r s , " where, a s b e f o r e , some of t h e shadow cones a r e truncated', b u t some a l r e a d y have reached completion. The presence of completed cones reduces
i s absence of deep l a y e r s .
1l 1 1l1l1 1l1l1 1 l I I1 I
E
\
-. -~
.- . --
__
/ -
t ------
F i g u r e 25.
Shape of t h e volume of p r o b a b i l i t y , V, i n t h e c a s e when t h e penumbra i s taken i n t o consideration. Designations are t h e same as t h o s e used i n F i g u r e 23.
. I n f l u e n c e of t h e penumbra.
(b)
v =c + u
+ P -
w,
(31.2).
(31.21)
where P i s t h e volume c o n t a i n e d between t h e expanding and t a p e r i n g cones. The o t h e r d e s i g n a t i o n s are t h e same a s t h o s e used i n Eq.
If t h e c e n t e r of some p a r t i c l e e n t e r s P , t h e p a r t i c l e w i l l c a s t a penumbra
on t h e element d e , and t h e i n t e n s i t y of t h a t penumbra w i l l depend on t h e p o s i t i o n of t h e c e n t e r of t h e p a r t i c l e with r e s p e c t t o de.
/9_0
92
p2
1.
which g i v e s t h e approximation f o r t h e e f f e c t of mutual shading w i t h excess. By Actually, t h e c o e f f i c i e n t s K and t h e p r o b a b i l i t i e s p are p o s i t i v e . n n ignoring t h e terms with s u b s c r i p t s l a r g e r t h a n one w e u n d e r e s t i m a t e t h e mean luminousflux, F; t h a t is, w e o v e r e s t i m a t e t h e e f f e c t of mutual shading.
On t h e o t h e r hand, d i s r e g a r d f o r t h e penumbra ( s e e "a" t h i s s e c t i o n ) under-
e s t i m a t e s t h e e f f e c t of mutual shading.
Thus, t h e t r u e amplitude of t h e e f f e c t
[ v n exp(-v)/n:l,
(31.24)
where v i s t h e mean number of p a r t i c l e s i n volume providing v and n are small compared with N .
v.
E q . (31.24)
is valid
o u r c a s e because V
<
R.
Since
=(N/R)V,
we can r e p l a c e Eq.
amax.
Then
and
Il l l I
(I - 3;-) tlV,
(31.30)
where S
t e r m s of M.
depending on t h e n a t u r e of t h e e c l i p s e .
94
... . .
..
Eqs. (31.311,
(31.32),
The r e s u l t s are
A w e see, it p a s s e s v e r y c l o s e t o s
T h i s r e f l e c t s t h e r a p i d de-
m n o r i n g t h e penumbra i s l e s s t h a n 0 .l.
N w we can i g n o r e t h e i n f l u e n c e of t h e o
penumbra i n a l l f u t u r e formulas i n t h e t h e o r y of t h e e f f e c t of mutual shading. (c) from Eq. The o r i g i n a l formula f o r b ( a ) / b l ( 0 ) i s obtained 1 (31.7) by r e p l a c i n g amax a W is not considered s m a l l as compared by . Phase f u n c t i o n .
with C + U.
<
1, o r z
< (p/cp)).
For
(31.201,
i n p l a c e of Eq.
(31.33) we o b t a i n (31.34)
95
where
and
=
a/q.
t h e volumes C and U ( F i g u r e 2 3 ) .
w i s g r e a t l y dependent on a, s i n c e it i s ,
i n t h e f i n a l a n a l y s i s , t h e reason f o r t h e lllogarithmiclf shape of t h e t h e o r e t i c a l phase curve. The p r e c i s e e x p r e s s i o n f o r w(cy) i s v e r y cumbersome. The r e a d e r can f i n d
(31.19
Ab(O)/b(O),
pp.
Beyond
The parameter r
/94 0 The v a l u e
( # l 7 ) , and i s not i n e x c e s s
#17,
g r e e of p h a s e ) .
96
'f
F i g u r e 26.
Shapes of t h e o r e t i c a l phase c u r v e s i n terms of parameters D, I 0' p and Ab/b ( d i s p e r s i o n s i n s i z e s of p a r t i c l e s i g n o r e d ) . The & g l e s of e l e v a t i o n have t h e f i x e d v a l u e A = A ' = 25O i n a l l c a s e s The v a l u e s (widely opened r i n g s ) , z i s t a k e n as equal t o 1 lan. 0 of t h e o t h e r parameters a r e shown n e a r t h e curves.
Pp'
/95 -
(1957).
are n o t p l o t t e d i n F i g u r e 27 i n o r d e r t o avoid c l u t t e r ) .
d a t a with t h e t h e o r e t i c a l d a t a a l i t t l e later.
W e s h a l l compare t h e s e
97
i a/u
F i g u r e 27. Comparison of t h e o r e t i c a l phase c u r v e s ( s o l i d l i n e s ) w i t h t h e obs e r v a t i o n s made by Hertzsprung (open c i r c l e s ) , Schoenberg ( f i l l e d c i r c l e s ; mean weighted v a l u e s f o r a l l of h i s f i l t e r s ) , and Lebedinets ( c r o s s e s ) . The lower, middle, and upper c u r v e s were The corresponcomputed f o r D = 1.6.10-3, 3.2-10-3, and 4.7.10-3. ding v a l u e s f o r B ( 0 ) B C are 0m .053, Om.128, and Om.145. In a l l c a s e s A = A I = 258 9 To = Z = 0.024 = 1, Ab/bl = 0.07, and p s t e l l a r magnitude/degree phase. The dashed c u r v e sPwere cons t r u c t e d through t h e e m p i r i c a l e q u a t i o n , Eq. (12.11, from Schoenberg's mean v a l u e s , with t h e same changes i n @ ( 0 ) as above. B C
09
A s w i l l be seen from F i g u r e 27, t h e concordance between t h e o r y and observ a t i o n s i s extremely good f o r t h e middle and upper curves. t h e more p r e f e r a b l e , b u t t h e corresponding v a l u e f o r
D =
4.7-10-~ is
BB ( 0 )
BC
-0
-145,
s e e m s e x c e s s i v e ( s e e n o t e accompanying t h e f i g u r e ) .
some s m a l l ,
Also t o be suspected i s
o b s e r v a t i o n s i n t h e r e g i o n of extremely s m a l l CY ( t h e dashed curve p l o t s above t h e s o l i d one). Then t o o , w e see t h a t t h e F r a n k l i n and Cook o b s e r v a t i o n s con-
B,(o)
- Bc,
can r e a d i l y be e l i m i n a t e d i f t h e v a r i a n c e
i n the sizes
of t h e p a r t i c l e s i s t a k e n i n t o c o n s i d e r a t i o n .
98
The v a l u e s of t h e o t h e r parameters and v a r i a b l e s used t o compute t h e t h e o r e t i c a l phase curves (see t h e n o t e accompanying F i g u r e 27) w e r e t a k e n from o b s e r v a t i o n s , f o r t h e most p a r t , and evoke no real o b j e c t i o n s . Thus, even a
Taken i n t o Consideration
(a)
General e x p r e s s i o n f o r amplitude.
The formulas s e t f o r t h i n t h e
preceding s e c t i o n can q u i t e e a s i l y be g e n e r a l i z e d f o r t h e case when t h e r a d i i of t h e p a r t i c l e s have variance i n t h e i n t e r v a l ( p 1, p 2 ) . variance The most i n t e r e s t If it i s narrow,
ing c a s e i s t h a t when t h e i n t e r v a l of
i s broad.
variance
law a p p l i c a b l e t o S a t u r n ' s r i n g s .
I n t h e next deduction we
where p i s t h e p a r t i c l e r a d i u s ; K i s a c o n s t a n t ; s is a d i s t r i b u t i o n parameter.
