Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Final Order Michael Hausfeld vs Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, PLLC

Final Order Michael Hausfeld vs Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, PLLC

Ratings: (0)|Views: 18|Likes:
Published by Robert Lee

This is the Final Order from Judge Timothy Rice in Michael Hausfeld vs Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, PLLC

This is the Final Order from Judge Timothy Rice in Michael Hausfeld vs Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, PLLC

More info:

Published by: Robert Lee on Dec 16, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

09/17/2013

pdf

text

original

 
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIAMICHAEL HAUSFELD, et al.:CIVIL ACTIONPlaintiffs,::v.::COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS: NO. 06-CV-826& TOLL, PLLC:Defendants:
ORDER 
AND NOW, this 30th day of November, 2009, after an evidentiary hearing heldon August 10, 2009 through August 13, 2009, and upon consideration of the parties’ proposedfindings of fact and conclusions of law, it is hereby ORDERED:1. Judgment is entered in favor of plaintiffs, Michael Hausfeld and RichardLewis, and against defendant, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, PLLC, with respect to the plaintiffs’ capital account calculations.Defendant is directed to pay plaintiffs one-half of their capital account balances byDecember 31, 2009, and the second half of their capital account balances by July 31, 2010.Michael Hausfeld’s capital account balance is $4,018,446.75 and Richard Lewis’ capital account balance is $705,517.57.2. Judgment is entered in favor of defendant, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll,PLLC and against plaintiffs, Michael Hausfeld and Richard Lewis, with respect to thedistribution of attorneys’ fees awarded to Hausfeld LLP from the case, In re Int’l Air Transp.Surcharge Antitrust Litig., No. 06-1793 CRB (N.D. Cal.).
 

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->