L e t u s take it t h a t when p is s u f f i c i e n t l y small, p e n e t r a t i o n of l i g h t
there is
The v a l u e n = 2 i s a j u d i c i o u s a t which t h e
(l/cp)
= 2000, t h e boundary v a l u e f o r p ,
p * = 2-10
-1
cm;
(32.2)
and t h a t p a r t i c l e s with p
99
L e t u s f i n d t h e luminous f l u x t r a n s m i t t e d t o t h e e a r t h by p a r t i c l e s i n
t h e i n t e r v a l (p,
t h e interval (r, r + d r ) .
p a r t i c l e s , i n accordance w i t h t h e proof i n & l b . The geometry of t h e volume of p r o b a b i l i t y , problem without variance ( F i g u r e 23).
V , remains as it w a s i n t h e
Only t h e r a d i u s of t h e c y l i n d e r ,
and
The magnitude
or shaded, by p a r t i c l e s i n t h e i n t e r v a l ( r , r + d r ) i s p
where d N
exp(-
V 2
dNr),
Let
i s t h e t o t a l number of p a r t i c l e s i n t h e i n t e r v a l ( r , r + d r ) .
<
Then, f o r a l l p r a c t i c a l purposes, t h e v a l u e s of p
f o r various
2 L e t a luminous f l u x rf(cr)p
, in
which
is a c o n s t a n t and f ( a ) i s t h e
p e r i o d i c a l l y shaded and s h i e l d e d by p a r t i c l e s i n t h e i n t e r v a l ( r , r + d r ) ,
The f l a t l a y e r of p a r t i c l e s i n t h e i n t e r v a l (p,
and a t d e p t h z , w i l l t r a n s m i t a luminous f l u x t o t h e e a r t h of
where dN
is t h e t o t a l number of p a r t i c l e s i n t h e i n t e r v a l ( p ,
p + dp).
and d N
i n t h i s l a s t e x p r e s s i o n by t h e i r v a l u e s
we obtain
100
I n o r d e r t o take i n t o account t h e e f f e c t of shading and s h i e l d i n g of t h e /97 particles in the (p, p + dp) i n t e r v a l by p a r t i c l e s of a l l s i z e s from p* t o p2,
of t h e p r o b a b i l i t i e s , equated t o f i x e d r.
t r a n s m i t t e d t o t h e e a r t h by p a r t i c l e s i n t h e i n t e r v a l (p,
p + dp) when t h e y
I n t e g r a t i n g i n t e r m s of p from p1
t o p,,
by
a l l r i n g p a r t i c l e s , w i t h t h e shadow e f f e c t of p a r t i c l e s , t h e r a d i i of which
are i n t h e i n t e r v a l ( p * ,
p2),
taken i n t o c o n s i d e r a t i o n (32.8)
= C
r'
and when
cy
max
vr
cr +
Ur'
W e obtain
K
(32.9)
bl ( Z , n a x ) bi
('J)
- f(0)
0
P.
-- f
(2"ItlX
>'-
The i n t e g r a t i o n of t h e numerator of t h i s e x p r e s s i o n h a s p r a c t i c a l complic a t i o n s stemming from t h e f a c t t h a t i n t h e i n t e r v a l 0 5 z g (p/cp)sin A , t h e volume U i s a t r u n c a t e d cone ( f o r any r from p * t o p 2 ) , and i s a complete cone r p i n t h e i n t e r v a l p/cp) s i n , f o r a l l r s a t i s f y i n g t h e i n e q u a l i t y Vz/sin A S r
cp
Iz 5 z
32.10)
101
a l l volumes.
J3q. (32.10)
i s a g e n e r a l e q u a t i o n ( t h a t i s , it is v a l i d f o r any s ) f o r
variance
/98
p taken i n t o consideration
The g e n e r a l
(32.11)
f o r t h e o p t i c a l t h i c k n e s s of t h e r i n g , and (32.12)
f o r t h e volumetric d e n s i t y .
Eq.
Eq. (31.19)
i s used
OS variance.
As will
s
i n t h e Q. (32.1) v a r i a n c e law.
< 3.
(32.13)
So l e t u s c o n s i d e r t h e connection between
, t h e magnitudes p 1, ,P
T ~ ,D
F i r s t l e t u s p o i n t o u t t h a t we can t a k e
and
as t h e minimum v a l u e s f o r p,
and .p ,
Q. (32.14)
f o l l o w s because t h e B r i n g
s c a t t e r s s o l a r l i g h t almost n o n - s e l e c t i v e l y
from t h e c o n d i t i o n of t h e c o s m o g m i c a l l y a c c e p t a b l e age of t h e r i n g
[#l7, E q .
(17.4) I.
102
Eqs. (32.11)
formulas f o r T
0
and (32.12)
m a k e it e a s y t o o b t a i n t h e f o l l o w i n g s p e c i a l
and D i n t h e i n t e r v a l of i n t e r e s t t o u s
s = 2.5
K T o = . 2 X. Z O [ I -
(Pl/P3)"zl
p'/a;
p'z/'.
s = 3.5
(32.2Q)
(32.21)
(32.16)
(32.21),
when s
< 3.0, t h e o p t i c a l t h i c k n e s s
m a s s of t h e r i n g ) over t h e e n t i r e i n t e r v a l of s v a l u e s of i n t e r e s t t o u s i s
determined by l a r g e p a r t i c l e s . This obvious r e l a t i o n s h i p must be added t o t h e s e formulas
0
2P2
(32.22) t h i c k n e s s system r e q u i r e s
=0
b u t t h e Eq. That EQ.
P2
(32.23)
c o v e r s a l o n g e r cy i n t e r v a l
If t h i s r a t i o i s
ratio.
103
t h a t i s , t h a t when cy = 6 O . 5 , from p
t h e n o n l i n e a r s e c t i o n of t h e curve h a s passed
The a p p l i c a t i o n of t h e Eq.
(32.21),
7
and e x p r e s s i n g D i n t e r m s of 7
= 1? o =
q u i t e e a s i l y t h a t when
-4 c m , and z 1.10
9' 10 c m .
it w i l l be found
D is 0.21, max The l a t t e r of
3.3-10-2,
and 3 . 0 - 1 0 - ~ f o r s = 2.5,
t h e s e v a l u e s i s so s m a l l t h a t t h e r e is no assurance t h a t t h e amplitude of t h e change i n b r i g h t n e s s of t h e B r i n g can be observed, even when t h e r e i s no persion, p ( s e e F i g u r e 24). dis-
ment of t h a t amplitude r e q u i r e s a model with h i g h e r D v a l u e s when t h e r e i s vari a n c e of p, t h a n when a model without t h e i n t e r v a l of v a r i a n c e variance
is used.
=
Consequently, when
i s a broad one, t h e v a l u e s
<
It w i l l sweep out t h e s l i g h t l y -
5 . 1 0 ~y e a r s .
I t i s t r u e enough
t h a t l a r g e p a r t i c l e s approaching S a t u r n v e r y much more slowly w i l l s h i e l d t h e p l a n e t from t h e s m a l l p a r t i c l e s , and, a t t h e same t i m e , w i l l i n t e r f e r e w i t h t h e sweeping out process.
As w i l l be seen from Eqs.
/lo0 . -
(32.16)
(32.21), t h e
s h i e l d i n g is p a r t i c u l a r l y strong- when s
< 3 , when t h e o p t i c a l t h i c k n e s s of t h e
A ray penetrating t h e r i n g r a d i a l l y
T
r i n g i s f i x e d p r i m a r i l y by l a r g e p a r t i c l e s .
c a u s e s an o p t i c a l t h i c k n e s s of t e n s of thousands because
1. From t h i s OB it f o l l o w s t h a t t h e e f f e c t of r a d i a t i v e braking on p a r t i c l e s w i t h p 3 c m
<
should l e a d t o t h e i r s e t t l i n g on t h e s u r f a c e s of l a r g e p a r t i c l e s .
The subse-
case.
H e r e w e no l o n g e r can speak of t h e t i m e of t h e f r e e p a t h of a s m a l l
104
So, even
i n t h i s l a t t e r case t h e r e w i l l be q u i t e a r a p i d r e d u c t i o n i n t h e number of
s m a l l f r e e p a r t i c l e s i n t h e r i n g volume.
Accordingly, c o n s i d e r a t i o n of t h e q u e s t i o n of e x t e n s i v e v a r i a n c e i n c l u d i n g p a r t i c l e s with p of p,
<
f i l l i n g of t h e r i n g volume w i t h such p a r t i c l e s .
d i s c u s s i o n , we s h a l l simply n o t e t h a t t h e most probable source of r e p l e n i s h ment can be t h e f r a c t i o n a t i o n and t h e breaking away from t h e surface l a y e r of l a r g e p a r t i c l e s a s a r e s u l t of t h e a c t i o n on t h e s u r f a c e l a y e r of s o l a r corp u s c u l a r r a d i a t i o n and of m i c r o m e t e o r i t e s , a s w e l l a s because of c o l l i s i o n s between l a r g e p a r t i c l e s .
L e t u s take t h i s assumption as a working hypothesis. I t imposes t h e
the
3 c m should b e of t h e o r d e r o f , o r
s;
-
- rrp'd .fl'V
:z
s i
PI
-- .-r>-/iE
.d.V,
( 32-24]
P,
where p
i s t h e r a d i u s of a p a r t i c l e , t h e t i m e of e x i s t e n c e of which i n t h e
(17.41, t h e t i m e of e x i s t e n c e of a p a r t i c l e i n t h e /lo1
Therefore (32.25) (32.24)
volume of t h e r i n g i s d i r e c t l y p r o p o r t i o n a l t o i t s r a d i u s . n = Po/P.
(32.25)
p2-s tlp.
Po
and (32.11,
we obtain
$--s
dp
:po
1
PI
(32.26)
a)
2.5,
p . ==
(.50'/:
'0
- 3p'/2)%;
(32.27)
(32.28 )
C)
s 3 3.5,
=
p2
p;/p1.
(32.29)
Substituting p
3 c m , and p1
10
2
-4
102,
and 9 . 1 0 ~ c m , r e s p e c t i v e l y ,
for p
when s = 2.5,
These numbers
The maximum p e r m i s s i b l e
i s n o t t h e only e f f e c t l i g h t p r e s s u r e h a s on t h e r i n g m a t e r i a l .
The component
t o e s t i m a t e i t s magnitude f o r p = 10
-4
cm.
AU),
t h e inclined
and t h e f a c t t h a t almost o n e - t h i r d
(32.30)
Actually, t h e p a r t i c l e s are n o t a b s o l u t e l y b l a c k , but are l i g h t gray ( t h e albedo i s of t h e o r d e r of 0.5 therefore n ' But when it i s remembered t h a t s o l a r r a d i a t i o n i s t o 0.61, diffusively scattering.
i s somewhat i n c r e a s e d .
because of t h e l a r g e p a r t i c l e s , t h e p
att r a c t i v e force
106
. ? 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 I11111 I .111
111 I 1
I1 I 1 1111II 1111.1.11-
1111.111111
I I1 11----IIIII.I1I.II11111111111l1l1
11111 1 1 1 I I1 I I1 11
I1 I = I -
Setting r =
lolo
c m ( t h e mean r a d i u s of t h e B r i n g ) , p 2 p,
10
-4
2 300
M.
(32.32)
If eo i s s i g n i f i c a n t l y l a r g e r t h a n t h i s number, t h e d e p r e s s i o n is n o t deep
enough f o r s p a t i a l s e p a r a t i o n of s m a l l p a r t i c l e s from l a r g e ones, even when
p = 10
-4
cm.
A n e s t i m a t e of t h e o r d e r of z
0'
of magnitude (#21), and t h e second i s weaker by even many more o r d e r s of magnitude. The e f f e c t s t h e y c r e a t e are s l i g h t , and w e w i l l no% c o n s i d e r them.
Without variance
s =2 . 5 s =3 0 .
2.4.102 1.of 10-4 1 .o. 10-4 1.0.10-4 1.0.10-4 2.7, I O ' 1.0.10-4 1 7 1 1 .II O 2 *
2,4*102
-' 7 .O
.I 0 ' 7.1.1OS
39 33
41
14
e21
-'
<39
< I <9 <39
s = 3.5
(c)
The sub-
/I --O 3
s t i t u t i o n of p a r t i c u l a r v a l u e s s = 2.5,
(32.10) r e a d i l y
5 cm,
III I1 1IIII I I I
l i s t e d i n Table
7.
The r'less t h a n " s i g n i s used when only t h e ma.jorizing Model d a t a without v a r i a n c e are
i n o r d e r t o o b t a i n concordance between t h e v a l u e s of t h e magnitude C (a, b 1 maX The observed v a l u e is 39 p e r c e n t . b (0)]/bl(O) and t h e B r i n g o b s e r v a t i o n s . 1 There i s no need t o reduce t h e d a t a f o r m u l t i p l e s c a t t e r i n g , because p
of B r i n g p a r t i c l e s d e r i v e from c o n s i d e r a t i o n of t h e d a t a l i s t e d i n Table 1.
7.
If t h e
variance
i n t e r v a l i s a broad one, t h a t i s , i f it i n c l u d e s
--
10
-4
c m , concordance with
< 3.
The e s t i m a t e of t h e volumetric d e n s i t y of t h e B r i n g , obtained w i t h ignored, should be reviewed. The new D v a l u e w i l l be higher. a s w e l l as observed f a c t s ,
variance
< 3.
A s a m a t t e r of f a c t , t h e e f f e c t on r i n g
A t t h e same t i m e , i t i s of i n t e r e s t t o n o t e
t h a t t h e r e l a t i v e d u s t c o n t e n t c l e a r l y i s low, because it cannot be d e t e c t e d by o b s e r v a t i o n when t h e r i n g s are open h a l f way, o r wide open. a n o t h e r i n d i c a t i o n i n f a v o r of t h e models w i t h s T h i s is y e t
< 3 , i n which t h e d u s t c o n t e n t
(32.18)
and (32.20)l.
( 0 ) is readily 1 + U with C + u
max
w i t h a, and C
- wr.
see #31),
108
of t h e expression f o r bl(@)/bl(0)
where
q = zfsin A ,
v =a &
(32.34) (32.35)
and d e s i g n a t i o n s of t h e t y p e
(32.36)
P .
of t h e penumbra i s n e g l i g i b l y s m a l l .
a l l volumes.
E<1. ( 3 2 . 3 3 )
ation.
i s a g e n e r a l formula f o r t h e phase f u n c t i o n of t h e e f f e c t of
variance i n t h e p a r t i c l e r a d i i , p, t a k e n i n t o c o n s i d e r -
mutual shading, w i t h
by s u b s t i t u t i n g t h e s e s p e c i a l v a l u e s i n Fq.
(32.33).
W e used Eq.
(32.33) t o
109
S=3,
To= ZOB 1, =
(32.28)
model w e r e s e l e c t e d such t h a t t h e y
T h i s s e l e c t i o n l e a d s one t o expect f i r s t ,
good concordance between t h e t h e o r e t i c a l and t h e observed phase curve, and, second, a q u i t e c l e a r l y expressed d i f f e r e n c e between t h e Eq. phase c u r v e , and t h e c u r v e s f o r models without variance. The s e l e c t i o n of v a l u e s f o r t h e parameters
7
(32.37)
model
0'
0'
d e n s i t y , D , p r o v i d e s t h e c o n c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e d a t a from o b s e r v a t i o n s .
done by t a k i n g a v a l u e f o r t h e l a t t e r which, i n accordance with t h e d a t a l i s t e d i n Table 7, should r e s u l t i n an amplitude c l o s e t o t h a t observed. variance i n t e r v a l (almost seven o r d e r s of magnitude)
The l a t i t u d e i n t h e
p2 w a s s e l e c t e d such t h a t t h e Eq.
(32.23)
con-
d i t i o n is s a t i s f i e d . i n t e r v a l , including p
T h i s means t h a t f o r a l l p a r t i c l e s i n t h e v a r i a n c e
2'
t h e n o n l i n e a r s e c t i o n of t h e phase curve i s w i t h i n
t h e l i m i t s of t h e observed i n t e r v a l of phase angles. Another model, Eq. (32.381, was taken f o r purposes of comparison. Here,
and p
2'
2 t h e Eq.
, otherwise
(32.23)
condition is not s a t i s f i e d .
/lo6 -
110
F i g u r e 28.
1, 2 c u r v e s f o r t h e Fqs. (32.37) and (32.38) models w i t h v a r i a n c e o f p , resp e c t i v e l y ; 3, 4 t h e i r analogs, o b t a i n e d f o r models without v a r i a n c e e p , f o r and z D values are shown n e a r t h e t h e same v a l u e s of t h e p a r a m e t e r s A , T 0 ' 0curves.
shape of t h e phase curve, t h e f i g u r e a l s o shows two phase c u r v e s f o r a model without v a r i a n c e o f p , one of which, curve 3 , is t h e analog of c u r v e 1; t h e o t h e r , c u r v e 4, i s t h e analog o f curve 2. and z
0
The v a l u e s o f t h e p a r a m e t e r s A , respectively,
0'
and s o
s o l e l y t o t h e e f f e c t o f v a r i a n c e of P.
A s w i l l be seen from t h e f i g u r e , when s
7
3 t h e s e d i f f e r e n c e s are much
g r e a t e r t h a n when s = 2.
T h i s can b e explained by t h e f a c t t h a t w i t h i n c r e a s e
p v a l u e h a s i t s " p a r t i a l " phase c u r v e , with t h e i n i t i a l ( l i n e a r ) and t r a n s i t i o n a l ( n o n - l i n e a r ) s e c t i o n s s h o r t e r and s t e e p e r t h e smaller p as compared with z The r e s u l t a n t phase c u r v e f o r t h e model as a whole i s t h e mean weighted 0 ' That is why, i n p a r t i c u l a r , curve, as it w e r e , of a l l t h e p a r t i a l curves.
/lo7 ---
F i g u r e 29. Comparison between o b s e r v a t i o n s and t h e o r e t i c a l phase curves f o r Eqs. (32.37) and (32.28) models, with v a r i a n c e i n s i z e s o f p a r t i c l e s considered. S o l i d curves are t h e t h e o r e t i c a l phase curves. The c i r c l e s and c r o s s e s are t h e b l u e and v i s u a l s t e l l a r magnitudes of r i n g b r i g h t n e s s according t o F r a n k l i n The luminous fluxes from t h e A and B r i n g s have and Cook (1965), r e s p e c t i v e l y . m h a s been t a k e n equal t o -0 -1-15. n o t been s e p a r a t e d ; @ ( 0 ) B C
F i g u r e 29 compares t h e t h e o r e t i c a l phase c u r v e s w i t h t h e o b s e r v a t i o n s .
W e used F r a n k l i n and Cook's o b s e r v a t i o n a l d a t a (1965). W e see t h a t t h e concor-
small,
s y s t e m a t i c , discrepancy w i t h t h e o r y when cy
<
0'30'.
The a u t h o r s
b e l i e v e t h a t t h i s discrepancy i s a real one and t h a t it i s t h e r e s u l t of d i f f r a c t i o n i n t h e microscopic, t r a n s p a r e n t , f r o z e n d r o p l e t s forming t h e surf a c e of t h e p a r t i c l e s ( t h e l a t t e r a r e assumed t o b e macroscopic). I t probably
i s t o o soon t o take t h e s e c o n c l u s i o n s as f i n a l .
A s a m a t t e r of f a c t , i n t h e
p h o t o e l e c t r i c photometry provided by F r a n k l i n and Cook t h e luminous f l u x e s from t h e A and B r i n g s w e r e n o t d i s t i n g u i s h a b l e from each o t h e r (#12). The
a u t h o r s assert (on t h e b a s i s of t h e i r simultaneous photographic photometry) t h a t t h e observed phase c u r v e s f o r t h e A and B r i n g s are a b s o l u t e l y i d e n t i c a l . T h i s a s s e r t i o n cannot b e v e r i f i e d , u n f o r t u n a t e l y , because t h e a u t h o r s have
It i s
r i n g i s s i g n i f i c a n t l y d i f f e r e n t from t h a t f o r t h e B r i n g ( # l l ) ; ( 2 )
/108,
(3)
9071,
0.
a r e not e n t i r e l y i d e n t i c a l . t i o n e d when
c x
C 0'30'
may be due s o l e l y t o t h e A r i n g .
t h i s i s t o m a k e d i r e c t p h o t o e l e c t r i c photometry of t h e s u r f a c e b r i g h t n e s s of t h e A and B r i n g s i n d i v i d u a l l y .
A s w i l l be seen from F i g u r e 29,
t h e behavior of t h e observed b r i g h t n e s s
values near
(y
= 0 possibly i n d i c a t e t h a t t h e value
Bc
i s somewhat ( a b s o l u t e l y ) i n f l a t e d .
t h a t i n f a c t t h e s value i s n o t 2.0,
out t h a t t h e mean v a l u e s of s f o r m e t e o r i t e s observed i n t h e v i c i n i t y of t h e e a r t h , a s well as f o r t h e m a t e r i a l r e s p o n s i b l e f o r t h e Fraunhofer component of t h e s o l a r corona have t h i s same o r d e r of magnitude.
F i g u r e 30.The
Same as
(0)
8,
= -0m -060.
In F i g u r e 30, pB(0)
i s more r e a s o n a b l e t h a n
- 8,
i s taken as equal t o ( - O m . 0 6 0 ) ,
a magnitude which
(-Om.115).
113
#33. Other S o l u t i o n s
F r a n k l i n and Cook r e c e n t l y published
(1965) formulas f o r c a l c u l a t i n g t h e
They considered two c a s e s : (1)
t h e cone-cylinder approximation, which c o n s i d e r s p a r t i c l e s l a r g e enough so t h e e f f e c t of d i f f r a c t i o n along t h e l e n g t h of t h e shadow can be ignored; and ( 2 ) t h e cone-cone approximation f o r microscopic p a r t i c l e s , when t h e volume of t h e s h i e l d i n g i s not a c y l i n d e r , or a cone. o r i g i n a l paper.
C a s e 1 is t h e complete e q u i v a l e n t of t h e c a s e which we had considered a t
Analysis of c a s e 2 l e d
W discussed t h i s question i n e
and found t h a t t h e l i f e of r i n g s c o n s i s t i n g of p a r t i c l e s of p
- 300
#l7,
microns
i s about 5-13' y e a r s , or
t h e l i f e o f t h e s o l s r system.
Consequently,
t h e assumption must be t h a t t h e r i n g material. has been renewed some 100 t i m e s during t h e l i f e of t h e s o l a r system, o r t h a t t h e r i n g s a r e v e r y young, and t h a t w now s e e them only because of an o c c a s i o n a l , f o r t u i t o u s coincidence. e p o s s i b i l i t i e s have a v e r y low o r d e r of p r o b a b i l i t y . Both
/la9
The a u t h o r s themselves t e n d
1 t h a n t o c a s e 2.
To be added is t h e f a c t t h a t t h a n k s t o t h e i n t e r n a t i o n a l ob-
-3
t o 4 km.
#34. Discussion of t h e R e s u l t s .
the Riags.
Values of t h e P r i n c i p a l P h y s i c a l Parameters of --
-- - _---
on a n a l y s i s of o b s e r v a t i o n a l d a t a .
It w a s found t h a t t h e B r i n g i s a many-
cy
0.5 t o 0.6.
In t h i s sys-
1, t h e phase behavior of t h e b r i l l i a n c e i n t h e r e g i o n of s m a l l cy
114
p a r t i c l e s by each o t h e r , s o t h e n e x t s t e p should be t o apply t h e t h e o r y of mutual shading t o t h e 3 r i n g i n o r d e r t o check and r e f i n e p r e v i o u s l y d e r i v e d c o n c l u s i o n s w i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e s t r u c t u r e of t h e r i n g , and t o o b t a i n a q u a n t i t a t i v e e s t i m a t e o f i t s p r i n c i p a l p h y s i c a l parameters. t h e t h e o r y of mutual shading i s explained, I n t h i s s e c t i o n , once
In t h a t case,
i n t h e main, be due
(#l7).
- 3",
l i m i t s of t h e l a y e r r e a c h e s a v a l u e of s e v e r a l t e n s p .
l a y e r , r e g a r d l e s s of A ,
.
f o r s m a l l A,
/sin
A; t h a t i s , i n t h e o p t i c a l
1, t h i s h a s l i t t l e e f f e c t on t h e
c r e a s e i n t h e t o t a l amplitude of t h e change i n b r i g h t n e s s .
w i l l be r e l a t i v e l y i n s e n s i t i v e t o change i n A i n t h e c a s e of t h e r i n g w i t h a
many-particle thickness.
it i s n e c e s s a r y t o add t o t h e n o n l i n e a r
phase curve f o r t h e mutual shading e f f e c t a l i n e a r component w i t h a phase f a c t o r of t h e o r d e r of Om.024 p e r degree of phase ( o r somewhat h i g h e r , i f one r e c a l l s t h e phase f a c t o r f o r t h e c e n t e r of S a t u r n ' s d i s k ) . Obviously, t h i s component The magnitude of t h e
t o a r r i v e a t c e r t a i n new c o n c l u s i o n s with r e s p e c t t o t h e s t r u c t u r e of t h e r i n g ,
as w e l l as t o m a k e a q u a n t i t a t i v e estimate of i t s p r i n c i p a l p h y s i c a l parameters.
I n f a c t , w e e s t a b l i s h e d t h e following i n #3l and 1. marked
#32.
The shape of t h e phase curve f o r t h e r i n g i n d i c a t e s t h e presence of a variance i n t h e s i z e s of t h e p a r t i c l e s forming t h e r i n g . variance l a w i s c l o s e t o 2.5, The exponent
s i n t h e Eq.
(32.1)
.
3.
z must be known i n o r d e r t o e s t i m a t e r i n g p a r t i c l e 0 ' The edge-on I n our models, Eqs. (32.37) and (32.381, w e used zo = 1 k m .
Ring t h i c k n e s s ,
sizes.
1, and s = 2.5,
w e f i n d t h a t 90 p e r c e n t o f t h e r e f l e c t i n g s u r f a c e be-
1 6 1
is particle
/ 1 1 1
4.
DA = DB,
z
If
ar =
l * 1 0 2 4 ; t h a t i s , about 1/70th t h e m a s s of t h e moon. I n c o n c l u s i o n , w e should l i k e t o emphasize t h e f a c t t h a t even i n i t s p r e s e n t form t h e t h e o r y of mutual shading s t i l l does n o t t a k e i n t o c o n s i d e r a t i o n a l l t h e main f e a t u r e s of S a t u r n s r i n g s t r u c t u r e . S p e c i f i c a l l y , it f a i l s t o c o n s i -
117
A, AI-
bl A b b = b
+ Ab - t o t a l r i n g b r i g h t n e s s
same, when cy = 0 ( a t t i m e of p r e c i s e o p p o s i t i o n of S a t u r n )
c y l i n d e r of s h i e l d i n g ( s e e F i g u r e s 23 and 25)
F(a)
K M
N
P
p o i n t on element of s u r f a c e de of e c l i p s e d p a r t i c l e ( F i g u r e s 23 and 25) number of p a r t i c l e s i n r i n g volume volume c o n t a i n e d between expanding and compressing cones of t h e volume of p r o b a b i l i t y , V ( F i g u r e 25) p r o b a b i l i t y of p a r t i c l e f a l l i n g i n t o -volume V n a t u r a l phase c o e f f i c i e n t f o r t h e p a r t i c l e ( t h e change i n i t s s t e l l a r magnitude f o r change i n phase angle of l o ) r i n g volume exponent i n t h e p a r t i c l e s i z e d i s t r i b u t i o n l a w cone of shading ( F i g u r e s 23 and 25) "volume of p r o b a b i l i t y . " The element dc w i l l be s h i e l d e d from t h e e a r t h (completely) o r from t h e sun (completely o r p a r t i a l l y ) when spart i d e f a l l s i n t o t h i s volume. V = C + U W when t h e penumbra i s i g n o r e d ; V = C + U + P W when t h e penumbra i s taken i n t o c o n s i d e r a t i o n
P pP
R
S
U V
118
p a r t of V, t o t a l of C and U; w = (cp/np
3 )W
x .= vz/(psinA) x
Z
a u x i l i a r y v a r i a b l e replacing t h e v a r i a b l e z
= cpzo/(psinA)
d e p t h of element de of e c l i p s e d p a r t i c l e ( F i g u r e s 23 and 25) measured from t h e p l a n e of t h e r i n g s , n, c l o s e s t t o t h e sun r i n g thickness phase angle a t S a t u r n ( t h e a n g l e sun-Saturn-earth) b c C t h e s t e l l a r magnitude of b r i g h t n e s s . If it i s measured i n s t e l l a r magnitudes f o r a square second of a r c , and t h e b r i g h t n e s s b i s i n a p o s t i l b s , C = 13.92 density a u x i l i a r y v a r i a b l e replacing t h e v a r i a b l e a
cy
= -2.5log
6
v = p
d~-
particle radius
p,,
d
P P*
'p
S u b s c r i p t s S , Sh, M,
IL,
/114
1960.
2. Arkad'yev, Vol.44,
V.K., N .4, o
ZhRFKhO, P h y s i c s Department,
3.
Barabashov, N . . P , Semeykin, B.Ye., "Monochromatic Photometry of S a t u r n and Its Rings," Astron. zh., V 0 1 . 3 , 1933, p.381. Barabashov, N.P., Chekirda, A.T., " 0 r a s p r e d e l e n i i y a r k o s t i na d i s k e S a t u r n a i o y a r k o s t i yego k o l e t s , " Trudy Khar'k. a s t r o n . obs. [On t h e D i s t r i b u t i o n of B r i g h t n e s s on t h e Disk o f S a t u r n and on t h e B r i g h t n e s s o f I t s Rings, Proceedings o f t h e Khar'kov Astronomical Observatory], Vo1.2 (101, p.9. "Observations of t h e E c l i p s e o f I a p e t u s i n t h e Shadows of Barnard, E.E., t h e Globe, Crape Ring, and Bright Ring of S a t u r n , 1889 Nov.1," Monthly Not., V 0 1 . 5 0 , 1890, p.107. Barnard, E.E., "Observations of S a t u r n ' s Ring a t t h e T i m e of I t s D i s appearance i n 1907," Monthly Not., Vo1.68, 1908, p.346 ( a ) . Barnard, E.E., llAdditional Observations of t h e Disappearances and Reappearances of t h e Rings of S a t u r n i n 1907/08," Monthly Not., V 0 1 . 6 8 , 1908, p.360 ( b ) . Barnard, E.E., "Recent Observations of t h e Rings o f S a t u r n , V01.69, 1909, p.621. Barnard, E.E., J., Vo1.40, Monthly Not.,
4.
5.
6.
7.
8. 9.
10.
Astrophys.
1914, p.259.
11.
S a t u r n ' s Rings,
'I
11.
Belopol 1 s k i y , A.A., t l I s s l e d o v a n i y e smeshcheniy l i n i y v s p e k t r e S a t u r n a i yego k o l f t s a , I 1 Izv. SPb. Akad. n-ayk. [An I n v e s t i g a t i o n of Displaced Lines i n t h e Spectrum of S a t u r n and I t s Ring, N e w s of t h e S a i n t P e t e r s burg Academy of S c i e n c e s ] , Vol.3, No.4, 1895, p.379. Relopol 1 s k i v , A.A., Astron. Nachr., "A S p e c t r o g r a p h i c Examination o f Satiirn' s Rings, Vo1.139, No.3313, 1896.
11
12.
13
Berry, A., Kratkaya i s t o r i y a a s t r o n o m i i [ A S h o r t H i s t o r y o f Astronomy], GITTL, 1946. Bobrov, M.S., "On t h e P h y s i c a l I n t e r p r e t a t i o n o f t h e Phase Curve of S a t u r n ' s Rings, Astron. zh., Vo1.17, No.6, 1940, p.1. Bobrov, M.S., "Toward t h e Question of t h e Thickness of S a t u r n ' s Rings,
14.
1s.
120
Astron.
zh.,
Vo1.33,
1956, p.161
(a).
16.
Bobrov, M.S., "On t h e S t r u c t u r e o f S a t u r n ' s Rings. 111. An E v a l u a t i o n of t h e Dimensions of P a r t i c l e s and t h e M a s s o f t h e Rings,lt Astron. zh., Vo1.33, 1956, p.904 ( b ) . Bobrov, M.S., D e r i v a t i o n o f t h e T h e o r e t i c a l Phase Function of B r i g h t n e s s of S a t u r n ' s Rings and a Comparison o f It w i t h O b s e r v a t i o n s , " Astron. zh., Vo1.37, 1960, p.306. Bobrov, M.S., Rings. I . p.306. ItTheoretical Phase Curves of t h e Shadow E f f e o t on S a t u r n ' s D e r i v a t i o n of Formulas," Astron. zh., Vo1.37, 1960,
17.
18.
19-
Bobrov, M.S., " A Summation o f t h e Theory o f t h e Shadow E f f e c t on S a t u r n ' s R i n g s on t h e Occurrence of P a r t i c l e s of Non-Identical Dimensions," Astron. zh., Vol.38, 1961, p.669. Bobrov, M.S., "On an Observation of O c c u l t a t i o n s of S t a r s by S a t u r n ' s Rings," Astron. zh., Vo1.39, 1962, p.669. Bobrov, MS , "Sovremennoye s o s t o y a n i y e voprosa o s t r u k t u r e i poryadke . o i i t o l s h c h i n y k o l e t s S a t u r n a , " T r . A s t r_ f_z .- n - t a AN KazSSR [The Modern S t a t u s o f t h e Question on t h e S t r u c t u r e and Order of Thickness of S a t u r n ' s Rings, Proceedings of t h e A s t r o p h y s i c a l I n s t i t u t e o f t h e Academy of S c i e n c e s o f t h e Kazakh SSR], vo1.9, N 0 . 8 3 , 1967. Brower, D., Clemence, J . M . , !'Orbits a n d Masses of P l a n e t s and S a t e l l i t e s , " I N : P l_ e t y i s p u t n i k i [ P l a n e t s and S a t e l l i t e s ] , e d i t e d by Kuiper and an ~ Middlehurst, I L , 1963, ch.3.
Walter, H., " S c a t t e r e d Light I n t e n s i t y of L a r g e S p h e r i c a l P a r t i c l e s , 'I Optik, Vo1.14, 1957, p.130. Walter, H., " S c a t t e r e d Light I n t e n s i t y of L a r g e S p h e r i c a l P a r t i c l e s . 11, Optik, Vol.16, 1959, p.401.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
/I15
25
Astrophys.
26.
H a r r i s , D.L. ,. " I n t e g r a l Photometry and Colorimetry of P l a n e t s and S a t e l l i t e s , " I N : P l a n e t y i s p u t n i k i [ P l a n e t s and S a t e l l i t e s ] , e d i t e d by Kuiper and M i d d v , ch.8.
27
Gehrels, T., "The Light-Curve and Phase Function of 20 M a s s a l i a , Astrophys. J., Vo1.123, 1956, p.331.
VI. Gehrels, T., "Photometric S t u d i e s o f Asteroids. Magnitudes," Astrophys. J., Vol.125, 1957, p.550.
~~ ~
I'
28.
Photographic
29
Coffeen, T., Owings, D., "Wavelength Dependence of P o l a r 111. The Lunar S u r f a c e , " Astron. J , v01.69, 1964, p.826. . 121
30
Hertzsprung, E., "Comparison Between t h e S u r f a c e B r i g h t n e s s of t h e Rings and C e n t r a l Body o f S a t u r n , " Astron. Nachr., V01.208, 1919, p.81. G i e s e , R.N., Bary, E., B u l l r i c h , K., Vinnemann, C.D., "Tables o f t h e D i f f u s i o n F u n c t i o n s and t h e S c a t t e r i n g Cross S e c t i o n of Homogeneous S p h e r u l e s Based on t h e M i e Theory, R e f r a c t i v e Index 1.50," Abhandl. Dtsch. Akad. W i s s . B e r l i n . .~- K1. Math., Phys.unA Techno, No.6, 1961, _ _ p.1. Goldsbrough, G.R., S a t u r n ' s Ring, "The I n f l u e n c e of S a t e l l i t e s Upon t h e Form o f Philop. Trans. A, Vo1.222, 1921, p.101.
l1
31
32.
l1
33
Goldsbrough, G.R., "Cause of Encke's D i v i s i o n i n S a t u r n ' s Rings, Roy. SOC. London A , Vol.101, 1922, p.280. Goldsbrough, G.R., "The S t a b i l i t y of S a t u r n s Rings, Vo1.244, 1951, p.1. Goldsmith, W., Udar [ C o l l i s i o n ] ,
Proc.
34. 35.
3637.
P h i l o s . Trans.
A,
C o n s t r u c t i o n L i t e r a t u r e P r e s s , 1965.
Greaves, W.M.H., "On t h e Behavior o f a Small Body Within t h e Cassini D i v i s i o n of S a t u r n ' s Ring," Monthly Not., V 0 1 . 8 3 , 1922, p.71 ( b ) . Gurevich, L.E., Lebedinskiy, A . I . , "Ob o b r a z o v a n i i p l a n e t . I. G r a v i t a t s i onnaya k o n d e n s a t s i y a , " Izv. AN SSSR, s e r i y a f i z . [On t h e Formation I. G r a v i t a t i o n a l Condensation," N e w s of t h e of t h e P l a n e t s . Academy of S c i e n c e s of t h e USSR, p h y s i c s s e r i e s ] , Vo1.14, 1950, p.765. Danjon, A., "Photometry and Colorimetry of t h e P l a n e t s Mercury and Venus," Bull. a s t r o n . , Vo1.14, 1949, p.315. Deslandres, H., "A Search f o r S p e c t r a l s on t h e Rings of S a t u r n , " C. Acad. s c i . , Vo1.120, 1895, p.11.55.
38
39.
r.
40.
D o l l f u s , A., " I n v e s t i g a t i o n s o f t h e P o l a r i z a t i o n of P l a n e t s , l 1 I N : P l a n e t y i s p u t n i k i [ P l a n e t s and S a t e l l i t e s ] , e d i t e d by Kuiper and Middlehurst, I L , 1963, ch.9 ( a ) . D o l l f u s , A., "Visual and Photographic O b s e r v a t i o n s o f P l a n e t s a t P i c du M i d i , " I N : P l a n e t y i s p u t n i k i [ P l a n e t s and S a t e l l i t e s ] , e d i t e d by Kuiper and Middlehurst, I L , 1963, ch.15 ( b ) . Dollfus, A., p.822. "A N e w S a t e l l i t e of S a t u r n , " C.
41.
42.
r. Acad. s c i . ,
V01.264,
1967,
43
D o l l f u s , A., "The Discovery of Janus, S a t u r n ' s Tenth S a t e l l i t e , I t Sky and Telescope, Vo1.34, No.3, 1967. D o l l f u s , A., Focas, J . H . , "Photometry of S a t u r n ' s Rings A s Seen Through t h e 1966 S l i t , " p r e p r i n t of t h e Meudon Observatory, 1968, Astron. and Astrophysics, Vo1.2, No.3, 1969.
44.
122
45.
46. 47. 48.
49.
Monthly Not.,
J e f f r e y s , H., "The E f f e c t s of C o l l i s i o n s on S a t u r n ' s Rings," Monthly ' . Not Vo1.107, 1947, p.263. Drake, F.D., "Microwave Spectrum of S a t u r n , Nature, Vo1.195, 1962, p.893.
Duboshin, G.N., "Ob u s t o y c h i v o s t i k o l e t s S a t u r n a , " Trudy GAISh [On t h e S t a b i l i t y of S a t u r n ' s Rings, Proceedings o f GAISh], Vo1.14, 1940, p.172. Davies, R.D., Beard, M., Cooper, B.F.C., "Observation o f S a t u r n a t 11.3 Centimeters, Phys. -~ L e t t e r s , Vo1.13, 1964, p.325. Rev. Davies, R.D., W i l l i a m s , D., "Observations of t h e Continuum Emission From Venus, M a r s , J u p i t e r , and S a t u r n a t 21.2 c Wavelength," P l a n e t . m and Space Science, Vo1.14, 1966, p.15. Zheleznyakov, V.V., "On t h e C o n f i g u r a t i o n of t h e Magnetic F i e l d of S a t u r n , " Astron. zh., Vo1.41, 1964, p.955. S e e l i g e r , H.H.,
V01.100,
/116
50.
51.
52.
Nachr.,
1881, p.177.
53.
S e e l i g e r , H.H., "Toward a Theory of t h e I l l u m i n a t i o n of t h e Large P l a n e t s , and P a r t i c u l a r l y of S a t u r n , " Abhandl. B a y e r ._ - Akad. W i s s . , -2 K l . , v01.16, 1887, p.467.
~
54.
S e e l i g e r , H.H., Akad. W i s s . ,
55.
56.
Z l o t n i k , Ye.Ya., "On t h e I n f l u e n c e of t h e Rings on t h e Exosphere and Magnetic F i e l d of S a t u r n , " Astron. zh., Vo1.44, 1967, p.581. Yabushita, S., " S t a b i l i t y Analysis of S a t u r n ' s Rings With D i f f e r e n t i a l R o t a t i o n , " Monthly Not., Vo1.133, 1966, p.247. Carmichel, H., astrophys., "Photometric Measures of S a t u r n and of I t s Ring," Vo1.21, 1958, p.231.
57.
58.
Ann.
Kiladze, R . I . , "Nablyudeniye k o l e t s S a t u r n a v period prokhozhdeniya Zemli cherez p l o s k o s t ' k o l e t s v 1966 godu," Doklad na Simpoziume PO f i z i k e Limy i p l a n e t [Observation of S a t u r n ' s Rings i n t h e P e r i o d o f E a r t h ' s Passage Through t h e P l a n e of t h e Rings i n 1966, Report a t a Symposium on t h e P h y s i c s of t h e Moon and t h e P l a n e t s ] , Kiev, October, 1968. Keeler, J .E., "Spectroscopic Proof of t h e Meteoric C o n s t i t u t i o n of S a t u r n ' s Rings," Astrophys. J., v01.1, 1895, p.416. Kirkwood, D., "The Zone of A s t e r o i d s and t h e Ring of S a t u r n , " Proc. P h i l o s . SOC., Vo1.21, 1884, p.263.
~~
59.
60. 61.
Amer.
Kowalewsky, S.V.,
Il l 1 I I I
Nachr.,
Vol.111,
1885, p.38.
Kozyrev, N.A., "Vodyanoy p a r v k o l ' t s e S a t u r n a i yego t e p l i c h n y y e f f e k t na poverkhnosti p l a n e t y , " Izv. GAO AN SSSR v Pulkove [Water Vapor i n S a t u r n ' s Ring and Its Greenhouse E f f e c t on t h e P l a n e t ' s S u r f a c e , N e w s o f t h e GAO o f t h e Academy o f S c i e n c e s of t h e USSR i n Pulkova], No.184,
65.
66.
67.
J.,
B a i r , M.E., Arnold, C.B., "Radio D e t e c t i o n o f Cook, J.J., Cross, L.G., t h e Planet Saturn, Nature, v01.188, 1960, p.393. Cook, A.F., F r a n k l i n , F.A., "Optical P r o p e r t i e s of S a t u r n ' s Rings. Transmission, Smiths. Contribs. Astrophys., V01.2, 1958, p.377.
I.
68.
69
Cook, A.F., F r a n k l i n , F.A., I1Rediscussion o f Maxwell's Adams P r i z e Essay on t h e S t a b i l i t y o f S a t u r n ' s Rings. I , " Astron. J., Vo1.69, 1966, p.179. Cook, A.F., F r a n k l i n , F.A., I1Rediscussion of M a x w e l l ' s Adams P r i z e Essay 11," Astron. J., Vo1.71, 1966, p.10. on t h e S t a b i l i t y of S a t u r n ' s Rings. Kutuza, B.G Losovskiy, B.Ya., Salomonovich, A.Ye., "Radioizlucheniye = 8 m m , " Dokl. AN SSSR [Radio Emission o f S a t u r n a t ) = 8 m m , " , S a t u r n a na Reports o f t h e AN SSSR], V01.161, 1965, p.1301. Laplace, P.S., MGcanique cgle-ste, vo1.3,
70
.,
71
72
Lebedinets, V.N., "Absolyutnaya f o t o g r a f i c h e s k a y a f o t o m e t r i y a Y u p i t e r a i S a t u r n a so s v e t o f i l f t r a m i , " Trudy Khar'k. a s t r o n . obs. [Absolute Photographic Photometry o f J u p i t e r and SaTurT W i t h F i l t e r s , Proceedings of t h e Khar'kov Astronomical Observatory], Vo1.12, 1957, p.167. Lyot, B., "Research on t h e P o l a r i z a t i o n o f Light of t h e P l a n e t and of C e r t a i n T e r r e s t r i a l Substances, Ann. Obs. Meudon, V 0 1 . 8 , 1929, pp. 56-62, 147-150. Lyot, B., "Aspect o f t h e P l a n e t a t P i c du Midi Through a 60 c m Lens,ll Astronomie, V01.67, 1953, p.3. Low, F.J., " I n f r a r e d B r i g h t n e s s Temperature of S a t u r n , Astron.
J.,
73.
74.
75.
76
Vo1.69,
1964, p.143.
and S a t u r n a t
20 p , I I
124
77.
78.
L o w e l l , P.
Nachr.,
Vo1.184,
1910, p.177.
Ricerca
Maggini, M., "The Recent Disappearance of S a t u r n ' s Ring, s c i e n t . , ser.2, Vol.1, No.5-6, y e a r 8 , 1937.
79.
Maxwell, J.C., "On t h e S t a b i l i t y of t h e Motion o f S a t u r n ' s Rings," Cambridge, 1859 ( r e p r i n t e d i n S c i e n t i f i c - P a p e r s-of J . C . Maxwell, Vol . l , Cambridge Univ. P r e s s , 1890),-Maksumov, D.D., Astronomicheskaya o p t i k a [Astronomical Optics], ~~__G T T I , 1946.
80.
81.
Meinel, A., "Quality of t h e Astronomical I m a g e and S e l e c t i o n o f a S i t e an Observatory, I N : Teleskopy [Telescopes], e d i t e d by Kuiper and Middlehurst, I L , r963, p.196. Coblentz, W.W., Lampland, C.O., "Planetary Temperatures Menzel, D.H., Astrophys. J., V 0 1 . 6 3 , 1926, Derived From W a t e r - C e l l Transmission,
82.
P-177.
83. 84.
85.
Mertz, L., "Astronomical I n f r a r e d Spectrometer, Astron. J . , v01.70,
1965, ~ - 5 4 8 Mertz, L., Vo1.71, Coleman, I., 1966, p.747" I n f r a r e d Spectrum o f S a t u r n ' s Ring," Astron.
J, .
Minnaert, M., =et i t~svetv p r i r o d e [ L i g h t and Color i n Nature], Fizmatgiz, 1958. Moroz, V . I . , "On t h e I n f r a r e d S p e c t r a of J u p i t e r and S a t u r n (0.9-2.5 Astron. zh., V 0 1 . 3 8 , 1961, p.1080.
b),"
86.
87.
88.
v01.137,
89.
90. 91.
92.
(36),
1961, P-39.
P e t t i t , E., Nicholson, S.B., Popul. Astron., __
~
Vol.32,
No.601,
1924, p.614.
Rabe, W., " I n v e s t i g a t i o n s of t h e D i a m e t e r s of t h e L a r g e P l a n e t s , " Astron. . Nachr., Vol.234, 1928, p.153. Radziyevskiy, V.V., "Radiation D e c e l e r a t i o n i n t h e S o l a r System and t h e Growth of S a t u r n ' s Rings," Astron. zh., Vo1.29, 1952, p.306. Wright, W.H., I'Photographs of S a t u r n Made by Light of D i f f e r e n t Colours, Pubis.. Astrpn. SOC. P a c i f i c , Vol.39, 1927, p.231. R u s s e l l , H.N.,
!!On t h e I l l u m i n a t i o n of t h e Dark S i d e o f S a t u r n ' s Rings,"
93. 94.
125
Astrophys.
J, .
V01.27,
1908, ~ - 2 3 0 .
95 96
. .
R u s s e l l , H.N., Astrophys.
J, .
It
Rose, W.K., Bologna, G.M., Sloanaker, R.M., "Linear P o l a r i z a t i o n o f t h e 1963, 3200 Mc/sec R a d i a t i o n From S a t u r n , " Phys. Rev. L e t t e r s , V01.10,
p.123.
97
98.
99.
100.
Rougier, G., " P h o t o e l e c t r i c Photometry of t h e Moon," Ann. Obs. S t r a s b o u r g , 1933, P.205. V01.2, NO.3, S l i p h e r , E.C., "Phenomena i n Connection With t h e E a r t h T r a n s i t .of t h e P l a n e of S a t u r n ' s Rings i n 1920-21," Popul. Astron., Vo1.30, 1922, p.8. Perenos l u c h i s t o y e n e r g i i v atmosferakh zvezd i-planet Sobolev, V.V., [ T r a n s f e r o f Radiant Energy i n t h e Atmospheres of S t a r s and P l a n e t s ] , G W I , 1956. S t e b b i n s , J., Kron, G.E., ~ 0 1 . 1 2 3 , 1956, p.440. 9 i x - C o l o u r Photometry of S t a r s , Astrophys. J.,
101.
102.
Stebbins, Jacobsen, T.S "Further Photometric Measures of J u p i t e r S a t e l l i t e s and Uranus, With T e s t s of t h e S o l a r C o n s t a n t , " Lick Obs. Bull., Vo1.13, 1928, p.180. "Observations of S a t u r n ' s S a t e l l i t e s a t t h e 30-inch Pulkova S t r u v e , H., Refractor, Publ. Obs. Poulkova, ser.2, Vol.11, 1898, p.232. " I n v e s t i g a t i o n o f t h e Threshhold of C o n t r a s t S e n s i t i v i t y S y t i n s k a y a , N.N., of Vision a t Low Values o f B r i g h t n e s s , " Uch. zap. LGU, s e r i y a m a t e m . nauk, No.18, 1949, p.158. Texereau, J . , "Observing S a t u r n ' s Edgewise Rings, and Telescope, vo1.33, No.4, 1966, p.226. October, 1968, I t Sky
J.,
.,
103.
104.
105.
/118
106.
Timiryazev, A.K., Kineticheskaya t e o r i y a m a t e r i i [The K i n e t i c Theory of Matter], 3 r d e d i t i o n , Moscow, Uchpedgiz, 1956, ch.4. Tikhov, G.A.,"Dvukhtsvetnyye f o t o g r a f i i Marsa i S a t u r n a , poluchennyye p r i pomoshchi pulkovskogo 30-dyuymovogo r e f r a k t o r a sposobom s v e t o f i l ' t r o v , If Izv. Russk. a s t r o n . ob-sa [Dichromatic Photographs o f Mars and S a t u r n , Obtained Using t h e Pulkova 30-inch R e f r a c t o r by Means of F i l t e r s , N e w s o f t h e Russian Astronomical Observatory], Vo1.17, No.5, 1911. Welch, W . J . , Thornton, D.D., Lohman, R., and Mercury a t 1.53 c m , f f Astrophys. Feibelman, W.A., P.793. "Concerning t h e
ID'
107.
108. 109.
J.,
Ring of S a t u r n ,
Nature, Vo1.214,
1967,
126
110.
Fesenkov, V.G., IlPhotometric Observations o f t h e P l a n e t S a t u r n , Astron. Vol.229, 1927, p.227; Nachr., Vol.226, 1926, p.127; Astron. Nachr. Astron. Nachr., Vo1.231, 1928, p.9. -
111.
F r a n k l i n , F.A., Cook, A.F.., llOptical P r o p e r t i e s of S a t u r n ' s Rings. 11. Two-colour Phase Curves o f t h e Two B r i g h t Rings," Astron. J., Vo1.70,
1965, ~ - 7 0 4 .
112. Hagihara, Y., " S t a b i l i t y of t h e S o l a r System," I N : P l a n e t y i s p u t n i k i [ P l a n e t s and S a t e l l i t e s ] , e d i t e d by Kuiper and Middlehurst, I L , 1963, ch.4. Hapke, B., "A T h e o r e t i c a l Photometric Function f o r t h e Lunar S u r f a c e , 'I J. _ Geophys. R e s . , Vo1.68, 1963, p.4571. Hapke, V., van Horn, H., "Photometric S t u d i e s of Complex S u r f a c e s , W i t h A p p l i c a t i o n s t o t h e Moon," J. Geophys. R e s . , V 0 1 . 6 8 , 1963, p.4545. Heath, M.B.B., P.57. "Saturn i n 1957," J. B r i t . Astron. Assoc.,
113.
114.
115.
116.
V01.68,
1958,
Hepburn, P.H., (1) "Dimensions of S a t u r n and H i s Rings as Measured on (2) llObservations o f t h e Prof. B a r n a r d ' s Photograph on 1911 Nov.19"; Transparency of Ring A , and Other D e t a i l s Appearing on t h e Photograph," Monthly Not., Vo1.24, 1914, p.721. Hughes, M.P., " P l a n e t a r y Observations a t a Wavelength of 6 cm,ll P l a n e t . and Space S c i . , Vo1.14, 1966, p.1017. ~Chandrasekhar, S., I L , 1953. Perenos l u c h i s t o y e n e r g i i [ T r a n s f e r o f Radiant Energy], -
117.
118.
119.
120.
Shayn, G.A., "On t h e I n t e n s i t y D i s t r i b u t i o n i n t h e Spectrum of S a t u r n and H i s Ring," T s i r k . Pulk. obs., Vo1.13, 1935, p.9. Sharonov, V.V., "An Experiment on t h e Absolute Determination of t h e Yerevanskoy B r i g h t n e s s C o e f f i c i e n t of S a t u r n ' s S u r f a c e , Byull. a s t r o n . obs., 1935. Sharonov, V.V., "Absolute Photographic Photometry of S a t u r n ' s Disk, T s i r k . GAO AN SSSR, No.26-27, 1939, p.37. Sharonov, V.V., P r i - a p l a n e t [Nature of t k e P l a ~ e t s l ,Fizmatgiz, 1958. rod
121.
122.
123. 124.
Shoenberg, E., "On t h e I l l u m i n a t i o n of t h e P l a n e t s , " Publ. Obs. Dorpat, V01.24, 1917. Shoenberg, E., "Photometric Examinations o f J u p i t e r and t h e System o f S a t u r n , Ann. Acad. S c i . Fennicae, s e r . A , Vo1.16, No.5, 1921. 127
125.
126.
Schoenberg, E., Theoretische Photometrie. -Hancbuch der Astrophysik [Theoretical Photometry. Handbook of Astrophysics3 , Vol. 2, Part 1, Berlin, 1929, p. 1 . Schoenberg, E , "hew Investigations of Saturn's Ring , I t Vierteljahresschr. . Astron. Ges., Vol. 68, 1933, p- 387. Shifrin, K.S., Rasseyaniye sveta mutnoy srgde [Light Scattering in a ~Scattering Medium], GTTI, 1951.
~~
127.
128.
129.
Shnyrev, G.D., Grechushnikov, B N , Moroz, V.I., "An Investigation of .. the Infrared Spectrum of Saturn by the Fourier Transform Method," Astron. tsirk., No. 302, 1964, p 1. . Aitken, R.G., "Observations of Saturn's Rings in 1907." Lick Obs. Bull., Vol. 4, 1907, p. 181.
130.
F-701
128
-30
N A T I O N A L A E R O N A U T I C S A N D SPACE A D M I S T R A T I O N W A S H I N G T O N , D.C.
-~
20546
POSTAGE A N D FEES P A I D
O F F I C I A L BUSINESS
P E N A L T Y F O R P R I V A T E U S E S300
(2
USMAIL
POSTMASTER :
The aeronadcal and space activities of the United States shall be conducted so as to contribute . . . t o the expansion of human knowledge of phenoiliena in the atmosphere and space. The Administration shall provide for the widest practicable and afipropriate dissemination of inforiliation concerning its actiidies and the res& thereof.